DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 321

Apple Becomes Exclusive U.S. Broadcast Partner for Formula 1 in Landmark Five-Year Deal

0

Formula 1 has signed a groundbreaking five-year partnership with Apple, making the tech giant the sport’s exclusive broadcast partner in the United States from 2026.

The agreement represents one of the most significant media rights shifts in global sports in recent years, combining Apple’s technological ecosystem and storytelling prowess with F1’s soaring popularity among younger audiences.

The deal extends beyond live racing broadcasts. It builds on Apple’s deepening involvement in the world of Formula 1, following the success of F1: The Movie, an Apple Original Film that premiered in cinemas and IMAX in June 2025 and will make its global streaming debut on Apple TV on December 12, 2025. Produced over three years in collaboration with F1 teams, drivers, and race organizers, the film has grossed nearly $630 million worldwide, making it the highest-earning sports movie in history.

The unprecedented success of the film highlighted Apple’s ability to capture the intensity and glamour of motorsport while reaching new and diverse audiences. Formula 1 said this same synergy of innovation and storytelling would now define its broadcast relationship with Apple.

Under the new arrangement, Apple TV will broadcast all Free Practice, Qualifying, Sprint sessions, and Grand Prix races live in the U.S. Select races and all Free Practice sessions will also be available for free in the Apple TV app, giving fans broad access to the sport. Meanwhile, F1 TV Premium, Formula 1’s own content platform, will continue to operate in the U.S. but will be accessible exclusively via Apple TV subscriptions — and free for those already subscribed.

Beyond live racing, Apple plans to integrate F1 content across its ecosystem, including Apple News, Apple Maps, Apple Music, Apple Sports, and Apple Fitness+. This cross-platform approach is expected to expand the sport’s visibility and engagement well beyond traditional viewing experiences.

“This is an incredibly exciting partnership for both Formula 1 and Apple that will ensure we can continue to maximize our growth potential in the U.S. with the right content and innovative distribution channels,” said Stefano Domenicali, President and CEO of Formula 1.

He emphasized that the collaboration marks the continuation of a successful creative relationship. “We are no strangers to each other, having spent the past three years working together to create F1: The Movie, which has already proven to be a huge hit around the world,” Domenicali said. “We have a shared vision to bring this amazing sport to our fans in the U.S. and entice new fans through live broadcasts, engaging content, and a year-round approach to keep them hooked.”

He added that Apple’s reach and technology would help push the sport to new audiences, particularly among younger and more diverse fans.

“I want to thank Tim Cook, Eddy Cue, and the entire Apple team for their vision, enthusiasm, and passionate approach to delivering this partnership. We are looking forward to the next five years together.”

Eddy Cue, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Services, described the partnership as a natural evolution of Apple’s growing role in live sports and entertainment.

“We’re thrilled to expand our relationship with Formula 1 and offer Apple TV subscribers in the U.S. front-row access to one of the most exciting and fastest-growing sports on the planet,” he said.

Cue highlighted that 2026 will mark a transformative era for F1, with new teams, new regulations, and new cars coming into play.

“We look forward to delivering premium and innovative fan-first coverage to our customers in a way that only Apple can,” he added.

For Formula 1, the deal represents not just a broadcast agreement but also a strategic move to deepen its presence in the lucrative U.S. market, where interest in the sport has surged dramatically in recent years. According to the 2025 Global F1 Fan Survey, 47% of new U.S. fans who have been following the sport for five years or less are aged between 18 and 24, and more than half are female. The findings underline the potential for continued growth among younger, tech-savvy audiences — a demographic Apple already commands with its ecosystem of devices and services.

The integration of F1 into Apple’s broader media portfolio could also reshape how fans engage with motorsport content. By weaving race highlights, real-time data, driver profiles, and interactive experiences into Apple’s apps, the company aims to make Formula 1 more accessible and immersive than ever before.

The partnership comes at a time when Apple is expanding its footprint in live sports broadcasting. The company already holds global rights for Major League Soccer (MLS) through its “MLS Season Pass” offering on Apple TV, and industry analysts have speculated that Apple’s deal with Formula 1 could set a new standard for the future of premium sports streaming.

