DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 418

LivLive’s AR Treasure Hunt Gives Users A Chance To Find $2.5 Million in Crypto Rewards

0

The LivLive augmented reality game layer is giving players the chance to uncover $1 million worth of $LIVE tokens hidden inside a secret virtual chamber. The $LIVE token powers the entire LivLive protocol, where users complete AR-based quests to earn real rewards.

During the presale, $LIVE tokens are trading at an effective price of just $0.0083, with the launch price offering a 30x at $0.25.

The LivLive protocol is built to fully leverage AR by combining it with blockchain technology and artificial intelligence. Blockchain ensures verifiable ownership and decentralized value, while AI personalizes experiences based on user behavior, making quests more relevant and rewarding.

The LivLive presale is now live, and every participant has a chance to unlock one of the virtual treasure chambers in the $2.5 million giveaway. One lucky player will walk away with $1 million in $LIVE tokens.

AR and Blockchain: A New Digital Frontier

Augmented reality (AR) has long been seen as a potentially revolutionary technology. As our lives become increasingly digital, it only makes sense to develop tools that merge the physical and virtual worlds.

However, several issues have prevented mainstream adoption of AR. One of the biggest obstacles has been the inability to safely store data, reward users with verifiable real-world assets, and support secure digital transactions. Blockchain technology directly addresses these problems with decentralization, transparency, and user empowerment and ownership.

LivLive is using blockchain to bring security, verifiability, and fairness into the AR space. Every action a player takes is logged on-chain, which means rewards are tied directly to their activity. This allows players to maintain ownership over their data and assets, rather than giving that power to corporations.

By combining AR and blockchain, LivLive creates immersive, reward-driven experiences. A player who completes a quest in a partnered store, for instance, might receive a real-world asset such as a product coupon or access to a live event – all verifiable and tradable on the Ethereum blockchain.

Earlier AR games like Pokémon Go showed the potential of immersive digital overlays, but they lacked the ability to provide real ecosystem value. LivLive expands this concept by adding crypto rewards and real-world asset integration, turning simple gameplay into a meaningful economic opportunity.

LivLive’s $2.5 Million Digital Treasure Hunt

The LivLive protocol is taking AR to the next level through a virtual treasure hunt. $2.5 million worth of $LIVE tokens have been hidden within the protocol, and presale players will be able to unlock digital chambers containing these rewards. One of these chambers holds a grand prize of $1 million in $LIVE tokens.

Players receive virtual NFT keys via the LivLive platform, which are used to unlock hidden treasure chambers scattered throughout the augmented reality layer. These chambers are located in both virtual locations and real-world points of interest, blending digital exploration with physical presence.

The experience feels like a true AR game. Users explore their surroundings, complete location-based quests, and search for hidden treasures using their mobile device and AR wristband.

This marks only the opening chapter of LivLive’s treasure hunt experience, with personalized and themed events set to expand the adventure. As brands and businesses harness the protocol for their own campaigns, players will encounter branded quests and ever-growing prize pools, blurring the line between play, marketing, and real-world value.

Presale Token & NFT Packs Go Live

The LivLive presale is the first opportunity that users have to join the AR world. There are five different token & NFT packs, each offering a wearable in the form of a unique smart wristband necessary to play the game, as well as $LIVE token allocations, which will grant the holder access to the currency that powers the ecosystem.

Every presale bundle includes a substantial bonus, with higher tiers delivering even greater rewards paid out in $LIVE tokens. The token’s price is set to increase by 30x from $0.0083 to $0.25 at launch.

 

Telegram

X

OpenAI Launches Sora, A TikTok-Style Social App Powered by AI Video Generation

0

OpenAI announced Sora 2, an advanced AI model for generating high-quality videos with synchronized audio, physics simulation, and consistent characters.

Alongside it, the company unveiled the Sora app, a standalone social platform designed for creating, remixing, and sharing short AI-generated videos in a vertical, swipe-to-scroll feed reminiscent of TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.

This marks OpenAI’s bold entry into social media, aiming to supercharge AI video adoption much like ChatGPT did for text-based AI. Users input text prompts to generate realistic clips up to 10 seconds in-app featuring synchronized audio, dialogue, sound effects, and lifelike movements.

Examples include beach volleyball scenes, skateboard tricks, or gymnastics routines—all fully AI-produced. Record a short video of yourself or friends once, then insert your likeness into any AI-generated scene for personalized content.

