DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5042

Solar Panda Raises $8 Million in Series A Funding

0

Africa is grappling with poor electricity supply that has greatly stymied its economic development for years. Except for a few countries, the whole continent is bedeviled with epileptic power supply dragging businesses, especially SMEs down.

In West and Central Africa, only three countries are on track to give every one of their people access to electricity by 2030, according to World Bank data. This means, 263 million people in the region will be left without electricity in ten years. West Africa has one of the lowest rates of electricity access in the world; only about 42% of the total population, and 8% of rural residents, have access to electricity, the World Bank said.

To fill its electricity gap, African countries have been exploring solar-powered technology as an alternative to the grid, creating an emerging market filled with solar-power startups that are increasingly attracting millions of dollars in investment.

Kenya and Canadian-based cleantech startup Solar Panda has secured $8 million in a Series A funding round led by Oikocredit and the EU-funded Electrification Financing Initiative.

“We are excited to partner with leading global impact investors Oikocredit and Electrifi and thankful that this funding will help us accelerate our mission of improving lives,” said Andy Keith, founder, and CEO of Solar Panda. “I’m very proud of the growth and success our team has been able to achieve over the past 4 years and, with nearly 1 billion people in the world without access to electricity, we feel we are just getting started. Seeing signs of pandemic recovery and a return to profitability, we will use the strength from our Series A raise to start work on our Series B round, which will be focused on international expansion. We are grateful to have ElectriFI and Oikocredit joining the team and look forward to working with them to take Solar Panda to the next level.”

Solar Panda sells Solar Home Systems through its own network of 37 storefronts and 1000 sales agents across Kenya, Solar Panda, a 2017 startup, provides Solar Home Systems, which include lighting, mobile charging, radios, and televisions.

Solar Panda designs, manufactures and sells pay-as-you-go (PAYGo) solar home systems in Kenya. With focus on rural areas, the Systems are subsidized to make them affordable for the underserved, thereby improving different facets of their lives, such as lowering the need for risky kerosene lanterns, saving families’ money, fostering education, and allowing higher productivity.

In about five years of its existence, the startup has recorded significant growth. Solar Panda is already operational in more than 200,000 houses in Kenya, and hopes to provide over 1 million Kenyans with clean, inexpensive electricity in the near future.

The firm said it will use this funding to offer more products, reach more people in Kenya, and establish the framework for future expansion into Sub-Saharan Africa and Kenya.

Oikocredit said it is thrilled to partner with Solar Panda.

“In a short period of time, Solar Panda has demonstrated its capabilities in designing and selling quality solar home systems needed by many households across Kenya. We are happy with the strong local talent they have assembled and are certain they can continue delivering positive results. As an equity investor in a partner like Solar Panda, we will collaborate and continue directing our efforts to make clean energy accessible and improving the quality of life of thousands more households for the communities we serve.”

Having seen evidence of recovery from the pandemic and a clear path to growth, Keith said the business will take the strength from its Series A round to begin work on its Series B financing, which will be focused on worldwide expansion.

“We are extremely delighted to become a shareholder of Solar Panda. The company has displayed impressive growth over the last years and demonstrated strong resilience amid COVID. Through this co-investment with Oikocredit, we aim at supporting the company in its next stage of development and realizing its full potential,” Lionel Dieu, ElectriFI Senior Investment Officer at EDFI Management Company, said.

China Regulator Fines Alibaba, Tencent Over Violations on Disclosure Of Transactions

0

China’s top market regulator, the state administration for market regulation (SAMR), has imposed fines on technology giants, Alibaba, Tencent as well as a range of other firms for failing to comply with the anti-monopoly rules concerning the disclosure of its transactions.

The SAMR disclosed that companies that were fined, were found to have not declared the concentration of business operators as per legal requirements. The state administration for market regulation (SAMR), recently released a list of 28 deals that violated the anti-monopoly rules.

Five (5) involved units of Alibaba, including a 2021 purchase of equity in its subsidiary, the Youku Tudou streaming platform. Also Chinese multinational technology company, Tencent was involved in 12 of the transactions on SAMR’s list.

What Is The Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law About?

The Chinese anti-monopoly law was made to beef up antitrust penalties in an explicit push for control over the digital sector in the country. The anti-monopoly law aims to safeguard China against anti-competitive activities.

It prohibits monopolistic conduct under the anti-monopoly law in China, individuals and companies are entitled to bring private actions against undertakings that have engaged in monopolistic conduct. The anti-monopoly law also prohibits “monopoly agreement”.

These are defined as agreements, decisions, or other concerted practices between business operators that have the purpose or effect of eliminating or restricting competition. In the year 2021, China’s President Xi Jinping reviewed and approved measures to fight monopolies in the country.

