DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 52

Kraken Receives a Federal Reserve Master Account, First of a Crypto Firm

2

Kraken Financial, the Wyoming-chartered banking arm of the crypto exchange Kraken, has become the first crypto-native or digital asset firm to receive a Federal Reserve master account.

This grants it direct access to the Fed’s core payment systems, such as Fedwire; for real-time gross settlement and related rails, without relying on intermediary commercial banks. The approval came from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, which oversaw Kraken’s long-pending application; filed back in 2020 after Kraken obtained its special purpose depository institution (SPDI) charter in Wyoming.

It’s described as a limited-purpose or “skinny” master account allowing direct settlement in central bank money, faster and more efficient fiat transfers, reduced costs, and lower operational risks—especially for institutional and professional clients. This does not include full traditional banking privileges like access to the Fed’s discount window (lending facilities).

Kraken positions this as a milestone where crypto infrastructure integrates with core U.S. financial rails, maturing from peripheral to central. Crypto firms have historically depended on partner banks for fiat movements, which added friction, delays, costs, and counterparty risks.

Direct Fed access levels the playing field, enabling Kraken to settle like traditional banks and credit unions. This could accelerate institutional adoption, streamline deposits and withdrawals, and signal a regulatory shift toward greater crypto integration.

Kraken’s own blog post highlights it as “the first digital asset bank in U.S. history” with this access. This could pave the way for others; Custodia Bank, which has pursued similar access and litigation to follow, especially under evolving Fed frameworks for non-traditional institutions. A big step for bridging crypto and traditional finance.

Custodia Bank’s pursuit of a Federal Reserve master account has been a high-profile, years-long effort that contrasts sharply with Kraken’s recent success. Custodia Bank, a Wyoming-chartered special purpose depository institution (SPDI) founded by Caitlin Long, applied for a master account with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City around 2020—similar timing to Kraken’s application.

The goal was direct access to Fed payment systems for faster, lower-risk fiat settlements, especially for its crypto-focused services. Custodia sued the Fed over delays in processing the application. The Fed formally denied the master account and membership applications, citing risks from Custodia’s heavy reliance on volatile crypto markets, insufficient risk controls limited traditional banking experience, and potential systemic risks.

2024: A U.S. District Court in Wyoming largely upheld the Fed’s denial, ruling that the Fed has discretion and is not required to grant access even to eligible state-chartered institutions.

October 31, 2025: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling in a 2-1 decision. The court confirmed the Fed’s authority to deny master accounts based on risk considerations, rejecting Custodia’s claim to automatic entitlement under statutes like the Federal Reserve Act.

December 2025: Custodia filed a petition for rehearing en banc (full court review) with the Tenth Circuit, asking all judges to revisit the panel’s decision upholding the Fed’s discretion.

No public resolution on the en banc petition or further appeals is reported in recent coverage. Custodia remains without a master account, and the Fed has not approved one for any fully crypto-native institution prior to Kraken’s limited approval. Kraken Financial secured a limited-purpose master account from the same Kansas City Fed in early 2026.

Reports highlight this as a milestone under potentially evolving regulatory views, possibly influenced by pro-crypto shifts or clearer frameworks. Custodia’s denial stemmed from specific concerns about its business model and risk profile. Kraken’s approval appears more restricted (no discount window access, shorter initial term), but it succeeded where Custodia has not.

Some commentary notes Kraken’s breakthrough could create a clearer precedent or path for others, including Custodia, though Custodia’s ongoing legal fight focuses on challenging the Fed’s discretion broadly. This case remains a key test for crypto integration into traditional finance rails.

Custodia continues advocating for fair access, but the courts have so far backed the Fed’s gatekeeping role to protect system stability.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Signals End to Investments in OpenAI and Anthropic Ahead of Their Expected IPOs

0

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told attendees at the Morgan Stanley Tech, Media and Telecom conference in downtown San Francisco on Wednesday, that his company’s recent investments in OpenAI and Anthropic are likely to be its last in both firms.

Huang indicated the window for such private investments typically closes once companies go public, which both AI labs are widely expected to do later this year. The remarks came during a wide-ranging discussion on Nvidia’s ecosystem strategy. Huang emphasized that the company’s stakes in OpenAI and Anthropic were made “very squarely, strategically” to expand and deepen Nvidia’s reach in the AI ecosystem — a goal he said has largely been achieved.