OpenAI includes safeguards like notifications for unauthorized use and stricter permissions for minors to prevent deepfakes or misuse. An algorithmic feed prioritizes creation over endless consumption—users get nudges to make videos if they’re scrolling too much.

Feeds are customizable via natural language instructions, and remixing friends’ content is encouraged. No infinite scroll for users under 18 by default. The iOS app launched invite-only in the US and Canada, with Android and global expansion planned soon.

It’s free to start, with potential charges for extra generations during peak times. ChatGPT Pro subscribers get early access to an experimental “Sora 2 Pro” version. OpenAI is positioning Sora as a direct rival to TikTok amid ongoing US regulatory scrutiny of the app’s Chinese ownership, including deadline extensions under President Trump.

A new AI video feed in the Meta AI app for short-form generated content. Google’s Veo 3: Integrated into YouTube for AI video tools. TikTok’s Approach: More cautious on AI, focusing on user-uploaded videos rather than generation.

Sora 2 can inadvertently generate videos with copyrighted elements unless opted out, raising lawsuit risks similar to past AI training ddisputes via Anthropic’s $1.5B settlement.

Deepfake potential is a flashpoint, though OpenAI emphasizes human moderators for bullying reports and revocable likeness consents. The company released a dedicated safety blog post with the announcement.

Monetization and Data relies on user data via IP, past interactions for recommendations, which can be disabled. No ads at launch, unlike TikTok’s model. This launch could redefine short-form video by making creation effortless and hyper-personalized, but it amplifies debates on AI’s role in media authenticity.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman teased it on X as “a new product that makes it easy to create, share, and view videos.” Sora 2’s ability to generate realistic videos with synchronized audio, physics simulation, and consistent characters lowers the barrier for high-quality video production.

This could democratize filmmaking but risks flooding platforms with AI-generated content, challenging platforms like YouTube and TikTok to adapt their algorithms. Sora 2’s integration of text, video, and audio generation signals a leap in multimodal AI, pushing competitors like Google’s Veo 3 and Meta’s AI tools to accelerate innovation.

Features like revocable likeness consents and notifications for unauthorized use of personal imagery aim to curb deepfake risks, but scaling moderation for a social app will test OpenAI’s safety infrastructure.

The Sora app’s emphasis on AI-generated videos could blur lines between real and synthetic content, amplifying debates about authenticity in media. The app’s Cameos feature and easy remixing could empower creators, especially non-professionals, to produce viral content.

However, an influx of AI videos risks content fatigue, as users may struggle to distinguish unique creations. Limiting infinite scroll for users under 18 and nudging creation over consumption are steps toward responsible design.

Still, the addictive potential of a swipeable AI video feed could mirror TikTok’s dopamine-driven engagement, raising concerns about screen time and mental health. Sora’s free-to-start model with potential paywalls for heavy usage challenges TikTok’s ad-driven revenue and Meta’s subscription experiments.

If successful, it could shift monetization trends toward hybrid models in social media. By simplifying video production, Sora could expand the creator economy, enabling more individuals to monetize content. However, it may devalue traditional filmmaking skills, as AI-generated videos compete with human-made ones.

Sora 2’s potential to generate copyrighted content could lead to lawsuits, similar to past AI training disputes. This may force OpenAI to invest heavily in legal defenses or licensing agreements, impacting profitability.

Sora’s launch aligns with US scrutiny of TikTok’s Chinese ownership, including deadline extensions under President Trump. A US-based alternative like Sora could gain favor with regulators and users seeking a “safer” platform, potentially accelerating TikTok’s market share loss.

TikTok’s cautious approach to AI-generated content and Meta’s Vibes launch suggest a race to dominate AI-driven social media. Sora’s first-mover advantage in seamless AI video creation could force competitors to integrate similar tools rapidly.

Sora’s focus on creation over consumption and customizable feeds sets it apart from TikTok’s passive scrolling model. Success hinges on user adoption and whether OpenAI can maintain a distinct identity.

While xAI’s Grok focuses on conversational AI and not video, Sora’s success could push xAI to explore multimodal applications to stay competitive. Other AI firms may also pivot toward social media integrations.

Sora’s launch could redefine short-form video by making AI-driven creation mainstream, challenging TikTok’s dominance and reshaping the creator economy. However, it risks amplifying deepfake concerns, copyright disputes, and regulatory hurdles. Its success depends on balancing innovation with safety, user engagement with authenticity, and global expansion with privacy compliance.

