Rug Radio, a decentralized media platform known for its Web3 podcast ecosystem and community-driven content, has officially announced the sunset of its $RUG utility token and Genesis NFT collection.
This move integrates the project into the MyriadMarkets ecosystem, a Solana-based prediction markets platform emphasizing no-KYC betting, fast settlements, and community rewards. The transition rewards early Rug Radio supporters by converting their holdings into allocations of the upcoming $MYR token.
A comprehensive snapshot was taken on October 7, 2025, capturing all Genesis NFT ownership and $RUG token balances—whether claimed, unclaimed, or pending earnings. This ensures no value is lost for holders.
Support for $RUG token production, claims, and Genesis NFT utilities like daily $RUG yields of 5-11 tokens per NFT ends immediately. The Genesis NFTs will no longer generate rewards within the Rug Radio ecosystem.
Snapshot data will convert into $MYR community allocations at Myriad’s Token Generation Event (TGE), expected soon. Early estimates suggest Genesis NFT holders could receive around 26% of total $MYR supply as rewards, though exact ratios are pending confirmation.
$RUG and $RDAO governance token balances will also factor into allocations. Rug Radio is pivoting to amplify its community within Myriad’s high-signal prediction markets meta, where betting volumes have already exceeded $10M mostly sub-$50 bets settled in <1 minute.
This aligns with broader Web3 trends toward integrated ecosystems, potentially boosting NFT floor prices amid the shift. Utility token for Rug Radio ecosystem (e.g., DAO access via 1,800 $RUG ? 1 $RDAO swap; earned via NFTs, listening bounties). Contract.
he announcement has sparked bullish sentiment among holders, with posts highlighting it as a “big move” for long-term value in prediction markets. One holder noted their Genesis NFT appreciated ~$245 in a week, attributing it to the Myriad integration.
Speculation on exact $MYR allocations per NFT is rampant, with calls for predictions on platforms like Xeet.ai. This evolution positions Rug Radio’s community in a “much bigger” narrative, blending media, DAOs, and on-chain betting.
Myriad Markets is a decentralized prediction market platform built on Solana, emphasizing no-KYC access, fast settlements often under 1 minute for small bets, and integration with social media and content ecosystems like Decrypt and Rug Radio.
It allows users to speculate on real-world outcomes—ranging from crypto prices and elections to sports events and cultural happenings—by trading “shares” in binary or multi-outcome markets.
The platform uses a constant function market maker similar to automated market makers in DeFi to dynamically price shares, ensuring liquidity and reflecting crowd-sourced probabilities.
Bets can be placed with USDC for real-money stakes or points for low-risk practice and rewards. The core appeal lies in its simplicity: shares act like probabilistic bets, where the market price signals the community’s consensus on an event’s likelihood.
For instance, a share priced at $0.63 implies a 63% chance of the outcome occurring. This setup aggregates collective intelligence, often outperforming polls or experts in accuracy.
Points vs. USDC Markets
Free-to-play with $MYR points earn via predictions, quests, leaderboards, or referrals—e.g., share PNL cards for bonuses. Ideal for testing; points convertible to $MYR tokens post-TGE or used for rewards.
Real-money bets with stablecoin. Higher stakes, direct USD payouts. Promotions like zero-fee October drops encourage entry. Bet via X extension; share referral links for USDC kickbacks on referred trades.
Earn $MYR points for activity (e.g., top leaderboard wins NFTs like Lil Pudgy). Ties into Rug Radio migration for airdrops. Solana enables sub-second trades; handled 415K users in 30 days via thirdweb infra, with $10M+ volume mostly micro-bets.
When the world tuned in to watch cyclists snake through Rwanda’s hilly roads — welcome to the “Land of a Thousand Hills” — during the 2025 UCI Road World Championships, they weren’t just witnessing athletic grit — they were seeing the culmination of a national vision.
Rwanda didn’t stumble into this spotlight by accident. Over the past decade, the country has methodically invested in sports diplomacy, infrastructure, and strategic branding — all under a larger ambition: to make Rwanda not only a top-tier tourist destination but a continental hub for global sports and events.