Huang had reiterated during the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call that all Nvidia investments focus on ecosystem expansion rather than purely financial returns. This means that Nvidia does not need additional upside from equity stakes in either company to benefit from their growth. The company remains the dominant supplier of GPUs that power both OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude models, generating massive recurring revenue from data center sales.

In that sense, the investments were more about strategic alignment and influence than financial engineering. Several factors appear to be driving Nvidia’s apparent decision to step back from further commitments. The most straightforward explanation is timing: late-stage private investments often taper off as companies approach IPOs, when public-market liquidity and valuation mechanisms take over.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic have been preparing for public listings in 2026, with OpenAI reportedly targeting a valuation north of $840 billion and Anthropic exploring a range above $360 billion. However, the relationship dynamics have grown increasingly complex. Nvidia’s $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s latest $110 billion round (finalized last week) came in well below the $100 billion figure floated in September 2025.

Huang has dismissed suggestions of bad blood between the companies as “nonsense,” but the reduction suggests a recalibration of exposure. The situation with Anthropic has been more visibly strained. In November 2025, Nvidia committed $10 billion to Anthropic. Just two months later, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei — speaking at Davos without naming Nvidia directly — compared U.S. chip companies selling high-performance AI processors to approved Chinese customers to “selling nuclear weapons to North Korea.”

The remark drew sharp attention in Washington and within Nvidia’s orbit. The tension escalated dramatically last week when the Trump administration barred federal agencies and defense contractors from using Anthropic’s technology after the company refused to remove restrictions on mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous lethal weapons.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a “supply-chain risk” and threatened broader consequences. Within hours, OpenAI announced its own Pentagon deal — a move Anthropic publicly called “mendacious.” Claude’s iOS app overtook ChatGPT as the top free app on Apple’s U.S. store in the immediate aftermath, reflecting consumer backlash.

Nvidia now holds equity in two companies that are diverging sharply in their approach to government partnerships. OpenAI has embraced defense contracts with explicit safeguards; Anthropic has drawn hard red lines and faced retaliation. This places Nvidia in an awkward position as both a major investor and the primary hardware supplier for two increasingly polarized AI labs.

Industry observers note that late-stage private investing often continues until the eve of an IPO when companies seek to maximize valuations and liquidity. Huang’s statement that the “opportunity to invest closes” with an IPO is technically accurate but somewhat simplified; many firms continue buying shares in pre-IPO windows or secondary markets.

The more likely explanation is that Nvidia is quietly stepping back from a situation that has become politically and reputationally complicated far faster than anticipated. The broader context is Nvidia’s extraordinary position in the AI boom. The company’s data center revenue — driven overwhelmingly by demand from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, Meta, and others — has made it one of the most valuable companies in history.

Equity stakes in AI labs were strategic, not essential for financial upside. With both OpenAI and Anthropic heading toward public markets, Nvidia can maintain influence through GPU sales without additional balance-sheet exposure. The timing of Huang’s remarks also coincides with Nvidia’s own investor scrutiny. Shares have been volatile in recent months amid concerns over AI spending sustainability, U.S.-China tensions, and competition from emerging Chinese AI chipmakers. Signaling a pullback from further high-profile AI equity bets may reassure investors focused on Nvidia’s core semiconductor dominance rather than venture-style side plays.

Whether Huang foresaw the full political and competitive complexity of backing two leading AI labs is impossible to know. What is clear is that Nvidia’s web of partnerships has become more tangled than ever. OpenAI is deepening government ties; Anthropic is publicly defying them. Nvidia, as both investor and indispensable supplier, sits at the center of that tension.

Democratic Attorneys General Move to Block Trump’s New Tariffs, Setting Up Fresh Court Fight Over Trade Powers

0

A coalition of state attorneys general led by Letitia James is preparing to file a new lawsuit aimed at stopping President Donald Trump’s latest global tariff regime, escalating a legal confrontation over trade policy only weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States struck down a similar effort.

The case, expected to be filed Thursday in the United States Court of International Trade, will seek to invalidate the administration’s newly announced tariffs and compel the federal government to refund states and businesses for duties already collected under the policy.

The lawsuit marks the second major legal battle over Trump’s sweeping tariff agenda and reflects growing resistance among Democratic-led states to the president’s attempt to maintain one of his signature economic policies.

A Policy Revived After Supreme Court Defeat

The new legal challenge follows a landmark Supreme Court ruling last month that invalidated most of Trump’s earlier tariff framework, often referred to as the “Liberation Day” tariffs.

