DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4674

Using Shadowgraph, Vanguard Newspaper is Redefining Cartoon as a Sociopolitical Object

0

Vanguard is one of Nigeria’s oldest surviving newspapers. In 1983, Sam Amuka-Pemu and three friends founded the newspaper. According to reports, the newspaper first appeared on newsstands in 1984. Vanguard is one of the national newspapers that uses the Internet to reach millions of readers, in line with the expected transformation of businesses based on emerging technologies.

According to our analyst’s observations of technology adoption, Vanguard has converged and continue to converge with technologies such as social and immersive interactive media with the intention of creating and disseminating valuable socioeconomic and political content through various forms of reporting.

Cartoons are another way that the newspaper, like other independent newspapers, uses a humorous approach to report socioeconomic and political challenges in addition to using news and editorial formats. Cartoons are frequently used to critique issues when news reports fail to elicit the desired responses or actions from concerned parties.

According to science “the modern comic strip dates from the late 19th century, when artists such as Rudolph Dirks, inventor of the Katzenjammer Kids, began drawing them for American newspapers; and the animated cartoon was born in 1907, when French artist Émile Cohl began drawing people and other images directly onto movie film.”

As previously stated, cartoons are now primarily used in newspapers to convey political commentary and editorial opinion, and in magazines to convey social comedy and visual wit. Since the emergence of cartoons as a format for reporting events, academics and independent researchers have studied them in order to uncover the social and political implications of the themes cartoonists communicated.

Some previous studies that used Vanguard cartoons revealed how the newspaper used them (cartoons) to establish power imbalance and government neglect. The cartoons in Vanguard have also highlighted various forms of corruption, insecurity, hunger, violence, theft, and other social vices.

Who is in the shadowgraph?  

Meanwhile, our analyst concluded that the newspaper is redefining the use of cartoon as a sociopolitical object after several days of observing the newspaper’s Facebook page with a specific interest in how the newspaper curated people’s lives and/or activities using shadowgraph. This is based on the fact that every day, shadow images of prominent people such as politicians, business leaders, and celebrities are created and shared with millions of readers.

The Vanguard newspaper frequently publishes brief messages that provide hints about the subjects of the shadow images. In other instances, the Facebook page post series’ title, GUESS WHO, is written without any indication of the person in the image. According to our analyst, this examines the readers’ psychological makeup and mental acuity.

Following readers’ interactions with the images for ten days revealed that many newspaper readers correctly identified the people in the images. The readers also have a tradition of outlining persons’ prior good and bad deeds. When the individuals are well-known politicians, the bad behaviour is quickly exposed. When the people are celebrities, the good deeds are highlighted the most.

Our analyst concludes from these observations that Vanguard is curating people’s lives and inspiring readers to curate the past and discuss it in light of current realities.

Hedera (HBAR), Orbeon Protocol (ORBN), and TRON (TRX) – 3 new projects that investors are swarming

0

The Orbeon Protocol (ORBN) presale is attracting attention from investors, with ORBN already selling out during the first part of the presale. Apart from Orbeon Protocol, investors should keep an eye on TRON (TRX) and Hedera (HBAR).

>>BUY ORBEON TOKENS HERE<<

Hedera (HBAR)

Hedera’s price has had some severe issues in recent months. Despite launching some highly anticipated use cases, the 50 billion token maximum supply continues to keep Hedera’s price low.

Users must purchase the Hedera (HBAR) cryptocurrency to conduct transactions and run applications on the Hedera (HBAR) Hashgraph network.

The HBAR token has a fixed supply of 50 billion. Some Hedera (HBAR) tokens will be distributed via “proxy staking,” a process that allows Hedera (HBAR) holders to lock their cryptocurrency in special contracts by allocating those funds to one of the network’s approved nodes.

Another factor limiting Hedera’s price growth is the high level of competition. The project effectively competes with public Layer-1 projects like Ethereum and Solana and private chains like Corda. Hedera faces stiff competition in gaining market share. 

TRON (TRX)

TRON (TRX), a crypto asset with lofty aims for a completely decentralized network, has aroused considerable interest since its debut. This implies that TRON was able to turn a considerable percentage of that interest into market value over time.

TRON is now trading at about $0.0499 – but how far can TRON go? Could it soon aim for $1?

There has recently been a lot of buzz regarding TRON. Investors and the media have been quite interested in the coin. Second, the TRON crew is highly ambitious. They intend to construct a decentralized internet and are working hard to achieve this goal.

Third, the underlying technology of TRON is highly novel. It could change how content providers are compensated for their efforts. Finally, people are investing so heavily in TRON that its market cap exceeds that of specific large cryptocurrencies like Ethereum Classic (ETC). Considering all of these factors, it appears that TRON could reach $1 within the next decade.

