DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 328

Tekedia Capital Commends Winich Fairms for Superior Execution

0

I have previously called Presco and Okomu Oil the agro-Bitcoins of Nigeria, companies that compound value from the soil, turning palm fruits into enduring wealth. Today, I add another name to that hall of value creation: Winich Farms, a Tekedia Capital portfolio company. This one is a junior agro-Bitcoin because it is young, vibrant, and already radiating the signals of greatness.

The numbers speak in the language that markets understand. Yes, growth, efficiency, and trust. And for those of us who believe that agriculture remains one of Africa’s most under-capitalized opportunities, Winich Farms stands as evidence that innovation can indeed sprout from the farmlands.

To Riches Attai and his brilliant team, I say well done. You have demonstrated that youth, when combined with vision and discipline, can feed nations and build prosperity.

In Tekedia, we teach that value compounds when knowledge meets execution. Winich Farms (Winich Inc ) is living that thesis and it is self-evident as I read the Q3 report, one harvest, one data point, and one innovation at a time.

ChatGPT Processes 2.5 Billion Messages Daily as Users Hit 800 Million Weekly

0

OpenAI’s ChatGPT has reached an unprecedented milestone, processing at least 2.5 billion messages every day as its weekly active users climb to 800 million — representing more than 10 percent of the world’s adult population.

The growth trajectory underlines the astonishing global diffusion of artificial intelligence and signals a structural shift in how people work, learn, and shop in the digital economy.

According to OpenAI’s July disclosure, ChatGPT was already handling over 2.5 billion daily prompts when the platform had 700 million users. That figure has now surged even higher as CEO Sam Altman confirmed that the platform’s weekly user base recently expanded to 800 million. The chatbot’s rapid rise is without precedent in technology history — surpassing the speed of adoption of the internet, smartphones, and even social media platforms such as Facebook and TikTok.

Earlier this year, OpenAI crossed the 400 million weekly user threshold in February, a figure that was considered groundbreaking at the time. Within just a few months, usage doubled, demonstrating how deeply ChatGPT has embedded itself in daily life across continents. The company has also maintained its position as the most downloaded app globally, topping iOS and Android charts for seven consecutive months between March and September 2025.

A recent analysis by researchers tracking ChatGPT usage patterns reveals that 70 percent of all queries are unrelated to work. Instead, users employ the AI assistant for everyday guidance, entertainment, and learning. Among professional users, the dominant application remains writing — from drafting emails and articles to generating original content from scratch. The study categorized ChatGPT queries into three main themes: practical guidance, seeking information, and producing text. Writing tasks were the most frequent work-related activity.

The data suggests that while the platform’s reach has exploded globally, deeper integration into structured workplace operations is still evolving. Much of ChatGPT’s traffic continues to come from individual users experimenting with AI for creative, personal, or educational purposes. Still, the fact that hundreds of millions of people interact with ChatGPT weekly means OpenAI now influences how knowledge is accessed and synthesized at a planetary scale.

The adoption speed has astonished analysts. Researchers who studied its diffusion earlier in the year concluded that “for a new technology, this speed of global diffusion has no precedent.” That sentiment echoes across the industry as ChatGPT cements itself not merely as a digital assistant but as a new layer of online infrastructure that connects humans, data, and commerce.

The numbers reveal how explosive that shift has been. In June 2024, ChatGPT processed roughly 451 million messages daily. By June 2025, daily message volume had exceeded 2.6 billion — a fivefold increase within twelve months. During that same period, OpenAI’s user count leaped from the hundreds of millions into the high hundreds of millions, marking one of the most accelerated growth curves ever recorded for a consumer product.

The chatbot’s staying power also highlights its evolution from novelty to necessity. Unlike other viral apps that fade, ChatGPT has sustained usage momentum, bolstered by a series of integrations that bring AI into commerce and productivity ecosystems. Most recently, OpenAI struck a deal with Walmart to allow users to purchase items directly through ChatGPT, transforming the platform into an interactive shopping interface. This development follows earlier partnerships with major corporations and institutions, deepening ChatGPT’s role in everyday economic activity.

Economically, ChatGPT’s rapid expansion poses both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, it has spurred demand for AI infrastructure — from chips and cloud storage to security systems — fueling an entire ecosystem of suppliers, including companies such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Oracle. On the other hand, OpenAI faces the task of monetizing a vast user base that still includes hundreds of millions of free users. While ChatGPT Plus subscriptions and enterprise offerings are growing, the question of how to sustain profitability amid rising computing costs remains central to the company’s future.

