DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 56

Air War With Iran Could Cost Israel $2.9bn a Week as Economic Fallout Spreads Across Global Markets

0

The intensifying air war between Israel and Iran is already exacting a heavy toll on the Israeli economy, with officials warning that weekly losses could exceed 9 billion shekels ($2.93 billion) if strict wartime restrictions remain in place.

Israel’s Finance Ministry said on Wednesday that under the current “red” emergency restrictions imposed by the military’s Home Front Command, the economy could lose about 9.4 billion shekels every week. The estimate largely applies from next week as the full effect of halted business activities, closed schools, and large-scale military mobilization begins to ripple through the economy.

The “red” designation is the highest civilian alert level. It limits travel to workplaces, shuts schools nationwide, bans public gatherings, and restricts most economic activities outside essential services. Large segments of the workforce are now operating remotely, while others have been called up for military service.

The government has requested that the Home Front Command lower the alert to “orange,” a level that still maintains security precautions but allows more workplaces to operate. If that shift occurs, the ministry estimates economic losses would fall to around 4.3 billion shekels per week.

The economic shock follows the escalation that began after the United States and Israel launched coordinated airstrikes on Iranian targets on Saturday. The offensive triggered retaliatory attacks across Israel and other parts of the Middle East, widening fears that the conflict could spread beyond a limited military campaign.

Officials in Washington and Tel Aviv have indicated the military operation could last for several weeks, raising the prospect of prolonged disruption to Israel’s economy and the wider region.

Across Israel, daily life has slowed sharply. Schools remain closed nationwide, large gatherings are banned, and businesses have been forced either to shut temporarily or shift to remote operations. Non-essential sectors—from retail and construction to tourism and hospitality—are among the hardest hit.

At the same time, Israel’s reserve military mobilization has pulled tens of thousands of workers away from civilian jobs, creating labor shortages in key sectors.

The escalation threatens to derail what had been a strong economic outlook for Israel. The country’s economy expanded by 3.1% in 2025, a pace that already reflected the lingering effects of the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas.

Following a ceasefire reached in October, economists had projected a strong rebound, with growth expected to exceed 5% in 2026 as business activity recovered and investment resumed.

Those projections are now under threat as the confrontation with Iran opens a new and potentially more costly front.

Beyond Israel’s domestic economy, analysts warn that the conflict carries broader global economic implications, particularly through energy markets.

Iran sits at the center of the Persian Gulf energy corridor, a region that handles a large share of the world’s oil exports. The fighting has already disrupted some energy shipments and heightened risks to maritime routes that pass through strategic chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.

Even limited disruptions in that corridor can trigger sharp swings in global oil prices.

Energy analysts say sustained military tensions could push crude prices unaffordably higher, feeding inflation across major economies and raising transportation and manufacturing costs worldwide.

Higher energy costs typically ripple across the global economy, raising fuel prices, increasing electricity costs, and pushing up the price of goods and services. For countries already struggling with inflation, such pressures could slow economic growth and complicate central bank policy decisions.

The impact may be particularly severe for energy-importing economies across Asia, Europe, and parts of Africa that rely heavily on Gulf crude supplies.

Global shipping and aviation industries are also watching the conflict closely. Airlines may be forced to reroute flights to avoid Middle Eastern airspace, increasing travel times and fuel costs, while insurers may raise premiums for ships transiting high-risk areas.

Financial markets have begun reacting as well. Investors typically move capital into safe-haven assets such as gold and U.S. Treasury bonds during periods of geopolitical tension, while equities tied to travel, logistics, and manufacturing often come under pressure.

If the conflict continues for several weeks—as U.S. and Israeli officials have suggested—the economic consequences could extend far beyond the immediate battlefield.

For Israel, the longer the restrictions remain in place, the greater the strain on businesses, government finances, and household incomes.

For the global economy, the most immediate risk lies in energy markets. A sustained rise in oil prices would ripple through supply chains and consumer markets worldwide, potentially slowing economic growth at a time when many countries are still dealing with the aftereffects of earlier inflation shocks.

Against this backdrop, economists warn that the longer the confrontation between Israel and Iran persists, the more likely it becomes that the conflict evolves from a regional security crisis into a broader economic shock felt across the global economy.