Some note that Apple’s entry into F1 broadcasting could further intensify competition among tech companies for live sports rights, as traditional broadcasters face growing challenges from digital platforms with deeper pockets and more advanced user engagement tools.

Apple’s collaboration with F1 also reflects a broader convergence of entertainment, technology, and sport. The massive success of F1: The Movie demonstrated how cinematic storytelling could reignite global interest in a sport, while the new broadcast deal could ensure that Apple remains at the forefront of the audience experience — from the screen to the track.

Additional details, including production innovations, subscription packages, and integration features across Apple’s products, will be announced in the coming months.

BMNR’s Tom Lee Says That The DAT Bubble May Have Already Burst, as Over $1.2B In Leveraged Positions Liquidated in the Crypto Markets

0
Blazpay – Best Crypto Presale 2025, integrating AI and DeFi for 100x potential returns

Tom Lee, the well-known strategist from Fundstrat Global Advisors and current chairman of BitMine Immersion Technologies (ticker: BMNR), recently stated that the “bubble” in digital asset treasury (DAT) companies may have already burst.

He made these comments during an appearance on Fortune’s Crypto Playbook podcast amid a broader discussion on the crypto market’s volatility and the rise and potential fall of DATs.

What Are DATs?

DATs are publicly traded companies designed to give investors indirect exposure to cryptocurrencies by holding large amounts of digital assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum on their balance sheets.

They’re often modeled after Strategy’s Bitcoin-heavy strategy, but applied to various cryptos. The sector exploded in popularity over the past two years as a way for institutions and retail investors to bet on crypto without directly buying coins—especially useful before widespread ETF approvals.

However, with hundreds of DATs now launching, the model has faced scrutiny for creating speculative hype without enough underlying value creation.Lee highlighted that many DATs are now trading below their net asset value (NAV)—meaning their stock prices are lower than the market value of the cryptocurrencies they hold.

He quipped, “If that’s not already a bubble burst, how would that bubble burst?” This reflects thinning liquidity, reduced institutional demand, and a market that’s grown “discerning” about which firms actually add shareholder value beyond just holding crypto.

He warned that simply “holding crypto on a balance sheet doesn’t guarantee long-term performance,” pointing to a $19 billion liquidation event in crypto derivatives earlier that week as a symptom of broader fragility.

Estimates suggest the total DAT market is worth around $162 billion, but 80% of firms are now underwater relative to their holdings. Despite the bearish tone, Lee positioned BMNR which recently completed an $827 million Ethereum buying spree, bringing its holdings to over 3 million ETH worth ~$11.88 billion as an exception.

He described it as more than a “passive DAT”—it’s the world’s largest Ethereum holder, acting as a “liaison between Wall Street and blockchain innovation.” BMNR aims to accumulate 5% of Ethereum’s circulating supply, emphasizing Ethereum’s role in tokenized assets and stablecoins.

Ethereum (ETH) has been under pressure, with recent liquidations wiping out leveraged positions, and broader market fears of a “trade war” under a potential Trump administration adding to the downside.

The hype phase is done. Now it’s builders, believers, and value creators time,” tying it to a potential setup for the next bull run. Skeptics like Raremints questioned if the “biggest ETH bull” (Lee) is turning bearish.

Many DATs trading below NAV signals a market correction, with investors losing confidence in firms merely holding crypto. Weaker DATs may fail or consolidate, favoring stronger players like BMNR with scale and strategic focus.

Reduced hype and liquidity suggest investors should prioritize fundamentals over speculative crypto exposure. Recent liquidations and macro fears like trade war risks could further pressure DAT stocks and crypto prices.

BMNR’s Ethereum focus and proactive strategy may position it to outperform in a maturing market. Lee’s take signals a shakeout in the DAT space—survival of the fittest, where scaled players like BMNR might thrive while smaller ones consolidate or fail.

If you’re invested in BMNR or similar, this could be a moment to reassess NAV discounts versus long-term crypto bets.

Over $1.2B In Leveraged Positions Liquidated in the Crypto Markets

The crypto market is experiencing significant volatility today, October 17, 2025, with over $1.2 billion in leveraged positions liquidated in the past 24 hours alone.

This comes on the heels of a broader sell-off triggered by escalating U.S.-China trade tensions, including President Trump’s announcement of 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, which ignited panic selling earlier in the week.

