DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5288

Police Orderlies should never be reduced to domestic staff in Nigeria

0

A video of a police officer attached as a security detail to Dr Nimota Nihilola Akanbi who was recently appointed as the pioneer Chairman of the National Secondary School Education Commission (NSSEC) has sparked a lot of negative reactions and it is putting the name of the Nigerian police force to ridicule.

In the viral video, the police orderly in his full police regalia was seen carrying a tray of food for the “Oga Madam”, following the Madam behind while the “Oga madam” was just exchanging pleasantries in an event over the weekend in Ilorin, Kwara state.

This act of VIPs turning their police or security protocols to domestic staff, using them to do menial jobs and house chores other than providing security for them which is the primary  reason they were attached to the individual is a no, no and should be highly condemned. A police officer is a security officer representing the uniform he wears and the Nigeria police force and should never be seen in his police outfit engaging in chores other than providing securities for the VIP for the pleasure of the VIP.

In no where in s.4 of the police act which provided for the general duties of the police and by extension the general duties of a policeman was it provided that a police officer attached to any VIP as an security orderly should be turned into a house boy or a “boy boy”,  used for menial chores or used as the VIP pleases. 

For the sake of emphasis, s.4 of the police act will be represented here, thus:

S.4. General duties of the police

The police shall be employed for the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehen- sion of offenders, the preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and the due enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, and shall perform such military duties within or outside Nigeria as may be required of them by, or under the authority of this or any other Act.

The Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Police Service Commission (PSC) should start withdrawing the police officers attached to some VIPs that are subjected to this kind of slavery and abuse. Just because you are privileged to be a high ranking member of the society should not warrant you to subject a fellow human who is same age bracket with you who is just attached to you to carry out his statutory duties ( of providing security for you) to this form of slavery.

Everything is wrong with this act.

It is wrong from every angle. Your security details attached to you as a VIP is a privilege and not your right,  they are for your security and not to do menial jobs and domestic chores for you. When you subject them to do some chores for you other than providing security, it amounts to abuse and mental slavery. Some VIPs even asked their police orderlies to do their laundry and do house cleaning; God forbid!

If you as a VIP need a domestic staff please employ one and stop subjecting the security forces of the nation to such abysmal ridicule and abuse.

The good news is that it was reported later today that the Police commission has summoned the officer who was seen carrying the food tray for his madam in the viral video. The police authorities also issued a strict warning that its operatives attached to Very Important Persons (VIPs) all over the country to stop serving purposes other than providing security coverage for the individuals against security threats. 

Tech Startups: The Lesson from Chelsea FC; Invested £140M in 2003, now Worth £4.5B

3

The business of football. As the owner of Chelsea FC sells the club, we are seeing into the window what happens behind the round leather balls. Yes, Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 for £140 million. Today, that club is now worth £3 BILLION.

 (That possibly excludes £1.514 billion in loans Chelsea took from Fordstam Limited which Abramovich is saying does not need to be repaid. If you include that, it simply means the club is worth £4.5 BILLION. You can do the multiples generated in less than two decades).

In the game of modern football, there are two emerging elements: winning trophies and making profits (not high valuations) seem to be largely uncorrelated. Yes, as Chelsea was racking up trophies, it was losing tons of money. However, those trophies boosted its reputation and value, making the value move up.

So, it did not make profit, but it increased valuation. Is that not how technology startups work? The difference here is that the scaling which is typical in startups is here equivalent to winning trophies!

Contrast that with Arsenal under Arsene Wenger who was actually making profits (yes, keep selling the best players) but struggled to win trophies. So, as Arsenal fans waited for trophies, the owners were smiling to the bank.

People, see beyond the round leather, football is business. It is all about business models. Chelsea FC under Abramovich was managed as a fast-growing tech-startup which was losing money but scaling fast, with high valuation as the outcome!

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Abramovich Puts Chelsea Up For Sale At £3bn

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Abramovich Puts Chelsea Up For Sale At £3bn

0

The whirlwind of Russia-Ukraine conflict is fast-reaching Russian oligarchs and its rich found to be supporters of President Vladimir Putin. A flurry of sanctions targeting their assets have been announced by the US, UK, EU and their allies.

Caught in the web of this misfortune is Chelsea Football Club’s owner, Roman Abramovich, who has been identified as a friend and supporter of Putin, a discovery that is not sitting well with the UK. This means, Abramovich’s assets and businesses in foreign lands have come under immediate threat of seizure by governments – and that includes Chelsea FC.

Seeking a way out of the possibility of his assets being frozen by the British government, Abramovich, who has been banned from entering the UK, is putting Chelsea up for sale. The oil magnate issued a statement on Wednesday, confirming that the football club now has a price tag.

“I would like to address the speculation in the media over the past few days in relation to my ownership of Chelsea FC. As I have stated before, I have always taken decisions with the Club’s best interest at heart. In the current situation, I have therefore taken the decision to sell the Club, as I believe this is in the best interest of the Club, the fans, the employees, as well as the Club’s sponsors and partners,” Abramovich said in a statement published on Chelsea’s website.

