DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5290

Air Peace Responds – Out of Respect to Emir of Kano, It Could Not Delay Flight!

1

Air Peace has responded to the Kano Emirate  which wrote a letter to NCAA to report it. The airline refused to delay its scheduled flight to make it possible for Emir of Kano and his team to join: ‘’If the Airline had agreed to halt and delay an aircraft already set to go – for another one hour – only for the door to be opened and the Emir and his entourage walk in, there would have been a very serious uproar in the media nationwide against both the airline and the Emir. This we pleaded with Isa Bayero to understand”.

“Our departure from Banjul was scheduled for 00:10hrs (local time) on 24th February, 2022, however, we departed Banjul at 01:19hrs and we landed at Lagos at 5:45am. Our connecting flight to Kano on the same Air Peace airline was for 6:15 hrs. This gave us only 30 minutes to make our flight to Kano.”

He said he personally called the Chairman of Air Peace, Allen Onyeama, to inform him of the precarious situation and requested him to assist by delaying their departing flight to Kano as a mark of respect to the revered Emir of Kano.

“He flatly refused and avowed that he will not do that. I personally took this as an insult and a flagrant show of disrespect to his highness and the Kano people at large.”

He said it was very disappointing because the delay was the fault of the airline, adding that he was “aware that even with arriving international flights, departing aircrafts – local or international – are often delayed to enable arriving passengers join. Why should that be different with Air Peace Airline?”

He said despite having to check into a hotel at personal cost, the airline also requested them to pay a “No-show” fee when they wanted to rebook the next available flight of the airline which was by 7pm.

“This is an extreme case of insensitivity and callousness. In view of the foregoing, I feel strongly aggrieved and demand your kind intervention for restitution and for appropriate measures to be taken to stop this unwholesome development from happening in the future,” he added.

When contacted, a spokesman of the airline said he would get back to one of our correspondents. He had yet to do so as of the time of filing this report.

The Director-General of the NCAA, Capt. Musa Nuhu, confirmed receipt of the letter but declined further comment.

“I can only say we received the letter, we are working on it but I cannot say anything on it,” he said.

The Emirate has the capacity to charter a flight from Lagos to Kano. But if for any reason he misses a flight, as a leader, his men should adjust his schedules accordingly. Asking an airline to delay a flight is not fair in this modern Nigeria.

Yet, Air Peace is also wrong here. The Emir and his team were connecting with an Air Peace flight. If that originating flight was delayed, the airline should have planned ahead knowing that some of its customers would possibly arrive late and would require adjustments. Sure, in Nigeria, where flight routes are limited, that might not have been possible. But not delaying a scheduled flight is the right thing to do. Where it got it wrong was not making an alternative for those arriving from its originating delayed flight.

People, Nigeria has important things to deal with. Air Peace, visit the Emirate and apologize. Next time you have an originating delay, plan ahead for clients. The Emirate, train your team to modulate: it is a no-go area to delay a scheduled flight.

Air Peace Statement

‘’Our attention has been drawn to a written complaint by one Isa Bayero to the DG of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) against Air Peace and which is published in the public domain.

‘’In the complaint, Mr. Isa Bayero alleged that Air Peace disrespected the Emir of Kano and the people of Kano by not delaying the Airline’s 6:15 am flight to Kano for the Emir! Rather than disrespect the reverred Emir of Kano, Air Peace did all that it could to protect the name and image of the emir from ridicule by not succumbing to what Isa Bayero demanded of the Airline.

‘’If the Airline had agreed to halt and delay an aircraft already set to go – for another one hour – only for the door to be opened and the Emir and his entourage walk in, there would have been a very serious uproar in the media nationwide against both the airline and the Emir.

‘’This we pleaded with Isa Bayero to understand, but he refused to accept.

‘’How could Isa Bayero want the management of Air Peace to halt and delay a fully boarded aircraft with doors shut and aircraft already moving, while our respected Emir and eight others in his entourage, including Isa Bayero, were still when I reported this statement to the Chairman, he did not believe me and insinuated that I might not have heard him rightly, because Isa Bayero was well acquainted with him and could not have said such.

