Recently released U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) documents from early February 2026 confirm that Jeffrey Epstein invested approximately $3 million in Coinbase in December 2014.
This occurred during Coinbase’s Series C funding round, when the company was valued at around $400 million (Coinbase is now valued at over $50 billion as a public company). The investment was made through Epstein’s US Virgin Islands-based entity, IGO Company LLC, and amounted to roughly $3,001,000 according to asset listings in the files.
The opportunity was facilitated by Brock Pierce (co-founder of Tether and Blockchain Capital), who had a prior relationship with Epstein. It was structured as a direct investment rather than through a fund.
Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam appears to have been aware of Epstein’s involvement, with emails showing discussions about meeting him and forwarding wire transfer details.
In 2018, Epstein reportedly sold half his stake back to Blockchain Capital for around $11–15 million, representing a significant return (several times the original amount), while possibly retaining the other half. This revelation surfaced in the latest batch of unsealed Epstein-related files, highlighting his access to early-stage tech and crypto investments even after his 2008 conviction.
This fits into broader patterns of Epstein’s documented interest in cryptocurrency and tech, including ties to Bitcoin-related projects like Blockstream.
The revelation that Jeffrey Epstein invested approximately $3 million in Coinbase during its 2014 Series C funding round at a ~$400 million valuation has surfaced in the latest February 2026 DOJ document releases, sparking renewed scrutiny but limited immediate fallout for the now-public company valued at over $50 billion.
Reputational Risk for Coinbase and Early Crypto
The emails show Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam was aware of Epstein’s involvement, with discussions about arranging a meeting like Ehrsam noting availability for a potential in-person discussion in New York. No evidence suggests wrongdoing by Coinbase or its team, and the investment was a tiny fraction (<1%) of the round, which included major VCs like Andreessen Horowitz and DFJ.
Still, it highlights the opaque, “move fast” nature of early crypto fundraising—where due diligence on investors may have been lax amid the industry’s outsider status. This fits broader patterns in Epstein’s tech ties like Blockstream investments, MIT DCI funding for Bitcoin Core devs, raising questions about how convicted figures accessed elite networks post-2008 conviction.
Epstein reportedly sold half his stake back to Blockchain Capital via Brock Pierce around 2018 for $11–15 million (a ~4–5x return at then-valuations of $1.6–2 billion), possibly retaining the rest. This was a private secondary transaction with no public market impact.
Today, the original stake’s hypothetical value (if held) would be enormous given Coinbase’s growth, but any remaining shares likely passed to his estate post-2019 death. No ongoing Epstein-linked ownership is indicated in current filings.
Coverage from Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Decrypt, frames it as a “bombshell” footnote in crypto history, emphasizing Epstein’s interest in Bitcoin/crypto for discreet wealth movement. Social media shows crypto communities discussing it—some tying it to broader “decentralization myths” or custody risks, others dismissing it as irrelevant ancient history.
No major stock price drop for Coinbase (COIN) is tied directly to this in reports; reactions lean toward optics and ethics rather than fundamentals. Some users criticize Coinbase’s past “Clarity Act” stances or stablecoin yield issues in the same breath, but it’s more narrative noise than coordinated backlash.
Reinforces calls for stronger KYC/AML in early-stage crypto VC, especially as the sector matures and faces institutional/regulatory scrutiny. Fuels speculation about “hidden influences” in crypto infrastructure, though documents show no control or ongoing leverage—Epstein was a passive investor via intermediaries.
No allegations of illegality against Coinbase; the focus remains on Epstein’s network. It underscores how small early bets could yield outsized returns in a high-growth space. This is more a historical embarrassment and reminder of crypto’s wild-west origins than a current crisis.
Coinbase has not issued a public response in the reports, and the story hasn’t dominated mainstream finance headlines beyond crypto-specific outlets. It adds to the Epstein files’ pattern of exposing uncomfortable elite connections without derailing major players like Coinbase today.