The rise of Manchester City

0

Manchester City Football Club’s ascent from a modest Victorian-era team to one of the dominant forces in world football is one of the most remarkable stories in the sport. By visiting the online sports betting platform 1xBet you will also be able to wager on all matches of this squad as well.

Founded in 1880 as a team formed by members of St. Mark’s Church in Manchester, the club first adopted the name Manchester City in 1894. Soon they won their first major honour, the FA Cup, in 1904, laying the foundations of their future ambition. With the online betting platform 1xBet, you can always find sports like football, where you can wager on the best tournaments as well.

The early struggles of the team

The early and mid-20th century brought sporadic success. This included league titles in 1937 and a memorable FA Cup triumph in 1956, but the club also endured periods of struggle and relegation that tested its resolve. Some betting football with high odds is available at the 1xBet platform on English football as well.

A golden era arrived in the late 1960s and early 1970s under managers Joe Mercer and Malcolm Allison. During this time City captured domestic silverware and even a European trophy, the UEFA Cup Winners’ Cup in 1970. Right now it is also possible to wager on UEFA competitions when making football betting with high odds at 1xBet.

Despite this, the decades that followed were inconsistent, and by the turn of the millennium the club had even dropped into the third tier of English football before rebuilding its position in the top flight.

A huge investment

The defining turning point in City’s modern history came in 2008, when Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan’s Abu Dhabi United Group acquired the club. This brought significant investment in players, facilities, and infrastructure, transforming Manchester City into a competitive power. Under manager Roberto Mancini, the club won the FA Cup in 2011 and then clinched their first Premier League title in over four decades in dramatic fashion in 2012. By obtaining the 1xBet apk official, you can also use your smartphone to wager on the Premier League too.

The appointment of Pep Guardiola in 2016 marked the start of an unprecedented era of dominance. Under his leadership, City has become synonymous with innovative, attacking football and consistency at the highest level. They set a Premier League record of 100 points in the 2017-18 season, achieved multiple league titles, domestic cups, and in 2023 secured their first UEFA Champions League trophy, completing a historic treble of:

  • Premier League;
  • FA Cup;
  • and UEFA Champions League.

Those 3 tournaments are available to bet with the official 1xBet apk too.

Gold Rebounds 2% on Wednesday as Dollar Pauses and Middle East Escalation Fuels Safe-Haven Demand

0

Gold prices climbed 2% on Wednesday, rebounding sharply from a more than one-week low hit in the previous session, as the U.S. dollar took a breather and escalating military action in the Middle East — now in its fifth day — intensified safe-haven flows into the yellow metal.

Spot gold gained 1.8% to $5,175.39 per ounce by 0925 GMT, while U.S. gold futures for April delivery added 1.2% to $5,186.90. The metal has now risen 6.5% in February, contributing to a cumulative gain of 58% over the past seven months — one of the strongest sustained rallies in recent history.

The U.S. dollar index fell 0.1% against a basket of major currencies, making greenback-priced gold more affordable for buyers holding other currencies. The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yield also eased, further reducing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold.

Jamie Dutta, market analyst at Nemo. money, explained the rebound, noting: “After the past few days of position unwinds and dollar strength, markets are back to a more typical macro risk-off stance, with silver higher too. A pause in the rise of the dollar and Treasury yields helps with their opportunity costs. Gold and silver’s safe-haven characteristics can shine again.”

Gold had fallen more than 4% on Tuesday as investors piled into the dollar amid inflation concerns that dimmed expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts. However, Wednesday’s recovery pinpoints a return to classic safe-haven dynamics driven by geopolitical escalation.

Middle East Conflict Enters Fifth Day with Intensified Strikes

U.S. forces continued round-the-clock assaults on Iranian targets, while Israel mounted a “broad wave” of strikes on Wednesday targeting Iranian missile sites and air defense systems. The conflict — sparked by U.S.-Israeli strikes over the weekend that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — has now engulfed Lebanon (via Israeli-Hezbollah clashes), Gulf states (Iranian missile/drone attacks on U.S. bases), and Cyprus (a British air base strike). President Donald Trump told the Daily Mail Sunday the military campaign could last “four to five weeks, but that it could go on far longer than that.”

