DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4604

The Regulatory Framework Governing Foreign Bank Representative Offices in Nigeria

0

It is becoming a practice for foreign companies desirous of maintaining a representative legal presence in Nigeria without intending to immediately carry on business in the country as subsidiaries of international businesses.

These representative offices are most common in the Banking and Finance sector where they serve important purposes of showcasing their brands and services of their parent companies overseas while serving as a conduit for channeling foreign capital to investment opportunities within Nigeria. 

This article will be focused on the topics of :-

– The components of the regulatory framework governing banking/finance representative offices in Nigeria.

– The permissible and non-permissible activities of representative offices in Nigeria.

– The licensing requirements for representative offices in Nigeria.

What are the components of the regulatory framework governing representative offices in Nigeria?

Representative offices in the Nigerian Banking and Finance sector are regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Guidelines For the Regulation of Representative Offices of Foreign Banks in Nigeria. 

What is the approved definition of a representative office under the CBN Guidelines?

The Guidelines define a representative office as a liaison of a foreign bank licensed by the CBN with the aim of marketing the products and services of its foreign parent as well as serve as a liaison between its foreign payment and local banks, OFIs, private companies and the general public.

What are the permissible and non-permissible activities of Foreign Bank representative offices in Nigeria?

Permissible Activities

– Marketing products and services of its foreign parent or an affiliate of the foreign parent licensed and domiciled outside Nigeria.

– Research activities in Nigeria on behalf of its foreign parent.

– Connecting banks and OFIs to its foreign parent.

– Pursuing business opportunities for the foreign parent or affiliated institutions regarding the availability and/or syndication of foreign currency denominated loans.

Nonpermissible Activities

– Provision of services designated in Nigeria as banking business.

– Provision of any commercial or trading activity that may lead to the issuance of invoices for services rendered.

– Acceptance of orders on behalf of the foreign parent.

– Engaging in any financial transaction directly except as allowed under the guidelines.

What are the licensing requirements for setting up a representative office in Nigeria?

The requirements for setting up a licensed representative office in Nigeria are :-

The Approval-in-Principle stage

– A formal written application to the CBN.

– A “No objection/approval” letter from the home supervisory authority of the applicant company conveying consent for the establishment of the representative office. 

– The payment of an application fee of 5 Million Naira to the CBN.

– A board resolution supporting the parent company’s decision to invest in the equity shares of the proposed representative office.

– Evidence of name reservation with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).

– An interview of the promoters of the representative office with the CBN along with a presentation by the promoters to the CBN. 

– A detailed business plan/feasibility report.

– A draft shareholders agreement except where the office is 100% owned by the foreign parent bank.

The Final Approval stage

Not later than 3 months after the AIP grant, the following should be submitted to the CBN :-

  1. A written application to the CBN.
  1. Evidence of payment of a non-refundable license fee of 10 Million Naira to the CBN.
  1. A Certified True Copy of the representative office Certificate of Incorporation.
  1. A Certified True Copy of the representative office MEMART (Memorandum Articles of Association).
  1. Evidence of the office location of the representative office.
  1. Names, addresses and CVs of the representative office management staff.
  1. A schedule of changes, if any, in the board or shareholding of the representative office after the AIP grant.

This will then be followed by a pre-licensing physical inspection of the representative office.

UNICEF relief materials are not for sale

0

With so much amazement and disgust, I always see folks openly hawking around and selling United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) educational relief materials. Some traders even display it brazenly for sale in their shops. The irony is that on those materials it is boldly written; “This Item is Not for Sale”, but people will out of greed and sheer foolishness trade those materials even in the open market.

Instead of sharing it with the right people freely that it is meant to, they will rather hoard it and sell it out. This is a crime and wickedness against humanity and whenever I see this I always wonder what the law enforcement agencies are doing about it or are they not seeing it as well?

Not just school bags and notebooks that are meant for indigent school children are being sold in the open markets, also mosquito nets that are to be freely distributed and shared amongst rural dwellers and those living in mosquito-prone areas as a United Nation agency fights against malaria are also be seen in the open market being sold with the inscription “not for sale” boldly written on them.

As expected, Covid 19 relief materials were also hoarded and sold by people who were supposed to freely distribute them to their ward members during the covid 19 peak.

