DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5247

African Mask Sold For $4.6 Million In France, People Protest

1

There was chaos at an auction site in Southern France after it was disclosed that a local Gabonese community staged a protest against the auction of a 19th-century wooden carved mask that was sold for $4.6 million. Activists who disrupted the auction protest stated that whoever bought the mask was acquiring stolen property. According to information obtained, it was disclosed that the rare wooden “Ngil mask” is used in ceremonies by the fang ethnic people of Gabon.

The Ngil mask is believed to have played a huge influence on the work of famous European artists including Picasso and Modigliani. According to the protesters, they disclosed that they will go further to file a complaint against such an inhuman act by France, and they will do everything to ensure that they recover the stolen artifact which was ill-gotten by the colonial masters. Amid the protest, Jean Christophe Guseppi the auctioneer in charge of the sale of the mask stated that the object belonged to the secret society of the Ngil vigilantes who roamed the villages to flush out troublemakers, among whom were individuals suspected of witchcraft.

He, therefore, concluded by saying that the auctioning of the object was legal as he saw nothing wrong in it. I strongly condemn this act of France for auctioning the Gabonese Ngil Mask, despite claims from them in trying to retrieve their artifact. According to history, it is a known fact that during the colonial era, most European countries invaded the African region and plundered all their precious artifacts that were sacred, symbolic, and spiritual to the African people. Some other artifacts were seen as metaphorical, as they spoke to the worldview and aspirations of the African people.

A lot of them have admitted that these artifacts were illegally obtained from Africa, of which some countries like Germany and Britain have returned some stolen artifacts in their possession back to their roots in Africa. I see no reason why some other European countries should still hold on to these objects, knowing full well the history of how it was illegally acquired by their colonial masters. Europeans must understand that these artifacts are not just mere objects, but rather, these objects help shape African history. Without it, history wouldn’t be complete.

French President Emmanuel Macron had in the past commissioned a report that the artifacts plundered from sub-Saharan Africa during the colonial era should be returned through permanent restitution. I am surprised at the recent development that just happened in France, concerning their refusal to return the “Ngil mask” to the Gabonese people. These European countries must understand that Africa’s treasure rightly belongs to Africa as it is sacrosanct to the people and it helps to shape their history. Selling it for financial gain is gross wickedness as it makes no sense to do that.

Prolific writer Chimamanda Adichie in one of her speeches in Germany stated that “European countries must see the need to have the courage to say that these arts are not ours, it should be returned to where it rightly belongs”. Some European countries have however made condescending statements as regards the stolen artifacts stating that they won’t return the arts, as African countries won’t take good care of them. Since when did it become their business how Africans took care of their arts? This is a specious argument, rooted in racist attitudes that somehow indigenous African people can’t be trusted to curate their own cultural heritage. It is also a product of the corrosive impact of colonialism.

One thing they fail to know is that Africans hold these artifacts in very high esteem, so saying they won’t know how to take care of them, doesn’t hold water at all. It doesn’t matter whether they can take care of them or not, what matters is that it is theirs. Since most European countries claim to practice the rule of law, they should live up to the ideals with which they define themselves by returning these arts. It might interest you to know that a lot of African arts are still being kept in Western Museums claiming that they are doing so for posterity’s sake. According to the most commonly cited figures from a 2007 UNESCO forum, 90% to 95% of sub-Saharan cultural artifacts are housed outside Africa.

The Elon Musk Impossible Social Media Project

0

His generation’s finest innovator wants to add a social media platform, free of censorship, to the list of his trophies.  But do not buy that, because as soon as Elon Musk unveils whatever he has in mind, he will attain a stable equilibrium state and that is censorship.

The problem is not the censorship. The real issue is people pretending that they do not censor. So before you plan to join Musk, understand that he will do the needful, sooner or later.

Censorship is global. In Russian websites over the weekend, the #1 trending video was the shooting of Russian Prisoners of War by Ukrainian soldiers. Magically, that video is severely restricted in our part of the internet. It is the same way Russia blocks videos of bombed hospitals in Ukraine, in Russia, even as they trend in our part of the web.

Elon Musk is brilliant but there is one thing he cannot achieve: a zero-censorship social media platform. Since they censored me, I have stopped writing about the Ukraine war as there is no need wasting time on issues I cannot freely express my views. Will Musk provide that freedom? My answer is IMPOSSIBLE.