He stressed on the importance of strengthening the anti-monopoly regulations, a move that has already cost tech giants hundreds of billions of dollars in market value over the past year.

Putting these laws and regulations into practice was an intrinsic requirement for improving the socialist market economic system, as it would create a level playing field for businesses. This law is disclosed to highly benefit consumers and promote “High-quality development and common prosperity, citing a broader drive by the Xi Jinping administration to narrow China’s wealth gap.

Therefore, in a bid to enforce the laws aforementioned, Chinese authorities had to take aim at some of the nation’s largest tech companies such as Alibaba, Tencent, and the likes, citing unease with their rapid growth and influence.

Earlier in January, the SAMR fined a number of companies including Alibaba, Bilibili, and Tencent for failing to properly report over a dozen deals, issuing a fine of 500,000 Yuan per case.

Such fines are said to be the maximum under the country’s existing anti-monopoly law. These laws continue to crack down on monopolistic behavior by companies in the country, most especially companies abusing their dominant market position.

Such law was created to foster a fair, predictable, and transparent market environment for business operations. China on its anti-monopoly law revealed that it will continue to formulate and implement competition rules compatible with the socialist market economy to improve a unified, open, and orderly market system.

These anti-monopoly laws reveal that the Chinese government is hell-bent on maintaining a socialist market economy, a system that has been predicted to be the heart of the nation’s economic transformation.

This is the Most OPEN Election where 3 Candidates Have Clear Paths to Nigerian Presidency

2

The Pundits: Peter Obi and Rabiu Kwankwaso do not have nationwide political structures like their APC (Tinubu) and PDP (Atiku) counterparts. 

My Response: Mobile internet is reducing information asymmetry as more voters can bypass the filters and intermediaries to get information from the sources. The existence of information asymmetry makes market systems imperfect.  In politics, it does the same thing – imperfect electoral systems.

But in 2023, Nigeria will have the first mobile internet era election. This is the first app utility-anchored national election. I am not arguing that decades-old political  structures are not important, my point is that disintermediation (cutting out intermediaries) is evident, and general voters have access to more information about candidates now, to make decisions independently, out of the influence of political bundlers and brokers.

The Ezes, Obas, Amanyanabos and Emirs influenced many past elections through zone defense and zone offense (as in football) via block voting, being custodians of information; the village head determined the candidates for most villagers.

In 2023, that will not happen because they do not have exclusivity on the information about candidates. This makes the paths wide open for candidates because the Best Message will WIN depending on how INEC behaves. 

Young People, if anyone tells you that your candidate has no chance; ignore him or her. It is 0-0 at full time and they are getting into sudden-death extra time, with every candidate positioned to score that first goal to win it.

I discussed this deeper here.

Comment on LinkedIn, FB Feeds

Comment 1: This is a position you take when you live far away from Nigeria and not familiar with the demographics of Nigerian voters. From data, majority of registered voters in Nigeria are the uneducated, market men and women, traders, the unemployed and largely the disenfranchised. Majority of this people are living below the poverty line, a large percentage don’t even have access to the internet, electricity or basic amenities of life. They are located in every region but more significantly in the Northern part of the country. They are simply moved by hunger and lack. It will take the right infrastructural amenities (food, money etc.,) to motivate them. They don’t listen to reasoning but rather to the unpleasant sound of their stomach emanating from perpetual hunger. Majority of them won’t even see this post, unfortunately ??…. #my point is this, until we have a good understanding of the Nigerian problem we won’t be able to come up with the right solution to it.

Another member Response to Comment 1: I disagree. The people you mentioned are being kept in those states you talked about by the same politicians. Hunger and poverty in Nigeria has been weaponized since time immemorial by these politiefians.

The advantage of social media here is that it cuts off a large chunk of the middle men who are political jobbers. The sane minds among these poverty stricken areas who are fortunate enough to have access to social media space now carry these good gospel message of redemption to their brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers who in your assertion ‘may not even read this message’.

Comment 2: You have spoken well, prof. Mobile internet system has also played an important role in bypassing conventional media both electronic and print. Governments regulate information broadcast in conventional media. Every citizen is, today, a journalist. Information can be uploaded and accessed at the comfort of our homes, offices and streets. This also makes political campaigning inclusive and relatively cheaper.