The total market capitalization has indeed plunged to around $3.75 trillion—levels last seen in early July 2025—wiping out approximately $730 billion in value since the peak last week.

The $1.2B figure primarily affects long positions bets on rising prices, with nearly 79% of liquidations coming from bullish trades. This has hit over 307,000 traders, with standout losses including a $20.4M Ethereum position on Hyperliquid.

This is a continuation of the historic October 10-11 liquidation cascade, which saw a record-breaking $19B some estimates up to $40B in forced closures across the market—the largest single event in crypto history, surpassing the COVID crash $1.2B in 2020, FTX collapse ($3.5B in 2022), and Terra/Luna unwind $8.6B in 2022.

Low liquidity and high leverage amplified the downturn, leading to cascading effects on exchanges. Bitcoin (BTC) has dropped below $106,000, shedding over 5% in the last day, while Ethereum (ETH) and altcoins like Solana (SOL) and Ripple (XRP) saw even steeper declines of 7-10%.

This purge of over-leveraged positions could act as a “healthy reset,” flushing out excessive speculation and potentially stabilizing prices in the medium term—similar to past corrections that preceded recoveries.

However, ongoing geopolitical risks and thinner liquidity in credit markets are heightening caution among investors. Options traders are piling into protective puts on BTC (e.g., at $95K and $115K strikes), signaling bets on further downside.

This cascade wasn’t just a price drop—it exposed deep vulnerabilities in leverage, liquidity, oracles, and stablecoins, turning a geopolitical shock into a systemic purge.

The meltdown unfolded rapidly on a low-liquidity Friday evening into Saturday, amplifying the chaos: October 10, ~4:00 PM U.S. equities close down sharply S&P 500 -2.7%, Nasdaq -3.4% amid broader trade war fears. Crypto, trading 24/7, begins feeling the heat.

President Donald Trump posts on Truth Social about imposing a 100% tariff on all Chinese imports effective November 1, 2025, plus export controls on “critical software.” This escalates U.S.-China tensions, triggered by China’s rare earth mineral export bans, hitting supply chains for chips like NVIDIA and AI/tech sectors.

Bitcoin (BTC) instantly wicks down $3,000. BTC plunges from ~$122,000 to below $110,000 (-10% in hours). Ethereum (ETH) drops 7-12% to ~$3,844. Over $6B-$8B liquidated in the first hour alone, with $3B in the first 60 minutes.

Prices bottom out—BTC at $101,000-$104,782 (-14% to -21% from highs), ETH at $3,373-$3,500 (-18%), Solana (SOL) below $140 (-30%). Altcoins like Dogecoin (DOGE) -50%, Cosmos (ATOM) flash-crash -99% (partial recovery). Total liquidations hit $19B+ by Saturday morning, with $16.7B from long positions (86% longs vs. shorts).

Partial rebound—BTC to $113,000-$114,000, ETH to $3,900+. But fear lingers, with options traders loading protective puts. BTC saw $5.39B in liquidations mostly longs, ETH $4.44B. Altcoins bore the brunt—127K+ traders hit, with meme coins and low-cap assets dropping 50-99% before rebounds.

Tragic reports emerged, including the suicide of Ukrainian crypto influencer Konstantin Galish in a Lamborghini, linked to massive losses. Public firms like Bitmine reported $1.9B floating losses on ETH holdings.

 

Trump’s tariff announcement ignited trade war fears, strengthening the USD (DXY +2%) and crushing risk assets. Crypto, correlated with tech stocks, got hammered as “collateral damage” from equity deleveraging—no chips without rare earths, no NVIDIA rally, no risk-on vibe.

High leverage up to 100x on perps created a domino effect—margin calls triggered sells, which hit more stops. 99.4% of BTC supply was in profit pre-crash, but short-term holders (STHs) dumped 26K+ BTC.

Weekend thinness + market makers withdrawing to manage inventory starved bids. Exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken reported “glitches,” halts, and delays up to 25 minutes, turning a 5-10% dip into a rout. Hyperliquid’s auto-deleveraging (ADL) forced profitable shorts to close, worsening the spiral.

Centralized oracles Chainlink/Pyth fed “faulty” CEX prices (e.g., Binance-dominant), poisoning DEX liquidations. Ethena’s USDe yield-bearing stable depegged to $0.6567 (-34%), exposing multi-asset reserve mismatches under redemption stress.