In that decision, the court ruled that the administration improperly used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping import duties.

The IEEPA law is typically used to sanction foreign governments or restrict financial transactions during national emergencies, and the court concluded that its provisions did not grant the president authority to impose broad tariffs across global trade flows.

The ruling represented one of the most significant legal setbacks of Trump’s second term, striking down a central pillar of his economic strategy. Rather than abandoning the tariff initiative, the administration quickly sought a new legal foundation.

Within hours of the decision, Trump announced that his administration would implement a new global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a provision that allows temporary import restrictions in response to balance-of-payments problems.

The tariff rate is currently set at 10%, but the administration has said it intends to raise it to 15% in the coming days.

States Argue the Law Is Being Misused

The coalition of attorneys general argues that the administration is stretching Section 122 far beyond its intended purpose.

Historically, the provision was designed to allow temporary trade restrictions when the United States faced acute international payment imbalances — a problem that was more common during the era when global currencies were tied to the gold standard.

State lawyers are expected to argue that the statute was never meant to authorize sweeping global tariffs targeting dozens of countries simultaneously. In their filing, the attorneys general will also argue that the tariffs violate constitutional limits on executive power.

Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress has primary authority over tariffs and taxation, although lawmakers have historically delegated limited powers to the executive branch for specific trade actions.

The states contend that Trump’s new tariffs exceed those delegated powers.

“The president is ignoring the law and the Constitution to effectively raise taxes on consumers and small businesses,” James said in a statement announcing the legal action.

“After the Supreme Court rejected his first attempt to impose sweeping tariffs, the president is causing more economic chaos and expecting Americans to foot the bill.”

A Growing Financial Dispute

The case arrives at a moment when the financial consequences of the earlier tariffs are already unfolding in court. On Wednesday, a federal judge ruled that companies that paid duties under the previous tariff system — which was invalidated by the Supreme Court — are entitled to billions of dollars in refunds.

That decision could force the government to repay large sums to importers who paid tariffs before the policy was struck down.

If the new tariffs are also overturned, the potential liability for the federal government could grow significantly. For businesses that depend on imported goods, the legal uncertainty has complicated planning decisions and pricing strategies.

Importers often pay tariffs months before goods reach consumers, meaning a reversal of the policy can create complicated refund claims and accounting adjustments. Trade lawyers say the situation underscores how rapidly shifting tariff policies can ripple through supply chains.

Trump’s tariff agenda has been a defining feature of his economic approach, aimed at reshaping global trade relationships and protecting domestic industries.

The administration argues that tariffs encourage companies to relocate manufacturing to the United States and reduce the country’s persistent trade deficit.

However, many economists note that tariffs raise costs for American businesses and consumers because importers frequently pass the higher costs along through prices. Industries that rely heavily on imported materials — including manufacturing, construction, and retail — have warned that broad tariffs can increase production costs and squeeze margins.

Financial markets have also been closely watching the legal battles over the tariffs, as sudden changes in trade policy can affect commodity prices, exchange rates, and corporate earnings forecasts. Analysts say prolonged uncertainty around the legality of the tariffs could weigh on business investment decisions.

The Political Divide Of U.S. Trade Policy

The lawsuit underpins the intensifying political divide over trade policy in the United States. Most of the attorneys general joining the case come from Democratic-led states that have frequently clashed with the Trump administration on economic and regulatory issues.

Many of those states were also involved in the earlier legal challenge that ultimately reached the Supreme Court. The new case is expected to argue that the administration’s latest move represents an attempt to circumvent the court’s earlier ruling rather than comply with it.

James described the tariff policy as “a clear attempt to escape the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case against the tariffs imposed under IEEPA.”

The dispute also unfolds against the backdrop of a long-running legal confrontation between Trump and James. The administration’s Justice Department indicted the New York attorney general in October on charges including bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution.

However, a judge later dismissed the case, and two grand juries declined to revive the charges. Although those proceedings are separate from the tariff dispute, the history between the two figures has added political intensity to the legal battle.

The case will first be heard by the Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court that handles disputes involving customs law and trade policy.

Any ruling there could be appealed to higher courts and ultimately return to the Supreme Court, setting the stage for another landmark decision about the limits of presidential authority over trade. The outcome of the case could determine not only the future of the tariffs but also how far future presidents can go in reshaping U.S. trade policy without explicit approval from Congress.