‘’It is, therefore, to my utmost shock that we saw in the media this deliberate falsehood.

‘’It is so unfortunate that Isa Bayero will go to this extent to portray the Chairman and Air Peace in this manner.

‘’The Chairman of Air Peace has the highest regard for the traditional institution as it could be recalled that the Emir of Kano had previously issued a certificate of commendation to the Chairman for his philanthropic work to the people of Kano and as such holds the office of the Emir and all traditional institutions in highest esteem.

‘’We are, therefore, appalled that this statement would be made to incite such negativity towards the airline.

‘’We make bold to say that the Emir of Kano we know would have been offended to know that a flight already taxiing was halted and delayed for over 40 minutes for him.

‘’The Emir would never have supported this publication. He may not have even known our offers and our reasons given to Prince Isa Bayero.

‘’We reiterate our respects to our reverred Emir of Kano.’’

Update 1: Someone had noted that the two flights are not in the same itinerary. In other words, there are separate tickets. If that is the case, the Emirate has no case as Air Peace would not have known about the originating delay. I have written on the assumption that the two legs of the flights are in one ticket.

Update 2: There was the note that the company offered alternative routes. That was not disclosed in the original statement shared above. If that is the case, the airline has done everything right.

How Far Has Nigeria Fared In Technology?

0

On a regular basis, we, either as individuals or groups, are expected to cross-examine our worth in a bid to ascertain the area that is in need of amendment. It also enables us to acknowledge the idiosyncrasies that ought to be maintained as the journey progresses.

The aforementioned method of assessment is not only essential for an individual or group of persons, but also in the case of a corporate body. Hence, it is essentially needed by all existing bodies.

This topic is basically interested in the technological worth of the acclaimed giant of Africa. In other words, we’re x-raying how far and well she has hitherto fared in tech issues and activities.

One might ask, does Nigeria really have technology, let alone x-raying its value? The truth is that the country could currently boast of over ninety tech hubs across the federation, the highest on the African continent.

In recent years, Nigeria has ostensibly become an incubator for some of the continent’s biggest start-ups, including online marketplace such as Jumia and Konga; and these digital outlets are unarguably driven by tech expertise.

It’s noteworthy that Nigeria reportedly has the largest economy in Africa with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of about $448.12 billion compared to its closest rival, South Africa whose present GDP is about $320 billion.

However, it’s worthy of note that the real wealth of any nation is calculated by its GDP per capita, and Nigeria ranks 140 out of 186 in GDP per capita global ranking.

Per capita GDP is a financial metric that breaks down a country’s economic value (output) per person, and is calculated by dividing the whole GDP by the country’s overall population.

In Economics, it’s widely accepted that technology is the key driver of economic growth of countries, regions or cities. Technological progress allows more efficient production of goods and services, in which prosperity depends on.

Technology brings skills, knowledge, process, technique, and tools together, toward solving problems concerning human existence, thereby making their life secure and happy.

It’s very pertinent in today’s world, because it is driving the global community as well as making it appear better. In fact, it is gradually becoming inevitable in our various homes, offices, and workplaces.

Nigeria’s tech patent has grown to be an envy of all who understands its real content. In terms of human and material attributes, it has over the years remains significant in the global society and market.

Take a walk round the world, you would comprehend that, most recent tech inventions and innovations across the globe were mainly as a result of contributions from Nigerians. Similarly, Nigerians remain the reason several countries’ tech sectors have grown beyond limits.

Ironically, Nigeria’s tech sector is presently nothing to write home about. As the days unfold, the sector continues to decline in its value, hence taking the country’s name to a state of ridicule.

Each day, the governments at all levels come up with empty promises and policies as regards tech-driven activity and innovation. The politicians at the country’s helm of affairs have unequivocally, over the donkey’s years, failed us in this regard.