Join Tekedia AI Lab This Saturday and Build AI Agents [Video]

0

Tekedia AI Technical Lab will begin on Saturday. I just want to connect via voice. I have released two of the AI agents we will build. Others will be released later.

Link 1: WinSupport – Customer Service agent https://winsupport.zenvus.com/

Link 2: WinJob – Job & Recruitment agent https://winjob.zenvus.com/

To pick your seat and get your login, go here and register https://school.tekedia.com/course/ailab/ . Have these agents on your website!

At Tekedia Institute, we have one product and that is knowledge. Come and co-learn with us for knowledge. All programs are online based.

Apple, OpenAI Move to Dismiss Musk’s Antitrust Suit Over iPhone ChatGPT Integration

0

Apple and OpenAI are pushing back against billionaire Elon Musk’s antitrust lawsuit, telling a U.S. judge on Tuesday that their partnership is not “exclusive” and does not harm competition.

Both companies asked the court to dismiss the case, which was filed in August by Musk’s AI venture, xAI, according to Reuters.

Musk’s company is seeking billions of dollars in damages, arguing that Apple’s deal with OpenAI unfairly sidelines competitors. According to the complaint, Apple has “no reason to more prominently feature” the X app or xAI’s Grok chatbot in its App Store because of what Musk called an “exclusive” arrangement with OpenAI.

The Apple–OpenAI Deal

The disputed agreement was first announced in June 2024, when Apple revealed that ChatGPT would be integrated into its iOS, iPadOS, and macOS operating systems. The move was widely seen as Apple’s most significant push into generative AI, giving users direct access to ChatGPT within native features on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.

Musk, who owns both X (formerly Twitter) and xAI, claimed the deal effectively locked up distribution channels for consumer-facing chatbots. His lawsuit accused Apple and OpenAI of having “locked up markets to maintain their monopolies and prevent innovators like X and xAI from competing.”

Apple and OpenAI Push Back

Apple’s lawyers rejected Musk’s characterization of the deal. “Apple and OpenAI’s agreement is expressly not exclusive, and it is public and widely known that Apple intends to partner with other generative AI chatbots,” they told the court.

In a separate filing, OpenAI accused Musk of engaging in what it called “a campaign of lawfare” against the company and its flagship product. The filing noted that Musk had already launched other legal actions targeting OpenAI, including a separate case in federal court in California challenging its transformation from a nonprofit into a for-profit entity.

“Musk’s xAI has not alleged any non-speculative harm rising directly out of ChatGPT’s integration as an option for certain features on certain iPhones — and certainly not the species of unlawful, anticompetitive harm targeted by antitrust law,” OpenAI’s lawyers wrote.

Musk’s Broader Legal Offensive

The lawsuit is part of a widening legal battle between Musk and OpenAI, the company he cofounded with Sam Altman in 2015 as a nonprofit. Musk left the organization in 2018 amid disagreements about its direction, and has since become one of its fiercest critics. Last year, he sued OpenAI and Altman in California, seeking to block what he described as the improper conversion of the company into a profit-driven enterprise.

Through xAI, Musk has positioned Grok as a rival chatbot to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, but he has argued that the Apple–OpenAI deal has tilted the playing field by giving ChatGPT direct exposure to hundreds of millions of Apple device users.

At the heart of the dispute is how the integration of AI tools into consumer devices could shape competition. Apple has signaled that ChatGPT is just one of several partnerships it plans, but Musk’s complaint underscores fears that early deals between Big Tech firms and leading AI developers could entrench incumbents before rivals like xAI can scale.

The court’s decision could determine how freely Apple can strike future deals to weave AI tools into its ecosystem. However, Musk is believed to see the deal as existential to his AI ambition. His concern is whether Grok and xAI can carve out meaningful distribution and compete against ChatGPT in a market increasingly shaped by platform access.

The 9 p.m. Problem: When Everyone Streams Football and Your App Slows

0

It is always the same rhythm. A midweek kickoff, a tight scoreline, and by 9 p.m. in key markets your dashboards light up. Concurrency soars, error budgets shrink, and previously healthy APIs begin to wobble. This is not only your app. Live football clusters millions of viewers into the same 90-minute window, which amplifies the worst parts of distributed systems: head-of-line blocking, thundering herds, cold caches, and brittle dependencies that were fine at 7 p.m. but buckle at peak.

Streaming already dominates downstream traffic on fixed broadband, so when match nights land, everything adjacent to video can feel slower. The pattern is predictable and, importantly, measurable. During Euro 2024 fixtures, Cloudflare observed country-level shifts in traffic during game time, a tidy reminder that attention, and therefore network utilization, moves in bursts, not in straight lines.

