DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3777

Nigeria Approves N5.1 Billion for TETFund National Research Fund

0

The Federal Government of Nigeria has greenlit the disbursement of N5.1 billion for the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) National Research Fund 2023 Grant Cycle. 

This substantial research grant is designed to allocate funds to researchers addressing critical areas of the economy and the welfare of Nigerians. 

The approval was announced by the Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman, following the comprehensive report submitted by the TETFund National Research Fund Screening and Monitoring Committee (NRFS&MC).

Prof. Mamman elaborated on the allocation of the approved sum, delineating the distribution for various thematic areas. Notably, N3.78 million is allocated for the Science, Engineering, Technology, and Innovation (SETI) thematic group, N759,875,400.00 for Humanities and Social Science (HSS), and N583,669,300.63 for Cross-Cutting (CC). Individual grants within these categories range from N8 million to over N46 million.

The Screening and Monitoring Committee, after a meticulous screening process initiated in March 2023, recommended funding for 185 research proposals out of 4,287 Concept Notes submitted by prospective applicants.

Prof. Mamman emphasized the purpose of the research grant, stating, “The National Research Fund (NRF) Grant was introduced by TETFund to encourage cutting-edge research that explores areas relevant to the societal needs of Nigeria, such as power and energy, health, security, agriculture, employment, and wealth creation, etc., in line with its mandate.”

He further highlighted the additional impetus received under the Renewed Hope Agenda, considering the NRF Grant as a vital tool to foster economic growth and enhance the standards of living for the Nigerian people.

Here are details of the approved thematic research areas that will receive funding:

Science, Engineering, Technology, and Innovation (SETI) Thematic Category:

  • Application of the hydro-biogeochemical framework to develop a national rural water quality assurance plan for sustainable water quality management in Nigeria.
  • The development and use of doubled haploid maize lines for improved maize yield and tolerance to armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).
  • The development of an intelligent multi-chamber evaporative cooling preservative system for post-harvest storage of selected fruits in Nigeria.
  • The development of electric vehicles with special tracking features, among others.

Cross-Cutting Thematic Category:

  • The utilization of scrap tires and plastic wastes as an aggregate conductive material for renewable energy storage systems.
  • Development of appropriate technology for the production of aluminum alloy sacrificial anodes for applications in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Industry.
  • Development of an economical low-voltage programmable electroporator and investigating pulse electric field for wound healing and cancer treatment.

Humanities and Social Science Category:

  • Digital financial inclusion for rural households’ consumption structure and well-being in Nigeria.
  • Creating access to library resources for students living with vision impairment in an e-learning environment in Nigerian Universities.
  • Initiatives for mitigating post-traumatic stress disorder among frontline Nigerian Army Personnel using stress inoculation therapy, among others.

This significant investment in research is said to reflect Nigeria’s commitment to advancing knowledge, fostering innovation, and addressing societal challenges for the betterment of its citizens.

Vanguard making a “terrible” mistake by ignoring the potential of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies – Cathie Wood

0

Cathie Wood, the founder and CEO of Ark Invest, has criticized Vanguard’s decision to block its clients from investing in Bitcoin ETFs. In a recent interview, Wood said that Vanguard was making a “terrible” mistake by ignoring the potential of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. She argued that Bitcoin was not only a store of value, but also a catalyst for innovation and social change.

Vanguard announced last week that it will not offer its customers access to Bitcoin ETFs, citing regulatory uncertainty and high volatility. This decision comes as a surprise to many investors who were hoping to gain exposure to the cryptocurrency market through a regulated and low-cost vehicle. Vanguard’s move is also in contrast to other major players such as Fidelity and BlackRock, who have expressed interest in launching their own Bitcoin ETFs or have already filed applications with the SEC.

Vanguard’s spokesperson said that the firm is “always evaluating new products and services based on client demand, but we have no plans to offer a Bitcoin ETF at this time.” The spokesperson added that Vanguard believes that “Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are highly speculative and do not meet our long-term investment criteria.” Vanguard also warned its customers about the risks of investing in unregulated and volatile assets, saying that they “could lose a substantial portion or even all of their investment.”