In October 2021, the Adamawa state government arrested ten officials and charged them to court for having hoarded and sold educational relief materials like school bags and notebooks sent by the United Nation agency that is meant for indigent school children.

For those that might be ignorant of the law, when an item it’s marked not for sale, the act of selling it amounts to stealing, and both the seller and the buyer will be held liable for theft.  The buyers and the sellers are guilty of the crime of theft so when next you see an item that is not meant to be sold, do not buy such items no matter how ridiculously cheap they are, instead notify the law enforcement authorities. How you will know such items is that “Not for Sale” will be boldly inscribed on them.

The law provides that anyone who buys an item of this nature is liable to fourteen years imprisonment for receiving stolen property as provided in the criminal code act.

 

The Eagle vs Duck Analogy: How Heuristic Creeps Into Talent Sourcing and Management

0

One of the experiences you get from using LinkedIn — other than a feeling of torment or self-persecution that sometimes accompanies seeing success stories of individuals popping up on your feeds– is that you get to learn from and share thoughts with other brilliant minds on the platform. Yes, I get that regularly, and sometimes I get inspired to post my winnings too. Of course, LinkedIn is one of the go-to-places to jolt yourself up for growth; it’s a place of many great opportunities.

The other day, I latched onto an opinion piece on LinkedIn which caught my attention. The poster, a Nigerian-American lady, leads a company in the US and has many years of recruiting experience as I discovered in her profile.

In the post, the lady declares her newly developed insights in talent sourcing and people’s management, and she claims her philosophical compass was a management nugget by Jim Rohn – Never send your ducks to eagles’ school!

Jim Rohn has used this nugget to explain the Mystery of motivation, and how managers must always take cognisance of the Mystery in people’s management. However, how this generally applies in people’s management remains a case for subjective analysis. The lady made the following remarks based on her understanding of the analogy:

‘’This lesson has guided me in my hiring decision as an executive. You don’t train people to be the best at what they do. If you want the best, you hire the best and empower them to be the best.

‘’Some organisations hire ducks expecting them to become an eagle. They invest much in training and development, hoping to turn ducks into an eagle. A duck and an eagle differ in motivation, drive and attitude. These are qualities that you can’t reach’’ she said.

At my first assessment of the foregoing proposition, I could only think of heuristic and how this has influenced many recruitment decisions in corporate management.

To start with, how do you distinguish an eagle from a duck in the recruitment process? If you only work with certain values in mind, you may be dealing with a parrot or a dove or a crow or a chicken without even realizing this. In this article, it has been shown how incompetent leadership has been encouraged due to emphasis on traits such as confidence, overbearance, masculinity, self-promotion, impetuousness etc over empathy, humility and courteousness.

But of course, my rejoinder to the post was not based on that line of thought. I’d rather consider the subject from a structural functionalist perspective.

My point is this: I’d rather have fewer eagles than ducks, and as a leader, I shouldn’t be bothered about having to turn a duck to an eagle since both have their unique purposes to fulfil within the corporate system, one handling strategic decisions and the other dealing with the operational routines.

I believe an organisation that hopes to have steady growth as well as stability would endeavour to not make the mistake of having more eagles than ducks or solely eagles. I came to this realization a long time ago after observing the inclination of the eagles towards office politics compared to the ducks. My experience informed my second book, Moral Licensing Syndrome: How Your Category-Best Employees Can Endanger Your System.

Eagles are highly expensive to maintain, they rarely can be domesticated and they’d often find it condescending doing the routines which are best suited for the ducks. Also, due to their high competitiveness, eagles are more calculative, self-serving and fleeting, hence, their loyalty is seldom guaranteed.

The self-serving and fleeting proclivity of the eagle is further explained here by Dharmesh Arora, regional CEO of Asia Pacific at German manufacture Schaeffler having understood in the hard way  why it’s no use trying to keep a star-performer who’s already decided to move on.

On the other hand, the only way ducks compensate for their shortfall against the eagles is loyalty. Generally, ducks appear weak not because of a lack of talent but because of low self-esteem resulting from lack of self-awareness and poor exposure. When you train and motivate them enough, the result is often magical.

How Business Managers Can Recognise and Deal with Hubris

0

Hubris has been identified as one of the early signs of a weak corporate leadership or a business waiting to fail. Hubris almost invariably morph into greed, accelerating the downward slope of the business growth curve. Many businesses that have moved from top quintile of economic profit to struggling underdogs and from bankruptcy to extinction have been found to exhibit these two characteristics.