The good news is that, in spite of the lingering hurdles and challenges, the prospects of the country’s tech value remain obviously great, perhaps owing to the fathomless resources lying fallow.

It’s worth noting that countless factors are behind the ongoing impediments in Nigeria’s tech sector. For us to get it right as a people, these barriers continually posing a threat must be severely tackled by the concerned authorities at all cost.

A certain tech-driven contract might be awarded by the government. In the long run, we would be greeted with a myriad of untold stories attributed to paucity of funds. In such case, it could be either the fund made available for execution of the project had been squandered or that insufficient fund was approved ab initio.

The steady economic fluctuation is another glaring factor that cannot be swept under the carpet. This particular plight has left Nigerians tech experts with no choice than to becloud their reasoning with uncertainties and fear of the unknown.

More so, those who – amidst the tough times – insisted on putting something together, would not find the apt market to sell their products or patents. This has continued unabated.

This could be as a result of infrastructural decay occasioned by lack of maintenance culture, or the required physical infrastructures have never been in existence from the onset. The cost of running a tech firm in Nigeria is too high, to say the least.

Russia Says It Will Partially Restrict Facebook, Accuses Platform of Censorship

0

US tech companies have managed to stay neutral since Russia invaded Ukraine on Thursday. Unlike several organizations following the trend of US-led sanctions on Russia by severing ties with either businesses from Russia or the Russian government itself, the Big Tech, especially social media platforms have shown little or no sign of taking a side.

But the story is beginning to change as the conflict escalates. In times of war, governments aim to push media propaganda using state-run media outlets and other platforms they could bend. Social media companies wield enormous global media influence that put them on the spotlight – and they may be forced to either allow government propaganda or get the boot. Facebook has begun to receive that treatment.

Russia said Friday that it would partially limit access to Facebook within its borders over what it alleges is censorship of four state news outlets.

In its announcement, the country’s communications regulator said it asked Facebook earlier in the week to remove the restrictions and explain its reasoning for them but did not hear back. It also accused the company of various other undetailed human rights and freedoms abuses.

Per Insider, Facebook said it had refused requests to stop fact-checking posts from certain outlets.

“Russian authorities ordered us to stop the independent fact-checking and labelling of content posted on Facebook by four Russian state-owned media organizations. We refused. As a result, they have announced they will be restricting the use of our services,” Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice president for global affairs and communications, tweeted on Thursday.

https://twitter.com/nickclegg/status/1497279120853590025?t=zN1z9FPJI_u5lzYCgzZ78w&s=19

It’s not clear if the planned restriction will impact other apps in Meta’s portfolio, like WhatsApp or Instagram.

Ukraine has been under serious unprovoked attack by Russia, as President Vladimir Putin flexes its military muscle to enforce his political will. Ukraine has picked up arms to fend off the heightened aggression which is expected to advance to more cities in the country in coming days.

The conflict, which brewed a lot of tension in the past weeks, became a full-scale war on Thursday after Putin recognized the independence of two breakaway regions of Ukraine – Donetsk and Luhansk. Putin said he moved into Ukraine to stop unproved genocide against the separatists.

More than 137 Ukrainians were dead as of early Friday morning, and one official said Friday would be the “hardest day.” The Ukrainian government claimed over 2,000 Russian troops have been killed.

Against this backdrop, the desire to control the narrative is forcing Russia to take aim at social media. According to Politico, a handful of Russia-backed media outlets have posted stories on Facebook and Twitter containing false claims that Ukrainian military forces were the ones who launched unprovoked assaults on Russian-allied troops.

Social media companies have been under intense scrutiny over what they allowed to be in their platforms, especially in times of crisis. Google’s YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and others have been pressured to pour more resources into handling false information related to the pandemic, the 2020 presidential election, and political disinformation more broadly.

