DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 50

Economists Expect Fed to Cut Rates Again Despite Deepening Policy Rift

0

The U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to trim its benchmark interest rate by a quarter percentage point at the December 9-10 policy meeting, with a large majority of more than one hundred economists surveyed by Reuters predicting another round of easing to support a cooling labor market.

That strong consensus mirrors November’s poll and aligns with the nearly eighty-five percent chance of a cut implied by futures markets, even as policymakers themselves have grown increasingly divided over whether the world’s largest economy needs further stimulus.

The split within the central bank stands in stark contrast to the unity among economists surveyed. The Fed delivered a quarter-point cut in October, but Chair Jerome Powell has repeatedly warned against risking a resurgence of inflation. Powell has stressed that a December cut was far from a “foregone conclusion,” a message sharpened by the fact that inflation has remained above the Fed’s two percent target since March 2021.

Complicating matters further, a forty-three-day government shutdown delayed key economic data releases, leaving policymakers to operate with partial visibility at a time when clarity on inflation, wages, and consumer spending is vital. Minutes from the October meeting revealed deep internal fractures, with some FOMC members saying rates should remain unchanged and several openly opposing the cut that was ultimately delivered.

Still, the November 28-December 4 poll showed an overwhelming eighty-two percent majority—eighty-nine of 108 economists—expecting another twenty-five basis point reduction next week.

Thomas Simons, chief U.S. economist at Jefferies, said the October caution came partly from a lack of available data during the shutdown. He argued that Powell is now unable to rely on that same justification, especially after several Fed governors signaled support for continued easing.

New York Fed President John Williams recently joined governors Michelle Bowman, Christopher Waller, and Stephen Miran in backing rate cuts, saying easing could be done without jeopardizing the inflation goal and would offer insurance against further weakness in the labor market.

Even so, as many as five of the twelve voting FOMC members have publicly opposed further cuts, widening the policy rift at a time when financial markets are clamoring for clarity.

The disagreement among central bankers is also echoed in forecasts for 2026, where divisions are striking. Median projections from the poll point to two additional cuts that would bring the federal funds rate to between 3.00 and 3.25 percent by the end of that year, yet no single quarter shows a clear majority. Concerns tied to the administration’s large tax-cut and spending bill, tariff uncertainties, and questions about the Fed’s institutional independence have all contributed to the fog surrounding long-term rate expectations.

Kevin Gordon, head of macro research and strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, said reflationary forces rooted in fiscal policy and tariff-driven goods prices will constrain how far the Fed can ease. He warned that the so-called “big beautiful bill” risks keeping price pressures higher than expected. Conflicting public signals from FOMC members on the timing and scale of future cuts have also fueled hedging flows, with investors ramping up protection against policy uncertainty in recent weeks.

A wide gap has also emerged in inflation expectations across the economy. The University of Michigan’s consumer surveys show inflation expectations near four percent, while market-based measures such as breakevens and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities remain far lower. Gordon said the disconnect is problematic because inflation perceptions remain central to affordability concerns, which have become a dominant issue for households.

Poll medians showed the Personal Consumption Expenditures index—the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge—running above two percent through 2027, suggesting a prolonged, stubborn descent toward the target. Growth expectations also signal a slower trajectory. The U.S. economy is expected to have expanded three percent in the third quarter, shifting sharply to 0.8 percent this quarter. Economists expect growth to average two percent both this year and in 2026.

The tension between cooling economic momentum, sticky inflation expectations, and a splintered central bank lies at the heart of the risks looming over 2026. If fiscal policy maintains its expansive stance while tariffs continue to prop up goods prices, the Fed may find itself trapped between growth concerns and persistent inflation. A sustained disconnect between consumer inflation expectations and market pricing could also force policymakers to take a more cautious route on rates, even as labor markets soften further.

Markets broadly expect the December cut, but the fractures inside the Fed and the uncertainty surrounding the economic path highlight that next week’s move may not signal a smooth easing cycle. Instead, it could mark the beginning of a more contentious debate over how much support the U.S. economy can expect as the effects of this year’s slowdown carry into the next political and fiscal cycle.

Microsoft To Raise Prices for Commercial Office Subscriptions in July as Competition Escalates and AI Upgrades Accelerate

0

Microsoft will raise the prices of its Office productivity software subscriptions for commercial and government clients on July 1, marking a significant shift for one of the company’s most profitable franchises.

The adjustment comes as Microsoft pushes deeper into AI-driven workplace tools, faces stronger competition from Google, and continues positioning Microsoft 365 as a premium, enterprise-grade ecosystem.