How “Visit Rwanda” Became a Global Brand
If you’ve watched an Arsenal, PSG, or Bayern Munich match lately, you’ve probably noticed “Visit Rwanda” emblazoned on the jerseys and sidelines. That wasn’t just clever advertising — it’s a symbol of Rwanda’s global outreach strategy.
Through sports partnerships and sponsorships, Rwanda has placed itself firmly on the international map. The “Visit Rwanda” initiative isn’t about traditional tourism alone — it’s about storytelling through sport. Every match, every mention, every image helps reshape global perception, transforming Rwanda’s identity from a post-conflict recovery nation to a place of aspiration, safety, and opportunity.
This sports-marketing synergy is working. Football fans who may have never heard of Kigali now associate Rwanda with ambition, modernity, and resilience.
A Model of What’s Possible in Africa
Rwanda’s sports renaissance is setting a template for other African nations — how to merge sports, tourism, and nation branding into a unified growth engine — captured in the 4-pointers below — infrastructure development, youth empowerment, economic impact and soft power diplomacy.
Infrastructure Development: The Kigali Arena, modern roads, upgraded stadiums, and world-class event logistics show how sports investment spills over into broader national benefits.
Youth Empowerment: Local initiatives are nurturing young athletes, coaches, and sports entrepreneurs. Cycling academies and football training camps are creating opportunities for the next generation.
Economic Impact: Every major event — from basketball tournaments to cycling championships — generates jobs, boosts local businesses, and expands Rwanda’s service economy.
Soft Power Diplomacy: By attracting global events and fostering partnerships with international organizations, Rwanda is rewriting its geopolitical relevance through sports.
The Symbolism Behind the Pedals
The 2025 UCI Road World Championships weren’t just a competition — they were a metaphor for the nation itself. The cyclists climbing Rwanda’s steep hills mirrored the country’s own journey — uphill, relentless, and driven by purpose.
In the words of a Rwandan rider featured by Cycling Weekly, “People will never forget what I’ve done — because it shows that Rwanda can rise, and we can win.” That sentiment echoes far beyond the race — it’s the pulse of a nation in motion.
Looking Ahead: The Road to Legacy
Rwanda’s challenge now is to turn moments into momentum. The infrastructure, visibility, and goodwill built through these global sporting ventures must evolve into a lasting ecosystem — nurturing athletes, drawing investors, and deepening tourism appeal.
Already, Rwanda is being scouted for future African and global sports events — from marathons to triathlons and international youth games. If it continues this trajectory, Kigali could soon stand shoulder-to-shoulder with global sports cities like Doha, Barcelona, and/or Cape Town — each known for blending tourism and sport into economic and cultural identity.
Final Thoughts
Rwanda’s story today is one of transformation — from recovery to resilience, from tourism to sports, from being visited to being celebrated. By boldly merging sports, tourism, and national pride, Rwanda has done more than host a race — it has redefined what African nations can achieve when vision meets execution. So whether you’re a traveller, a sports enthusiast, or an investor, keep your eyes on Rwanda — the small country making big moves on the global stage.
One of the more overlooked and underappreciated trends in crypto is the omni-bank supertrend. This trend is at the intersection of fintech and crypto and is often dubbed the “omni-banking” revolution.
Omni-banking refers to the convergence of traditional banking services with cryptocurrency. Consider it a super app where users can send, receive, hold, transfer, save, invest, and spend value in any form on one platform. In an omni-bank ecosystem, dollars, euros, yen, cryptos, and stablecoins are all interchangeable money in a single account.
The omni-bank investment thesis has taken a back seat among the investment community, who are focused on DeFi, NFTs, RWAs, and other hot topics. However, consumer demand for a product that offers the speed and freedom of crypto with the familiarity of traditional finance is rapidly growing and could show a snowball effect over the coming years.
1. Inside Digitap’s Omni-Bank: Wallets, FX, and Visa Access
Digitap ($TAP) is one of the projects that best represents the omni-bank supertrend. Marketed as the world’s first crypto omni-bank, Digitap created a platform where all forms of money coexist and interact with each other.