ESPN had earlier reported Abramovich’s decision to sell Chelsea, citing sources. As the UK teamed up with the US and others to mete out heavy sanctions on Russia, the 55-year-old attempted to separate the club from a possible personal sanction from the U.K. government by passing “stewardship and care” of Chelsea on to its trustees on Saturday.

However, per ESPN, the trustees were seeking legal advice before responding to Abramovich’s instruction due to concerns that a charitable foundation is not a suitable entity to run a football club. This has forced his decision to sell the club.

Abramovich, who has always strenuously denied any ties to the Putin regime, was uncovered in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, prompting the debate on Wednesday in the UK Parliament whether to sanction him.

The session had begun in the House of Commons, with Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer calling for sanctions against the Chelsea owner.

“Roman Abramovich is the owner of Chelsea Football Club and various other high-value assets in the United Kingdom,” Starmer said.

“He is a person of interest to the Home Office because of his links to the Russian state and his public association with corrupt activity and practices. Last week he [U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson] said Abramovich was facing sanctions. He later corrected the record to say he isn’t. Well, why on Earth isn’t he?”

A decision to sanction Abramovich will mean that Chelsea would be frozen because it’s one of his assets – and that would make it impossible for him to sell the club or inject any funds into it – which would have huge repercussions for the club.

Abramovich has been supporting Chelsea with his personal money since he bought the club nearly a decade ago. He said the decision to sell “has never been about business nor money for me, but about pure passion for the game and Club,” and that “the sale of the Club will not be fast-tracked but will follow due process.”

Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 for £140 million. According to ESPN, the club’s latest accounts show he is owed £1.514 billion in loans through parent company Fordstam Limited, which he controls.

“When Chelsea announced their latest accounts — a £145.6m loss after tax for the year ending June 30, 2021, despite winning the Champions League — the club admitted at the time they were ‘reliant on Fordstam Limited for its continued financial support’,” the report said.

Sources have told ESPN that Abramovich has told potential buyers in the past that he valued the club at around £3bn. The price tag was considered too much for potential buyers who were worried about loan repayment. Chelsea owes Abramovich nearly 2 billion pounds but he has said “I will not be asking for any loans to be repaid,” allaying the concern of buyers.

Abramovich said the proceeds of the sale will go to charity: “I have instructed my team to set up a charitable foundation where all net proceeds from the sale will be donated. The foundation will be for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine. This includes providing critical funds towards the urgent and immediate needs of victims, as well as supporting the long-term work of recovery,” he said.

The Technicalities of Contemporary Education System

0

It’s not anymore news that the contemporary education system across the globe has been characterized by some technicalities that are rather harmful to the system.

Education is simply defined as the imparting and acquiring of knowledge via teaching and learning, respectively, especially at a school or similar institution.

In the words of G. K. Chesterton ‘Education is simply the soul of a society as it passes from one generation to another.’ No wonder every sane and rational society treats it as the fundamental factor required toward any meaningful development.

The earliest educational processes involved sharing information about gathering food and providing shelter; making weapons and other tools; learning language; and acquiring the values, behaviour, as well as religious rites or practices of a given culture.

Prior to the invention of writing and reading, people lived in an environment in which they struggled to survive against natural forces, animals, and other humans. At the time, to survive, preliterate individuals developed skills that grew into cultural and educational patterns.

Education, therefore, emanated from the human struggle for survival and enlightenment. It may be formal or informal. The latter refers to the general social process by which human beings acquire the knowledge and skills needed to function in their culture. Whilst, formal education refers to the process through which teachers instruct pupils or students, as might be the case, in subjects of study within institutions.

Modern day education makes one feel proud that s/he is truly educated, though formally or informally, everyone is educated. Real education, which is the overall development of mind, body and soul, can be acquired via any means. According to Carter Woodson, education means to ‘inspire people to live more abundantly, to learn to begin with life as they find it and make it better.’

It’s noteworthy that modern education is aided with a variety of technology comprising computers, projectors, internet, and calculators, among others. This fact forms the basis of this discussion, hence shall take time to do justice to it.

Everything that can be simplified has been made simpler by the introduction of the aforementioned gadgets into modern day education. Science has obviously explored every aspect of human life. It suffices to say that there is now much to learn as well as more to assimilate. The Internet alone provides abysmal knowledge, meaning literally that there’s no end to it.

Skill development and vocational education has added a new feather to the modern system of education. Everyone has something to learn. Even an infant these days goes to a kindergarten. And a little grown – mentally and physically – is promoted to a nursery.

The most fascinating part is that everything is being categorized ranging from kindergarten, nursery, primary, secondary, to tertiary; and each of these stages has a certain set of technical acquaintances. The truth is, the modern pattern of education is a never-ending process. Aristotle Nicomachus, in his usual way, stated that education is an ‘ornament in prosperity and a refugee in adversity.’ This is exactly what modern education represents.