Hubris is the feeling of overconfidence or excessive pride usually resulting from the savour of previous achievements. At the highest level of hubris is a winning obsession or a wanton desire for more. Hubris inspires heuristic, experience bias and self-serving bias which often lead one to take excessive, uncalculated risks.

For example, when a manager or an executive thinks their domain-knowledge and professional experience always gives them an edge to make better strategic risks and financial decisions than their peers or subordinates, such executive may be said to be suffering from hubris.

Placing emphasis on short-term gains over long-term benefits is a notorious reinforcer of the tendency for hubris and greed among top executives. Studies have shown that some organizations would rather promote opportunistic pursuit of strategies that were based on self-interest if that translates to short-term monetary gains or quick profit that can easily impress shareholders or stockholders.

Even though, in some cases, appeal to self-interest may be useful to motivate managers to improve performance, excessive self-interest culminating into greed has never been the best option for organizational growth.

“Our system has fallen into self-reinforcing command loop constructs as follows; increase shareholder value at all costs without regard for the human factor. Sadly if you do not cure the cancer in the root of the tree, not only will the branches and the leaves die; but so will the tree” — Richard Branson.

Analysts have suggested that greed would invariably result from self-interest when an increase in executive benefits exceeds the marginal returns provided to shareholders and to society at large. In fact, studies have shown that many acquisition decisions made by managers with hubris have not only failed to produce higher performance or better integration of the companies but have also led to losses in shareholder value due to excessive premiums.

In his book, How the Mighty Fall, Jim Collins presents five stages of organizational decline; hubris and greed constitute the foundation of his organizational decline unsurprisingly. The book which explores many great companies, specifically in the US and Europe, that have suffered a great setback or completely gone into extinction describes declining companies to exhibit the following pattern:

Hubris born of success — Undisciplined pursuit of more — Denial of risk and peril — Grasping for salvation — Capitulation to irrelevance or Death

On avoiding the hubris, some set of behaviours must be exhibited. According Jim Collins, the opposite of those behaviours are what reinforces hubris in corporate management. These behaviours include the following:

  1. Avoiding success entitlement or arrogance
  2. Always having the why (purpose) of your business in mind
  3. Constantly reinvigorating your flywheel or building incremental momentum
  4. Keeping a curious mind and always open to learning opportunities
  5. Willingness to appreciate the role of luck in business success

Paxful Announce increment On Its Processing Fees

0

Paxful, a centralized peer-to-peer exchange for buying, selling, and trading digital currencies has announced plans on increasing processing fees on it protocol. A statement from Paxful reads;

As of December 15th (UTC 12:00), we will be increasing the escrow fee on gift cards (from 4% to 5%) and bank transfers (from 0.5% to 1%). This was not an easy decision but it is in the best interest of the platform.

Meanwhile, in a letter to Investors, Ray Youssef, Paxful’s CEO claim, “I’m responsible for the Bitcoin of over 11 million people. I take great pride in protecting our community’s funds and, unlike others in our industry, I have never touched our customers’ money.”

My sole responsibility is to help and serve you. That’s why today I’m messaging all of our users to move your Bitcoin to self-custody. You should not keep your savings on Paxful, or any exchange, and only keep what you trade here.

Why? For far too long people have trusted others to hold money on our behalf but—like we saw with the banks in 2008 and recently with FTX—you’re at the mercy of these custodians and their morals.

However, Bitcoin has given us the chance to finally be in control and we must take it. Rest assured, if you do wish to keep your Bitcoin on Paxful, your funds are safe with us but remember—only keep what you want to trade, Ray noted.

When buying cryptocurrency from another user on Paxful, you are buying at a rate set by the sellers themselves. These rates vary based on numerous factors such as your verification status, payment method, currency pair (such as USD, EUR, CNY), and order size.

Escrow amount is deducted from your Paxful Wallet at the beginning of the trade. Upon successful completion of the trade, Paxful receives the escrow fee. If the trade is not completed, the cryptocurrency is released from escrow back to the cryptocurrency seller—Paxful takes no fee.

Paxful, has recorded tremendous growth in Africa notably; Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana, where there is a rising number of unbanked people who source for decentralized ways of processing payments.