Users can store fiat currency and crypto in a single account, exchange between them instantly, and spend their balance via a Visa-branded Digitap card. This means that users can get paid in a crypto stablecoin, invest part of the proceeds in a crypto like Bitcoin (BTC) or Ethereum (ETH), and use the remaining balance to pay for everyday items via the Visa card.
Digitap’s goal is to make crypto-enabled banking as easy as traditional online banking, which is key to attracting mainstream users. Digitap is early in its journey and is currently undergoing the second round of its presale event.
Currently priced at $0.0159 per token, early investors who bought in the first round have already made a 27% paper profit, and those buying today will make a 22% profit when the price jumps to $0.0194 in the next round.
Still, the current price offers investors a ground-floor opportunity to invest in one of the few crypto presales with real utility. Digitap needs to capture just a fraction of a percent of the trillions of dollars in global payments to succeed.
2. Stellar’s Rails Power Remittances, but Fees Remain Sticky
Stellar (XLM) is a crypto veteran project built for financial integration. It is an open-source blockchain designed for fast, low-cost payments and cross-border transactions. Stellar’s network has been selected by traditional financial institutions like MoneyGram to assist in global on- and off-ramps. Stellar is testing upgrades to handle up to 5,000 transactions per second to support enterprise-scale workloads.
Stellar’s proven technology and the 12,000% lifetime gain in its token validate the omni-banking investment thesis. Users can turn cash into digital dollars (Circle’s USDC stablecoin) and vice versa through the MoneyGram mobile app, essentially blending traditional remittances with crypto.
The problem with Stellar’s business model is that it has no say in how a firm like MoneyGram sets fees. Traditional remittance fees cost on average 6.2% of the transfer’s total value. Coupled with high foreign exchange fees for global transfers, consumers can certainly move their money quicker but at too high a cost.
To be clear, this is no fault of Stellar. However, platforms like Digitap, for example, can slash the remittance fee by up to sixfold to a potentially industry-leading sub-1% rate.
3. Tron’s Speed Matters, But Still Falls Short
Tron (TRX) isn’t a pure play “bank” or provider of banking services. However, it has become an industry leader for something very relevant: stablecoin transactions. In the context of omni-banking, stablecoins are vital, as they are digital dollars that people actually use for day-to-day value transfer.
Tron has evolved to become the preferred rail for moving stablecoins worldwide. Over half of Tether’s USDT supply (the largest dollar stablecoin) is used on Tron. Tron also handles more than $23 billion in USDT transactions on a daily basis.
Tron’s network is built for speed and low cost. Transaction fees on Tron come in at a fraction of a cent, while throughput is high at more than 1,000 TPS. This means sending USDT on Tron is near-instant and almost free.
Tron has positioned itself as a major player in the backbone of crypto transactions. But one thing it lacks is the advanced features of a new DeFi app that can handle fiat transactions or be used to pay for everyday items.
Omni-Banking Needs an All-in-One: Where $TAP Fits Today
The concept of omni-banking in crypto refers to breaking down the wall between crypto assets and everyday money. While Stellar and Tron deserve praise for their contribution to making it easier for people to send and receive money, they fall short of an all-in-one crypto and fiat app.
Digitap checks all the right boxes and remains mostly undiscovered among investors. Digitap is certainly making the case to be included in the list of best crypto presales for 2025.
Digitap is Live NOW. Learn more about their project here:
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin for high-level discussions on bolstering Ukraine’s defense capabilities amid stalled peace negotiations with Russia.
During a joint press conference, Merz explicitly committed to “stepping up” pressure on Moscow to force engagement in ceasefire talks, emphasizing Europe’s resolve to end the conflict—the continent’s deadliest since World War II.
Germany will collaborate with Ukraine to develop and manufacture long-range weapons domestically in Kyiv, free from Western-imposed range restrictions. This includes cruise missiles and ballistic systems, with Merz stating, “We want to enable long-range weapons… and we will not speak about details publicly but will intensify cooperation.”
He declined to confirm direct delivery of Germany’s Taurus missiles but hinted at lifting all prior limitations on supplied arms. Merz vowed to prevent the recommissioning of the Russia-Germany gas pipeline, framing it as a direct economic lever: “We will do everything… to ensure that Nord Stream 2 cannot be put back into operation.”