However, it’s pertinent to acknowledge that the existing technical intricacy of modern education has caused colossal harm to the present days’ children, thereby posing threat in their respective ambitions and future endeavours.

For instance, before now, devices such as abacus were used during Mathematics classes. Such an approach helped tremendously to educate the kids – ranging from ages 6 to 14 – on mental arithmetic, a knowledge that enables them to face any form of Mathematics problem in the future.

But now, except in countries like India, Russia, China, Ghana, and what have you, that still make use of counting frames or abacus, calculators have suddenly overtaken its use in Nigeria. Worse still, even primary school pupils are now exposed to scientific calculators.

Modern education has deprived most learners the opportunity of seeing the real events or scenes. Engineering students, for example, only see pictures of what is being taught, or what is expected to be produced by them.

Final year undergraduates, and perhaps postgraduate students, presently do their projects or theses by merely downloading the required materials from the net. Most students don’t even know where the fabric they are wearing came from. The word ‘how’ is currently missing in our world, which causes severe ignorance.

Modern education has succeeded in spreading more ignorance than knowledge. It has produced a vast population able to read but unable to distinguish what is worth reading. Learners do more of cramming rather than memorizing, which can only be achieved by getting close to facts or the actual pictures. Albert Einstein once said education is ‘that which remains if one has forgotten everything learned in school.’

For the technical intricacies involved in modern education to be advantageous to the learners, they must serve as supplements. In other words, they ought to be used for reference purposes, and not as fundamental devices as they are presently utilized in various institutions of learning.

The pupils or students must get used to the real pictures or sites before introducing the use of tech gadgets to them. Their brains shouldn’t be complicated with those things at an early stage. Those brains are still fragile, thus ought not to be juxtaposed with tech intricacies. More so, endeavour to let the practical segment be preceded by theory.

The truth is that we must note that every invention was made for a purpose, and to be applied at a particular time. So, if we end up misusing them, it becomes a problem when they are meant to serve as blessings.

Hence, there’s a need for concerned authorities to acknowledge the essence of following the required processes in any system.

Mercury Bank Places Restrictions On Accounts Linked To African Tech Start-Ups

0

Mercury bank, an online bank located in San Francisco, California designed to help small companies (start-ups) manage their cash flow better, just recently restricted several accounts linked to African tech start-ups. The number of companies affected by the restriction remains unknown. Information gotten from a few sources disclosed that companies affected, range from 12 to 30. According to those affected, Mercury bank did not give any prior notice as to why they carried out this action, nor did they give an explanation why the action was taken on the affected start-ups.

Upon persistent questioning, Mercury Bank which holds over $4 billion in customer deposits for its 40,000+ businesses in over 200 countries, later disclosed that some of the affected start-ups got their account was flagged and placed under review by its compliance team after it noticed some “unusual activity” and couldn’t provide further details until it’s review are complete. Displeased with these restrictions, a couple of tech founders and stakeholders had to directly send a mail to Mercury CEO Immad Akhund, asking him what the issue was and also stating that they need the issue resolved immediately.

The CEO however responded, stating that their partner bank noticed an unusual activity, and instructed Mercury Bank to lock and investigate a large set of accounts linked with such activity. He however assured them that they are currently working on the issue and hopefully all restrictions will be removed.

These restrictions sparked mixed reactions from Twitter, where a couple of Tech founders insinuated that the restrictions might be linked to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which has seen the company’s partner bank review its exposure to “high risk” regions such as Africa.

Although Mercury has reached out to affected start-ups, stating that its intention wasn’t to single out the founder or start-up. But considering how most of the complaints seem to be coming from the African region as compared to other regions, it is hard to think that these start-ups in Africa are not prime targets. This is not a good look for start-ups affected, as nearly $3k estimated in return check fees for checks were already sent out before the restrictions. Will these companies be compensated for these losses accrued? One can only imagine.

This act indeed should be a wake-up call to African startups. It is high time they build their finance system and regulate their global fintechs. They need to get to the point where they don’t have to raise capital overseas. Self-reliance looks like the ideal solution. The restrictions should be a reminder to Nigerian Tech CEOs and stakeholders that there is no other perfect alternative than to build their own International Finance center and buy offshore bank licenses so start-ups can bank their money.

Truth be told, Africa especially Nigeria is more of a consumer, than building their infrastructures. There is an urgent need to double down in building our structures, as over-reliance on foreign infrastructure can spell doom someday.

In November 2021, the central bank governor, Godwin Emefiele disclosed that the Apex bank would establish an international financial center at the Eko Atlantic city, for investors to invest in critical sectors of the economy, and this will help to position Nigeria as a key destination for investment in Africa. But then, building at home can be filled with uncertainty too as anything in allegiance with the federal government is often faced with misfortune that can hit any time soon. The Apex bank of Nigeria is known for abnormally freezing accounts.