DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 364

Avalon X (AVLX) Taps Into Grupo Avalon’s Real Estate Backing — Will Bitcoin & Solana Hold Their Dominance

0

The center of gravity of the crypto market is gradually shifting to a new investment approach. While major players like Bitcoin and Solana still command market attention, a lot of retail attention is moving to product-first presales.

For instance, the Avalon X (AVLX) presale, priced at $0.005 and backed by Grupo Avalon’s near $1 billion development pipeline, is combining real estate solidity with blockchain’s access.

Experts believe that it has the potential to be one of the top blockchain real estate projects in the industry and can even defeat Bitcoin price and Solana in terms of ROI. With only 3 days left until the major price increase Avalon X presale gains traction across crypto whales.

Join the Avalon X team for a live AMA today, October 10th on their official X.

What Does the Recent Bitcoin Price Prediction Mean?

Bitcoin’s recent surge to $122k is mostly driven by massive ETF inflows and safe-haven rotations. This illustrates how deep liquidity invites staying power. CoinShares and other trackers reported record weekly ETF capital flows into digital assets, with Bitcoin leading the charge.

The sheer scale of the market cap kind of stops Bitcoin Price from getting a 100x run. For it to achieve those numbers, humongous fresh capital flows will be required. Comparatively, a new altcoin like Avalon X is much more likely to witness 50x or even 100x growth multiples.

Why is Solana Price Down Today?

Solana’s story is a bit different. Solana price USD spikes are often tied to developer momentum, low fees, and retail liquidity. SOL’s on-chain activity and daily volumes make it a favorite for traders seeking quick turnover.

However, platform speed wins rely on continued ecosystem build-out and usage. If developer sentiment or TVL lowers, SOL’s leadership can be tested. For instance, the price of the altcoin has gone down by more than 6% in the past day. It is currently traded near $219.

How is Avalon X’s Model Different?

The Avalon X crypto does something different to retain its staying power in the markets. Its AVLX coin is a real estate-backed cryptocurrency that unlocks hospitality utility, staking benefits, and is backed by Grupo Avalon’s tangible developments.

This gives the Avalon X token a real and stable backing, which is uncommon in most RWA crypto presales. It’s a token that uses blockchain technology to provide real services rather than just speculative liquidity. The capped 2B supply and burn mechanism makes it a long-term bet as well.

Moreover, today, consumer demand for travel experiences is growing. Avalon X exactly taps into this growing demand with its exclusive access and membership perks.

To market the product to the masses, Avalon X has organized two large-scale giveaways that are getting huge traction on social media. The Avalon X $1M crypto giveaway promises $100k in AVLX to ten winners, and the crypto townhouse giveaway is also up for grabs for one lucky winner. The luxury townhouse is located in the gated Eco Avalon development which has already been built. The project has introduced a referral program alongside the giveaways designed to reward community participation. Users will receive 10 bonus entries for each successful referral, along with an additional 10% in tokens, giving them even greater chances to win and earn.

Moreover, the CertiK audit and the ongoing presale success are already proving that investors have confidence in Avalon X’s product and its roadmap. The presale has already achieved more than 50% of its presale target and has sold over 30 million tokens.

Should You Go for Avalon X over Bitcoin & Solana?

Investments naturally depend on an individual’s risk appetite and goals. However, for those targeting 100x crypto coins 2025, Avalon X (AVLX) definitely makes a strong case for itself.

Moreover, with the Avalon X giveaways and the other bonuses running currently, now is the correct time to invest in the altcoin for maximizing gain potential. With only

 

Join the Community

Website: https://avalonx.io

CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/avalon-x/

Telegram: https://t.me/avlxofficial

X: https://x.com/AvalonXOfficial

AI and the Future of Trading: How AI is Changing Investment Strategies

0

Artificial intelligence has moved from a buzzword to a key focus in boardrooms. On trading floors and digital platforms, algorithms now guide how investors manage risk and find opportunities in volatile markets. Tasks that once required large analyst teams and months of modelling can now be done in real time by adaptive systems. This marks a major change in investment strategies. It creates new opportunities but also demands stronger control, transparency, and oversight.