Vanguard’s stance on Bitcoin ETFs is likely to disappoint some of its customers who are looking for more diversification and innovation in their portfolios. However, the firm may also be trying to protect its reputation and avoid potential legal troubles, as the SEC has not yet approved any Bitcoin ETFs in the US and has repeatedly raised concerns about fraud, manipulation, liquidity, and custody issues. Vanguard may also be waiting for more clarity and stability in the cryptocurrency market before making any moves.

Vanguard’s decision to deny its customers access to Bitcoin ETFs may have an impact on the overall demand and price of Bitcoin, as well as on the prospects of other Bitcoin ETFs that are seeking approval from the SEC. However, it is not clear how significant this impact will be, as Vanguard’s customers may still be able to access Bitcoin through other platforms or products, such as Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust or Coinbase’s exchange. Moreover, Vanguard’s position may change in the future if the regulatory environment and the market conditions improve.

Wood said that Ark Invest was one of the first asset managers to embrace Bitcoin and allocate a portion of its funds to the digital asset. She said that Ark Invest had benefited from the strong performance of Bitcoin, which had outperformed most traditional assets in the past decade. She also said that Ark Invest had witnessed the growth of the Bitcoin ecosystem, which included various applications and services that leveraged the blockchain technology.

Wood said that Vanguard was missing out on a huge opportunity by denying its customers access to Bitcoin ETFs. She said that Bitcoin ETFs were a convenient and low-cost way for investors to gain exposure to the cryptocurrency market, without having to deal with the technical and regulatory challenges of buying and storing Bitcoin directly. She said that Bitcoin ETFs were also a way to diversify one’s portfolio and hedge against inflation and currency devaluation.

Wood said that Vanguard’s decision was based on a lack of understanding and vision. She said that Vanguard was still stuck in the old paradigm of investing, which focused on traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, and commodities. She said that Vanguard was ignoring the fact that Bitcoin was a new asset class, with unique properties and advantages. She said that Bitcoin was more than just a digital currency, but also a network, a protocol, and a platform for innovation.

Wood said that she hoped that Vanguard would reconsider its decision and allow its customers to access Bitcoin ETFs in the future. She said that she believed that Bitcoin was here to stay, and that it would continue to grow in value and adoption. She said that she was confident that Bitcoin would eventually become a mainstream asset, and that it would transform the world of finance and beyond.

Crowdfunding for kidnapping is not a solution in Nigeria

0

In recent times, there has been a disturbing trend of people using online platforms to raise money for illegal and immoral activities, such as kidnapping, extortion, and ransom. These people claim that they are acting in the name of justice, revenge, or self-defense, but in reality, they are violating the law and the human rights of their victims.

Kidnapping is a serious crime that carries severe consequences. It is not a joke, a prank, or a form of entertainment. It is a violent act that causes physical and psychological harm to the kidnapped person and their loved ones. It also creates fear and insecurity in the society and undermines the rule of law and the social order.

Crowd funding for kidnapping is not a solution to any problem. It is a problem in itself. It is an unethical and irresponsible use of technology and social media. It exploits the generosity and sympathy of unsuspecting donors, who may not be aware of the true nature and purpose of the campaign. It also encourages more people to engage in criminal behavior, thinking that they can get away with it or even profit from it.

Kidnapping is the act of taking someone away by force or deception, without their consent, and holding them in a place where they are not free to leave. Kidnapping can be done for various reasons, such as ransom, extortion, human trafficking, terrorism, or revenge. However, no matter what the motive is, kidnapping is a violation of human rights and dignity.

The legal penalties for kidnapping vary depending on the jurisdiction, the circumstances of the case, and the harm done to the victim. However, in most countries, kidnapping is considered a felony that can result in long prison sentences, fines, or even death penalty. For example, in the United States, federal law defines kidnapping as a crime punishable by up to life imprisonment or death if the victim is killed or seriously injured. In addition, state laws may impose additional charges and penalties for kidnapping.

Besides the legal consequences, kidnapping also has moral implications. Kidnapping causes physical and psychological harm to the victim and their loved ones. It deprives the victim of their freedom, autonomy, and security. It also violates the social contract and trust that underlie a civilized society. Kidnapping is an act of violence and injustice that cannot be justified by any reason.

Therefore, kidnapping is a serious crime that carries severe consequences. It is not only illegal but also immoral. If you are tempted to kidnap someone, you should reconsider your actions and seek professional help. Kidnapping is not a solution to your problems; it is a problem itself.

How can kidnapping be reduced in Nigeria?