Comment 3: Prof. These old men can change the mobile internet strategy if they notice it won’t favour them o… For Tinubu to have opted for a Muslim-Muslim ticket, it simply shows his desperation to win using religious+ethnic blackmail on the emotions of the Northerners… Tinubu and Atiku are friends and have their last shot at the opportunity, so instead of them losing out altogether to Obi, they would rather one of them wins and they share the spoils…

My Response to Comment 3: Let us keep this polite, fact-based without innuendos. This is a contact sport and you play to win. If that is what Tinubu wants to do to win, good luck. Obi has his own, good luck. Atiku has his own, good luck. But all will be evaluated by the Nigerian people. If INEC makes it free and fair, we have democracy.

I have never voted in America. But the day Trump started insulting Africans (1st generation and newbies in America), I decided to vote. He lost. Those insults were strategic for him but he activated more opposing voters. (Till today, Trump is still asking -how did so many Africans (1st gen and new) vote with some precincts 96%? In most areas he contested results, Africans (1st gen and new) outperformed the past).

Like in chess, every move has consequences. BAT, Atiku, Obi, etc must be respected as they deploy their strategies. You have your rights to respond how you want. But they have the right to plan how to win.

Nigerian Presidency is Wide Open As Mobile Internet Could Disintermediate Old Political Structures

Crude Oil Theft In Nigeria Is An Organized Crime

0

There is no discussing the fact that crude oil theft in Nigeria has been going on for a long time, without any strict measures put in place by the government to curb the dastardly act carried out by some unscrupulous people.

A report released last month reveals that between January 2021 and February 2022, Nigeria lost $3.2bn to crude oil theft which is crippling the economy. The CEO of Chevron Nigeria Richard Kennedy, recently disclosed that crude oil theft in Nigeria is an organized crime and should be differentiated completely from host community issues.

He made this remark when he was asked to comment on the host community provision of the petroleum industry act. He further emphasized the need not to confuse the agitations of host communities of oil-producing areas with the spate of crude oil theft being carried out in the area.

In his words, “From my experience, the issue with crude oil theft should not be confused with host community issues. It is much bigger than that. It is completely different from host community issues. Quite frankly it is an organized crime. The volume of crude oil that is being stolen is well beyond comprehension”.

It is disheartening to note that the high level of crude oil theft in Nigeria, is costing the nation millions of dollars daily, which is lost in revenue that could have been used to help solve the nation’s fiscal challenges.

It has been disclosed that the nation loses about 100,000 barrels per day at $100 per barrel, which is equivalent to $10 million per day that is being stolen. Nigeria has been experiencing this menace for a long time with millions of dollars lost daily.

There have been several agitations made by individuals, companies and communities to the government on the need to secure the pipelines, to secure it from constant vandalism, yet to no avail. This crude oil theft has made the country unable to meet its OPEC production quota of 1.8 million barrels per day, yet the government seems unperturbed by these declining impacts.

Earlier I published an article where the Nigeria security and civil service defense corps, NSCDC, disclosed that some high-profile individuals are behind the crude oil theft and pipeline vandalism in Nigeria.

It is appalling to discover that some high-profile individuals continue to sabotage the growth of the Nation’s economy with constant crude oil theft. It is painful that one major national resource (crude oil) that the nation capitalizes on, is being vandalized with reckless abandon.

Nigeria as an oil-producing state ought to be enjoying the dividends of crude oil due to the rise in price in the international market, due to the Russian-Ukraine war, yet the oil theft in the country has sabotaged that.

Previous and past administrations seem to lack the political will to put this incessant oil theft to a halt. The recent disclosure by the CEO of Chevron stating that oil theft in Nigeria is an organized crime further validates the fact that some high-profile individuals are behind it.

Crude oil theft is not something that is done by a single person, but rather by some group of people. No ordinary person can muster the courage to carry out such an act, rather it is done by high-profile individuals who have the backing of some political leaders and security personnel.

As vandals continue to destroy pipelines, the nation’s account continues to bleed. To combat crude oil theft in Nigeria, all hands must be on deck. The government should collaborate with security agencies, host companies, and oil companies operating in the area with the deployment of the right technologies to curtail the act.

Some stakeholders have also suggested that there should be the installation of LACT units, installation of check meters with flow rate and pressure measures capabilities, and competent entities for pipeline surveillance.

There is also the need for these high profile individuals behind this menace of oil theft and pipe vandalism, to be publicly punished by the government, to serve as a deterrent to all those involved. If the government lacks the will to do that, then it is unfortunate that the illegal act of oil theft will not be put to a halt.

For Techpreneurs: The Nigerian Data Protection Regulations 2019 – What You Should Know

0

One of the reasons for the astronomic rise of the Tech Industry in Nigeria and worldwide is the monetization/mining of information otherwise known as Data, it also means that Tech companies, especially those in the Social Media subsector, wield some of the greatest forms of influence in modern history, having access to almost everything private about us in a way unfathomable by governments of the world. 

It is as a result of this that the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), the overall agency in charge of the Regulatory Framework governing the Nigerian Tech Sector, in pursuance to the NITDA Act, created and issued the Nigerian Data Protection Regulations 2019(hereinafter referred to as ‘The Regulations’) which must be adhered to by every digital service provider dealing directly or indirectly with the receipt and processing of end-user data. 

These regulations are a loose conceptual adoption of the European General Data Regulations (GDPR) and will form the focus of this article which aims to provide you with : 

– A clear understanding of what the Regulations considers Data and its core focus, personal data. 

– The compulsory compliance demands of the Regulations on every Digital Platform service provider dealing with end-user data. 

– The penalties to which defaulters of its provisions can and/or will be liable under the Regulations. 

What isDataunder the Regulations? 

The regulations define Data as “Characters, symbols & binary which operations are performed by a computer which may be stored by transmission in the form of electronic signals stored in any format or device”. 

It goes further to define personal data as “Information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (referred to under the regulations as a “Data Subject”) being one who can be identified directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location,data, an online identifier to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that person and can be anything from a name, address, a photograph, email address, bank details, Social Media posts, Medical information and other unique identifier such as but not limited to MAC address, IP address, IMEI number, IMSI number, SIM information, Personal Identification information and others”. 

Who are the regulations applicable to? 

The regulations apply to natural persons and legal persons(companies and organizations) in Nigeria and Nigerian citizens or Diaspora residents with Nigerian Ancestry. 

What exactly are the demands of the regulations regarding data? 

The Regulations have provisions for the following requirements:- 

Data Safety/Security/Protection 

– Anyone involved in the activity of processing data or Data control is required by the regulations to have in place set up and continuously improved sufficient security measures including Anti-hacking safety measures, Firewall set-up, Data encryption, reinforced storage with zero access probability to unauthorized persons, as well as continuous competence and capacity upskill training for all staff involved in Data receipt, processing, storage &  protection. 

3rd Party Processor engagement by a Primary Data Processor. 

– Any outsourcing by a primary Data receiver to a 3rd party involved in Data processing MUST be governed by a written contract between the 3rd party and the primary Data receiving party (known as the Data controller) in line with the provisions of the regulations. 

End-user/Data Subject Consent 

– The consent of the end-user (data subject) MUST be obtained AFTER informing him/her of the purpose/reason for the data collection. 

– The Regulations place a legal duty on the data controller to ensure that there’s no presence of a misrepresentation/fraud or force used in acquiring the consent of a data subject. 

– Consent shall not be given, asked for or accepted where there’s a possibility of digital or online promotion of hate through speech and hate action encouragement, human or child rights violations, crimes or anti-user community conduct. 

– Data subjects must be made aware of their right/legal option to withdraw their consent even though the legality of data receipt, processing and storage of their data based on previously acquired consent will not be questioned. 

– 3rd party transfer of the data subject’s data by the primary Data controller must happen only after legally obtaining the data subject’s consent. 

This is a must especially regarding Fintech companies that deal with a lot of end-user personal data and which leverage a lot of 3rd party partnerships with banks and other financial institutions e.g Digital Lending, Digital International Remittance transfers, Digital Savings Platforms, E-commerce platforms, etc. 

Privacy Policy Requirements 

– Data collection & processing methods and privacy policies must be disclosed via display in an easily discernible form to the data subject. 

– The Privacy Policy must include the following pieces of information : 

a). A clear definition of what makes up the consent of the Data subject. 

b). What constitutes receivable Personal Information of the Data subject. 

c). A stated purpose of the end-user’s personal data collection. 

d). Information on the technologies used in the collection and storage of personal info, cookie policies, etc. 

e). Notification to the data subject for the purpose of obtaining prior consent in the event of 3rd party access to his personal information. 

f). A set of agreed Dispute Resolution/Remedy mechanisms in the event of the Data subject’s privacy. 

Liability for Data Privacy Breach by the 3rd Party. 

This was not explicitly mentioned in the regulations but by virtue of the principle of vicarious liability the primary Data controller will be liable in the event of a breach of the Data Subject’s Data Privacy arising out of the deliberate actions or negligence of the 3rd party Data Processor. 

Are there any rights guaranteed by the regulations? 

Yes, there are. The regulations grants to the end-user/data subject the following rights:- 

– The right to delete personal data. 

– The right to object to personal data processing for the purpose of marketing or commercial promotions. 

– The right of a data subject to withdraw consent to the use of his personal data. 

– The right of an end-user to be notified in the event of a privacy breach. 