Nicole Herskowitz, corporate vice president for Microsoft 365 and Copilot, said in a statement that the company has delivered more than 1,100 new features across Microsoft 365, Security, Copilot, and SharePoint in the past year. She argued that those additions strengthened the overall value of the suite and justified the upcoming changes.

Office remains central to Microsoft’s dominance in enterprise software, though Google Workspace has become a tough rival in areas such as small business, education, and cloud-native companies. With both companies embedding generative AI across their tools, the competition has shifted from basic productivity to automation, writing assistance, and analytics — and Microsoft wants customers to pay a premium for features it sees as foundational to modern work.

Price increases are relatively uncommon for the company. Microsoft last adjusted commercial Office pricing in 2022, the first major shift since Office 365 launched in 2011. The bundles were rebranded to Microsoft 365 in 2020. Earlier this year, Microsoft announced higher prices for consumer-grade Office subscriptions.

The new changes affect nearly all commercial offerings. Microsoft 365 Business Basic will rise to seven dollars per user per month, up from six. Microsoft 365 Business Standard will increase to fourteen dollars from twelve fifty. Business Premium remains at twenty-two dollars. Office 365 E1 stays at ten dollars, while Office 365 E3 rises to twenty-six dollars from twenty-three. Microsoft 365 E3 will go to thirty-nine dollars from thirty-six, and Microsoft 365 E5 climbs to sixty dollars from fifty-seven. Microsoft 365 F1 for front-line workers rises to three dollars from two twenty-five, and Microsoft 365 F3 increases to ten dollars from eight. Government clients will face similar percentage increases.

None of the price points include Microsoft 365 Copilot, the thirty-dollar AI add-on that offers generative capabilities across apps. Adoption of Copilot varies widely. Some companies have begun large deployments, while others are still studying cost and workflow impact.

Although many large organizations negotiate discounts that reduce the sting of list price adjustments, Microsoft has recently scaled back some categories of volume deals. That shift means certain customer groups will absorb more of the increase directly.

The productivity division remains one of the company’s most important businesses. In the first quarter of its fiscal year, the Productivity and Business Processes segment contributed almost 43 percent of Microsoft’s seventy-seven point seven billion dollars in revenue. The company also reported seventeen percent growth in Microsoft 365 commercial cloud revenue in October, with seats up six percent, driven largely by small and midsize businesses and front-line worker deployments.

How Previous Price Hikes Have Affected Microsoft’s Retention Rates

Microsoft has historically been able to raise prices for Office-based products with minimal impact on overall customer retention. While the company does not publish detailed churn figures for specific subscription tiers, several structural factors have consistently kept retention high after past adjustments.

The company’s last major commercial price increase in 2022 is a clear example. After the change, Microsoft reported continued growth in commercial seat counts, steady expansion among small and medium-sized businesses, and increasing adoption of Microsoft 365 bundles that include Windows and security features. The absence of any reported decline in seats or revenue growth suggests the price hike did not cause a broad pullback.

A large part of that stability comes from the nature of Office itself. Most enterprises have deeply integrated Word, Excel, Outlook, and Teams into their internal processes, training cycles, and compliance frameworks. Migrating tens of thousands of users to alternative platforms would require retraining, rewriting workflows, revising document templates, and recertifying security systems — steps that are costly and time-consuming even before technical differences are considered.

Another factor is contractual structure. Many organizations operate under multi-year enterprise agreements, meaning short-term fluctuations in list prices have a limited immediate effect. Changes typically take hold at renewal, not mid-contract, giving customers time to budget and plan.

The broader context is that Office remains a standard across corporate environments. Even when Google Workspace adds users in specific segments, most large enterprises maintain Microsoft 365 as their primary suite. The company’s integration of cloud security, mobile device management, and Windows licensing into higher-tier bundles has also reduced the likelihood of customers peeling away individual components.

Microsoft’s track record suggests that while price hikes draw criticism and increase budget pressure, they have not triggered meaningful waves of customer departures. Instead, the company has consistently retained — and continued to grow — its commercial base during previous adjustments.

This history forms a key backdrop to the July 1 changes. Microsoft is betting that long-standing customer stickiness, combined with sharply expanding AI capabilities, will keep retention high even as organizations face rising software costs and more aggressive competition from Google.