Apathy toward social media is growing with a recruiting dynamic that has drawn popular voices to jump the bandwagon of its criticism, and the idea of creating an alternative platform devoid of propaganda and censorship as a solution to social media platforms’ undoing.

The latest recruit is Elon Musk. On Saturday, the world’s richest man started a series of tweets accompanied by polls on Twitter, where he revealed that he is seriously thinking about starting a social media platform.

The SpaceX founder and CEO started the conversation with a poll asking whether Twitter algorithm should be open source. 82.7% of the 1.12 million responders voted yes at the close of the poll.

Elon Musk Is Considering Starting His Own Social Media Platform

Elon Musk Is Considering Starting His Own Social Media Platform

0

Apathy toward social media is growing with a recruiting dynamic that has drawn popular voices to jump the bandwagon of its criticism, and the idea of creating an alternative platform devoid of propaganda and censorship as a solution to social media platforms’ undoing.

The latest recruit is Elon Musk. Last week, the world’s richest man started a series of tweets accompanied by polls on Twitter, where he revealed that he is seriously thinking about starting a social media platform.

The SpaceX founder and CEO started the conversation with a poll asking whether Twitter algorithm should be open source. 82.7% of the 1.12 million responders voted yes at the close of the poll.

This was followed by another poll the next day. Musk tweeted that “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy,” and then ask if people believed that Twitter was rigorously adhering to this principle. He then urged people to vote carefully as the consequences of the poll would be important. At the end of the voting session, 70.4% of the 2.04 million respondents said “No”.

He then went on to say that “Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy. What should be done?”

A couple of minutes later, Pranay Pathole, an Indian software developer asked the Tesla CEO if he would consider building a new social media platform, “One that would consist an open source algorithm, one where free speech and adhering to free speech is given top priority, one where propaganda is very minimal. I think that kind of a platform is needed.”

To this, he answered that he was “giving it a serious thought.”

https://twitter.com/PPathole/status/1507780749629730817?t=TLTc6_QiAoFXUucUHGDB-Q&s=19

Musk’s weekend conversation and polls on Twitter have resurrected a fresh discussion around freedom of speech, disinformation and hate speech that social media platforms have been continuously fingered as its enablers.

In January last year, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube banned the accounts of former US president, Donald Trump, following the January 6 Capitol insurrection he was accused of stoking using social media. The ban drew mixed reaction, which mostly centered on free speech, around the world.

Last year, Nigeria’s president Muhammadu Buhari banned Twitter after his tweet was removed for violating Twitter policy. While his decision was widely condemned, it got a lot of support from many popular individuals, including Trump himself.

Trump’s attempt to strip social media platforms of some powers and to hold them responsible for activities on their platform, by amending section 230(c)(2), which provides immunity from civil liabilities for information service providers, allowing social media sites to remove or add warning labels to users’ posts or even suspend people who violate their rules, was vetoed by the Congress.

Since then, Trump has made two attempts to establish his own social media platform where he claimed people will have liberty to express themselves without being censored. The latest, Truth Social, has gained a lot of attention since it was announced, though people doubt that it will be anything near a platform of free speech since Trump himself is known for being intolerant to criticism.

Social media companies have found themselves in between the devil and deep blue sea. Many governments around the world are working to limit what everyone is allowed to post on social media, while outside the governments, the people don’t want to be censored on social media.

Besides governments’ pressure to control the narrative, social media is seen to be struggling to find a balance in an era of woke and cancel culture, where unnatural ideas are becoming a norm and people are not allowed to speak out against them. Many are accusing social media platforms of censorship while others say they have allowed users to create unhealthy environments in the name of free speech.

Musk’s revelation that he is “seriously” considering establishing a social media platform may be the disrupter that the industry should be wary of, especially Twitter, which is his platform of choice. But would it solve the problem? In a world where one man’s truth is another man’s lie, running a social media platform on uncontrolled freedom of speech beckons disaster.

Before succumbing to pressure to ban Trump from Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that social media platforms shouldn’t act as arbiter of truth. He said that the first time Twitter affixed a label on Trump’s tweet, highlighting it as a potential lie. But with pressure piling up on social media as legislators and rights organizations step up efforts to stem online hate and disinformation, Facebook has updated its policy and has begun taking similar action against users.

