JPMorgan Chase & Co. has announced a sweeping plan to invest up to $10 billion in U.S. companies considered vital to national security and economic resilience, marking the most ambitious private-sector response yet to President Donald Trump’s renewed focus on industrial sovereignty and defense readiness.

The program, announced on Monday, is part of a 10-year, $1.5 trillion initiative that aims to facilitate, finance, and invest in industries critical to the growth and stability of the U.S. economy — including defense, energy, and manufacturing. JPMorgan said it will deploy the initial $10 billion through direct equity and venture capital investments, with the broader commitment spread across lending, project financing, and capital markets support.

The announcement sent shares of the nation’s largest bank up 1.4% in pre-market trading.

The plan aligns closely with the Trump administration’s agenda to modernize infrastructure and reduce dependence on foreign supply chains, particularly in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, clean energy, and rare earth minerals — all areas where the U.S. has long been reliant on imports from China.

“It has become painfully clear that the United States has allowed itself to become too reliant on unreliable sources of critical minerals, products and manufacturing — all of which are essential for our national security,” JPMorgan Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon said in a statement accompanying the announcement.

Dimon’s comments echoed the White House’s broader industrial policy objectives, which have gained renewed urgency following President Trump’s revival of a trade war with Beijing last Friday. The president promised to sharply raise tariffs in retaliation for China’s decision to curb exports of rare earth materials, vital components in electronics and defense systems.

Trump, who has repeatedly criticized major U.S. banks for “debanking” clients based on political or religious beliefs, praised the new initiative as a sign that Wall Street was “getting back to serving America’s interests.”

The “Security and Resiliency Initiative”

JPMorgan said its new “Security and Resiliency Initiative” will focus investment on four strategic areas:

• Supply chain and manufacturing
• Defense and aerospace
• Energy independence
• Frontier technologies — including artificial intelligence and quantum computing

These broad areas will be further divided into 27 sub-sectors, covering everything from shipbuilding, nuclear energy, and nanomaterials to secure communications and next-generation computing systems.

The bank also announced that it will establish an external advisory council, composed of public- and private-sector leaders, to guide the initiative. It plans to hire more bankers and investment professionals dedicated to national security-linked transactions and expand research on supply chain vulnerabilities through its recently launched Center for Geopolitics.

The program builds on JPMorgan’s existing work with the federal government. Earlier this year, the bank helped structure the U.S. government’s deal with MP Materials (MP.N) — a Nevada-based rare earth mining company — aimed at revitalizing domestic mineral extraction.

“We’ve had no less than 100 calls with clients to talk about the MP transaction as well as what this means for other industries,” said Andrew Castaldo, JPMorgan’s co-head of mid-cap mergers and acquisitions. “And we’ve had numerous trips down to Washington to explore those opportunities with the government.”

According to people familiar with the discussions, JPMorgan is coordinating closely with the administration on dozens of transactions across up to 30 industries identified as “critical to national and economic security.”

A $1.5 Trillion Industrial Push

The newly announced $10 billion allocation forms part of a much larger strategic plan. JPMorgan revealed it has already committed to facilitating about $1 trillion in financing for clients in these strategic industries over the next decade, and now plans to expand that figure by 50%, to $1.5 trillion.

Analysts say the bank’s decision represents a structural pivot in how Wall Street approaches industrial investment — from maximizing global efficiency to reinforcing domestic production capacity.

Policy Frustrations and a Call for Speed

While unveiling the plan, Dimon also took aim at regulatory and bureaucratic delays that he said were stalling America’s ability to rebuild.

“America needs more speed and investment,” Dimon said, warning that outdated policies and workforce shortages were undermining progress. He added that if key reforms and infrastructure modernization “had been done earlier, things wouldn’t be this bad.”

That sentiment aligns with the Trump administration’s push for accelerated permitting and deregulation to encourage investment in manufacturing, energy, and defense.

The U.S. is currently pursuing deals across multiple strategic sectors, ranging from critical minerals and microchips to advanced defense manufacturing, as part of an emerging national security-industrial complex that fuses government policy with private capital.

In that sense, JPMorgan’s plan is not merely a financial commitment — it is a signal that Wall Street is re-aligning with Washington’s industrial strategy under Trump’s second term.

The bank is effectively positioning itself as a financial backbone of America’s new industrial era by combining its capital strength with federal priorities, helping to fund projects designed to re-shore production, secure supply chains, and drive technological self-sufficiency.

Market analysts expect the plan to stimulate investment in middle-market defense and energy companies, particularly those seeking capital to scale domestic production. It may also boost innovation in frontier technologies — especially in AI and quantum computing, where national competitiveness has become a defining geopolitical issue.