Binance Launches Binance Junior, A Parent-Controlled Crypto Savings Tool for Kids

0

Binance officially announced the launch of Binance Junior today, December 3, 2025, as a dedicated app and sub-account system aimed at introducing children and teens ages 6–17 to cryptocurrency in a controlled, educational way.

This move positions Binance as a pioneer in family-focused crypto education, blending savings features with strong parental oversight to promote financial literacy while mitigating risks like speculative trading.

Parents who must be verified Binance users with KYC and 2FA create and link a child’s sub-account. They can deposit funds from their main account or via on-chain transfers, set daily spending/transfer limits, and receive real-time notifications for every transaction. Parents can instantly freeze or disable the account if needed.

Kids can access Binance’s Flexible Simple Earn product to grow savings through interest-bearing crypto holdings, but no spot trading, futures, or high-risk activities are allowed. For teens 13+, limited use of Binance Pay enables peer-to-peer transfers between siblings or parents, restricted by parental limits and regional regulations.

The app features a simplified interface for family use, with built-in tools to teach basics like blockchain and security. Binance also released a companion illustrated book, “ABC’s of Crypto”, to make learning fun and accessible at home.

It’s rolling out initially in select markets via the Apple App Store and Google Play, with global expansion pending regulatory approvals. Transfers to non-family adults are blocked for safety.

Binance Co-founder Yi He emphasized this as a step toward “preparing the next generation for a digital financial future” by encouraging healthy saving habits over gambling-like trading.

The launch has ignited lively debate on X, with over a dozen posts in the last hour reflecting a split in opinions, some see it as a “huge step for real adoption,” praising the controls as a responsible way to onboard the next generation.

One user called it a “smart financial education move.” Others highlighted its potential to build long-term family wealth. Detractors worry it’s “crazy and irresponsible,” accusing Binance of “targeting kids” and turning them into “exit liquidity” for the market. Jokes about “future moonboys in training” underscore fears of early exposure to volatility.

French-language posts noted the app’s controls for deposits and withdrawals, while others tied it to broader trends like Trump-era family finance initiatives. While supporters view it as innovative and empowering, skeptics argue the crypto space isn’t mature enough for minors—echoing ongoing global discussions on youth financial literacy.

The ABC of Crypto released alongside the Binance Junior app launch, “ABC’s of Crypto” is a self-published educational book by Binance designed to demystify cryptocurrency for children, teens, and crypto newcomers.

Structured as an A-to-Z children’s book, it uses simple rhymes, colorful illustrations, and everyday analogies to make complex topics “as easy as ABC,” aligning with Binance’s family finance initiative to foster early financial literacy without overwhelming jargon.

An illustrated hardcover or digital book available for free in the Binance app, aimed at ages 6–17 but accessible to all beginners. It features fun, engaging visuals—like cartoon characters explaining concepts—to encourage family reading sessions.

Each letter of the alphabet spotlights a core crypto idea, turning learning into an alphabetic adventure. The book breaks down essentials like: A for Assets: What digital money is and why it matters in everyday finance.

B for Blockchain: The “digital ledger” that keeps everything secure and transparent. W for Wallets: How to store and protect crypto safely. Basics of staying safe online, types of cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin as “digital gold”), and avoiding risks.

It emphasizes healthy habits like saving over speculation, tying into Binance Junior’s controlled savings features. Part of Binance’s push for “preparing the next generation for a digital financial future,” the book promotes shared learning to build confidence in crypto as mainstream finance evolves.

It’s not about trading tips but foundational knowledge to prevent common pitfalls like scams. Download the digital version directly in the Binance mobile app under educational resources or access physical copies via Binance’s family finance hub. It’s free, with no purchase required, and integrates with Binance Academy for deeper dives.

Global rollout matches Binance Junior’s phased approach, starting in select markets. This book stands out in a space often criticized for complexity—it’s a refreshing, low-pressure entry point.

Larry Fink Sees Tokenization Buzz as Dot-Com Bubble in 1996

0

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, in a guest column he co-authored with BlackRock COO Rob Goldstein for The Economist, published on December 1, 2025.

They’re drawing a direct analogy between the nascent stage of asset tokenization today and the internet’s awkward adolescence in 1996—back when Amazon was barely a blip with $16 million in book sales, Google and Facebook were years away from existing, and the web felt more like a quirky experiment than a world-altering force.

Fink and Goldstein argue that tokenization—the process of converting real-world assets like real estate, bonds, or funds into digital tokens on blockchains—is on the cusp of explosive growth, much like how the internet went from dial-up novelty to economic juggernaut.