For investors in the UK, the growth of AI-driven platforms has been particularly important. Many reviews now point to the best AI trading platform UK as those that combine powerful analytics with tools that remain simple enough for everyday use. This shows that artificial intelligence is no longer limited to hedge funds. It is now part of everyday trading.

From Spreadsheets to Self-Learning Models

For many years, traders relied on spreadsheets, indicators, and intuition. These methods worked in calm markets but often failed when conditions changed quickly. Artificial intelligence offers a different approach. It can process huge amounts of data and find patterns that people cannot see.

Modern trading models now:

  • Handle millions of market updates every second.

  • Scan news, company reports, and social sentiment for signals.

  • Adjust positions automatically as new data emerges.

This brings more speed and accuracy to trading. In the past, only large hedge funds could use such tools. Today, cloud platforms make them available to retail investors, independent traders, and even small firms. This wider access is helping level the playing field in financial markets.

Risk Management Reinvented

Volatility is a constant feature of financial markets. AI is transforming how investors deal with this challenge. Instead of relying on fixed stop-loss rules, modern systems adjust exposure continuously. Portfolio managers can view current positions in real time and also project outcomes under multiple scenarios.

The main advantages are:

  • Speed: instant reaction to sudden market shocks.

  • Accuracy: forecasts based on live probability models rather than static assumptions.

This helps investors protect capital and allocate resources more effectively. It also supports discipline during stressful times, when emotions can lead to poor choices. Investors looking to enhance their portfolio strategies can consider high-risk and low-risk investments. These approaches provide a simple framework for balancing opportunity with stability.

The Rise of AI-First Platforms

The competitive edge is shifting to platforms that put AI at the centre of their design. Investors no longer want basic charting tools. They expect predictive analytics, back-testing powered by machine learning, and alerts that adapt automatically as market conditions change.

In the UK, providers are racing to meet this demand. The strongest platforms combine advanced data processing with simple, user-friendly layouts. This balance allows professionals to test complex strategies while giving retail traders clear insights they can act on confidently. The trend is also visible in the evolution of AI crypto trading bots, which are transforming digital asset management and making automated systems accessible to a wider audience.

Beyond Prediction: Strategy Design

Artificial intelligence is not limited to forecasting. It also supports the design of new strategies. Techniques such as reinforcement learning can test thousands of ideas at once. The most effective survive while weaker methods are rejected.

For investors, this means:

  • Faster discovery of strategies with profit potential.

  • Plans tailored to specific risk preferences.

  • Less reliance on trial-and-error in live markets.

The human role becomes one of oversight. Traders decide when to follow model signals and when to apply their own judgement. This balance reduces error and allows for more consistent performance.

Challenges and Limits

AI in trading carries risks of its own. Systems may inherit bias from the data they are trained on. Some models act as black boxes, giving results without explaining the process. This lack of clarity makes regulation and auditing more difficult.

Key challenges include:

  • Overfitting to historical patterns that may not repeat.

  • Dependence on reliable internet and system infrastructure.

  • Compliance and ethical issues when algorithms operate with little human input.

Regulators in Europe and the UK are working to close these gaps. Their goal is to protect investors without slowing innovation. Rules on model transparency, fair data use, and system testing are expected to become stricter in the coming years.

The Investor’s New Toolkit

The main lesson for investors is not to fear AI but to use it wisely. Best practices involves:

  • Treating AI output as support, not certainty.

  • Combining algorithmic analysis with human judgement.

  • Choosing platforms that explain their models clearly.

This approach positions AI as a partner rather than a replacement. It extends analytical reach while leaving responsibility in the hands of the investor.

Outlook

The direction is clear. Markets are becoming faster, more connected, and shaped by intelligent systems. Investors who adapt gain an advantage through speed and stronger discipline.