Berlin will ramp up financial support for Ukraine’s arms production, including drones and air defense systems, signaling a shift toward sustained industrial aid as U.S. involvement wanes under President Donald Trump.
Zelenskyy, in turn, accused Russia of deliberate stalling tactics, noting Moscow’s failure to agree on negotiation venues including rejecting a Vatican-hosted proposal and its massing of 50,000 troops near Ukraine’s Sumy region for potential “buffer zone” incursions.
He highlighted Russia’s mobilization of up to 45,000 troops monthly against Ukraine’s 25,000–27,000, underscoring the asymmetry in the ongoing front-line fighting. The Berlin meeting followed failed Istanbul talks earlier in May, where Russia delayed delivering a promised peace memorandum despite U.S. pressure for a resolution.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticized the missile production pledge as an “obstacle to peace,” while both leaders rejected Moscow’s demands, such as halting NATO expansion.
This comes as Merz, in office since early May 2025, navigates coalition tensions at home over defense spending but has earned praise abroad for his proactive stance—meeting Zelenskyy three times in under a month.
By August 2025, Merz reiterated calls for “pressure” on Russian President Vladimir Putin during talks with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, accusing him of “delay tactics” ahead of potential U.S.-brokered summits.
These developments reflect Europe’s growing role in sustaining Ukraine’s defense as the war enters its fourth year. What began as a rapid Russian advance on Kyiv has devolved into a grinding war of attrition, with Russian forces controlling approximately 20% of Ukrainian territory, primarily in the east and south.
Russian President Vladimir Putin remains committed to his strategy of outlasting Ukraine and its Western allies, claiming incremental territorial gains around 4,900 square kilometers in 2025, though independent assessments like those from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) put it at about 3,561 km².
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, meanwhile, continues to call for stronger international support, recently urging U.S. President Donald Trump to broker an end to the war, drawing parallels to recent Gaza ceasefire efforts.
The conflict shows no immediate signs of resolution, with recent escalations in aerial strikes, energy infrastructure attacks, and diplomatic maneuvering.
Casualties remain staggering: estimates suggest over 219,000 Russian soldiers killed since 2022 with 90,000-100,000 in 2025 alone, alongside tens of thousands of Ukrainian military and civilian deaths.
Both sides report high enemy losses while downplaying their own, but the war has displaced millions and caused economic devastation estimated at $1.3 trillion for Russia through sanctions and direct costs.
Russian forces have intensified combined missile and drone strikes, targeting Ukraine’s energy grid to exacerbate winter hardships. Around October 2-3: A massive barrage of 381 drones and 35 missiles hit gas extraction facilities in Kharkiv and Poltava oblasts, damaging Naftogaz infrastructure and injuring civilians, including an 8-year-old child.
Ukrainian officials described it as the largest attack of the war, aimed at disrupting heating ahead of winter 2025-2026. October 4: Shahed drones struck a civilian train in Sumy Oblast, killing one and injuring 30; agricultural warehouses storing 1,700 tons of grain were also hit.
October 5: Over 500 weapons systems containing 100,000+ foreign parts, evading sanctions targeted energy sites, causing outages for 800,000 in Kyiv power later restored.
Ukrainian countermeasures: Forces downed 50% more Shahed drones in September 2025 than August, extending “kill zones” with FPV drones up to several kilometers behind Russian lines. Ukraine has also ramped up long-range strikes on Russian oil refineries, idling nearly 40% of Russia’s refining capacity and causing gasoline shortages.
It’s 2 years since we started work on the ‘Sino Amazon and Sino Signia’ project. It’s ten months since we released the first ‘Det0xant’ tokenized artwork series as ‘merch’ to support the release of ‘.det0x’ Web 3 names.
We have learnt a lot about the whole spectrum from Cryptocurrency to Blockchain and Web 3, particularly when we read or listen to sector writers, platform commentators and journalists.
Some don’t hold crypto in any significant proportions. Neither do they own or build blockchains, they haven’t been a creator of web3 product, and they don’t generally accumulate or volume trade in digital collectibles.
Because of this, they nurture a huge gap of perception, but they are unfortunately the go-to for the web3 and cryptocurious to be taking first steps.