If successful, JPMorgan’s $10 billion security initiative could serve as a template for other major banks, including Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, to follow suit, as Wall Street and Washington draw closer in reshaping America’s economic future.

Former Intel Chief Executive Officer Pat Gelsinger has become the latest high-profile voice to warn that the world is in the midst of an artificial intelligence (AI) bubble — though he believes the boom still has significant room to run before it slows down.

“Are we in an AI bubble? Of course. Of course we are,” Gelsinger told CNBC’s Squawk Box in an interview on Monday. “I mean, we’re hyped. We’re accelerating. We’re putting enormous leverage into the system.”

Gelsinger, now a general partner at the Silicon Valley venture capital firm Playground Global, said he expects the AI bubble to continue expanding for “several years” before any correction happens. He noted that while there has been an “industry shift to AI,” companies have “yet to really start materially benefiting from it.”

His remarks come amid an increasingly fierce global debate about the sustainability and real economic impact of the AI boom, which has driven record investments, valuations, and stock market surges.

Investors Keep Pouring In

Despite repeated warnings, investors remain unrelenting in their bets on companies offering AI products and infrastructure. Tech giants such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta have together invested hundreds of billions of dollars into AI data centers, cloud infrastructure, and chip manufacturing. Nvidia’s market value alone has soared past $4 trillion, largely due to its dominance in the GPU market, powering AI systems.

In recent months, companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cohere have attracted multi-billion-dollar funding rounds, while chipmakers such as AMD, Broadcom, and TSMC have seen unprecedented demand from data center clients.

However, the pace of investment has sparked anxiety among analysts and executives who question whether the returns will justify the massive capital outlays. As Gelsinger pointed out, the market’s enthusiasm has far outstripped the tangible productivity gains AI has delivered so far.

The Growing Bubble Debate

The divide among business leaders over the real impact of AI has widened sharply in recent months. Gelsinger’s assessment adds to a chorus of voices suggesting the industry is entering speculative territory.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, whose company ignited the current AI frenzy with the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, said earlier this year that the sector is “overhyped in the short term and underhyped in the long term.” Altman admitted that a correction could occur as companies and investors realize that not every AI application will be transformative or profitable.

Alibaba cofounder Joe Tsai also warned recently that he was “beginning to see some kind of bubble” in AI valuations, saying the pace of investment reminded him of the late 1990s internet boom.

“I start to see the beginning of some kind of bubble,” Tsai told delegates at the HSBC Global Investment Summit in Hong Kong earlier this year. Some of the envisioned projects commenced raising funds without having secured “uptake” agreements, he added. “I start to get worried when people are building data centers on spec. There are a number of people coming up, funds coming out, to raise billions or millions of capital.”

On the other side of the debate, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang — whose company is arguably the single biggest winner from the AI surge — has dismissed comparisons to the dot-com bubble. Huang insists that AI represents a lasting technological shift already delivering measurable productivity.

Similarly, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has argued that AI is not a bubble but the “next platform shift” comparable to the birth of the internet or the smartphone. Microsoft has invested tens of billions of dollars in OpenAI and in upgrading its Azure data centers to handle AI workloads, betting that AI will redefine enterprise software and search.

“Late on AI” and Lessons from Intel

For Gelsinger, the lessons come from experience. During his nearly four-year tenure as Intel’s CEO, he tried to reposition the company to compete in the fast-evolving semiconductor market dominated by Nvidia, AMD, and TSMC. However, Intel’s delays in developing high-performance chips for AI workloads left it struggling to keep pace.

Reflecting on his time at the company, which he left in December 2024, Gelsinger admitted that Intel “made a set of bad decisions over 15 years” and was “late on AI as well.” He said his focus at Playground Global now includes supporting startups working on practical applications of AI, robotics, and computing infrastructure that could prove durable beyond the current speculative cycle.

Financial analysts have echoed Gelsinger’s caution, warning that AI infrastructure spending could soon outpace near-term returns. Goldman Sachs recently estimated that global AI investment could reach $1 trillion by 2030, but noted that only a fraction of that spending has translated into measurable profit so far.

Morgan Stanley analysts have drawn parallels with the early internet era, saying that while AI will likely have a lasting impact, the valuation multiples for many AI-linked companies are “unsustainably high.”

Similarly, economists at Bank of America said that while AI adoption could eventually boost productivity, “the market may be pricing in gains that could take years to materialize.”

“Building the Rails”

Gelsinger concluded his remarks with a metaphor capturing both the optimism and caution surrounding AI’s evolution.

“We’re building the rails for the future,” he said, “but we haven’t yet seen the trains really running on them.”

His view underscores a growing recognition in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street that while AI is undoubtedly transforming industries and sparking one of the most powerful investment waves in decades, its true payoff — and whether it can sustain the trillions of dollars now chasing it — remains uncertain.