US Spot Bitcoin ETFs Resume Increased Net Inflows 

0

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have resumed a positive momentum in net inflows recently, snapping a prolonged period of outflows that characterized much of early 2026.

After five consecutive weeks of net outflows totaling around $3.8–$4.5 billion, the funds flipped positive. Last week, they recorded approximately $787 million in net inflows, marking the first green weekly print in that streak. This reversal accelerated with strong consecutive daily inflows: A three-day surge brought in over $1 billion collectively.

On March 2 (Monday), inflows reached $458 million—one of the strongest single-day figures this quarter—led heavily by BlackRock’s IBIT around $263 million. On March 3 (Tuesday), another $225 million in net inflows, again driven by IBIT (offsetting some outflows elsewhere). This has extended the inflow trend into early March, with reports of institutional demand returning amid “buy-the-dip” sentiment, even against backdrop factors like geopolitical tensions.

Cumulative net inflows since the ETFs’ launch remain robust around $55–$62 billion across major trackers, with total Bitcoin holdings in these products exceeding 1 million BTC in many updates. This shift signals renewed institutional interest, potentially supporting Bitcoin’s price stabilization or recovery after earlier pressure.

BlackRock’s IBIT has consistently led the pack in recent positive days. The trend appears to be continuing positively as of early March 2026. The recent resumption of net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs has had a noticeably positive impact on Bitcoin’s price trends in early March 2026, contributing to a sharp rebound and upward momentum.

Bitcoin is trading around $71,000–$72,000, with recent highs approaching or briefly exceeding $72,000—marking a one-month high and a significant recovery from earlier range-bound trading in the $60,000–$70,000 zone during late February. BTC surged notably, climbing over 4–8% in some sessions from lows near $67,500–$68,000 to highs around $71,800–$72,400.

This follows a period of pressure where BTC hovered lower amid prior outflows and macro headwinds. The key driver appears to be the renewed institutional demand via ETFs: Late February into early March saw a reversal: After five weeks of heavy outflows totaling ~$3.8–$4.5 billion, inflows returned strongly.

A standout stretch included ~$1.1 billion in net inflows over three consecutive days (late February), the strongest since mid-January. Specific daily figures: ~$458 million on March 2 (led by BlackRock’s IBIT at ~$263 million), with continued positive momentum into March 3–4. Weekly totals (e.g., week ending February 27) showed ~$787 million in Bitcoin ETF inflows, snapping the prior negative streak.

This fresh buying pressure—primarily outright long exposure from institutions (not just basis trades)—has helped absorb selling and support price stabilization/recovery. Analysts note:Models suggest BTC was trading below its “flow-implied” value; one estimate showed ~41% upside potential to ~$95,000 based on historical ETF flow elasticity, and the recent inflows are closing that gap.

The inflows coincide with “buy-the-dip” sentiment, regulatory optimism around U.S. crypto legislation, and reduced selling pressure, outweighing some lingering macro and geopolitical risks in the Middle East tensions impacting risk assets. However, the relationship isn’t perfectly linear—strong flows don’t always translate to immediate explosive gains if offset by broader market headwinds or existing supply.

Still, the current trend points to stabilization and potential for further upside; some macro views target $100K–$120K in March if momentum holds, with thin resistance in certain ranges above $72,000 potentially leading to quicker moves toward $80,000+ due to low historical volume there.

Overall, the ETF inflow streak has acted as a clear tailwind, fueling Bitcoin’s recent rally and shifting the short-term trend from bearish consolidation to bullish recovery.

BlockDAG Network Goes Live with a Historic 100x Price Structure! Aptos Struggles Under $1  & XRP Battles Breakout Limits

0

The alternative currency market in 2026 is currently witnessing many short jumps followed by long periods of falling prices. Aptos crypto saw a 37% price increase after its Decibel update, yet it has quickly dropped back under the $1 mark. Meanwhile, the XRP current price stays near $1.41, trapped beneath its main average lines while sellers keep control. Both of these projects have interesting stories, but neither one is showing a strong reason to expect quick gains right now.

Looking at the top crypto coins getting the most attention today, BlockDAG (BDAG) is in a completely separate league. Its main network is active, and after a huge $452 million presale phase, it has officially started trading on the open market. Unlike other projects that are still trying to find their way, BDAG is entering the market with everything already built and ready. With a launch price that offers a 100x gap from its early stages, this is one of the most important moments of the year for people following the latest market trends.