The whole area of tokenized artwork has come a long way. We thought we’d wade into the area of Digital Collectibles. We imagine it is time to re-examine the market, the concept of value, and where people really see it.
We’ll also highlight some pitfalls to avoid.
A random PfP image in use circa 2014, before Web 3 tokenization. Source Pinterest
The concept of OFP.
OFP stands for ‘Original Floor Price’. It’s the first price a Digital Collectible or Tokenized Product was available at.
The ‘Route To Market’ is often a determinant of what the OFP will be like. A creator can set it directly to a market like OpenSea. There are many other markets, popular ones being Magic Eden, Blur, Rarible, Nifty, Mintable, Element, OKX and Ronin.
Sometimes it can be as low as zero. This is often the case when a series is issued in special appreciation of a select network of contacts, a loyalty bonus, merch supporting the launch of another product, or a ‘pre-sale’ airdrop as a tactic to stimulate market interest.
‘Lazy Minting’ is sometimes used, particularly by outfits creating their own retail network. The collectible may be free, but the new owner will bear their own minting cost. It’s a way the series creator can limit risk while achieving adoption.
This can be important when issuing collections directly minted to Ethereum, or Ordinal collections on Bitcoin
PFPs vs Tokenized Artwork
A PFP series in Web3 refers to a collection of profile picture non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that are designed to be used as avatars on social media and other online platforms. These series often feature unique digital artworks, allowing users to express their identity and affiliation with specific communities within the NFT space.
PFP series are built on a modular framework where individual artwork options can be placed in different sections of the image. Each module (section) integrates seamlessly with each other. In some cases, they can be chosen manually by buyers on a dedicated platform, or they can be subscribed to, and are received as a random selection by an algorithm.
Tokenized Artwork are digital images in the form of jpegs, pngs or some other format. They can be a digital capture of a ‘Real World Artwork’, or it can be images manually created with the assistance of tools like Adobe Photoshop. AI generated images can be created with programs like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Dalle E, Nightcafe’s ‘Flex, Googles Image FX or Adobe’s Firefly. Some of the most complex results, like those of 9ja Cosmos come from different layers and iterations of both manual and AI tools. They are then tokenized.
The market has been gradually moving away from PFP type offerings to Tokenized Artwork, simply because ‘good’ PFP series can now be made quickly, effortlessly, and without any unique skillset. The ‘algo’ can generate thousands or even tens of thousands at the press of a button. Digital Collectible Market thrives on difficulty of production and rarity, and the age of Cryptopunks, Bored Apes and Mfers is over.
A ‘Cryptopunk’ from Larva Labs, circa 2017
Have ‘NFT’s ever been dead?
When describing ‘NFTs’ Chainlink say: ‘ERC721 (also known as NFTs) define a framework for making tokens that are unique and different from each other (hence the term non-fungible), while the popular ERC20 standard defines tokens that are “fungible”, meaning the tokens are all interchangeable and guaranteed to have the same value.’
Protocols like ERC 721 and ERC 20 on Ethereum/EVM define techniques creating tokens that can act as an ownership deed to something. They are most easily used with digital property. ERC 721 has popularly been used with Digital Collectibles while ERC 20 has more commonly been used with memecoins and celebcoins. Different Protocols have been created on other Blockchain Ecosystems, such as Ordinals and Stamps on Bitcoin, while we have Token 22 and SPL with Solana. Use of ERC 721 (also known as NFTs) isn’t confined to Digital Collectibles, and ‘tokenizing’ or ‘minting’ Digital Collectibles isn’t limited to ERC 721.
Moreover, in the initial wave of different Tokenized Digital Collectibles large numbers of people with speculating tendencies, got caught up in very unrealistic valuations for some types of Digital Collectibles particularly PfP series like Cryptopunks, Bored Apes and Mfers.
Most remarks about ‘NFT’s being dead’ are based on these ‘very unrealistic valuations’ not being sustained. They are often flippant clickbait, which neither recognises the ‘NFT’ protocol has a huge application beyond PfP series, nor recognises that artwork can be tokenized without using ERC 721.
