DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5392

Who Destroyed The Naira?

0

The last time I checked, the Nigeria’s currency, Naira had suffered a seemingly unpredicted destruction, though the identity of the destroyers was significantly unknown.

It’s noteworthy that this critique was informed by the compelling need for every Nigerian to comprehend fully the overall nomenclature of the masked destroyers.

Currently, the worth of the Naira per a US dollar is over #500 in the parallel market as against its official exchange of #413. Though it isn’t only Nigeria that is confronting the US dollar presently ravaging her once respected currency and local economy, it’s pertinent to acknowledge that the ongoing misfortune of the said currency didn’t abruptly emerge. It suffices to assert that the destruction was apparently a foreseen circumstance.

Going down the memory lane, it would be recalled that from 1972 to 1985, the official worth of Naira per a US dollar was between #0.66 and #0.89 involving a consistent slight fall and rise. From 1986 to 1992, it was worth between #2.02 and #9.91 involving a steady fall.

Subsequently, from 1993 to 1999, its worth was between #17.30 and #21.89, involving an onward apparent constant exchange rate after an initial decrease. Similarly, from 2000 to 2009, it was between #85.98 and #145, which involved an outrageous continuous fall. Then, recently from 2010 to 2015, we witnessed a steady fall from #150 to #171. And in 2016, it declined to #198 per a US dollar, witnessing a free fall.

The bone of contention is that from the onset, excluding the initial point when it was ostensibly steady, there has been a continuous fall of the value of the Naira when compared to the US dollar.

Hence, having painstakingly perused the above comprehensive chart, I have succeeded in disabusing us of the notion that the fall of the exchange rate of the Naira, either at the official market or parallel market, commenced in recent times. Needless to say that naira had suffered an untold hardship from genesis till this moment.

But if you take a closer glance at the above analysis, you would observe that it was during the democratic era that the Naira’s value fell outrageously, although the origin of its downward depreciation could be traceable to 1986 or thereabouts. In view of this assertion, one may be challenged to ascertain the reason for such anomaly.

The answer is simple. Any democratic leadership, compared to military regime, is usually synonymous with loose principles or policies. This implies that the former often ends up overlooking the invariable nonchalant or lackadaisical attitudes of its citizenry, which is definitely not a wholesome practice in any society that intends to grow economically. Most times, sustaining a certain policy requires a non-human face. Read my lips!

Looking beyond the history, currently it’s obvious that the value of the Nigeria’s currency, Naira is diminishing on a daily basis as if it’s being relentlessly and endlessly pursued by a hidden monster.

The ongoing phenomenon unarguably is categorically not unconnected with the recent stiff measures taken by the nation’s apex bank – the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

It’s no longer news that a few years back, foreign exchange for importation of various commodities into the country was banned by the Mother bank. This severe approach made people, particularly importers, to divert their attention to only the various illicit Bureaux De Change (BDCs) situated across the nation.

Consequently, the CBN ordered the closure of all the existing branches of the BDCs in Nigeria, and thereafter stated that, it could not continue selling foreign currencies directly to them (the BDCs).

Owing to the above sanctions, the various seekers of foreign exchange (forex) shifted their entire attention to the parallel market, thereby causing an alarming increase of the demand for forex at the market. This is no doubt the sole reason a US dollar is being unofficially sold at almost #600.

However, the question remains, who destroyed the Naira? Unequivocally, the currency in question was dastardly molested and destroyed by some unscrupulous elements in Nigeria as a result of their selfish interests.

Bfree, Nigerian Ethical Credit-Recovery Startup Raises $1.7m to Expand Services

0

Recently, digital loan companies took the center stage of Nigeria’s private data watchdog, National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), who found some of the lenders, who use ‘shaming’ as a debt-recovery technique, guilty of invading and violating the privacy of borrowers. Sokoloan was fined N10 million last year.

The development exposed a friction in the burgeoning digital loan market, especially in Nigeria. How can digital lenders recover their money without violating people’s privacy?  A company has found an answer to the question, and is now raising millions of dollars to expand its services around the world.

Bfree, a Nigerian credit management fintech, which uses data provided by the lenders to build the user profiles of defaulters, running their data through an algorithm to predict their behavior and recommend the best way to collect debt, has raised $1.7 million in a pre-Series A round to expand into new markets where new digital lending apps are springing up.

Investors include 4Di Capital, Octerra Capital, VestedWorld, Voltron Capital, Logos Ventures among other angel investors.

The latest round brings the total capital raised by the Lagos-based startup to $2.5 million, since it started operation in August last year. The startup raised $800,000 in a seed round last May.

Founded by Chukwudi Enyi (COO), Moses Nmor (CPO) and Julian Flosbach (CEO), Bfree is growing rapidly as ethical tech-based debt-collection tools. This means exploring new markets following the acceleration of digital loans. The market is buoyed by the huge number of underserved people shut out of loan services by traditional financial firms.

“We are going into markets with large populations, credit deepening and an underdeveloped regulatory environment, where a behavioral collection approach is likely to work,” Bfree co-founder and CEO Julian Flosbach told TechCrunch.

“We saw that there was like a little bit of a breach in the value proposition of lenders — they are good at giving out loans, but the aftersales services of the credit market didn’t work as collections processes were inefficient and not user friendly,” said Flosbach.

Bfree has found 16 new markets which include Ghana, India, Uganda, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Russia, Poland, Pakistan and Indonesia. The startup is now recruiting massively as it sets up operations in the new markets.

Flosbach told TechCrunch that Bfree employs the use of ethical debt collection standards and works closely with defaulters for tailor-made settlement options, with the end-goal of increasing the repayment rate and customer satisfaction.

By applying ethical debt collection standards, Bfree ensures the privacy of customer information during the process, explore flexible repayment options and do not lead to unnecessary penalties like lateness fees and debt-shaming.

Per TechCrunch, Bfree is currently working with 30 credit institutions, including digital lenders, micro-finance institutions and banks. The startup uses a two-way method, depending on a customer’s risk. It either directs them to a self-service platform, where borrowers set new payment plans using their phone number, or follows up on debt balance through automated communication (chatbots, callbots or IVR technology) or direct calls.

Using the ethical debt collection standards, Bfree has so far followed up with 1.1 million defaulters to date, and is currently handling around 800,000 customers, a majority of them in Nigeria. Flosbach said it anticipates the startup to be handling 1.4 million profiles by the end of next month.

Bfree’s ethical debt collection now presents a solution that will end the controversial method of debt-shaming, which has seen digital loan firms calling and texting friends and family members on the contact list of their borrowers.

The Wisdom from Samuel Eto’o: “Africans have a lot of talent … “

0

The former Barcelona and Cameroon’s Indomitable Lions ace striker has a message: Africa will rise via education.

Samuel Eto’o: “I am convinced that us Africans are significant in so many things but we don’t know how to come together.”

“It has to be said that everyone has their opinion, that’s certain, and that will always be the case, but everyone’s interests must come first, ahead of the individual’s. That’s how other continents develop. We have to know how to do it here.”

“Africans have a lot of talent, Europeans a bit less. But the Europeans have understood something: education. Education is the magic of every success.”

“In Africa, we don’t know how to educate ourselves, and to educate you have to have patience. What you educate today will bear fruit in 10 years’ time. We don’t have that patience.”

“On the other hand, in Europe, people don’t stop educating themselves. You go and see someone in France and they say, ‘I’m going to do a course on this’. But why does he do that when he has a job?”

“Because the people have understood that to improve you have to educate yourself. And that’s what we Africans have to do — educate Africans and not stop. And then we will have the chance to win the World Cup.”

Source: CC WhatsApp

Nigeria Ramps Us Taxes As It Looks for Revenue to Service Debts

2

“There’s now an excise duty of N10/per liter imposed on all non-alcoholic and sweetened beverages; and this is to discourage excessive consumption of sugar in beverages which contributes to a number of health conditions including diabetes and obesity.”  Nigeria’s minister of finance,  Zainab Ahmed.