Orbeon Protocol (ORBN)

Orbeon Protocol (ORBN), built on top of the Ethereum network, employs fractionalized NFTs to tokenize equity in early-stage firms. This means that anyone can participate on Orbeon Protocol (ORBN) and engage in a range of initiatives without putting up a large sum of money.

Startups seeking to raise funding on the ORBN platform are issued as fractionalized, equity-based NFTs. Ordinary investors can buy these for as low as $1, making it a viable fundraising vehicle for both sides. Because smart contracts power everything, the process is streamlined and efficient. The smart contracts will repay investors if a project fails to meet its financial target.

The ORBN token drives the Orbeon Protocol (ORBN) platform. ORBN provides many perks, including first access to new projects on the platform, the chance to vote on the network’s direction, and the option to generate passive income through staking.

The Orbeon Protocol presale is a generational investment opportunity with far more upside than most projects, and the market recognizes this — analysts have already forecasted that the value of ORBN will rise by 6,000% just during the presale.

 

Find Out More About The Orbeon Protocol Presale

Website: https://orbeonprotocol.com/

Presale: https://presale.orbeonprotocol.com/register

Telegram: https://t.me/OrbeonProtocol

BBC Focus on Africa as a Socio-Political Object

0

BBC Focus on Africa programme is produced and distributed by the British Broadcasting Corporation via traditional and new media platforms. Traditional media platforms include traditional radio and television stations, whereas new media channels include social networking sites, podcasts, and websites in multiple languages. The programme is an object because it allows Africans to tell their stories personally in some cases and employees of the corporation in the majority of cases. It continues to be a platform where ordinary and powerful Africans negotiate various topical issues in order to develop and sustain ways of being. The subjects of discourse (people, policies, needs, daily experiences) are typically scrutinized by state and non-state actors as they negotiate and construct identities as exemplified by Annette Markham.

In other words, to find a strong foundation for better ways of being in the areas of social, economic, and political development, there are always elements of knowledge and power relationship from different content being produced and disseminated to the audience.

In the following section, I presented my thoughts after deconstructing a recent article about how the programme is produced and perceived by the public, particularly political stakeholders in Africa.

After reading the passage, I realized that the author wants readers to understand the significance of the BBC Focus on Africa programme. Throughout the passage, BBC Focus on Africa is presented as an object and a tool for reporting on Africa’s socioeconomic and political development. According to the author’s analogical approach to presenting the corporation in relation to the continent’s socioeconomic and political peculiarities, it is an object because the corporation (BBC) intends to tap into the continent’s human resources for content production while also partnering with some established media organizations through the programme.

In my opinion, pursuing these is beneficial. However, the programme remains a tool with the goal of reporting development and exposing some challenges through the use of African talent in London. This is an example of reemphasising colonial authority over the continent. In this regard, the author reintroduced Western imperialism into the discussion of the programme’s importance to Africa. The submission at one point in the passage is that the programme will be carried out independently. At the same time, it is obvious that the content of the programme would be driven solely by the British’s authority and power over the continent, particularly over the countries it colonized. As a result, the narrative in the passage is more concerned with suppressing Africa’s ideologies about its own socioeconomic and political advancement than resonating with the truth that the uncertainties and challenges the programme seeks to expose exist in the United Kingdom as well.

The author employs a dialogical approach, drawing on the perspectives of some current corporation employees as well as personal observations of the continent’s socioeconomic and political development. It was discovered through these methods that BBC Focus on Africa is being established to meet the needs of Africans, who listen to radio and television being used as mass communication channels for disseminating the programme, as the continent grows in terms of socioeconomic and political advancement. It is also obvious that the programme cannot be implemented without a strategic partnership with some media organisations as well as the use of experienced media professionals from the continent. As a result, the BBC, African media organisations, and professionals are key players. While audience use radio and television as traditional media for listening and watching the programme, media owners are using the media to help the British government advance its media hegemony over the continent. Specifically, the United Kingdom government, through indirect power granted to the corporation, remains the dominant power broker between the BBC and partnering establishments and individuals using the media system.

Theoretical Queries and Adjustment

Following Annette Markham’s metaphorical description of an object as a place to negotiate different discursive elements towards developing and sustaining ways of being and Karl Marx’s proposition on tool, in which man’s motive power is one of the elements determining its (tool) functionality, it could be argued that BBC would continue to be one of the ways to profit from perceived underdevelopment on the continent by reporting issues and needs in a way that favours British authority. The United Kingdom, which owns the BBC, colonized many African countries. In particular, through media capitalism, does BBC Focus on Africa promote African development or the imperialism of the British government?

What is unclear is whether Africa does not have leaders who are doing well in terms of providing sustainable public goods, which could be captured in the narrative as part of the programme’s content. It is also absurd that the author cannot logically present benefits to both the BBC and Africa as a whole without first establishing the United Kingdom government’s dominance through motive power granted to the BBC. As a result, the story must be retold with a focus on how the continent’s positive political narratives, rather than just the negative narratives, can influence programme content.

Why Nations Are Poor – And Why 63% of Nigerians (133 million) are Poor [video]

1

A National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) report has revealed that 63% of persons living in Nigeria (133 million people) are multidimensionally poor: “65% of the poor (86 million people) live in the North, while 35% (nearly 47 million) live in the South. Poverty levels across States vary significantly, with the incidence of multidimensional poverty ranging from a low of 27% in Ondo to a high of 91% in Sokoto.” 

In the video below, I explain why we are still witnessing this level of poverty in a land of  latent abundance. Indeed, Nigeria is wasting years and our leaders are underperforming on their responsibilities. 

This nation has leverageable anchors to lift millions out of poverty. This is simply shameful!  How can 91% of Sokoto people be poor, and the governor qualified himself to even imagine to lead the nation as  a president? This is simply unbelievable on how we do things in this country. I am stunned!

My sincere commendations to NBS for being bold to publish these reports and also my appreciation to the Presidency for not blocking the reports.  I wish the presidential candidates could debate on the substance of the reports.

—Report from NBS

Nigeria launches its most extensive national measure of multidimensional poverty.

The Federal Government of Nigeria through the National Bureau of Statistics today launched the results of the 2022 Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) Survey. This survey was a collaborative effort between the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the National Social Safety-Nets Coordinating Office (NASSCO), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). The survey, which sampled over 56,000 households across the 36 states of the Federation and the FCT, was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022, and provides multidimensional poverty estimates at senatorial district level.

Highlights of the 2022 Multidimensional Poverty Index survey reveal that:

  • 63% of persons living within Nigeria (133 million people) are multidimensionally poor.
  • The National MPI is 0.257, indicating that poor people in Nigeria experience just over one-quarter of all possible deprivations.
  • 65% of the poor (86 million people) live in the North, while 35% (nearly 47 million) live in the South. Poverty levels across States vary significantly, with the incidence of multidimensional poverty ranging from a low of 27% in Ondo to a high of 91% in Sokoto.
  • Over half of the population of Nigeria are multidimensionally poor and cook with dung, wood or charcoal, rather than cleaner energy. High deprivations are also apparent nationally in sanitation, time to healthcare, food insecurity, and housing.
  • In general, the incidence of monetary poverty is lower than the incidence of multidimensional poverty across most states. In Nigeria, 40.1% of people are poor according to the 2018/19 national monetary poverty line, and 63% are multidimensionally poor according to the National MPI 2022.
  • Multidimensional poverty is higher in rural areas, where 72% of people are poor, compared to 42% of people in urban areas.

The National MPI is reported with a linked Child MPI, which provides additional information on Multidimensional Child Poverty in Nigeria. According to the report:

  • Two-thirds (67.5%) of children (0–17) are multidimensionally poor according to the National MPI, and half (51%) of all poor people are children.
  • The highest deprivations are in the indicator of child engagements – where over half of poor children lack the intellectual stimulation that is pivotal to early childhood development.
  • Child poverty is prevalent in rural areas, with almost 90% of rural children experiencing poverty.
  • Across the geo-political zones, the child MPI shows higher poverty in the North-East and North-West (where 90% of children are poor) and lower poverty in the South-East and South-West (74% and 65.1% respectively). The incidence of Child MPI is above 50% in all States and greater than 95% in Bayelsa, Sokoto, Gombe and Kebbi.
  • Four million Nigerians – 2.1% of the population – live with a child aged 15–17 who is the first generation in that household to have completed primary school.

The full report which contains further details and insights from the survey is hosted on the NBS website www.nigerianstat.gov.ng. Hard copies can also be obtained from the Data Shop at the NBS Corporate Headquarters in Abuja.

 

 

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: That’s one of the craziest things about Nigeria. A non performing governor all of a sudden thinks that he will metamorphose to a performing president. We can’t run away from the fact that our constitution must be tinkered with. The potentials of the various States will remain just potentials under the current system. It is hardly surprising that the bulk of the poor are in the North. We need a birth control policy, you cannot give birth endlessly without thinking about taking care of your children rather you are happy that once in 4 years you have an advantage in the election. There’s life beyond the election. If we can get our States to be more functional, the country will become the better for it. Why don’t our policy makers see the connection between population explosion and poverty explosion? With poverty comes insecurity because the poor must eat, even if they have to steal it. We are better off thinking about the public good if not, it will affect all of our private lives. Can’t you see that the developed world are trying their best to manage their population. Yet the ruling party that has performed poorly for the past 8 years is campaigning to retain power.

Comment 2: The root cause of the poverty and any of the symptoms we see manifest in the greater society is strategic ineptitude fueled by corruption, avarice and gold plated stupidity!
We are poor because :
1. We conduct our major export trade in USD and retain same in non Nigerian owned banks. The FX remains abroad and we artificially print Naira to sell to the industries that require them ( but give preference to BDCs that are economic rent seekers) thereby creating huge inflationary pressure on the Naira and causing poverty (poverty is actually lack of productive capacity that is competitive) on a economic grand scale.
2. Education dysfunctionality: since inception there are just slightly over 50k chartered accountants in Nigeria (by ICAN rolls) and these include the dead and departed. Medical doctors are under 30k ( as at 2018) and by 2020 40% of them have quit Nigeria for greener pastures. Same goes for engineers, actuaries, realtors, machinists! The more of these a society has the more wealth is created. Check China, Turkey, Germany etc.
3. Low value addition : from crude oil to cocoa, cassava chips to sesame seed, we export without benefication. And we import crazy things like egg shells ( yes eggshells in millions of dollars)
Etc.

Nigeria and Kenya Engage Google To Solve the “Loan Shark” Attacks

1

This is an asymmetric attack: ‘Google has ordered loan apps in Nigeria and Kenya to provide proof of license to operate in the country, or risk being taken down from the Google Play store. This move according to Google was necessitated to protect borrowers from rogue loan apps, otherwise known as “loan sharks”, many of which charge borrowers outrageous interest rates as well as operating against legal provisions’.

This one will certainly work. The government has banned these companies and many continue to operate even though they are not registered or licensed or permitted. How do they get bank accounts opened? The government has gone to their physical offices and fought them. Yet, nothing has worked.

This playbook of using Google will certainly work because if the head is cut-off, the apps will fade. Yet, do not celebrate. While I do not support what these loan sharks are doing, we need to understand the circumstances which make them useful to some citizens.

If you do not have money. If your bank does not believe in lending. If your network cannot offer any financial support. But you have a loved one in the hospital, and a loan shark is charging outrageous interest, but can help with fast funds, that should not be seen as stupidity on your side. There are many people  who are fighting the economic crisis daily because they are poor. They live for hours and not days. These loans put them in a vicious loop but sometimes save the hours!

If the government thinks shutting down the loan apps is the solution, that is playing a short-term game. Indeed, there needs to be a mechanism to make sure these citizens do not need those solutions by offering them alternatives. Otherwise, kicking the apps out of Google does not help in the long term because they will continue to need those fire funds to live in the hours!

I ask you to permit me to write that the government is part of the problem. If there are decent alternatives for these citizens, loan sharks will not be necessary. So, no moral high ground here. Engaging Google will cut off these loan sharks but that does not mean the citizens have been helped. I still find it hard to understand why in this digital age, Nigeria cannot organize alternative credit systems to help people access credits in the formal banking system.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: The move by Google is a step in the right direction, some of these loan sharks have taken undue advantage of desperate Nigerians, there’s need for serious regulations to enable genuine operators thrive and to protect the data and sanctity of debtors

Comment 2: How about the citizens that borrows money with the intention of never paying. Personal financial growth is the responsibility of the individual, and in most cases people don’t want to take decisive choices that we make them grow.

Comment 3: Insightful. I agree with this and I will like to add that, shutting them down on playstore is not enough measure, they can just go on and maintain websites to continue their venture.

The government should, as you’ve said, provide alternatives. Access to credit is very key to helping the poor out of poverty not only when they’re lives are at risks.

Comment 4: The online world needs to be regulated. Since the activities have moved to online. If it is not done lots of bad things will go on unpunished. Lending is a specialized field. You have to show that the government knows about your activities.

Comment 5: My understanding of their modus operandi,they do not carry out due diligence on their customers before approving the loans hence getting their money back becomes a problem. I lost my phone sometime in October last year at computer village around 3pm in the afternoon. I ran to the Bank to block my account. By the time I retrieved d line 3 days later, some one has used the phone number to borrow 10,000 naira from a loan shark company without my knowledge hence they started threatening me that I must paid back the loan which I refused. We are Valuers to lots of commercial banks in Nigeria and I can attest to it that they carry out due diligence before granting loans to their customers atleast on 90% scale. I support this moves by Google for them to show their evidence of license registration as a requirement for them to operate on the Google play store. These loan shark companies send ridiculous text messages on Whatsapp and sms to people claiming all sorts of nonsenses and harassments to claim their loan back