As these tools develop, success will not depend on who has the biggest dataset. It will depend on who uses data in a responsible way. The most effective strategies will combine automation with human oversight, mix innovation with governance, and pair technology with skill.

AI is no longer just a feature. It is now the framework that shapes how money moves, how risk is managed, and how opportunities appear in global markets.

Google Asks Court to Allow Integration of Gemini As U.S. Antitrust Remedies Threaten Its AI Ambitions

0

Google is mounting a fierce defense in court to prevent sweeping restrictions that could limit its dominance in search and curb its expansion into artificial intelligence.

The company, already found guilty of monopolizing the search market, is now fighting to ensure new court-ordered remedies do not undermine its efforts to integrate its Gemini AI app with other Google services such as YouTube and Maps.

At a hearing in Washington on Wednesday, Google attorney John Schmidtlein urged U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta not to impose restrictions that would prevent the company from bundling Gemini with its most popular apps. Schmidtlein argued that the court should treat AI differently from search, warning that overly broad remedies could stifle innovation in an emerging market.

“Maps and YouTube aren’t monopoly products,” he told the court. “There’s no notion that Google has to date gained monopoly or market power” in AI.

Judge Mehta, however, expressed skepticism, pointing out that requiring device manufacturers to install Gemini as a condition for accessing YouTube and Maps could give Google undue leverage—similar to the tactics that once allowed it to dominate search distribution channels.

“That leverage,” Mehta said, “could recreate the same kind of dominance we are trying to correct.”

The hearing is part of the remedies phase of a landmark antitrust case in which Mehta ruled last year that Google unlawfully maintained its monopoly in online search. The Justice Department had accused the company of using exclusionary contracts with device makers, browser vendors, and carriers to make Google the default search engine on billions of devices. Those deals, the DOJ argued, shut out rivals such as Microsoft’s Bing and DuckDuckGo by denying them crucial distribution channels.

In his ruling, Mehta agreed with the DOJ, concluding that Google’s dominance was preserved not by superior products but by restrictive agreements that made competition nearly impossible. The case, filed under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, became the most significant U.S. antitrust challenge since the government’s action against Microsoft in the late 1990s.

Now, with the court preparing its final order on remedies, the Justice Department is pushing for broad measures to restore competition. These include ending Google’s exclusive distribution agreements, forcing it to share parts of its search index and user-interaction data with competitors, and requiring it to open up its search advertising services to other firms. The DOJ has also proposed barring Google from tying or conditioning the use of one of its services—like Search, Chrome, or Assistant—to access to another, such as Gemini or Maps.

More controversially, the government has suggested potential structural remedies if behavioral ones prove insufficient, including the divestiture of Google’s Chrome browser or portions of its Android operations. Justice Department lawyers argue that breaking up parts of Google may be the only way to ensure lasting competition in digital search and advertising.

Google has strongly opposed those ideas. The company insists that such drastic remedies would “hold back American innovation at a critical juncture,” especially as it seeks to expand its investments in AI. Executives argue that forcing data-sharing or unbundling could amount to a “de facto divestiture” that would weaken incentives for product improvement and research. They also maintain that Gemini’s integration into its services is comparable to Microsoft’s use of CoPilot in its Office products—a natural evolution of its technology rather than a monopolistic maneuver.

In September, Mehta declined to force Google to divest Chrome or Android, rejecting the DOJ’s most aggressive proposals. However, he did impose a series of behavioral and structural constraints aimed at preventing Google from repeating its past conduct. These include banning exclusive contracts involving Search, Chrome, Assistant, or Gemini; mandating data-sharing arrangements to allow rival search engines to compete; and prohibiting Google from tying the licensing of one product to the distribution of another.

In issuing the remedies, Mehta acknowledged the challenge of regulating in the age of generative AI, describing the task as “looking into a crystal ball and trying to predict the future.” The judge noted that while the court’s goal is to restore competition, it must avoid stifling technological progress in an emerging industry.