Samuel Nwite explains how Nigeria has ramped up taxation in this piece. The nation has no option with debt servicing picking a big chunk of the nation’s revenue. My prediction remains: by 2027, most national universities would be privatized as the government looks for ways to cut expenses.

The current model of everywhere tax will not do much since there are few things to tax. The key thing would be cutting expenses; you will see surprises.

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has stated that heavy debt servicing is taking a toll on lean fiscal resources.

This was disclosed by a member of the CBN board, Prof. Mike Idiahi Obadan in his personal statement at the last MPC meeting.

The debt serving position for Nigeria could hinder the availability of funds to finance critical government programmes and projects.

[…]

“The Federal Government has struggled against the tide of two debilitating recessions in five years, occasioned largely by externally-induced shocks including the coronavirus-induced health and economic shocks. With little or no fiscal buffers, it has had to borrow heavily, domestically and externally, to mitigate the negative impacts of the shocks,” he said.

He stated that the skyrocketing debt service to revenue ratio is putting pressure on Nigerian’s fiscal resources. “With the rising debt service-to-revenue ratio, which is currently put at over 90%, heavy debt servicing is taking a toll on lean fiscal resources and could hinder the availability of funds to finance critical government programmes and projects,” Obadan stated.

Sugar Tax: Nigeria Introduces N10/Liter Tax on Non-alcoholic Beverages

Energy Strikes Bitcoin Hard

0

It is a big irony: a decentralized currency could be muted by a centralized asset called energy. Yes, as Kazakstan protests and Iran stays in the crosshairs of the Vienna meeting, Bitcoin will wobble; both countries mine 25% of total BTC after the great China exit.

This is a black swan on this fledgling currency because if the Nordic follows as planned, this winter for hodlers may be really long! Sure, if truly a “decentralized” currency, you will hope hodlers can mine it from their home power sockets.

The next 6 months could be extremely important for BTC and it has nothing to do with the exchanges and national “bans”, but all to do with nations that provide electricity to mine the stuff. Be on alert!

China’s crackdown on Bitcoin mining last year, culminating in a full ban in September, unleashed a diaspora of producers seeking new homes. Many flocked to green sources in the Nordic nations, while others tapped coal and natural gas in Kazakhstan, Iran, Kosovo, and tiny Abkhazia; by last fall, more than one-quarter of all of the signature currency’s coins were being minted in Kazakstan and Iran alone.

But in the past few months, those formally welcoming venues have been booting miners en masse. The newcomers are hoarding gigantic volumes of electricity, creating shortfalls that are spreading blackouts from Tehran to Almaty. The trend is especially bad news for enthusiasts who predict that the Bitcoin industry will soon solve its pollution problem by running mainly on renewable energy. In a new twist, Scandinavian nations are claiming that they can’t meet clean energy goals if crypto is hogging such a huge and growing share of their wind, energy, and geothermal resources. (Fortune)

Comment on LinkedIn Feed

Comment: Given that people in different countries get their energy from different sources, energy is not centralized. And it is distributed. During the Kazakhstan protests, Bitcoin hashrate made a new high, and has since not dropped as it did in the China ban times not even close. The network learns about weak spots and route around things like that. Even the internet was out too, yet blocks were still broadcast by some miners through eg: blockstream satellites. Oh the price drop may be correlated with the KZ protests not caused by it.

Response: Certainly, Nigeria is not powered from the same source as Iran. And Brazil is not getting energy from the same source as Canada. The concept of “centralized” energy is not defined by the geographical distribution of the global population, rather the total energy received from the national grid per population within a nation (in my understanding)

So, when I said energy was centralized, I was saying that the bulk of commercial and industrial energy sources are not disparate but largely delivered from national grids within the economies. In other words, those sources are not in people’s backyards. That does not mean that Nigeria and Ghana and USA and Canada are getting energy from the same source.

Let me also leave a formal definition of centralized energy from United States EPA: ““Centralized generation” refers to the large-scale generation of electricity at centralized facilities. … The electricity generated by centralized generation is distributed through the electric power grid to multiple end-users.” It is not defined based on global population or national sources of energy at global scale.

I do think that my usage is in order; I will not edit it. Thanks