DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5032

Russia Fines Google $373 Million for Promoting “Fake News”

0

Russia has maintained efforts to keep mainstream media in check as its war with Ukraine rages on. It started with an outright ban on news outlets and escalated to other platforms, particularly US tech companies.

The attack on the media got a legal backing in March after the Russian parliament overwhelmingly voted to pass a bill criminalizing fake news – which is – reports not approved by the Kremlin. The bill, which was swiftly signed into law, recommends up to 15 years imprisonment for anyone spreading information contrary to what the Kremlin approves.

Since early this year, it has been a roller-coaster ride for journalists in Russia. Since the war began, the Kremlin has added over 5,000 websites to its “denylist,” according to the research and security firm Top 10 VPN. Almost all foreign journalists in Russia have been kicked out and over 80 news outlets and 30 financial sites have been stripped of access since February 24th.

The Kremlin also blocked Twitter and Facebook for allowing disapproved content on their platforms but Google was allowed for a reason believed to be that Russia can’t afford to do without it now. However, the Kremlin is taking another step to ensure that the web search giant is under its control – fines.

Reuters reports that Alphabet’s Google was fined 21.1 billion roubles ($373 million) on Monday by a Moscow court for a repeated failure to remove content Russia deems illegal, such as “fake news” about the conflict in Ukraine, Russia’s communications regulator said.

Alphabet’s YouTube has been a particular target of the state’s ire but, unlike Twitter and Meta Platforms’ Facebook and Instagram, it has not been blocked.

The regulator, Roskomnadzor, said the Tagansky District Court had fined Google 21.1 billion roubles for repeatedly failing to restrict access promptly to banned materials, and singled out YouTube for particular criticism.

It said YouTube had not deleted “fakes about the course of the special military operation in Ukraine, discrediting the armed forces of the Russian Federation”.

It also said YouTube was permitting content promoting extremist views and calls for children to participate in unauthorized protests.

Google, which can appeal, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The fine was calculated as a share of Google’s annual turnover in Russia. It had been handed a similar 7.2 billion rouble penalty late last year.

Google’s Russian unit’s bank account has been seized, prompting the subsidiary to file for bankruptcy and making it impossible to pay staff and vendors.

Anton Gorelkin, deputy head of the parliamentary committee on information policy, said Google was showing a demonstrative disregard for Russian law.

“It is not hard to predict what this attitude will lead to: Google risks losing the Russian market altogether,” he wrote on Telegram.

Tekedia Capital Offers To Help African Fintechs That Need US Compliance Guidance via Our Experts

0

African Fintech Founders, CEOs, etc: I have read some troubling accounts in the African fintech space. As an investor, I feel bad. This is not the way we will win the future. These demons must be cast out – fast. The virtues of honesty, decency and transparency are the only trajectories that will take everyone to the mountaintop.

Every fintech startup in Tekedia Capital with international exposure has access to a network of top US banking executives. These are my friends and associates; one is a Managing Director of a bank and heads a top US bank’s compliance unit. This bank has more than US$40 TRILLION under custody and administration. That is the highest level it could get.

To help African fintechs which  are struggling to build a better compliance regime, Tekedia Capital is available to connect these compliance experts to speak and provide guidance.  Just let us know, my team will schedule for them to speak with you (and will mentor you to build the right system based on US standards). There is a reason God has blessed me to know the right people,  and if this is one way I can help, so be it.

But we need to address this matter as a community. Email my team on contact here. Note: no one will ask you to pay anything; I just want this mess to stop before foreign investors lose interest in the ecosystem.

We will help on the KYC/AML and the chargeback fraud nemesis many of you are having. Ask for help.

Financial Modeling and Investment Valuation at Tekedia Institute

0

He is a very brilliant young man. He graduated with First Class honours from the University of Lagos. He works in the temple of business where amazing professionals make business work, across sectors and territories, by deepening our understanding of the mission of firms, and the utilization of factors of production.

Tekedia Institute Faculty Philip Bakare – ACA, Dip.IFR(ACCA), BSc will be in class tomorrow to teach “Financial modeling and Business Valuation”. How do you know what that business is worth? How do you make it physics? Come and learn from the best at Tekedia Institute

To register for the next edition of Tekedia Mini-MBA, go here .

Russian President Vladimir Putin Signs Law To Ban Use Of Digital Assets For Payments

0

President of Russia Vladimir Putin has signed into law a national ban on the use of digital assets for payments. The new law requires that digital assets will no longer be accepted as monetary surrogates and therefore cannot be accepted as payments for goods and services.

Other monetary units are also banned, re-affirming rubles as the only officially accepted currency within the Russian federation.

