DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5416

Restrictive Social Interaction: Can We Go Back to the Stone Age Ways of Communicating and Socialising?

0
Amo from South Africa talks to Patrice C. McMahon, , director of Global Engagement, before the lecture. 20 Students from southern African countries are on the UNL campus for 4 weeks as part of UNL study of the U.S. Institute on Civil Engagement. January 17, 2014. Photo by Craig Chandler / University Communications

The power of reasoning God gave to mankind has led to various inventions that have helped and still help in solving simple and complex activities. These inventions have significantly contributed and still contribute to interpersonal, intercultural, and public communication among different races in the world. Within human communication, technological advancement has led to changes in the manners through which people communicate at personal and societal levels. With the advent of technologies tools such as telephones, the internet, social networking sites, and other interactive media, we are now connecting in new ways on both physiological and emotional levels.

Despite paying a huge sum of money to have these technologies, none of us has really realised that our social intimacy is being eroded on a daily basis. Before the advent of these technologies, in a typical African society, family members would visit each other frequently, but now new media tools such as telephone has taken over the usual visits of Africans living in other towns or cities within their geographical locations. Nowadays, an African man prefers calling his relative, exchanging pleasantries for a visit capable of cementing social cohesion. This observation agrees with Thieubaud that “people have given up so much in exchange for the glory and never-ending development of science, technology, and commerce, but they have little or no time for a few kind words with a neighbour or a friend or simply another human being whose path they cross during their busy days.”

No doubt, the emergence of various technologies for communication purposes has reduced social intimacy, leading to social isolation and numerous poor health conditions, especially when people find it difficult to do certain things without others. As it was examined earlier, all communication was conducted orally, using the mouth and tongue to converse and the ears to hear before communicative technology tools sprung up.

Nowadays, we have seen people engrossed in interaction with one another online without seeing specific non-verbal cues, which have the tendency to give clues to effective understanding of the messages being passed across. At the educational level, during lectures, we have seen how learners interact among themselves online through social networking sites, jettisoning teacher-learner rules. Findings from my recent empirical study support this observation. In the study, it was discovered that sampled students of a senior secondary school in Nigeria significantly initiated textual and voice communication and sought more clarifications on class-assignment among themselves without considering the consequences of not paying attention to teachers.

Apart from social isolation and a reduction in social intimacy, poor health conditions such as depression, isolated alienation, and being overweight could also result from overdependence on technological tools for interpersonal communication. For instance, addiction to the use of interactive platforms on the Internet for many hours without physical empathy with the interlocutors is a unique way of creating depression in one’s life. Being with a computer for a long time meditating alone is also a typical means of increasing estrangement, while situations that result in both dangers are keenly connected with being overweight.

No matter the present benefits we are deriving from the various technologies, we still need to go back to our previous interpersonal communication norms, which aid us in communicating with passion and compassion for the betterment of everyone. Returning to pre-technological interpersonal communication would go a long way toward reducing social conflict escalation caused by excessive consumption of individualized information from technologies such as the Internet, which do not allow inclusive social interaction. In other words, our social interaction within the technological sphere is mainly established through machines and ends with the same means without real-life face-to-face contacts, which give interlocutors the opportunity to assess non-verbal cues and establish empathy.

Consulted Materials

Lasisi, Mutiu Iyanda “Class Structure as Determinant for Students’ Academic Uses and Gratifications of New Media: Luther’s King College, Ile-Ogbo, Nigeria as a Case” Journal of Communication and Media Research (in press)

O’Donoghue, Zoe “Friend Me”: The Impacts of Technology on Human Interaction” Running  Head: Technology and Human Interaction Volume (na) (n.d) Pp1-13

Thiebaud, Jane “Effects of Technology on People: Living F2F Conversation and Socia Interaction” Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, Volume 11, 2010 Pp 117-128

Don’t try to play Boss too early in a startup

0

First, I would like to point out that I have used the term CEO in a very loose form to represent the general perception of a CEO lifestyle, where one is boss to everyone and accountable to no one.

In the first year or couple of years of your business operation, there are a lot of things you will be doing as the founder, but none of them includes playing Boss. If anything, you will in fact take on any and every role to fill every vacuum. It is not uncommon to find the founder acting as a marketer, business developer, sales manager, accountant, secretary, and so on. Without taking on any of the titles, the founder will carry out all the functions in the beginning, and only let them go when he employs others with time.

Even after employing others, most successful entrepreneurs will tell you that in the first couple of years, they had to sit in the same room and work with the other employees. It is at this stage that you walk into an office and cannot differentiate the founder from the rest of the employees. And indeed, this is what it should be.

“I’m a boss, I get to do what I want to do and I can come in whenever I want and close whenever I want and I don’t have to answer to anyone. No one tells me what to do…”

As a founder and entrepreneur, this is the exact mindset you do not need. In fact, if you do your recruiting right, you should get some life-saving suggestions and insights from your employees but if you decide to act like a boss instead of an employee, you would be taking the quickest route to failure.

As the founder, you have the employees accountable to you. The next question is who are you accountable to? Who will make sure you attend your meetings, meet deadlines, and do all you have on your to-do list?

Some CEOs and founders will tell you that their Personal Assistants or Executive Assistants are like the bosses they have to answer to. They draw up the itinerary, schedule meetings, oversee operations, and make sure that the CEO shows up and does all he is supposed to. Although they are assistants, they are often critical parts of the business and keep the CEO on his toes.

The word ‘entrepreneur’ is not synonymous with ‘boss. As a founder, if you don’t hold yourself accountable and you don’t have someone who does, you will fail.

Be focused on selling your product and idea first. Know what is going on with sales, or else your business might hit the rocks. you should know how to connect with the customers instead of playing Boss. Don’t try to be too much of a business owner, but focus on trying to sell and make money based on your selling abilities

That dream life of a CEO will come anyway, but trying to live the dream too early can kill the dream. The dream life of an entrepreneur based on social media perception can be late mornings, dishing out the orders and taking no one’s suggestions but yours; but if you choose to toe this path in your business, you can well expect a crash soon.

The Innovators of Abia And Scaling The Umunneoma Economics

0

Let’s meet at Abia State special day on Dec 30. Let’s renew the spirit of the Aba women of 1929 through entrepreneurial capitalism. Let’s scale the mercantile spirit of Arochukwu people. Let’s expand the trading sagacity of the Bende people. Let’s elevate the enyimba spirit of Ngwaland.

Let’s drum up the enterprising spirit of the Ukwa people. Let’s pursue new knowledge  like the Isuikwuatos and Umunneochis. Let’s build as the Umuahias. Let’s visit foreign lands and close deals like Ohafias.

From the east of Abia to the west, from the north of Abia to the south, boys and girls, men and women, the old and the young, are looking for a new rebirth and restoration of the state. We’re God’s Own State and indeed we need to make Abia this earthly paradise.

I will be speaking to deliver the message for our beautiful state. Join me on Dec 30 before the icons, merchants, titans, and leaders of our state. I want to see the innovators back. We built the old Aba – and we can rebuild Abia state.

Ndi Abia, let’s begin and get it done.

Amazon Agrees to Workers’ Unionization

0
Amazon has been investing in India

The long battle between Amazon and its workers, over the latter’s move to unionize, seems to be drawing close to an end. For the first time, the e-commerce giant is making concessions to workers’ union.

Amazon reached a settlement on Wednesday with the National Labor Relations Board, which will allow workers to engage in union organizing at its warehouses, Times first reported.

The agreement nullifies the company’s policy that made it nearly impossible for its workers to organize a union. The policy has been upheld by Amazon for a long even though it stood against labor regulations.

Under the settlement, Amazon must allow employees who are done with their shifts but working on union activities to access nonwork areas of the facilities, such as break rooms, if other off-duty workers are also allowed there.

“This settlement agreement provides a crucial commitment from Amazon to millions of its workers across the United States that it will not interfere with their right to act collectively to improve their workplace by forming a union or taking other collective action,” NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo said in a statement. “Working people should know that the National Labor Relations Board will vigorously seek to ensure Amazon’s compliance with the settlement and continue to defend the labor rights of all workers.”

Amazon workers’ repeated attempts to form unions at warehouses in Alabama and New York, had been met by stiff opposition by the company. The agreement followed a complaint filed by six workers, which said that Amazon did not allow them to be on-site outside 15 minutes on either side of their shifts, making it difficult to organize.

The agreement also protects workers who are participating in union activities outside the facilities, such as in the parking lots, from getting kicked off the premises.

Amazon has had growing complaints from its workers since the pandemic began. NLRB’s database shows that more than 75 complaints of unfair practices had been lodged against the company.

As part of this week’s agreement with the NLRB, Amazon must send notices informing workers of their rights to current and past hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers who were employed at the company since March 22.

“WE WILL NOT tell you that you cannot be on our property, or that you need to leave our property 15-minutes after the end of your shift, or threaten you with discipline or that we will call the police, when you are exercising your right to engage in union or protected concerted activities by talking to your co-workers in exterior nonwork areas during nonwork time,” Amazon’s required notice to workers says.

Amazon also agreed to a bypass of the NLRB administrative hearing process that’s usually involved with these sorts of agreements. The move will make it easier to investigate claims of Amazon failing to uphold the settlement agreement.

The agreement, which comes on the heels of a fresh union petition filed by a group of Amazon warehouse workers in Staten Island, means that Amazon workers will likely have another shot at unionization as soon as possible. Defying Amazon’s opposition, a group of workers named The Amazon Labor Union, moved to collect signatures for a union vote three months ago. However, at roughly 2000, the signatures fell short of the number needed for a proper unit to be formed by the workers, according to NLRB.

But NLRB called for a revote last month after it was discovered that Amazon had made improper interference in the first election. This means the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union will get a second shot.

Another group of Amazon workers based in Staten Island is also taking another shot at unionization, and has this week, filed an application with the federal government to hold a vote.

The finalization of the agreement on Wednesday means more groups, scattered across Amazon facilities around the U.S., will likely spring up and the company should anticipate disobedience to its policies.