How important is the token type being an ‘NFT’ or not an ‘NFT’?
Different protocol types suit different tokenizing/minting solutions. ERC 721 is purpose built to represent NFA’s (Non Fungible Assets). Other protocols can be used, and they don’t have to be on Ethereum.
There are several solution on other blockchains that are far more secure, and decentralized, but wallets for them can be a bit obscure and the protocol may have a handicap when it comes to adoption.
Non-Fungible means one-of-a-kind, unique and not interchangeable with other similar objects. ERC 721 enforces this condition in the token. ERC 1155 is often used for different types of Digital Collectibles, but Web 3 ‘window shoppers’ need to check that the ‘supply’ of the item is only 1.
ERC 1155 and many other protocol types can be set to a supply of any chosen number, and if other than ‘1’, the one-of-a-kind, i.e. ‘NFT’ properties are absent.
Human involvement, tech capacity, and place in ‘time’.
Much of what determines quality of ‘Digital Collectibles’, are inherited from older times. Human beings capacity for ‘collecting’ is as old as time itself. They are wrapped in nostalgia, memories and emotion.
We have antique furniture and pottery. We have memorabilia of sports and music equipment of people held in high esteem by others. We have trading card collections that remind some financially independent people of a youth, which while it seemed less secure, it was also simpler.
As villages became towns, towns became cities, cities became metropolis, and workforces became more mobile, family relationships began to contract. From extended families to nuclear families, single parent families, childless couples, and ultimately, many insular humans.
Collectibles were at least as much a social focus, and an extension of ‘self’ as they were an investment. Visitors to friends and relatives’ homes were introduced to ‘collections’ or ‘exotic features’ as a social focal point.
The digital space improved the scope for leaning on our ‘collections’ as an aspect of ‘personal branding’ and social exchange.
Vinyl gave way to CD’s DvDs and then MP3s. Then came platforms like Spotify. Cameras and Canvas gave way to Photoshop and digital cameras. Modern smartphones achieve amazing resolution and replace dedicated devices for all but high-end niche professionals.
Then came Web 3, and we now have ‘Digital Collections’ tokenized to blockchains. This offers an unparalleled secure deed of ownership to digital property.
It allows people to carry their display of collectible ‘things’ with them everywhere, and with them, the extension to a sense of personal choice, taste, lifestyle values, sense of self. Everything that makes Personal Branding. To be shown anywhere. On a phone, laptop, or event VDU and sound system.
Young people share an interest in Tokenized Artwork on an iPad
Technologies change; styles change. Things are authentic for their time. 17th century can be old by todays standards, and most agree antiquity carries value. But if a furniture piece initially thought to come from that era had work done to it in the 18th century, it is worth only a fraction of its value. 18th century is a long time ago. It takes special experts to be able to notice these things and adjust value fairly.
Web3 product is shrunk down, not into centuries but less than a decade. Much earlier work was done painstakingly by people who ‘spun up’ their own nodes, before the ‘Age of OpenSea’.
Cryptopunks, Bored Apes and Mfers each have their place in the Web 3 evolution spectrum. Similar things done later aren’t worth the same.
As Technologies improved, the difficulty with which to achieve things reduced. Complexity drives aesthetic value.
Early mints on Ethereum, before the advent of Layer 2 networks (L2s) were expensive, and efforts to tokenize frequently failed, losing minting fees.
Algorithmic activities and early AI (Large Data Model) brought unexpected results leading to high levels of manual work, both technical and artistic. Limitations in the scale of quality output, caused by failed minting losses, software tool challenges, and more intense labour compared to latest standards, underpin the value of successful pieces.
Is the golden age of creating new ‘valuable’ Digital Collectibles gone forever?
No, but special measures need to be taken to give Digital Collectibles their potential for ‘value’ in an age of more reliable, cheaper and faster tokenizing options, automated retail network options, plus quicker and simpler tools, particularly AI tools. It also helps if the market can see ‘investment of self’ in the product:
What’s the story, Morning Glory?
Digital Collectible series with a good backstory, links to individuals or notoriety, and/or an anchor in other products from the same stable bring something different to something that just says ‘Buy from my series’.