While the new law prohibits the use of digital financial assets to pay for “transferred goods”, performed works, and rendered services, it permits for other cases in the use of DFA payments.

The central bank in Russia holds that cryptocurrencies should only be used for International settlement which was well received amid harsh sanctions imposed on them following their invasion of Russia.

Despite the adoption of crypto for international payment the government still holds the opinion that the ruble should remain the country’s only legal tender.

Recall that last year Russia’s financial monitoring agency introduced a crypto monitoring service, aimed at the integrity of the mechanism for the circulation of digital currencies into the financial system and ensuring control over cash flows in the circuit of credit institutions.

The agency has disclosed its plans to improve the capabilities of its crypto monitoring service. The ban on crypto in the country was enforced after the government identified specific criminal cases involved in cryptocurrencies adding that the bank of Russia seeks to improve its systems and identify transactions and blockchains that are hidden.

The bank also stated that due to the fact that cryptocurrency records and transactions are stored on the blockchain technology, without the identity of wallet-owners, it makes them difficult to track.

Due to the invasion of Russia on Ukraine, as the country seek to evade sanctions, the Russian government had to develop its digital currency called rubles. The Russian government also cited the environmental impact of cryptocurrencies.

They disclosed that these coins have for long been a cause for concern due to the amount of power used in mining. The government had to ban crypto mining in Russia as they revealed that it affects electricity consumption, as it deals with a severe energy crisis.

It disclosed that Bitcoin mining consumes around 91 terawatt hours of electricity annually. Russia now joins the list of five countries where Bitcoin is banned. Countries where Bitcoin is banned are as follows; China, Bangladesh, Egypt, Morocco, and Russia.

Despite the widespread adoption of these cryptocurrencies in countries around the world, these countries above-mentioned have cracked down on it’s adoption citing various reasons.

Furthermore, these governments want to uphold a regulatory check on transactions and trades initiated from an individual account. Countries like Russia and Thailand disclosed that using cryptocurrency can make it difficult to trace, which can also be used to sponsor terrorism.

The lack of transparency surrounding cryptocurrencies has been a major concern for the government of these countries aforementioned, which is why they are strongly against adoption the use of it in their countries.

African Fintechs Threatened by Fraud: Union54 Policy Update Forces Fintechs to Halt Virtual Dollar Cards

0

African fintechs are getting caught in a very ugly situation that will likely jeopardize the burgeoning industry.

Flutterwave, the most valuable African fintech, was in April called out for gross misconduct. Early this month, a Kenyan court froze the accounts of Flutterwave payment technology limited, Boxtrip travel and tours limited, Bagtrip travel limited, Elivalat fintech limited, Adguru technology limited, Hupesi solutions, Cruz ride auto limited and one Simon Ngige over allegations of money laundering and fraud.

Last week, Ping Express CEO, Anslem Oshionebo and COO, Opeyemi Odeyale were sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for allowing the platform to be used for fraudulent transactions. A report from the US Department of Justice, said the Texas based company admitted to transmitting more than $167 million overseas, including $160 million transmitted to Nigeria, without seeking sufficient details about the sources or purposes of the funds involved in the transactions, or the customers initiating the transmissions.

The duo have pleaded guilty for their failure to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program. The IT/Business Development officer was sentenced to 42 months in prison for his role.

The company, Ping Express, faces five years of probation and a fine of up to $500,000.

The culmination of these events became glaring last week by the report that a group of African fintechs, including Flutterwave, Eversend, Busha, GetEquity and Payday are suspending their virtual card services due to a policy update from their card partner – Union54.

Union54 said the policy update was necessary “mainly due to our partner’s commercial inflexibility and inability to move quickly to implement technical solutions that are required to solve the operational issues we have experienced.” But there is more to that. TechCrunch, reported below citing sources, that the decision was necessitated by increasing chargeback fraud activities in the affected companies.

African fintechs halt virtual dollar cards after Union54 chargeback fraud surge

Last Friday, Barter, the consumer app of Africa’s most valued startup Flutterwave, told customers via email that they would not be able to access its virtual dollar card service from July 17. Hence, customers would be unable to create new virtual dollar cards, fund existing ones or make online and in-store payments and purchases with them.

Subsequently, other African fintechs such as Eversend, Busha, GetEquity and Payday sent identical messages giving various timelines between July 17 and 18. They attributed the virtual dollar card service disruption to an update from a card partner—which happens to be Union54—without citing a definite recommencement time.

As part of Mastercard Principle membership and the first fintech company from Africa, Union54 acts as an “issuing bank” and can provide debit cards (physical and virtual). The startup plays an essential role in the growth of the African fintech space with its card issuing product. But in May, Union54 began experiencing some operational issues with its product, resulting in the temporary suspension of its Bank Identification Number (BIN), the first four to six numbers on a payment card that identifies a card issuer.

According to a memo sent to its clients in May and obtained by TechCrunch, Union54 said though it resolved several of these issues, some remained. And as the company sought solutions, it became apparent that there were “some fundamental blockers to Union54 operating a long-term, profitable card issuing product, mainly due to our partner’s commercial inflexibility and inability to move quickly to implement technical solutions that are required to solve the operational issues we have experienced.”

Sources told TechCrunch that the main issue Union54 had been experiencing since its launch was chargeback fraud. Here, cardholders claim to have not initiated purchases before proceeding to dispute a transaction, placing a complaint and contacting the issuing bank—in this case, Union54—for a chargeback. If Union54 feels the claim is valid, it will remove the transaction amount from the merchant’s account and return it to the cardholder.

A follow-up memo allegedly sent by Union54 confirms what sources and local tech publication, Benjamindada.com, have said about these chargebacks. “Ever since we launched, there’s been a consistent increase in fraud cases emanating from our Bank Issuing Number (BIN),” the memo read. “During one of our conversations with Mastercard, they declared that never in their history has there been such frequent instances or cases of card fraud from this region.”

Upon further investigation, Union54 discovered that cardholders were increasingly attempting to defraud merchants by requesting chargebacks after their orders had been fulfilled. Many cardholders also tried to make purchases with empty cards, said Union54. Another plausible scenario, which Union54 didn’t state, could be the use of the cards by fraudsters to perform transactions without the knowledge of the original cardholders.

Merchants—who bear the brunt of chargeback fees that potentially affect their bottom line—can contest cardholders’ claims and ask the issuing bank to reverse the chargeback. And that’s what international merchants such as Facebook, Google and AliExpress did; in addition, they reported Union54’s BIN to Mastercard, which resulted in its number’s suspension.

At first, Union54 decided to stop authorizing card payments on June 16 and cease operations by June 30. The two-week timeframe was to “allow for the defunding of cards and refunds of remaining float deposits, as well as for our clients to access any user, card or transaction data required for your ongoing operations.” In the first memo, Union54 said its API would no longer be available from July 1. However, the fintech pushed the shutdown to July 18 as Mastercard, which requires merchants to maintain a chargeback rate of less than 1.5% of transactions, gave Union54, which also doubles as an acquirer, an ultimatum to improve its processes.

In the follow-up memo, Union54 explained how the company could not redeem the situation despite the extension. Union54’s efforts “weren’t deemed enough by Mastercard” as clients’ virtual dollar cards failed more frequently, disrupting customer experiences, an excerpt from the memo read.

Union54 hopes to get a resolution soon, though. CEO Perseus Mlambo sent a tweet today saying fintech is undergoing a compliance audit that shouldn’t take more than two weeks. However, in the memo, fintech said it’d be working with its partners, merchants and Mastercard to get its cards service back up within the next 6-8 weeks. TechCrunch reached out to Union54 for comments but didn’t get any at the time of publication.

Some industry analysts say this event calls for better KYC/AML compliance checks in the card issuing space as inconsistent due diligence for cardholder chargeback claims could invoke more fraudulent activities.

“It [The news] didn’t come as a shock for those playing in compliance because of the huge fraudulent activities in the space. Suppose a card scheme raises red flags that a region is having a lot of fraudulent activities. In that case, you as a provider will probably want to withdraw from the markets,” said Lanre Ogungbe, co-founder of Identitypass, a Nigerian digital compliance and security company that delivers seamless identity verification solutions to African businesses.

“KYC is not the A-Z of security checks, but what it does is to backtrack and trace a fraudulent transaction. And for many fintechs in the region, we seem to place more emphasis on aesthetics rather than the compliance and security side of things.” The report also comes at a period where various fraud allegations regarding executives and companies in the region have rocked the fintech space within the past few weeks.

In the past couple of years, virtual dollar debit cards provided by fintechs have proved a lifeline to many Africans and replaced local alternatives from banks whose cards have transaction limits. With these virtual cards, customers (individuals and businesses) can make international online transactions on platforms such as Alibaba, Google, Amazon, Netflix and Spotify. So it’s not hard to see why these customers—who have had to rely on these virtual cards built on Union54’s backend—expressed their displeasure on social media following the news. Many have begun searching for alternative options, which include Sudo Africa, another card issuing platform and other fintechs which claim to be unaffected by Union54’s downtime (as a result of using another provider), such as Chipper Cash, Mono and Bitmama.