Kidnapping is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires a holistic and coordinated approach from all stakeholders, including:

The government: The government should strengthen its security forces by providing them with adequate training, equipment, intelligence and incentives. The government should also improve its judicial system by ensuring speedy trials, fair sentences and accountability for kidnappers and their accomplices. The government should also address the root causes of kidnapping by implementing economic reforms, social policies and political dialogue.

The civil society: The civil society should raise awareness and educate the public about the dangers and consequences of kidnapping. The civil society should also advocate for the rights and welfare of kidnapping victims and their families. The civil society should also monitor and report on kidnapping cases and hold the government accountable for its actions or inactions.

The media: The media should report on kidnapping cases responsibly and ethically. The media should avoid sensationalizing or glamorizing kidnapping stories or divulging sensitive information that could endanger the lives of the victims or compromise the rescue operations. The media should also highlight positive stories of successful interventions or recoveries.

The private sector: The private sector should invest in security measures to protect their employees, customers and assets from kidnapping threats. The private sector should also cooperate with the authorities and share information on kidnapping incidents or suspects. The private sector should also support social initiatives that aim to prevent or reduce kidnapping.

The individuals: The individuals should be vigilant and cautious about their personal safety and security. The individuals should avoid traveling alone or at night, especially in high-risk areas. The individuals should also avoid flaunting their wealth or status or sharing too much information about themselves or their activities on social media or other platforms. The individuals should also report any suspicious activities or persons to the authorities or the nearest security agency.

How Money Actually Scales: Gold, USD and Bitcoin

0

Money is a medium of exchange that facilitates trade and economic activity. Money can have different forms and characteristics, such as durability, portability, divisibility, scarcity, fungibility, and acceptability. We will compare three types of money that have been used throughout history: gold, USD, and bitcoin.

Gold is a precious metal that has been used as money for thousands of years. Gold has many advantages as money: it is durable, portable, divisible, scarce, and fungible. However, gold also has some drawbacks: it is heavy, costly to store and transport, vulnerable to theft and confiscation, and subject to price fluctuations.

Moreover, gold does not scale well with the growth of the global economy and population. The supply of gold is limited by nature and mining, which means that the demand for gold can outstrip the supply, leading to deflation and hoarding. Deflation reduces the incentive to invest and spend, which can slow down economic growth and innovation.

USD is the fiat currency of the United States of America. Fiat currency is money that is not backed by any physical commodity, but by the authority and trust of the issuing government. USD has some advantages over gold as money: it is lighter, easier to store and transport, more divisible, more flexible in supply, and more widely accepted.

However, USD also has some disadvantages: it is not durable, not scarce, not fungible, and not immune to inflation. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of money over time, which reduces the incentive to save and invest. Moreover, USD is subject to political and economic risks that can affect its value and stability. For example, the US government can print more money to finance its debt or stimulate the economy, which can devalue the currency and create hyperinflation.

Bitcoin is a digital currency that was created in 2009 by an anonymous person or group using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin is based on a peer-to-peer network that uses cryptography to secure transactions and prevent double-spending. Bitcoin has some advantages over both gold and USD as money: it is durable, portable, divisible, scarce, fungible, and decentralized.

Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million units that are released at a predictable rate until 2140. This makes bitcoin immune to inflation and manipulation by any central authority. Moreover, bitcoin scales well with the growth of the global economy and population. The bitcoin network can process millions of transactions per day with low fees and fast confirmation times.

However, bitcoin also has some challenges as money: it is not widely accepted, not easy to use, not stable in value, and not environmentally friendly. Bitcoin faces regulatory uncertainty and social resistance from governments and institutions that may see it as a threat to their sovereignty and control.

Bitcoin also requires technical knowledge and skills to use safely and securely. Bitcoin users need to manage their own private keys and wallets, which can be lost or stolen if not backed up properly. Bitcoin also suffers from high volatility in price due to speculation and market forces. Bitcoin’s price can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time, which can affect its usability as a medium of exchange.

Furthermore, bitcoin consumes a lot of energy and resources to maintain its network security and consensus. Bitcoin’s energy consumption is estimated to be comparable to that of some small countries.

Money is a complex and evolving phenomenon that has different forms and functions. Gold, USD, and bitcoin are three examples of money that have their own strengths and weaknesses as a medium of exchange. Each type of money suits different needs and preferences of users depending on their goals and values. Ultimately, the best money is the one that serves the common good of humanity.