This article looks at the practical mechanics behind peak-time slowdowns and what engineering teams can do about them. The goal is not to explain streaming or basic network concepts. Instead, we focus on the 9 p.m. problem as a systems issue: how to absorb spikes without degrading the rest of your experience, and how to prepare capacity, caches, and queues for the reality that live football stacks demand into tight, simultaneous peaks.

How a proxy server buys you time at peak

A well-placed proxy server is one of the most effective tools for reshaping bursty demand into something your origin can survive. Forward proxies at the client edge and reverse proxies at your application edge both change the flow of traffic in your favor. They terminate TLS, reuse connections, and keep upstream pools warm so your services do not pay a handshake tax on every new request. Connection coalescing and keep-alive tuning let a small set of long-lived sockets carry huge volumes smoothly, which reduces SYN storms that often appear when viewers resume streams after halftime or jump between highlights.

Reverse proxies (can be found on Webshare and other reliable platforms) also give you intelligent routing. With least-connections or latency-aware load balancing, you can steer traffic toward the healthiest pool and away from stragglers that would otherwise create a convoy effect. Health checks become a gate that drops bad backends quickly instead of letting them poison retries. Surge queues and circuit breakers absorb micro-bursts and allow upstreams to recover, which means fewer cascading failures when sign-in endpoints spike as viewers swap devices.

Caching is where the gains compound. A proxy server that speaks HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 can coalesce duplicate fetches and serve a single origin response to many clients, cutting origin load dramatically when thousands request the same playlist or tile image at once. For segmented video, short TTLs with request collapsing keep the hottest HLS or DASH segments close to viewers without overfilling memory.

For various APIs, tiered caches and soft-expiry hints let you return slightly stale data for non-critical UI while your origins catch up. Finally, IP reputation and simple rate shaping at the proxy reduce noisy neighbor effects from aggressive clients, keeping latency jitter low for everyone else. In short, the proxy is your first responder at 9 p.m., turning chaos into a manageable queue.

What the data says about football nights

Peak-time slowdowns are not anecdotal. Multiple datasets show how live football compresses demand and shifts behavior. The numbers below illustrate the pressure your app competes with when a big match is on.

Metric Value Why it matters
General web traffic change during Euro 2024 games ?6% average during national-team matches Attention consolidates into live viewing, which alters load on other apps and APIs
Frankfurt IXP peak on Champions League night 17.09 Tbps on Apr 18, 2024 City-scale throughput spikes during marquee fixtures
Video share of fixed downstream traffic 39% of fixed downstream, ~5.7 GB per user per day Video sets the baseline load your app must live alongside
Global Internet traffic growth in 2024 +17.2% year over year Peak problems intensify on a larger base
UK households with at least one SVOD 68% in Q1 2025 High streaming penetration raises the odds that match nights create national peaks

It is worth noting how these signals interact. Video’s heavy share of fixed traffic means the floor is already high before any match kicks off. Add a Champions League night and you get citywide throughput surges. Layer on year-over-year traffic growth and the same architecture that worked last season can run out of headroom this season. Finally, high subscription penetration means more households can switch to streams simultaneously, which tightens the concurrency spike and shortens the time you have to react.

Designing for the 9 p.m. surge

The strongest mitigation is to treat peak minutes as a first-class workload. That starts with pre-warming: scale edge instances, connection pools, and caches 30 to 45 minutes before kickoff, then throttle the ramp down slowly after final whistle to avoid a cliff when highlights or post-match clips trend. Keep autoscaling signals diverse and early, for example, concurrent connections at the edge, queue depth, and TLS handshakes, not just CPU. Shape retries with jitter and caps so a brief origin blip does not become a synchronized storm.

Euro 2024 traffic patterns showed halftime spikes in social and companion services as viewers reached for phones while the stream paused. That is a cue to prefetch critical UI, warm caches, and isolate cross-service dependencies before halftime, not after.

Treat your release cadence accordingly. Avoid pushing schema changes or big feature flags within two hours of a marquee match in your core markets. Bake synthetic load that mimics match-night behavior into staging, including rapid join and leave patterns, seek storms on VOD, and login bursts. Measure connection reuse, request coalescing hit rates, and cache effectiveness, not just median latency. When you do these things, the same infrastructure that feels fragile at 9 p.m. can feel routine.