Evans the Billionaire kidnapper sentenced to life imprisonment: The Nigerian laws on Kidnapping

0

The Lagos state high court sitting in Ikeja, on Friday, the 25th of February, 2022 finally sentenced the popular billionaire Kidnapper Evans and two of his accomplices to life imprisonment.

Evans was arrested in a sting operation after investigation proved that he and his cohorts were the masterminds behind the kidnapping of Mr Donatius Dunu, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Maydon Pharmaceuticals Ltd on February 14, 2017, and a ransom of €223,000 was collected from his family. Evans and his accomplices before then had been accused of other numerous kidnap cases and they were subjects of police investigation until he was busted and arrested with his gang. 

What the Nigerian laws say about the crime of Kidnapping and abduction for ransom:

The crime of kidnapping was duly provided for in the criminal code act in S.364 of and it reads thus:

S.364. Kidnapping

Any person who?

(1) unlawfully imprisons any person, and takes him out of Nigeria without his consent; or

(2) unlawfully imprisons any person within Nigeria in such a manner as to prevent him from applying to a court for his release or from discovering to any other person the place where he is imprisoned, or in such a manner as to prevent any person entitled to have access to him from discovering the place where he is imprisoned,

is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for ten years.

In the criminal code, the crime of kidnapping carries the punishment of ten years imprisonment but some  state legislators and even federal legislators have in some many plenaries argued that the punishment of 10 years jail term for a kidnapper is not efficient to punish a kidnapper and to deter other prospective kidnappers from committing the crime and this led to some states and federal legislators proposing and even passing a bills/laws to provide stiffer punishments for the crime of kidnapping.

Lagos state is one of the states that are openly against the 10 years jail term for kidnappers provided in the criminal code. Though the federal law which is the Criminal code already provides for the crime of kidnapping and its punishment, Lagos state have passed a state law that provides for stiffer punishments for kidnappers; stiffer than the punishment of 10 years jail term provided in S.364 of the criminal code.

The Lagos State promulgated a law in 2019 captioned “The Lagos State Kidnapping Prohibition Law, 2019” and Section 3(3) of this law punishes kidnapping with a jail term of 25 years to life imprisonment and when the kidnapper is liable for the death of the hostage, he will be liable for for death penalty as provided in s.2(2) of the law.

The senate has also proposed a bill to amend s.364 of the criminal code which provides for the punishment of 10 years jail term for a kidnapper.  The federal lawmakers have incessantly argued that stiffer punishments like  death sentence or life imprisonments for the crime of kidnapping will be the best alternative punishment. A bill was then proposed by the senate: captioned “Abduction, Wrongful Restraint and Confinement Bill 2021. The bill’s primary goal is to introduce stiffer punishment for kidnapping, wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement for ransom.

In summary, although the punishment for the offense of kidnapping is Nigeria as provided in s364 of the criminal code is 10 years jail term, some states of the federation have made a law which provides for stiffer punishment for kidnappers; Lagos for example provided for 25 years to life imprisonments for kidnappers and in some cases death penalty for the kidnapper(s) if the hostage died in the custody of the kidnapper.

The Evans,  the kidnapper’s case was a very notorious case and he and his cohorts finally met their Waterloo as they had been sent away for life.

WhatsApp Should Remove The 256-User Group Limit

0

Dear META’s WhatsApp,

You need to remove the 256-limit in groups. We understand that your product is great and your positioning makes it very challenging for new entrants. Tekedia Institute spent money and created a really great product, Tekedia Hub. But the adoption by our members was poor.

So, in this edition of Tekedia Mini-MBA, we decided to revert to WhatsApp which worked very well in the past except the capacity issue. But just days into our program, we are forced to create multiple groups, creating communication confusion. 

(Telegram is hopeless here as the adoption remains low.)

If you want to monetize it to remove the limit, do so and companies will pay. The world needs an uncapped WhatsApp Group that can accommodate thousands because companies like Tekedia Institute need it to create virtual communities in programs.

You may need to reconsider this limiting 256 capacity.

Regards,

Ndubuisi

Tekedia Institute