Money is a complex and evolving phenomenon that has different forms and functions

Money is a complex and evolving phenomenon that has different forms and functions. We will explore some of the main aspects of money and how they relate to the economy, society and culture.

Money can be defined as any item or record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services or repayment of debts in a given country or socio-economic context. Money can also serve as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, a store of value and a standard of deferred payment. However, these functions are not fixed, or universal, as different types of money may perform them better or worse depending on the circumstances.

One of the most common forms of money is fiat money, which is issued by a central authority such as a government or a central bank and has no intrinsic value. Fiat money derives its value from the trust and confidence that people have in the issuing authority and its ability to maintain the stability and purchasing power of the currency. Fiat money can be created or destroyed by the monetary policy of the central authority, which affects the supply and demand of money in the economy.

Another form of money is commodity money, which is based on a physical commodity that has some intrinsic value, such as gold, silver or salt. Commodity money can be used as a medium of exchange or a store of value, but it may not be very convenient or efficient as a unit of account or a standard of deferred payment. Commodity money can also be subject to fluctuations in the market value of the underlying commodity, which may affect its purchasing power.

A third form of money is digital or electronic money, which is created and stored in digital form using computers, mobile devices or online platforms. Digital money can facilitate fast and secure transactions across borders and currencies, as well as enable new forms of financial innovation and inclusion. However, digital money also poses some challenges and risks, such as cyberattacks, fraud, privacy breaches, regulation and taxation.

Money is not only an economic phenomenon, but also a social and cultural one. Money reflects and influences the values, norms and beliefs of the people who use it. Money can also affect the distribution of power and wealth in society, as well as the relationships and interactions among individuals and groups. Money can also be a source of motivation, satisfaction, conflict or stress for people depending on their attitudes and behaviors towards it.

Money is a complex and evolving phenomenon that has different forms and functions. Understanding the nature and role of money can help us make better decisions and improve our well-being.

Implications of Nigeria’s Electronic Money Transfer Levy on FCY Transactions

0

The Nigerian government recently introduced a new levy on electronic money transfers in foreign currency (FCY) as part of its efforts to boost its revenue and reduce its fiscal deficit. The levy, which took effect from January 1, 2024, imposes a 0.005% charge on all FCY transfers above $10,000, whether inbound or outbound. The levy is expected to generate about N20 billion ($48.8 million) annually for the government, according to the Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning.

However, the levy has also raised some concerns among stakeholders in the financial sector, especially those involved in cross-border transactions. Some of the implications of the levy are:

Increased cost of doing business: The levy will increase the cost of doing business for Nigerian companies and individuals that rely on FCY transfers for their operations, such as importers, exporters, remittance service providers, foreign investors, and diaspora Nigerians. The levy will also affect the competitiveness of Nigerian businesses in the global market, as they will have to factor in the additional cost of transferring funds in their pricing and profitability.

Reduced financial inclusion: The levy will discourage some Nigerians from using formal channels for their FCY transfers, as they may opt for informal or alternative methods that are cheaper or unregulated. This will reduce the level of financial inclusion and transparency in the country, as well as expose Nigerians to risks such as fraud, money laundering, and terrorism financing.

Potential breach of international agreements: The levy may contravene some of the international agreements that Nigeria is a signatory to, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) protocols.

These agreements aim to facilitate trade and integration among African countries by eliminating or reducing barriers such as tariffs, quotas, and levies. The levy may also violate some of the bilateral investment treaties that Nigeria has with other countries, which guarantee fair and equitable treatment of foreign investors.

Possible retaliation from other countries: The levy may trigger a backlash from other countries that are affected by it, especially those that have a significant volume of FCY transfers with Nigeria. These countries may impose similar or higher levies on Nigerian transfers or take other measures to protect their interests. This may lead to a trade war or a diplomatic row that could harm the bilateral relations and cooperation between Nigeria and its partners.

In conclusion, while the levy may have some benefits for the Nigerian government in terms of revenue generation, it also has some negative implications for the Nigerian economy and society in terms of cost, inclusion, compliance, and relations. Therefore, the government should reconsider the levy and explore other options that are more conducive to the development and growth of the country.

Beyond Levies, Nigeria Needs to Grow Capital to Advance