For Google, the battle is about more than legal compliance—it is about survival in its current form. The company is fighting to remain whole and to preserve its ability to innovate across its ecosystem. Its legal team has positioned AI as a separate market that should not be constrained by remedies designed for search. The company is also seeking to delay or soften some of the new behavioral restrictions through appeals and ongoing negotiations.

The Justice Department, however, views Google’s arguments as part of a broader strategy to maintain dominance under the guise of innovation. Officials have warned that without strict limits, Google could replicate its monopoly power in the AI market, using its vast distribution network to push Gemini ahead of competitors.

BYD’s U.K. Sales Surge 880% as Chinese EV Giant Strengthens Global Expansion

0

Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer BYD recorded a massive surge in U.K. sales last month, selling 11,271 cars — an 880% year-on-year increase, the company announced on Monday.

The jump solidifies the United Kingdom as BYD’s largest market outside China, underscoring the company’s accelerating global footprint despite intensifying scrutiny of Chinese EV makers in Europe.

The automaker said total sales in the U.K. so far this year have crossed 35,000 units, giving it a 2.2% market share year-to-date. The performance marks a milestone for BYD, which started as a mobile phone battery manufacturer before transforming into the world’s largest EV producer by volume.

Affordable EVs Drive Growth

BYD’s success in the U.K. has been fueled by the company’s strategy of offering lower-priced electric vehicles compared to Western competitors. Its Dolphin compact EV, which starts at just over £26,000 ($34,900), undercuts Tesla’s Model 3, priced at around £40,000, by nearly one-third. The company’s hybrid SEAL U DM-i and fully electric SEALION 7 were among its best-selling models in September, appealing to cost-conscious consumers seeking performance and value.

In addition to its growing retail presence, BYD recently opened a battery service facility in the U.K., primarily to support its electric bus operations, reflecting its commitment to deeper local integration.

Policy Boost and Market Trends

The U.K.’s broader EV market also experienced a strong month. According to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales rose 29.1% year-on-year to 72,779 units in September, following the reintroduction of an EV purchase grant in July aimed at boosting adoption.

However, the incentive excluded Chinese EV brands, a move widely interpreted as a protectionist measure amid growing trade and security tensions between London and Beijing.

European Expansion Gains Pace

Beyond the U.K., BYD’s success in Europe has been equally striking. The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) reported that BYD’s sales across Europe rose more than 200% year-on-year as of August, while Tesla’s European deliveries dropped by 36% over the same period.

The surge places BYD among the most formidable challengers to established Western automakers, particularly as it expands its network across key European markets, including Germany, France, and Norway. The company has also announced plans to build a major manufacturing plant in Hungary, further embedding itself within the continent’s auto supply chain.

Domestic Slowdown and Stock Movement

Despite its global gains, BYD recently reported its first year-on-year decline in deliveries in China in 2025, with volumes falling nearly 6%. Analysts attribute the dip to intensifying domestic competition from rivals such as Li Auto, Nio, and Xpeng, along with price wars triggered by Tesla’s continued markdowns in the Chinese market.

Even so, BYD remains China’s best-selling car brand overall, a position it achieved last year by overtaking Volkswagen in total vehicle sales.

Following Monday’s announcement, BYD’s shares slipped 1.3% in Hong Kong trading, as investors weighed the company’s slowing domestic growth against its expanding global market dominance.

Industry observers say BYD’s performance in the U.K. and Europe highlights how Chinese automakers are redefining the global EV industry, leveraging scale, affordability, and strong battery technology to capture markets once dominated by Western firms.

While China’s EV sector faces trade barriers and potential tariffs from the European Union’s ongoing anti-subsidy probe, BYD’s surge in U.K. sales underlines a growing appetite among European consumers for cheaper, high-quality electric cars — even amid geopolitical headwinds.

BYD’s international push and its success in the U.K. signal a broader shift in the balance of power in the global auto industry — one in which Chinese automakers are no longer niche players but central competitors shaping the future of mobility.

U.S. Regulators Open Federal Investigation Into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving System After Dozens of Reported Safety Incidents

0

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has opened a sweeping federal investigation into potential safety defects in Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, also known as Full Self-Driving (Supervised), after a growing number of crashes and traffic violations allegedly linked to the technology.

According to the NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI), the probe follows 44 reported incidents in which Tesla vehicles using FSD were said to have run red lights, veered into oncoming traffic, or committed other unsafe maneuvers that led to collisions, some resulting in injuries. The agency’s preliminary evaluation, made public Thursday, will cover an estimated 2.88 million Tesla vehicles equipped with either FSD (Supervised) or FSD (Beta).

The NHTSA said it aims to determine whether Tesla’s system provided “adequate warning or sufficient time for the driver to respond to unexpected behavior” and whether its cameras and sensors are capable of correctly detecting lane markings, wrong-way signs, and traffic lights. The review will also assess how the FSD system communicates warnings to drivers and whether those alerts are sufficient for safe supervision.

Even with FSD engaged, Tesla requires a human driver to remain alert and ready to take control at any time — a stipulation that federal regulators say is essential to avoid fatal errors. However, drivers have repeatedly reported instances in which FSD appeared to misread intersections, misjudge other vehicles’ movements, or fail to recognize road hazards.

Tesla has not commented on the new probe, though the company released an updated FSD version 14.1 this week, part of ongoing refinements to the semi-automated system that remains central to CEO Elon Musk’s vision for the future of driving. Musk has long promised that Tesla’s vehicles would eventually operate as fully autonomous “robotaxis”, capable of generating revenue for owners while they sleep or travel.

That vision, however, remains elusive. Tesla has since informed customers that full autonomy will require both software and hardware upgrades, undercutting earlier claims that existing cars could achieve full self-driving through software updates alone.

The new investigation comes at a time when the industry remains divided over the best path to achieving safe autonomous driving — the use of cameras versus LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging).

Tesla’s approach relies entirely on camera-based vision and neural networks, with Musk frequently dismissing LiDAR as “a fool’s errand” and “a crutch” for developers who, in his view, do not trust computer vision enough. He has argued that human drivers rely solely on visual perception, not laser sensors, so a camera-based AI should eventually be capable of outperforming people on the road.

However, many autonomous driving firms, including Waymo (Alphabet’s self-driving unit) and Cruise, continue to use LiDAR — a laser-based system that builds detailed 3D maps of the vehicle’s surroundings — in combination with radar and cameras. These companies argue that LiDAR provides superior depth perception, distance accuracy, and reliability in poor lighting or weather conditions, areas where camera-only systems have struggled.

Notably, while both technologies have faced challenges, LiDAR-based autonomous vehicles have been involved in far fewer reported safety incidents than Tesla’s camera-only models. Analysts say this reinforces the case for using multi-sensor systems until camera-based AI can consistently match human perception under all driving conditions.

Tesla’s latest regulatory trouble also coincides with continued budget cuts at NHTSA, part of a broader downsizing ordered by President Donald Trump in February to reduce the federal workforce. The cuts reportedly affected several key divisions, including the autonomous vehicle oversight unit, limiting the agency’s resources for comprehensive field investigations.

Despite that, the launch of this new FSD probe signals that regulators remain vigilant as Tesla continues to push the boundaries of driver-assistance technology. The findings could have significant implications for Musk’s long-promised robotaxi rollout and for the broader debate over whether full self-driving cars should rely on cameras, LiDAR, or a hybrid of both.

If the agency determines that FSD poses systemic safety risks, Tesla could face mandatory recalls, new operational restrictions, or further scrutiny of its marketing claims — especially its use of the term “Full Self-Driving,” which many regulators and safety advocates argue is misleading.

For now, the probe adds to growing questions over whether Tesla’s vision-only strategy can safely deliver on its promise of autonomy — or whether, in the race to eliminate human error, it has introduced new dangers of its own.