Musk is currently worth a whopping $250 billion, weighs a huge social media influence and can easily create a successful social media platform. But will it be immune to regulatory influences? Will it not become a sanctuary for hate and bullying at the long run? It is believed that just like in Trump’s case, individuals’ idea of starting a social media platform is borne from the desire to promote what they believe in.

JAMB Needs Reform; Validity of Results Should be At least 3 Years before Expiration

1

First, the registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) must be commended for his service to the nation. He has turned a loss-making Board into one that has become a profit-center for the Nigerian government. Unfortunately, that success is the reason why some of us are not happy. Simply, JAMB should not be another LNG or NNPC which makes money to send excesses to the federal government.

The only thing Nigeria offers the common man today is subsidized tertiary education. Making access to it affordable will remain a key pillar for families to rise.  And as part of it, JAMB results MUST not expire after a year. It makes no sense to subject young people to this seasonable stress.

I propose for all results to expire after three years. That will reduce the burden for young people since not getting admitted into a university in Nigeria is not really about not being able to pass, but largely access. You have close to 2 million writing the exams for available slots of 500k across the colleges. Many of those 1.5m who will pass but cannot find space. Then,next year, they have to begin from afresh.

I call on the government to fix this mess even as we celebrate another record of JAMB revenue:  N8.6 billion in Q1 2022! As JAMB celebrates another “registration surpasses expectation’ moment, I want the House of Assembly to understand that we have really nothing to celebrate since next year is expected to be higher as repeatedly frustrated young people will retake an exam they have passed. 

Phase out the 1 year expiration of JAMB results;  I recommend a  3-year minimum.

At the close of the registration for the 2022 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) and Direct Entry (DE) programme on Saturday, the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) said a total of 1,837,011 candidates were successfully captured in the exercise that took place nationwide between February 19 and March 26.

This is contained in the latest weekly bulletin by JAMB which was released in Sunday night.

With N4,700 registration fee paid by the applicants, JAMB has successfully generated an estimated revenue of a total of N8.6 billion.

Out of the lump sum, a total of 776 computer-based test centres that took part in the exercise will share an estimated amount of N1.3 billion at the rate of N700 per candidate registered by each of the centres.

Will Smith should be arrested and tried for assaulting Chris Rock

9

At the Oscars award held last night, Will Smith, Denzel Washington, Andrew Garfield, Benedict Cumberbatch and Javier Bardem were nominees for the academy best actor in a leading role. Chris Rock the comedian  was the host and as comedian he made some jokes about Jada Pinket Smith, Will Smith’s  controversial wife who was also present at the award show. The joke didn’t sit well with Will Smith who deemed it fit to leave his seat and walk up the stage and gave Chris Rock a deafening slap.

After slapping Chris Rock, he walked back to his seat with threats that Chris Rock should leave the name of Jada Pinket Smith, the wife, out of his mouth.

The show continued as if nothing happened; as if Will Smith hadn’t just assaulted his colleague over a joke. He (Will Smith) later on won the best actor academy award category for the night beating the four other nominees to clutch the award.

The action of Will Smith was crude, totally uncalled for and disappointing. There are ways to register displeasures in sane and civilized societies, if you feel what a person said triggered you or you find it offensive and insulting, you can sue for libel or slander, that is why laws are put in place to make sure there are avenues and machineries where individuals can legally seek revenge and enforce their rights.

You don’t just go assaulting people because you feel offended or triggered, when you do that you have taken the law into your hands and the law which is meant to help you and to protect you will come after you and the law will definitely be against you.

The United States of America who prides herself as a lawful and civilized society should never let this behavior of Will Smith go unpunished, because if it is pushed under the carpet without Will Smith getting punished it will reinforce bad behaviors like these. People will see that it is okay to assault another person over a joke and you can get away with it, as much as you are a celebrity.

If you feel you have been abused, slandered or insulted, why not file a proper action in court and let the jury and the judge decide that and award you damages?

Pro-Will Smith’s people,  who are obviously Will Smith’s fans, are saying that Chris Rock deserves what he got but will they say the same thing if someone that got slapped over a joke happens to be their relation or friend. 

The LAPD should arrest Will Smith and make it public that the society does not condone jungle justice so as to deter other individuals who are slap-happy and are currently warming up to replicate this kind of habit.