They highlight BlackRock’s own push into this space, including its Bitcoin ETF and tokenized money market funds, as early bets on a “next generation” of markets. It’s a bullish signal from one of Wall Street’s biggest players, especially as regulatory clarity (e.g., from the SEC and EU) starts to grease the wheels.

Why 1996 Feels Like a Fitting Comparison

To ground this historically: Internet in 1996: About 36 million users worldwide 0.9% of the population. Netscape was the hot browser, but e-commerce was a joke—Amazon launched in ’95 with minimal traction. No smartphones, no social media, and “broadband” was sci-fi.

Total tokenized assets under management are around $10-15 billion mostly stablecoins and funds, per recent estimates. It’s functional but clunky—regulatory hurdles, interoperability issues, and scalability lags persist. Yet, pilots from giants like BlackRock, JPMorgan, and HSBC suggest it’s scaling quietly.

If Fink’s right, we’re pre-dot-com boom: expect tokenized real estate marketplaces, instant cross-border settlements, and fractional ownership of everything from art to carbon credits to dominate by 2030. BlackRock’s already tokenizing its $7 trillion AUM empire, so this isn’t hype from a crypto bro—it’s a trillion-dollar asset manager saying, “Get ready.”

Tokenized funds represent a bridge between traditional finance (TradFi) and blockchain technology. In essence, they convert shares of investment funds—such as money market funds—into digital tokens on a public blockchain.

These tokens act as programmable, transferable representations of ownership in the underlying assets. Unlike traditional fund shares, which settle via slow, intermediary-heavy processes (often T+2 days), tokenized versions enable near-instant transfers, 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, and integration with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

This reduces costs, enhances liquidity, and opens up new use cases like using fund tokens as collateral for loans.BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager with over $10 trillion in assets under management (AUM), is at the forefront of this trend.

Tokenization aligns with CEO Larry Fink’s vision of digitizing capital markets, as he noted in late 2025 that it’s akin to the internet’s early days in 1996—poised for explosive growth.  BUIDLBlackRock’s flagship tokenized offering is the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), launched in March 2024 on the Ethereum blockchain.

It’s a tokenized money market fund designed for institutional investors, providing exposure to short-term, high-quality assets like U.S. Treasuries and repurchase agreements (repos). As of November 2025, BUIDL has grown to approximately $2.5 billion in AUM, making it the largest tokenized money market fund globally.

The fund invests in cash equivalents yielding U.S. dollar returns typically 4-5% annually, based on prevailing rates. Unlike non-yielding stablecoins (e.g., USDC), BUIDL passes through yields directly to token holders via daily accruals, paid out in additional tokens or cash.

BlackRock manages the fund, with Securitize a BlackRock-backed firm handling token issuance, compliance, and transfers as the registered transfer agent. Shares are minted as ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum. Investors subscribe via Securitize Markets minimum $5 million investment for qualified institutions like hedge funds or private equity firms.

Tokens are custodied by options like BNY Mellon (traditional) or crypto-native providers (e.g., Anchorage Digital, BitGo, Coinbase, Fireblocks). Investors can redeem tokens for USD at net asset value (NAV), with blockchain enabling atomic (instant) settlements—cutting out intermediaries.

Initially Ethereum-only, BUIDL now operates across multiple blockchains for broader accessibility and DeFi integration:November 2024: Added Aptos, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism’s OP Mainnet, and Polygon.

In May 2025, BlackRock introduced sBUIDL, a DeFi-wrapped version using Securitize’s sToken framework. This ERC-20 token unlocks composability—e.g., using BUIDL as collateral in permissioned lending pools or yield optimizers—while maintaining regulatory compliance. It has helped push BUIDL’s AUM past $1.7 billion earlier in 2025.

BlackRock envisions tokenizing $10 trillion of its AUM over time, including ETFs, real estate ($39 billion managed), and structured products. In September 2025, they advanced plans for tokenized ETFs, converting popular iShares funds into on-chain versions for faster creation/redemption and borderless trading.

Still, with pilots like BUIDL proving viability—hitting $1 billion AUM in under 40 days—BlackRock is betting big on tokenization as the “next generation infrastructure for finance.”

MKBHD’s Panels App Will Shut Down Amid Criticisms Citing Data Leak and High Pricing

0

Tech YouTuber Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) announced that his wallpaper app, Panels, will shut down on December 31, 2025—about 15 months after its September 2024 launch.

In an unlisted YouTube video and a notice on the app’s website, Brownlee cited challenges in sustaining the project, including a changing development team and difficulty finding collaborators who shared his vision for a “vibrant ecosystem” supporting artists and high-quality wallpapers.

The Rocky Launch and Monetization Backlash

Panels debuted as a marketplace for exclusive, artist-partnered wallpapers inspired by Brownlee’s own device reviews fans often asked about his stunning lock screens. But it hit immediate turbulence, $11.99/month or $49.99/year for full-resolution downloads with artists getting a cut. Free users could only access 1080p versions after watching ads.

The app requested location data, cross-app tracking, and other permissions that felt overly intrusive for a wallpaper tool. Critics called it “DOA” (dead on arrival), arguing why pay for digital images when free options abound (e.g., Google Photos, Reddit, or personal shots).

It topped download charts briefly but saw low conversion to paid users—despite 2 million wallpaper downloads overall. Brownlee responded by slashing prices to $2/month, improving the free tier, and tweaking privacy features. However, as he noted, “we made mistakes in making our first app, and ultimately, we weren’t able to turn it into the vision I had.”

The niche market for paid wallpapers proved too small to sustain growth. All downloaded or purchased ones are yours forever—no rescinding. Full access until Dec 31; automatic pro-rated refunds for active annual subs post-shutdown. Early refunds available via the site.

It’ll vanish from App Store and Google Play soon. All user data deleted after closure. In January 2026, the code drops on GitHub under Apache 2.0 license—free for anyone to fork and build a spiritual successor. Brownlee called it a “rollercoaster ride” with some wins, like artist partnerships, but ultimately a learning experience in app development.

The launch of Panels in September 2024 was a masterclass in how not to debut a product, especially from a creator like Marques Brownlee, who’s built a reputation for razor-sharp critiques of tech giants.

The app, meant to curate high-quality wallpapers from artists inspired by fan queries about his review setups, instead became a lightning rod for backlash.

The main criticisms, drawn from user reactions, reviews, and media coverage. At $11.99/month or $49.99/year for full-res downloads with ads for 1080p free tier, it screamed “subscription fatigue.” Users mocked it as absurd—why pay premium for pixels when free alternatives like Unsplash, Reddit, or your camera roll exist?

Brownlee admitted the pricing was a “mistake,” slashing it to $2/month post-launch, but the damage stuck. As one X user put it, it felt like a “quick cash grab” from a guy who calls out corporate greed. Revenue data later revealed a stark reality: ~900,000 downloads but only ~$95,000 in purchases across platforms.

The free tier forced 30-second unskippable ads per download, making it feel punitive. Early users called the interface “clunky” and ad-riddled, with one X post uninstalling after 10 seconds and questioning if anyone on the team had the guts to flag it.

It launched during Brownlee’s iPhone 16 review video his biggest of the year, turning comments into a hate-fest and tanking engagement. Requesting location, cross-app tracking, and usage data for a wallpaper app? That sparked “creepy” accusations, eroding trust in Brownlee’s privacy-conscious brand. Fixes came later, but not before App Store reviews piled on.

MKBHD, who “canceled” startups like Humane and Fisker with scathing reviews, faced the same scrutiny: “You gotta be ready to take what you dish out.” X threads roasted it as out-of-touch, damaging his “quality advocate” image—especially since wallpapers aren’t a “must-have” justifying subs.

Panels’ shutdown on Dec 31, 2025—just 15 months in—ripples beyond one app. It’s a sobering case study for creators dipping into product waters, with broader takeaways. This is a gut-check on monetizing “side hustles.” Brownlee’s 20M+ subs didn’t translate to sustainable revenue in a saturated, low-barrier niche like wallpapers.

It highlights the subscription economy’s pitfalls: Users are weary of $X/month for non-essentials, and one misstep can torch credibility. As app expert Sarah Chen noted, “Even the most trusted voices can’t force consumers to accept pricing they perceive as unreasonable.”

Expect more cautious pivots—maybe merch or tools with clearer value—over apps that feel like grifts. It also flips the script: Brownlee’s review power blamed for company downfalls now invites “what about your failures?” blowback.

Data deletion post-shutdown sets a privacy-positive precedent, potentially inspiring ethical exits. Artists lose a revenue stream but gain exposure via the code drop. It empowers users: Vote with wallets, and even icons fold.

In the end, Panels was an ambitious swing that whiffed, but Brownlee’s transparency salvages some goodwill. It’s a reminder: Tech’s easy to critique, hard to build. Will this dent MKBHD long-term? But it’ll make future ventures sharper.