The Sino Amazons by 9ja Cosmos carry a deep narrative about a group of female maritime warriors who terrorized the East Coast of Asia between approximately 1100 and 1700 AD.
Diverse discovery routes
The more platforms, networks, communities, websites and other avenues through which a series can be discovered, the better.
Product Ecosystem and Loyalty Programs
‘Collecting’ from businesses, brands, or movements, who have a ‘build out’ into different segments of Web3 has far more promise than collecting single Digital Collectibles from random project creators.
They may be ‘into’ their own retail networks, web 3 names/domains, web3 gaming, tokenizing event passes/access, tokenizing online business ownership… (inexhaustible list).
Anon’s Skulls were issued as a series intended to have earning potential
The more ‘build out’ and tendency towards a diverse (Web3) Product Ecosystem, the stronger a ‘one stop shop’ phenomenon, acting as a magnet for disparate Web 3 communities, growing collateral interest in other parts of the Product Ecosystem. These also tend to be strong breeding grounds for Loyalty Programs.
Owning assets from one part of the ‘Ecosystem’ can lead to access to free airdrops, preferential positioning for new releases or VIP treatment as they extend into Web 3 partnering and collaboration.
A ‘Det0xant’ tokenized artwork, which was given as ‘merch’ with the initial offering of .det0x Web3 names
Improvements keep pace with tech advancement.
The space has moved to collapse production cost and speed delivery in a very short time. It’s important Digital Collectible products in 2025 show marked departures from those evolving between 2021 and 2023.
NSFW and Universal Content Rating
Moral Compass swings widely across the globe and what’s ‘ok’ varies widely depending on who you ask and where they are. NSFW means ‘Not Suitable For Work’. Having a USR means having a product that is universally permissible and non objectionable. It’s not a moral, but a purely pragmatic decision to restrict collecting to NSFW and USR specimens. This guarantees the specimen the widest possible reach and the lowest possible chance it will fall foul of the restrictions placed by various market networks, or social media platforms. This doesn’t apply if the collector is purchasing for private retention.
Application Application Application
The Web 3 environment brings a new dimension to Collectibles, and that’s the ability to introduce new applications to tokenized assets by giving them programmable properties. That property is highest at the root level (Blockchain) a bit lower at subsequent layers, lower still at the retail network layer, and lowest at the token itself. However, a lot depends on the token design, for example, tokens that represent ‘Handshake Names’ have huge programmability. Tokenizing Web 3 Digital Collectibles in a way that offers programmability options is a huge plus.
Collectors Instinct vs Profit Greed
An investors path in Digital Collectibles is an inheritance from older activities which are a hobby and a passion. It takes a special kind of person to become successful as a collector regardless of the collections’ focus.
Notorious collection specialists over time became very successful and have made ground breaking sales at renowned auction houses such as Christie’s and Sotheby’s
(Web3) Digital Collecting is taking this millennia old practice into the Web 3 age. To be successful, it is important a collector has long range vision, and sees value in the art of collecting as a journey, which supersedes the desire to make money. Web 3 Degens will not last and will probably fall at the first hurdle.
This profound mis-read of Digital Collectibles was probably what was responsible for the initial unrealistic highs, particularly in PfPs. Greedy people that don’t understand collecting conceptually, over extended themselves, resulting what became called a ‘crash’ and leading to uninformed statements like ‘NFTs are dead’. The reality is they fell to levels that were still an order above what they were really worth.
Summary:
You must have a keen interest in Digital Collectibles, take pride in your own collection, and develop your own story about pieces
PfP is out. Tokenized Artwork is in
Purchase from a series, not single offerings
If the protocol is not ERC 741, check that the supply is 1 (unique)
Buy close to, or on the ‘OFP’, $USD 0 – 50 for ERC 741, to $30 for others.
Look for dynamic or extended features, programmability, futureproofing, etc
Product Ecosystem is better than single project
Check that the product or ecosystem can be found in online searches where it’s mentioned, besides just the network where it is sold
*Check that it has a backstory and/or linked to other Web 3 products.
Unless purchasing something to keep, pick specimens that are universally permissible, and meet what’s requred to feature them on generic markets and write about them on typical online platforms.