Politically, the surge in AI adoption carries weighty implications. Governments are increasingly aware that platforms like ChatGPT now influence what billions of people read, write, and believe. Regulators in the U.S., Europe, and Asia are scrutinizing OpenAI’s data usage and algorithmic transparency, while debates over privacy, misinformation, and intellectual property intensify.

As adoption deepens, ChatGPT’s impact is also becoming economic in another sense — it is beginning to change labor patterns. Surveys suggest that workers in marketing, research, and education increasingly rely on AI tools to handle routine writing and data analysis tasks, freeing time for higher-order work but also raising fears of job displacement. For policymakers, balancing productivity gains with workforce stability is emerging as one of the defining economic challenges of the AI age.

For OpenAI, the scale of demand means the company must keep expanding its computing capacity. It has already partnered with leading chipmakers, including Nvidia and Broadcom, to design specialized AI processors and data infrastructure to sustain future growth. Analysts expect that, by 2026, ChatGPT’s daily message volume could double again as new features — including voice interfaces and AI agents capable of completing online tasks — reach mass users.

Trump’s Tariffs to Cost Global Businesses More Than $1.2tn in 2025 – S&P Global

0

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and business groups worldwide are grappling with a new era of trade economics as President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff policy pushes global companies toward what analysts describe as a trillion-dollar squeeze.

According to a new white paper from S&P Global released Thursday, Trump’s tariffs will cost global businesses more than $1.2 trillion in 2025 alone, with most of that cost ultimately borne by consumers.

The report, based on analysis from more than 15,000 sell-side analysts across 9,000 companies, warned that the estimate was “probably conservative.” The authors, Daniel Sandberg and Drew Bowers, described the effect of the administration’s trade policy as a massive redistribution of wealth that will reshape profit structures and global supply chains for years to come.

“The sources of this trillion-dollar squeeze are broad,” Sandberg wrote. “Tariffs and trade barriers act as taxes on supply chains and divert cash to governments; logistics delays and freight costs compound the effect. Collectively, these forces represent a systemic transfer of wealth from corporate profits to workers, suppliers, governments, and infrastructure investors.”

A Global Cost Spiral

The $1.2 trillion hit comes after Trump imposed a 10% blanket tariff on all goods entering the United States in April, followed by a series of “reciprocal” duties on dozens of countries. Additional levies were placed on specific items such as autos, timber, and kitchen cabinets, adding to trade friction.

While the White House has insisted that foreign exporters will carry the brunt of the costs, S&P’s analysis challenges that assertion. The firm estimates that only one-third of the tariff impact will fall on companies directly, with the remaining two-thirds absorbed by consumers through higher prices. The report notes that this estimate could understate the true burden, as “real output declining means consumers are paying more for less.”

S&P’s breakdown shows $907 billion in costs hitting publicly listed firms, while private equity and venture-backed businesses will share the rest. The impact extends beyond direct trade disruptions, encompassing logistics bottlenecks, port delays, and new compliance costs as companies rush to adjust to shifting trade rules.

For the Trump administration, the policy marks a defining economic move — one aimed at reasserting U.S. manufacturing dominance while claiming to restore a “fair trade balance.” White House spokesman Kush Desai said the policy represents a necessary “transition period” toward a stronger domestic industry.

“The President and Administration’s position has always been clear: while Americans may face a transition period from tariffs upending a broken status quo that has put America Last, the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by foreign exporters,” Desai said. “Companies are already shifting and diversifying their supply chains in response to tariffs, including by onshoring production to the United States.”

However, economists warn that the policy’s domestic impact could complicate broader macroeconomic goals, especially as inflationary pressures remain a concern. Though Federal Reserve officials have largely regarded the tariffs as a one-time shock, not a lasting inflation driver, S&P’s data suggest the effects may persist longer than expected.

The firm’s analysts forecast a 64-basis-point contraction in corporate profit margins this year, with the damage gradually easing to 28 basis points in 2026 and around 10 basis points by 2028. The report cautions that while some companies may recover, others could face permanent erosion in profitability.

“In effect, 2025 locked in the hit; 2026 and 2027 will test whether the market’s optimism about re-equilibration is warranted,” Sandberg wrote.

The Supply Chain Rebuild

The tariffs are already forcing multinational firms to rethink sourcing strategies. From electronics and consumer goods to automotive manufacturing, companies are racing to mitigate the financial blow through supply-chain diversification and nearshoring.

Trump’s decision in May to eliminate the long-standing “de minimis” exception — which had allowed goods under $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free — marked what S&P described as the “real inflection point.” The removal sent shockwaves through shipping data and earnings reports, as low-cost items that once bypassed tariffs became subject to full levies.

“When the exemption closed, the shock rippled through shipping data, earnings reports, and executive commentary,” Sandberg said.

Some analysts have likened the situation to a structural reset in global trade. Whereas previous tariff rounds under earlier administrations focused on targeted industries, Trump’s blanket approach has reshaped the entire flow of goods, creating ripple effects from Asia to Europe. The rare-earth dispute with China — which escalated after Beijing hinted at restricting exports vital for tech and defense manufacturing — has only deepened tensions.

While some firms see the tariffs as an opportunity to strengthen domestic operations, others warn that the costs could hollow out smaller enterprises.

The Political Gamble

For Trump, the tariffs represent a political statement as much as an economic one — a test of whether protectionism can fuel domestic revival without destabilizing markets. The White House has framed the duties as a tool to “reclaim fairness,” but the global repercussions have been substantial.

The S&P report suggests that if the current trajectory continues, tariffs could become a quasi-permanent feature of global commerce, effectively acting as “structural taxes” on profitability. Sandberg said that “in the optimistic scenario that this turbulence is temporary,” supply chains will eventually stabilize and markets will rebalance. But if not, the world may enter a prolonged period where tariffs and trade barriers define the new normal.

The Silver Surge – A Temporary Flip or the End of Bitcoin’s “Digital Gold” Era?

0

Silver has smashed through its all-time high (ATH) of around $52.50 per ounce from 1980, trading near $54–$55 today amid a blistering 63% year-to-date rally.

This has propelled silver’s estimated market capitalization to approximately $2.8–$2.9 trillion—briefly eclipsing Bitcoin’s $2.1 trillion market cap with BTC at ~$108,000. But is this the death knell for Bitcoin as “digital gold”? Let’s break it down with the facts, context, and forward-looking implications.

Silver’s flip is a symptom of systemic distrust in fiat, not BTC’s obituary. Bitcoin has outperformed silver 10x over the past decade; expect reversion. Both thrive in chaos—diversify, but BTC’s network effects decentralized, programmable position it as the ultimate evolution of gold.

Silver’s explosive move isn’t isolated—it’s part of a broader “debasement trade” where investors flock to hard assets amid fears of U.S. dollar weakness, ballooning national debt now over $36 trillion, and geopolitical tensions.

Silver’s Rally Drivers: Industrial demand such as solar panels, EVs accounts for ~50% of silver use, up 20% YoY per the Silver Institute. Add in retail panic-buying of physical bars/coins—U.S. Mint sales hit 1.2 million ounces in September alone—and supply constraints global mine output flat at ~26,000 tons/year, and you’ve got a perfect storm.

Backwardation in futures markets spot price > futures signals acute physical shortages, unseen since 1980. BTC dipped 8% last week post- “Crypto Black Friday” a $19B liquidation cascade on October 11, the largest ever.

Ethereum fell 12%, erasing ETF inflows. Yet, BTC’s dominance is at 63% of crypto market cap, and institutional holdings remain robust.
This is silver’s first market-cap overtake of BTC since BTC’s inception.

Historically, BTC has “flipped” silver multiple times like in March 2024 at $1.4T, November 2024 at $1.7T, only for silver to reclaim ground during crypto winters. Silver’s cap grew ~$1T in 2025 alone, fueled by fiat fears—BRICS nations like China are dumping Treasuries for gold/silver reserves, accelerating the shift.

With U.S. debt servicing costs at $1T/year more than defense spending, investors see metals as “real” hedges. Gold hit 39 ATHs in 2025; silver’s industrial edge amplifies this. The cracks are showing—BRICS flips to gold, fiat spirals.

Post-halving (April 2024), BTC’s rally stalled amid regulatory scrutiny and over-leveraged positions. The October 11 liquidation wiped out 1.6M traders, per The Kobeissi Letter. Meanwhile, silver’s tangible allure shines: “As gold & silver disappear from the market, frustrated buyers will turn to Bitcoin”, but for now, physical metals are winning the sentiment battle.

Equities S&P at ATH, homes $400K median, and even Mag 7 stocks are soaring too—signaling broad asset inflation. X users quip: “S&P ATH, Gold ATH, Silver ATH, Bitcoin ATH… are we in a bubble?”. It’s less a bubble, more a “hyperflation” scramble: Own something scarce, or watch USD erode.

Has the Age of Digital Gold Ended?

Not Quite—It’s Evolving. Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative isn’t dead; it’s under siege but resilient. BTC’s hard cap (21M) is absolute—no new supply post-2140. Silver’s supply grows ~1–2% annually via mining/recycling.

BTC’s portability send $1B globally in minutes, fee-free trumps metals’ logistics nightmares.
Governments like the U.S. Bitcoin reserve talks and corps like Strategy holds 300K+ BTC are stacking.

ETFs saw $38B volume peaks in 2025. Silver? It’s industrial, volatile, and harder to custody at scale. BTC flipped silver in 2024 bull runs, then consolidated. Silver’s current ATH feels euphoric ratios like gold/silver at 50:1 signal overstretch, but BTC’s $125K peak in September shows untapped upside.

Analysts eye $150K by year-end if Fed cuts deepen. Bears point to BTC’s energy use vs. silver’s “green” solar role and correlation to risk assets beta ~1.5 to Nasdaq. If dollar collapse accelerates, metals could dominate short-term.

If industrial demand hits 1.2B/oz projected 2026, $60–$70/oz possible. But squeezes end fast—watch COMEX inventories down 15% YTD. Halving scarcity + ETF flows = $200K+ by 2026. “BTC will outperform everything long-run”.

Recession crushes industrial silver; crypto regs tank BTC. Global liquidity M2 up 5% YoY favors both. The age of digital gold is just getting started—silver’s shine is a wake-up call, not a funeral. Own hard assets; the debasement train has left the station.

Volkswagen Advances on Major Job Reduction Plan, as Germany Records High LNG Imports in 2025

0

Germany’s Volkswagen Group is making steady headway in implementing extensive job cuts across its portfolio, as confirmed by CEO Oliver Blume in a recent interview with dpa news agency.

The restructuring, aimed at navigating a severe downturn in the European automotive sector, targets over 35,000 positions at the core Volkswagen brand, alongside 7,500 at Audi and approximately 4,000 at Porsche, with additional reductions planned for other subsidiaries.

Blume described the process as progressing “well,” emphasizing the need for cost controls to ensure long-term viability, especially as first-half profits fell 38% year-over-year.

The moves come against a backdrop of declining sales—down by a fifth in Europe over the past five years—and intensifying competition from Asian manufacturers.

Volkswagen is also shifting production of smaller electric vehicles to more cost-effective sites in Spain and Portugal, reducing capacity by over 700,000 units annually at its German facilities.

While earlier plans in 2024 sparked protests from workers and unions, including potential factory closures, the current focus is on voluntary redundancies and operational efficiencies to safeguard the company’s future in “turbulent times.”

Germany’s auto industry, which employs 770,000 people and generates over €540 billion in annual revenue, remains a cornerstone of the economy, making these adjustments critical for broader economic stability.

Germany extends EV Tax Breaks and Introduces Incentives for Working Retirees. In a dual push to bolster its electric vehicle (EV) transition and address labor shortages, the German government is advancing policies to prolong tax exemptions for EVs while rolling out new benefits for pensioners who continue working.

On the EV front, Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil announced plans to extend the current 10-year vehicle tax exemption for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel-cell electric vehicles (FCEVs)—originally set to expire for new registrations after December 31, 2025—through to 2035.

This measure, part of a comprehensive automotive support package to be discussed at an industry summit hosted by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, aims to stimulate EV adoption, secure jobs in the sector, and position Germany as a leader in sustainable mobility.

Additional incentives include accelerated depreciation for corporate EV purchases up to 40% in the first year, valid through 2028 and ongoing investments in charging infrastructure.

Klingbeil underscored the urgency: “Everyone knows that the future is electric,” highlighting the need to keep high-quality manufacturing in Germany. Simultaneously, the coalition government has greenlit the “active pension” (Aktivrente) initiative, effective January 1, 2026, allowing working pensioners to earn up to €2,000 per month tax-free on top of their retirement benefits.

This policy removes prior restrictions on re-employment with former employers and seeks to retain skilled workers in high-demand fields like engineering, healthcare, and transport amid an aging population and talent shortages.

CDU General Secretary Carsten Linnemann described it as a way to “make working in old age more attractive” and combat skilled labor gaps. While praised for its potential to fill vacancies, critics from employers’ associations and unions argue it may prove costly—estimated at billions annually—without fully resolving underlying issues like health barriers or poor working conditions for seniors.

These developments reflect Germany’s strategic efforts to revitalize its auto industry and workforce resilience in the face of economic headwinds and demographic shifts.

Germany Records High LNG Imports in 2025

In a significant milestone for Europe’s energy transition, Germany’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports reached an all-time high in the third quarter of 2025, underscoring the country’s rapid pivot away from Russian pipeline gas following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

According to data from the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA), a record 35 terawatt-hours (TWh) of LNG was supplied to the German gas network during this period—the highest volume since the first terminal opened in Wilhelmshaven in late 2022.

This surge has positioned 2025 as the most successful year to date for LNG deliveries to German terminals, surpassing all prior annual totals.

The record 35 TWh of LNG supplied in Q3 2025 ensures a stable gas supply for German industries, particularly energy-intensive sectors like manufacturing, chemicals, and steel. In 2022, gas shortages threatened industrial output, with GDP losses estimated at 1.5–2% due to reliance on Russian pipeline gas.

The shift to LNG has mitigated these risks, supporting continuous production. Stable energy supply prevents production halts, preserving jobs and output. For example, Germany’s industrial sector, which accounts for ~30% of GDP, benefits directly.

The chemical industry, a key gas consumer, employs over 460,000 people and contributes €220 billion annually to the economy. Avoiding disruptions supports these figures.

 

Germany accelerated the construction of floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) and land-based terminals to diversify supplies. By mid-2025, five major facilities were operational or nearing completion.

Wilhelmshaven (North Sea): The pioneering site, operated by Uniper, began in 2022 and now includes a second FSRU Wilhelmshaven 2 launched in August 2025.

Brunsbüttel (North Sea): A permanent land-based terminal, supported by €40 million in state aid, became fully operational earlier this year.

Lubmin (Baltic Sea): Relocated FSRU operations boosted capacity. Mukran saw a dramatic uptick, with over 10 TWh fed into the grid in Q2 alone—more than any other site. Weekly LNG carrier arrivals deliver about 1 TWh each, and all regasification slots for late 2025 are booked.

Stade (upcoming): Set to add further capacity by late 2025, with advance bookings from utilities like Czech CEZ for 2 billion cubic meters annually starting 2027.

These expansions have increased Germany’s total LNG regasification capacity by over 30% since 2021, with an additional 3.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) expected EU-wide by January 2025, much of it in Germany.

Seasonal factors played a role, as summer imports allow for cheaper stockpiling ahead of winter demand. Gas storage levels hit 75% by early September 2025, easing earlier shortages.

The share of LNG in Germany’s total gas supply jumped from 8% in the first half of 2025 to 13.25% in Q3, reflecting a 500% year-on-year increase in Russian LNG imports alone valued at €7.32 billion in 2024, with trends continuing.

Europe’s LNG imports fell 16% overall in 2024 to about 21 billion cubic meters less than peak levels, thanks to reduced consumption down 15.6% from 2017–2022 averages and renewables growth.

However, Germany’s aggressive buildout—aiming for a “safety buffer” of oversized capacity—has made it a key player, with imports now primarily from the US leading supplier, Qatar, and Nigeria.

This record highlights Germany’s success in securing energy independence, but it raises concerns. Critics argue the infrastructure is “massively oversized,” potentially locking in fossil fuel dependence amid climate goals under the European Green Deal.

Plans for hydrogen/ammonia conversions at sites like Wilhelmshaven aim to mitigate this, with green hydrogen imports targeted for 2025. Environmental groups have challenged projects legally, though most hurdles have been cleared.

Overall, these developments ensure supply stability for winter 2025–2026, but sustained demand reduction and renewable integration will be crucial to align with decarbonization targets.