– The right to limit personal data processing and the right to transfer personal data to another controller (the latter right is of a two-way application, subject to the data subject’s consent in the case of the data controller’s right to transfer personal data to a 3rd party). 

– The right of rectification regarding personal information. 

What do the regulations say about the Transfer of Personal Information (Data Subject information) to a foreign country or International organization? 

This is under the Regulatory governance of NITDA  which as a government agency is statutorily empowered to give directions in collaboration with the supervisory role of the Attorney-General of The Federation (AGF) regarding the determination of which countries/organizations have adequate Regulatory Frameworks set up regarding the issue of End-user/Data Subject Privacy Protection. 

Where there are no directives in the manner described above, the primary data controller can go ahead with the transfer of the Data subject’s transfer where: 

a).The consent of the transfer was obtained legally from the Data subject after clearly informing him of the likely risks of breach involved therein. 

b). The performance of a contractual obligation between the data subject and primary data controller depends on the transfer . 

c). The necessary execution of pre-contractual measures upon the end-user’s demand. 

d). There’s overriding Public Interest. 

e). There’s the need for proving a legal claim. 

f). The subject is physically or legally incapable of giving consent on health grounds or legal incapability .e.g. Unlawful detention. 

What are the further compliance requirements of the regulations on Private & Public organizations? 

Under the Regulations, all organizations involved in Data collection, processing and storage are expected to :- 

– Make public their Data protection policies; 

– Appoint a Data Protection Compliance Officer( or DCPO) for the purpose of carrying out compliance with the Regulations as well as carrying out data protection instructions of the Data controller. A DCPO can be an outsourced firm or individual; 

– Carry out continuous upskill capacity building for its Data receipt, protection and processing staff; 

– Carry out a detailed audit of its Data Protection practices stating important information that includes: 

a). Collected Personal information of their employees and its Data subjects. 

b). The purposes of its Data collections. 

c). 3rd party access to data subject personal information where applicable. 

d). The presence of consent where an data subject’s personal information is collected, processed, stored, and transferred along with the disclosed method of obtaining consent. 

  1. e) . The Privacy and Data Protection policies of an organization.

f). The measures of an organization used in the monitoring and reporting of Privacy & Data Protection Policy violation. 

g). The organization’s means of assessing the impact of current and emerging technologies on its Data Privacy/Security policies. 

– An audit soft copy containing the relevant information must be remitted to NITDA where a Data controller processes the data of more than 1,000 data subjects in a period of 6 months. 

– Send every year on a date not later than the 15th of March, a Data protection audit to NITDA where a Data controller processes the personal data of more than 2,000 data subjects within a 12-month period. 

Who or what exactly is eligible to be a DPCO? 

A DPCO Data Protection Compliance Organization/Officer can be an outsourced IT service provider, outsourced Lawyer/Law firm, or Audit firm. A DPCO is licenced by NITDA to provide the following services – 

– Data Regulations /Privacy Policy/3rd Party Access contract documentation. 

– Data Protection Compliance & Advisory services. 

– Data Compliance audit preparation. 

– Data Protection & Privacy Due Diligence Investigation. 

– Data Privacy Breach Remediation and Dispute Resolution. 

What are the penalties for being in default of the regulations and do i have the right to seek further redress? 

A Data Controller dealing with or having more than 10, 000 data subjects will in the event of a default be liable to a fine of whichever is greater in value between 2% of its preceding year annual gross revenue or a fine of Ten Million Naira. 

In the case of a Data controller with less than 10,000 data subjects, a default of the regulations will earn a fine of whichever is greater in value between 1% of its preceding year annual gross revenue or a fine of Two million Naira. 

These fines are payable to NITDA and yes, as a data subject you have the right to seek further redress via damages for Privacy and other consequent breaches against a Data controller in Civil law as well as a Criminal law by virtue of the Cybercrime Act. 

As a Primary Data Controller, you have a right to seek legal redress against a 3rd party outsourced by your company to process data transferred by you in the event of losses arising breaches of your data subject’s privacy due to a deliberate act or negligence of the 3rd party. 

Conclusion :- The Regulations are just an aspect of the Regulatory Framework governing ICT and the Tech Sector in Nigeria, a Regulatory Framework that is constantly evolving due to the dynamic nature of Tech from communications to E-commerce to Fintech to Social Interactions. It is thus wise to ensure your up-to-date compliance with this Regulatory Framework constantly to avoid possible unplanned losses, especially of the type constantly experienced by ICT and Fintech subsectors such as Mobile Communications and Digital Moneylending by having close by diligent Data Protection Compliance professionals going forward.