Suspicious pre-crash activity—whales opened $1.1B in shorts like the $438M BTC at 10x on Hyperliquid hours before the announcement, netting $200M+ profits. On-chain data shows BlackRock-like clusters dumping $970M BTC/ETH “disguised” as rebalancing.

Analysts like Lark Davis called it the “worst ever,” but a “healthy deleveraging” flushing speculation. Leverage ratios dropped sharply, potentially paving for Q4 stability. Options activity spiked on downside protection.

Exposed CEX/oracle centralization risks, stablecoin fragility, and crypto’s macro sensitivity. Regulators may push for better safeguards; meanwhile, inflows to platforms like Kalshi prediction markets surged.

Remnants linger in today’s $1.2B liqs, but this cascade could precede a rebound—historical flushes often yield 20-300% rallies. If you’re in the game, remember: position sizing over predictions.

Investors Flock to Gold as Bitcoin Suffers Sharp Weekly Decline

0

Bitcoin recent sharp decline, have forced investors to pull out their resources from the crypto asset, redirecting it toward gold, according to multiple market reports.

The leading cryptocurrency declined more than 5% to around $105,105 on Friday, extending its losses to roughly 13% below its October 6 peak of nearly $126,000. The crypto asset saw a slight pull back to trade to $106,917 at the time of writing.

Analysts attributed the selloff to heavy crypto liquidations, which added significant pressure to the market. While Bitcoin continued on its downward trajectory, gold surged to new record highs. Spot gold prices climbed above $4,300 an ounce, reaching a session peak near $4,312, while U.S. futures briefly touched $4,328.70. The rally reflected a strong shift toward traditional safe-haven assets as investors weighed mounting economic uncertainties and geopolitical tensions. Reports indicated that gold is on pace for its biggest weekly gain since 2008.

Several factors fueled this week’s contrasting trends. Forced selling in the crypto derivatives market amplified downward moves, with one report estimating $1.23 billion in liquidations over a 24-hour period. Of that, $453 million came from Bitcoin positions and $277 million from Ethereum. Simultaneously, renewed concerns over regional U.S. banks and uncertainty surrounding future interest rate decisions strengthened demand for gold.

Exchange-traded funds also played a crucial role. Gold ETFs experienced robust inflows, with some funds reaching long-term holding highs as investors sought security. In contrast, spot Bitcoin ETFssaw net outflows in parts of the week, signaling a clear rotation from digital to traditional assets. Analysts observed that during times of financial stress, the liquidity and behavioral differences between gold and cryptocurrencies become more apparent.

The week’s events reignited the long-standing debate over whether Bitcoin truly serves as “digital gold.” Critics noted that Bitcoin’s volatility and tendency to decline alongside other risk assets during market selloffs undermine its role as a reliable store of value.

Gold advocate Peter Schiff stated on X that “Gold is eating Bitcoin’s lunch”, claiming that Bitcoin is “down 32% priced in gold since its August high.” He further argues that a “brutal” bear market for Bitcoin is imminent.

However, amid BTC massive decline, several others have pointed out that the crypto asset has still provided strong returns for certain investors throughout the year, even if it fails to match gold’s resilience in times of crisis.

Crypto analyst and Investor Miles Duetscher, believes that Bitcoin has superseded Gold to become a far superior asset for purchase

He made this statement in response to a post on X that stated that Gold has been very much outperforming Bitcoin since the start of March. He replied, “BTC is a much better buy than Gold now”.

While the speed of gold’s rise is remarkable, Deutscher argues that Bitcoin presents a more asymmetric opportunity moving forward. He suggests that much of gold’s upside may already be priced in after this year’s extraordinary performance.

The crypto market has failed to sustain the initial “Uptober” hype as prices of leading cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, have returned to levels not seen in months, with bearish sentiments increasingly intensifying. While Bitcoin has continued to plunge deeper, renowned crypto market prediction platform Polymarket has disclosed data showing a 52% chance that Bitcoin will fall below $100,000 this month.

Despite the discouraging price trend, institutional investors like Michael Saylor’s Strategy have not given up on their aggressive Bitcoin accumulation. Although the firm appears to be exercising caution, it has continued its weekly accumulation but has significantly reduced the volume of its purchases amid the declining price trend.

Outlook

Market attention now turns to the Federal Reserve and the outlook for U.S. banks. Should expectations for rate cuts strengthen, gold may continue its upward momentum. Conversely, if risk appetite returns, some of the capital currently parked in gold could flow back into cryptocurrencies.

ChatGPT’s Mobile App Growth Slows as User Engagement Declines, Signaling End of Early Boom Phase

0

ChatGPT’s mobile app appears to be entering a new phase of maturity after more than a year of explosive growth, as new data suggests that its download momentum and user engagement are beginning to flatten.

According to analytics firm Apptopia, global download growth of the app has slowed sharply since April, and daily active user (DAU) trends are now leveling off, signaling that OpenAI’s most popular product may have reached its early adoption peak.

Apptopia’s analysis shows that the percentage change in new global downloads began tapering off in the second quarter of the year, with October on pace to record an 8.1% month-over-month decline in new downloads. While millions of people continue to install the app each day, the data highlights a slowdown in growth rate rather than a fall in total numbers — a key distinction that nonetheless suggests the initial viral surge is cooling.

The stagnation in download growth coincides with declines in several engagement metrics. In the United States, Apptopia found that the average time spent per DAU has dropped by 22.5% since July, while average sessions per DAU are down by 20.7%. This means users are not only spending less time in the ChatGPT app but also opening it fewer times per day.

However, there’s a nuance to the shift: user churn in the U.S. has stabilized, suggesting that while casual experimenters are leaving, the app is now retaining a loyal base of regular users who incorporate ChatGPT into their routines for productivity, research, or creative tasks.

Apptopia analysts interpret these findings as a sign that ChatGPT has transitioned out of its “experimentation phase” — a period when millions of users downloaded the app simply to test its capabilities — and into a more normalized phase of sustained, functional use.

That transition is not necessarily bad news for OpenAI. In fact, it mirrors the trajectory of many viral apps that initially surge on novelty before finding a stable, long-term user base. But for OpenAI, it underscores the challenge of maintaining engagement as the product matures.

Part of the slowdown, analysts suggest, may stem from increased competition and changes in user perception of ChatGPT’s AI behavior. Following an April update intended to make the chatbot’s responses less sycophantic, and the August release of GPT-5 — a model described as more factual but less personable — some users have reported the app feels more transactional and less “conversational” than before.

That tonal shift, coupled with competition from Google’s rapidly expanding Gemini ecosystem, may have chipped away at the app’s stickiness. Gemini’s recent surge in downloads, especially following the release of Google’s AI image model Nano Banana in September, has vaulted it to the top of app charts in several countries, drawing attention from users seeking alternative AI experiences.

Still, Apptopia cautions against attributing the full decline in ChatGPT’s engagement to Gemini’s rise. The downward trend in average session time and frequency began months before Google’s latest AI push, suggesting deeper behavioral changes among users.

The firm points out that if only the average time per DAU were falling, it could imply users were simply becoming more efficient with their prompts. But the simultaneous drop in both time spent and session frequency suggests that people are using ChatGPT less intensively overall.

Many note that this pattern — a surge in early engagement followed by normalization — is common in the lifecycle of transformative technologies. In its first months, ChatGPT was a global curiosity, drawing hundreds of millions of users who tested its capabilities across everything from writing poems to generating code. But as the novelty fades, sustained growth now depends on continual product innovation, integration, and value creation.

For OpenAI, that means shifting from viral growth to user retention. The company has already begun deepening partnerships that extend ChatGPT’s utility beyond text generation — including deals with Walmart and India’s National Payments Corporation to enable in-app shopping and AI-powered payments via UPI. These integrations are part of a broader strategy to embed ChatGPT into everyday commerce and productivity ecosystems, potentially reigniting user engagement through functionality rather than novelty.

Nevertheless, the report suggests that OpenAI can no longer rely on organic growth alone to expand its user base. To sustain momentum, it will likely need to increase marketing investment, roll out new features, and perhaps expand the personalization capabilities that once made ChatGPT feel more conversational and engaging.

With an estimated 800 million users worldwide — more than 10% of the global adult population — ChatGPT remains by far the world’s most widely used AI application. Yet the Apptopia data underscores that even technological revolutions must evolve beyond their hype cycle. The challenge for OpenAI now is to ensure that ChatGPT’s next phase is defined not by slowing growth, but by deeper integration into the everyday fabric of digital life.

Jefferies CEO Rich Handler Says Bank Was Defrauded by Bankrupt Auto Parts Maker First Brands Group

0

Jefferies Financial Group CEO Rich Handler said Thursday that the Wall Street investment bank was defrauded by bankrupt auto parts manufacturer First Brands Group, marking the latest fallout from a corporate collapse that has rattled U.S. credit markets.

“I’ll just say this is us personally — we believe we were defrauded,” Handler told analysts and investors during the firm’s investor day, according to a regulatory filing released Friday.

He did not provide specific details about the alleged fraud, but said Jefferies remains confident in the overall business environment despite the episode.

His comments come as the U.S. Department of Justice investigates First Brands Group and as several financial institutions have reported potential losses tied to the company. The auto parts maker filed for bankruptcy protection in late September, listing more than $10 billion in liabilities, sending shockwaves through leveraged credit markets.

Fallout Across Credit Markets

The collapse of First Brands — alongside that of subprime lender and car dealership Tricolor — has deepened concerns in Wall Street’s multitrillion-dollar credit ecosystem, which spans leveraged loans, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), trade-finance funds, and subprime auto lending.

“I’m not saying there aren’t other issues like this,” Handler said. “I think there’s a fight going on right now between the banks and direct lenders who each want to point fingers at each other and say, ‘It’s your fault, no, it’s your fault.’”

Those remarks point to growing tension between traditional banks and private credit funds, as both sides grapple with defaults that threaten to expose weaknesses in risk management and underwriting standards across the market.

Jefferies’ stock tumbled sharply after First Brands’ bankruptcy filing, though it rebounded 5% on Friday after Thursday’s steep selloff. Analysts at Oppenheimer said the drop was driven largely by “atmospheric” credit concerns rather than by any material financial weakness at Jefferies, noting that credit managers, business development companies (BDCs), and several banks had come under similar pressure.

Jefferies President Brian Friedman stressed that the investment bank’s exposure to First Brands was isolated from its core operations.

“Kind of Chinese Wall 101. Nothing more to be said,” Friedman told investors. “The two have absolutely no relationship and, in fact, the decision in 2019 of the asset management Point Bonita team to engage with First Brands was absolutely independent and disconnected from anything on the investment banking side.”

Friedman said the fund involved was managed by Leucadia Asset Management, a Jefferies subsidiary that oversees alternative investments. Jefferies disclosed earlier this month that Leucadia holds about $715 million in receivables tied to First Brands but reiterated that its direct exposure after potential recoveries is under $100 million.

“We’ve estimated the firm’s direct exposure to the First Brands fallout to be relatively small — comfortably under $100 million,” said Morningstar analyst Sean Dunlop, noting that the potential loss is “readily absorbable” given Jefferies’ capital position.

Broader Sector Ripples

The First Brands bankruptcy has compounded broader credit jitters in the U.S. banking sector. Shares of several regional lenders slumped this week after Zions Bancorporation disclosed a $50 million charge-off in the third quarter, while Western Alliance Bank filed a lawsuit alleging borrower fraud.

The concerns briefly spilled over into European and Asian markets, where investors reacted to fears of contagion in corporate credit. However, U.S. banking stocks later recovered after a series of strong earnings reports reassured investors about the sector’s underlying health.

DOJ Probe Deepens

Meanwhile, the Justice Department’s probe into First Brands is said to be focusing on accounting irregularities and the company’s relationships with key creditors, according to people familiar with the investigation. The inquiry is expected to widen as regulators examine whether the company’s financing structure concealed deeper liquidity problems.

Handler’s acknowledgment of fraud adds a personal dimension to Jefferies’ response and underscores how the First Brands collapse has become a flashpoint for tensions between traditional and private lenders in the $1.6 trillion leveraged-loan market.

Jefferies insists the damage is currently contained. But the episode highlights a larger question looming over Wall Street: whether the boom in complex, high-yield lending over the past decade has left the financial system vulnerable to more hidden risks — risks that may only surface when credit conditions tighten.