Aptos Crypto Jumps on Update News but Fails to Stay Above $1

Aptos crypto made a lot of noise recently when it climbed over 37% from its low point of $0.80 to reach above $1.10. This was caused by people getting excited about the Decibel update. This new version brings in a new stablecoin, limits the total supply to 2.1 billion, and cuts the creation of new coins by half. It also burns all the fees from transactions to help keep the supply low. However, this price jump did not last long at all. Sellers pushed Aptos crypto back under $1, and the network slowed down quite a bit as more people tried to use it at the same time.

The chance for a price increase now depends on more money coming into the project and the price staying above its old resistance lines. If that does not happen, this jump might just be a small bounce before the price falls even further. Among top crypto coins, APT has some good features, but it still needs to show that it can keep its value high once the excitement of the update goes away.

XRP Current Price Faces Heavy Pressure Despite Big Fund Interest

The XRP current price of $1.30 is a story many have heard before: a slow drop with only small moments of hope. XRP is sitting below its 50-day and 200-day average price marks, which shows a very weak trend across all time periods. There are some good facts in the background, though. Big funds saw $6 million come in over two days, and major banks like Goldman Sachs have shown they hold $153 million in XRP. Also, the partnership with Deutsche Bank for a new stablecoin gives the project more respect in the long term.

However, none of these big news stories has helped the price move up yet. Experts think the XRP current price will stay between $1.30 and $1.50 for a while, with a very low chance of breaking out to higher levels soon. Until XRP can get back above the $1.42 level, it is mostly a defensive choice for buyers. For people looking through top crypto coins for a real chance at big growth, XRP might need a lot more time to get ready.

BlockDAG Is Officially Trading as the Final Opportunity Arrives

While Aptos struggles to stay at $1 and XRP moves sideways under heavy resistance, BlockDAG (BDAG) is making a much bigger move. This is not a project that is just waiting for updates or hoping people feel better about the market; it has already finished the hard work. That is why BDAG is constantly mentioned whenever people talk about top crypto coins with real chances for fast growth. The main network is fully running, and the event to create the tokens is finished. By raising $452 million during its early phase, BlockDAG has created one of the strongest foundations for a launch that the market has seen in a long time.

Trading is live right now! You can find the platform available on Coinstore, BitMart, and Pionex USA, and you can also do a direct swap through the BlockDAG website. Many more global platforms are currently lining up to list the coin soon. Market makers have released price predictions suggesting a value of $0.2 in the very short term, and they say $0.4 or $0.5 is very possible soon after. Many analysts believe BDAG could reach a top 50 market cap rank, which would mean its total value would go above $1.2 billion. Major Tier 1 exchanges, including those in the United States, are expected to list it very soon.

There are many reasons why this project is seen as a leader among top crypto coins. Some are even saying that BDAG staking could beat the early levels seen by Solana. Reports from major exchanges and technical studies show that the trading volumes are predicted to be much larger than what Kaspa or Solana saw during their first days.

This is why some experts believe the price could jump 100x or even more now that the launch has happened. The supply of coins is being taken up very quickly as wallets are filled by those who see the massive potential here. Unlike other coins that are still looking for a direction, BlockDAG enters the world of trading with a finished product and a massive group of people behind it.

For those who are still hunting for top crypto coins that have real substance and a huge chance to go up, the current trading activity around BDAG is a sign of things to come. The network is already built, the community is active, and the systems are in place to support a huge amount of growth. This is a rare moment where a project delivers exactly what it promised right at the start of open trading. The gap between the early entry points and the new public price is clear evidence of the high demand.

Summing Up!

Aptos crypto has some energy from its recent update, but it still has not proven it can stay above $1. The XRP current price shows a downward trend that even big banks have not been able to fix yet. Both of these projects have potential for the future, but they are also very risky right now because of their weak price charts and uncertain timing. They are established names, but they are not showing the fast growth that people want to see.

BlockDAG takes away that doubt by delivering results immediately. With a working main network, $452 million in support, and trading now live on several exchanges, the project has already finished the race that most other coins are still running. The move from the early $0.0005 level to the new trading price is proof of how much people want this coin. Buyers are moving fast to get their positions now that the March 5 launch has happened and open trading has begun. Among the top crypto coins available in 2026, BlockDAG is the one that is already proving its value to the world.

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu