DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3

BOJ’s Himino Flags Need for Timely Rate Hikes as Inflation Risks Strengthen September Move

0

Bank of Japan Deputy Governor Ryozo Himino has strengthened expectations for an interest rate increase in September, warning that policymakers need to act in time to prevent inflation from moving persistently above the central bank’s 2% target.

Himino stopped short of committing to a September hike or indicating how quickly borrowing costs could rise thereafter. But his comments were broadly hawkish and reinforced market expectations that the BOJ is approaching another policy tightening cycle.

“We must balance the need to gain as much information as possible, and acting in a timely fashion to avoid being behind the curve on inflation,” Himino told reporters on Thursday.

“We will debate that balance at each meeting, mindful of the fact underlying inflation is approaching 2%,” he said.

Markets had been closely watching Himino’s remarks because of his previous record of providing relatively clear signals ahead of policy changes. His comments were interpreted as leaving the September meeting firmly open for a rate increase.

“He didn’t rule out the chance of a September rate hike and was generally hawkish as expected,” said Shotaro Mori, senior economist at SBI Shinsei Bank. “The September meeting is likely to be live.”

Reuters has reported, citing sources, that the BOJ is considering raising its policy rate as soon as September and could subsequently tighten monetary policy more aggressively than the current pace of roughly two increases a year. Expectations for a September move have strengthened following a sharp increase in wholesale inflation and increasingly hawkish signals from BOJ officials. Markets are now pricing in a rate increase with a high degree of confidence.

The central bank’s concern is now shifting from whether Japan can generate inflation to whether price growth could overshoot its target.

In a speech before his news conference, Himino said Japan had entered a phase in which policymakers must pay greater attention to upside risks to inflation.

“If underlying inflation deviates above our 2% target, that would have an adverse impact on the economy. We should pay greater attention to upside risks to prices than in the past,” Himino said.

“In-depth deliberations should be held at each monetary policy meeting with these perspectives in mind,” he added.

Several forces are contributing to the inflation risks.

Himino pointed to rising fuel costs linked to the conflict in the Middle East, strong global demand associated with artificial intelligence and elevated import prices resulting from the yen’s weakness. The combination is considered crucial for Japan because higher energy and import costs can quickly feed into household prices while also squeezing businesses.

Japan’s wholesale inflation rose 7.2% year-on-year in July, highlighting the strength of those cost pressures. Economists expect some of the impact from higher fuel prices to pass through to consumer prices with a lag.

Himino nevertheless maintained that his assessment of Japan’s broader economic and price outlook had not changed substantially since the BOJ’s July meeting. He said weak signals from second-quarter GDP data were likely to have been driven largely by technical factors, suggesting policymakers should not overreact to the recent economic slowdown.

The BOJ raised its key policy rate to 1% in June, the highest level in 31 years, before leaving rates unchanged at its July meeting. At the July meeting, however, policymakers issued some of their strongest warnings yet about rising inflation risks.

Himino is now arguing that maintaining excessively accommodative financial conditions could itself create risks.

“Raising rates in a timely manner will help avoid a spike in inflation and abrupt rate hikes in the future,” he said, adding that such an approach would ultimately benefit smaller companies.

He rejected the argument that additional rate increases would necessarily damage Japan’s still-fragile economy. Instead, Himino said adjusting financial conditions could improve the allocation of capital by directing funds toward investments with stronger growth potential.

“As we are still pressing on the accelerator, or keeping financial conditions accommodative, I believe we will need to ease off in a timely manner through rate hikes,” Himino said.

The language matters because the BOJ remains well behind most major central banks in terms of the level of interest rates, even after its recent tightening. Japan spent years battling deflation and weak wage growth, leaving policymakers reluctant to withdraw monetary support too quickly.

The policy environment has now changed.

Underlying inflation is approaching the BOJ’s 2% objective, while higher energy costs, a weak yen and strong global demand are creating additional upside risks. The challenge for the central bank is to withdraw accommodation without choking off the economic recovery that has allowed Japan to move away from its long period of deflation.

The timing of further increases will therefore depend heavily on incoming data.

Himino said policymakers would assess economic activity, prices and financial conditions at each meeting rather than commit to a predetermined path. That leaves September as a potentially important turning point. A rate increase would signal that the BOJ is becoming more confident that inflation is sufficiently entrenched to justify further normalization of monetary policy.

The bigger question for markets is what follows.

If inflation continues to accelerate, the BOJ could be forced to raise rates more frequently than its current roughly twice-yearly pace. That possibility is already being considered by markets, particularly as wholesale price growth accelerates and external cost pressures intensify.

At the same time, a more aggressive tightening cycle could strengthen the yen by narrowing the gap between Japanese and overseas interest rates. A stronger currency would help reduce imported inflation, although it could also weigh on Japanese exporters.

Himino’s comments therefore mark a delicate shift in the BOJ’s policy calculus. The central bank is no longer focused only on supporting Japan’s emergence from deflation. It must now guard against allowing an inflationary cycle to become entrenched.

While the message from Himino was not an explicit promise of a September hike, it was clear enough to keep the market focused on the possibility that the BOJ is preparing to move again. Analysts now believe that the central bank’s immediate task is to take its foot off the monetary accelerator gradually enough to preserve economic momentum, while moving quickly enough to prevent inflation from running beyond its 2% objective.

Crypto Industry Loses $3.63 Billion to 245 Security Incidents in 19 Months

0

The cryptocurrency sector has suffered $3.63 billion in losses from 245 documented security incidents between January 2025 and July 2026, according to CoinGecko’s 2026 State of Crypto Security Report.

The figure covers roughly 19 months and accounts for a substantial share of total historical crypto hack losses, which now exceed $14 billion since 2016.

Incident frequency accelerated in 2026. The first seven-plus months of the year alone recorded 164 breaches, nearly 70% more than the 97 incidents logged across all of 2025.

Average losses per incident declined as the large-scale events that defined 2025 became less dominant. One outlier still stands out: the Bybit exchange breach, which alone accounted for approximately $1.436 billion and was linked to sophisticated actors.

Other major incidents in the period included KelpDAO ($292 million), Drift Protocol ($285 million), and Cetus ($223 million). The top 20 exploits made up the bulk of total stolen funds.

Infrastructure and supply-chain vulnerabilities emerged as the most damaging attack vectors, responsible for more than $1.8 billion in losses across both centralized exchanges and decentralized platforms.

Centralized exchanges were frequently hit through private-key compromises, while decentralized applications lost around $546 million to smart-contract exploits. Oracle and market-manipulation issues also contributed to losses at several major platforms.

A striking finding is the limited protection offered by traditional security audits. Roughly 60% of the exploited platforms (147 out of 245) had undergone independent audits before being compromised, and those audited platforms accounted for nearly 88.5% of all stolen funds.

However, only about 11% of incidents involved vulnerabilities within the actual scope of those audits. Most successful attacks targeted areas outside typical smart-contract reviews, such as infrastructure, key management, governance mechanisms, and supply-chain weaknesses.

On-chain crypto insurance coverage has also contracted. Active underwriting on major insurance protocols fell about 20% to roughly $130 million, with several protocols becoming inactive or shifting focus. In response, some centralized exchanges have expanded their own user protection funds.

As cryptocurrency continues to mature and integrate into mainstream finance, it remains a critical element in modern criminal operations.

Individual cryptocurrency holders are also facing a growing threat. Chainalysis identified approximately 158,000 personal-wallet compromise incidents in 2025, affecting at least 80,000 unique victims. Although the total value stolen from personal wallets declined compared with the previous year, the sharp increase in incidents demonstrates that crypto theft is becoming increasingly widespread.

At the same time, decentralized finance has shown signs of becoming more resilient. Improvements in security monitoring, governance and incident response have helped limit some of the losses historically associated with DeFi exploits.

Yet another threat is emerging outside the digital environment altogether: physical crypto theft.

Criminals are increasingly targeting cryptocurrency holders through kidnappings, home invasions, and other forms of coercion in an attempt to force victims to surrender their digital assets. Chainalysis estimates that more than $30 million had already been stolen through violent crypto attacks in 2026, putting the year on pace to potentially exceed the $58 million stolen through such attacks in 2025.

The development illustrates a fundamental change in cryptocurrency crime. As digital assets become more valuable and more widely held, criminals are finding new ways to access them—whether through sophisticated cyberattacks, compromised employees, or direct physical intimidation.

For the cryptocurrency industry, the challenge is therefore becoming broader than protecting blockchain networks and smart contracts. Exchanges, custodians, companies and individual investors must increasingly defend against social engineering, insider threats, compromised credentials, sophisticated laundering networks and even physical attacks

While decentralized finance (DeFi) has historically been a major target, Chainalysis found that individual attacks against centralized services have become increasingly severe.

The data paints a clear picture of an industry still grappling with persistent security gaps even as defenses and professional practices improve. While individual incident sizes have trended smaller in 2026, the rising volume of attacks continues to extract a heavy toll.

Tekedia Capital Portfolio Startup Acquired

0

Two months ago, OpenAI acquired one of our portfolio companies. Last month, Vercel acquired another. And today, another major American company has acquired yet another company in our portfolio (public announcement coming in 15 days).

To the members of Tekedia Capital: enjoy the ride.

And to the Good People here, I am having a great day!

In the entrepreneurial cambrian moment, one thing remains certain: the rain will always fall. Today, it is raining abundantly at Tekedia Capital. Onward!

Tekedia Capital >> we make friends with great founders capital.tekedia.com

Nvidia Agrees To Buy Hugging Face For $12.9bn In Major Push Into Open-Source AI Ecosystem

0

Nvidia has agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12.9 billion, The Information reported on Wednesday, in a deal that would give the world’s leading AI chipmaker control of one of the most widely used platforms for developing, sharing, and deploying open-source artificial intelligence models.

The report, citing a person familiar with the matter, said negotiations began after Hugging Face received acquisition interest from another potential buyer. Business Insider separately reported that Nvidia had been in talks to acquire the startup.

The transaction, at completion, would represent a major expansion of Nvidia’s reach beyond semiconductors and deeper into the software and model layers of the AI industry.

Hugging Face has become a central hub for developers and researchers working with open-source AI. Its platform allows users to share models, datasets and development tools, making it an important distribution and collaboration layer for the rapidly expanding open-source AI ecosystem.

The acquisition would therefore give Nvidia access to a community and platform that sits much closer to AI model development than the chipmaker’s traditional hardware business.

The potential deal also fits Nvidia’s broader strategy of building an integrated AI technology stack.

Siddy Jobe, a fund manager at Eonopolis Exponential Technologies funds, said Nvidia’s approach to open-source AI made Hugging Face a natural target.

“I think Nvidia is very much a community, a platform-based company, and in that respect, I think Hugging Face fits perfectly within that,” Jobe told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”

He said Nvidia has identified foundational models as one of several layers of the AI ecosystem it wants to participate in.

“It is clear that Nvidia wants to be integrated in the entire stack vertically, going from energy to foundational models and also to applications,” Jobe said.

That move would mark a significant evolution from Nvidia’s position as primarily a supplier of GPUs and networking equipment. The company has increasingly invested in the infrastructure surrounding its chips, including software, AI startups, cloud infrastructure and model developers. A Hugging Face acquisition would extend that strategy into an open-source platform used by a broad developer community.

Nvidia’s shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading following its blockbuster earnings report on Wednesday, underscoring the extraordinary financial momentum generated by demand for AI infrastructure. The company has also pursued large transactions and strategic investments. Its recent deals include a reported $20 billion licensing agreement with AI chip startup Groq.

A $12.9 billion acquisition of Hugging Face would be considerably larger than many of Nvidia’s recent investments and would signal that the company is prepared to deploy substantial capital to secure strategic positions across the AI stack.

The potential acquisition also raises questions about the future of open-source AI.

Hugging Face has positioned itself as a major advocate and infrastructure provider for open models, while Nvidia has repeatedly sought to support AI developers regardless of whether they use proprietary or open-source models. Bringing Hugging Face under Nvidia’s ownership could give the chipmaker greater influence over how open models are distributed, optimized, and integrated with Nvidia’s hardware and software ecosystem.

The commercial logic for Nvidia is that more AI models and applications ultimately require computing infrastructure, and Nvidia dominates the market for the high-end accelerators used to train and run many of those systems. Owning a major model-development platform could allow Nvidia to deepen that relationship with developers at an earlier stage of the AI development process.

The proposed deal is also expected to give Nvidia a direct connection to a vast pool of AI developers experimenting with models from multiple companies and research communities. That could help Nvidia maintain relevance as AI computing becomes increasingly diversified and as developers explore alternatives to the large proprietary models offered by companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.

Hugging Face has also recently become involved in a high-profile AI cybersecurity incident, adding another dimension to the proposed transaction. The platform was targeted in a hacking incident that raised concerns about the security implications of increasingly capable AI and cybersecurity systems.

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue, a prominent advocate of open-source AI, attributed the incident to engineering mistakes and said his company used an Nvidia version of a Chinese open model to address the attack.

“AI cybersecurity is going to become a huge market in the U.S. and in the world,” Delangue told CNBC earlier this month.

“In this market, probably open models will be kings,” he added.

The episode reveals both the opportunity and risk surrounding the open-source AI ecosystem. Open models can accelerate innovation by giving developers broad access to powerful technology, but their availability can also create new security challenges as increasingly capable models are used for offensive and defensive cyber operations.

However, acquiring Hugging Face would bring those open-source models, developers, and associated tools closer to Nvidia’s own technology stack. That means that well beyond Nvidia’s semiconductor business, the deal would potentially give the company a stronger position across several layers of the AI economy, from computing infrastructure to software, model development and the developer community that turns models into applications.

But the growing concern is whether Nvidia can maintain Hugging Face’s appeal as a relatively open platform after bringing it under corporate ownership.

Hugging Face’s value has been built partly on its role as a neutral meeting point for developers working across different AI models and hardware platforms. Nvidia will have to preserve that ecosystem while finding ways to connect it more closely to its own products.

If the reported $12.9 billion transaction is completed, Nvidia would be making a much larger bet that control of the AI ecosystem cannot be secured through chips alone. The company would instead be positioning itself across the stack, seeking to capture value from the models, software, and developer networks that determine how those chips are ultimately used.

Bitcoin ETFs Attract $232M While Ether ETFs See $192M Outflows

0

U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded $232 million in net inflows on August 26, highlighting renewed institutional appetite for the largest cryptocurrency even as Ether ETFs experienced $192 million in net outflows.

The contrasting flows offer an important snapshot of investor positioning across the digital-asset market and suggest that, despite broader volatility, Bitcoin continues to attract meaningful demand through regulated investment products.

The $232 million Bitcoin inflow represents a significant vote of confidence from investors using traditional financial markets to gain exposure to BTC.

Spot ETFs have become one of the most important bridges between conventional finance and cryptocurrency because they allow investors to participate in Bitcoin’s price movements without directly managing wallets, private keys, or crypto exchanges.

As a result, daily ETF flows are increasingly viewed as an indicator of institutional sentiment. Bitcoin’s continued ability to attract capital is particularly notable after a period of sharp market fluctuations.

Investors have been closely watching price momentum, interest-rate expectations, liquidity conditions and regulatory developments. When capital consistently moves into spot Bitcoin ETFs, it can provide additional buying pressure because fund issuers must generally acquire Bitcoin to back new shares.

Sustained inflows can therefore reinforce positive market momentum, although they do not guarantee that prices will continue rising. The picture for Ether was considerably different on August 26. Spot Ether ETFs reportedly recorded $192 million in net outflows.

Indicating that investors were reducing exposure to Ethereum investment products during the session. The divergence between Bitcoin and Ether flows raises questions about how institutional investors are currently ranking the two largest cryptocurrencies.

Ethereum remains a major component of the digital-asset economy, supported by decentralized finance, stablecoins, tokenization and smart-contract applications. Its investment narrative differs from Bitcoin’s.

Bitcoin is frequently positioned as a scarce digital asset and potential store of value, while Ethereum is more closely associated with blockchain infrastructure and applications. During periods when investors become more selective.

That distinction can influence where institutional money is allocated. The outflow from Ether ETFs does not necessarily mean that investors have abandoned Ethereum. ETF flows can change rapidly from one trading session to another, influenced by profit-taking, portfolio rebalancing and short-term market expectations.

A single day of withdrawals therefore needs to be considered within a broader trend rather than interpreted as a definitive change in Ethereum’s long-term prospects.

For Bitcoin, the latest inflow strengthens the argument that institutional participation remains an important pillar of the market.

The development of spot ETFs has fundamentally changed the structure of cryptocurrency investing by making digital assets easier to access through familiar brokerage accounts and regulated financial infrastructure. This has expanded the potential investor base beyond crypto-native participants.

The divergence also highlights the growing importance of capital rotation within crypto. Investors are not necessarily making an all-or-nothing decision on digital assets. Instead, they can adjust allocations between Bitcoin.

Ethereum and other assets depending on market conditions, risk tolerance and expectations for future returns. Strong Bitcoin inflows alongside Ether outflows may therefore reflect a temporary preference for Bitcoin’s perceived defensive characteristics.

Looking ahead, ETF flows will remain a key metric for analysts and traders. Persistent Bitcoin inflows could support bullish sentiment and strengthen demand if they coincide with rising prices and improving liquidity.

Conversely, sustained Ether outflows could pressure Ethereum investment products if withdrawals continue. The August 26 figures underline a market that is becoming increasingly institutionalized. Bitcoin’s $232 million net inflow demonstrates continued demand for regulated BTC exposure.

While Ether’s $192 million outflow shows that institutional preferences can diverge even within the largest digital assets. The next several trading sessions will reveal whether this gap represents a temporary rotation or the beginning of a broader shift in cryptocurrency investment strategy.