Global Market Reaction

Oil prices have soared as the conflict disrupts infrastructure and shipping. Brent crude hit a new 52-week high Monday at $79.40 per barrel before further gains, with analysts now forecasting sustained levels above $80–$85 if disruptions persist. Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura refinery (550,000 bpd) remains shut after a drone strike, Iraqi Kurdistan fields are offline, Israeli Leviathan and Tamar gas fields are idled, and uncertainty surrounds Iran’s Kharg Island export hub. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz — handling 20% of global oil and LNG — has nearly halted after vessel attacks on Sunday, with insurers cancelling war-risk cover and tankers anchoring (200 vessels).

Airspace closures continue to devastate westbound flights from India and Europe. Many Europe/U.K. routes remain cancelled or rerouted, adding up to four hours of flight time and significantly raising fuel costs. IndiGo and Air India have suspended flights to/from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, and parts of Europe. Aviation expert Mark D. Martin estimated the weekly impact on Indian/international carriers at ~?875 crore ($96 million), with disruptions likely persisting for at least another week.

Asian stocks tanked overnight as investors dumped crowded bets on chipmakers, fearing an oil shock would raise inflation and delay rate cuts. U.S. futures and European markets opened lower Tuesday, with safe-haven flows supporting gold and bonds while the dollar weakened.

Although Trump said he intends to provide Naval escorts for ships, the conflict’s duration remains highly uncertain. An extended Strait of Hormuz disruption would push prices higher. The situation has created room for market volatility, and gold is expected to rise further as investors seek a hedge.

Wall Street Slides as Middle East Conflict Lifts Oil, Stokes Inflation Fears

0

U.S. stocks closed sharply lower on Tuesday as investors weighed the risk that an expanding Middle East conflict could push energy prices higher for longer, reigniting inflation pressures and complicating the policy path for the Federal Reserve.

Selling was broad-based across sectors, with the Cboe Volatility Index, widely known as the VIX, climbing to its highest closing level since November — a signal that demand for downside protection has intensified. Major indexes, however, finished well off their intraday lows after staging a partial recovery in afternoon trading.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 403.51 points, or 0.83%, to 48,501.27. The S&P 500 lost 64.99 points, or 0.94%, to 6,816.63, while the Nasdaq Composite declined 232.17 points, or 1.02%, to 22,516.69. Earlier in the session, the S&P 500 had been down more than 2%.

Investors are increasingly focused on the inflationary implications of the conflict, now in its fourth day, as oil prices extend sharp gains. Israeli and U.S. forces have struck targets across Iran, prompting retaliatory attacks around the Gulf and drawing Lebanon into the widening hostilities. The risk of sustained disruption to energy infrastructure has become a central market concern.

“There seems to be some notion that perhaps (the Iran war) will persist longer than people thought 24 hours ago, because it’s spreading and starting to potentially impact energy infrastructure,” said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer of Horizon Investment Services in Hammond, Indiana.

Tehran’s threat to attack vessels attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint that carries roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption — has amplified fears of supply disruptions. Production halts by several Middle Eastern oil and gas producers have already pushed up global shipping rates and driven crude and natural gas prices higher.

In response, President Donald Trump said he had directed the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to provide political risk insurance and financial guarantees for maritime trade in the Gulf. He added that the U.S. Navy could begin escorting oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz if necessary. The comments underscore the strategic stakes for global energy markets and the administration’s attempt to reassure traders and shipping operators.

Higher oil prices present a direct challenge for inflation dynamics in the United States. Energy costs filter through transportation, manufacturing, and consumer prices, raising the prospect of renewed price pressures just as policymakers were attempting to stabilize inflation expectations following earlier tariff-driven increases. U.S. Treasury yields rose for a second consecutive session, reflecting market unease about the inflation outlook and the possibility that interest rates may need to remain elevated for longer.

In a potentially bearish technical signal, the S&P 500 closed below its 100-day moving average for the first time since November 20. Such breaches are often viewed by market participants as indications of weakening momentum and can trigger algorithmic selling or portfolio rebalancing.

“Investors are grappling with the volatility and the news, and they’re looking at their portfolios and saying, wow, this could get worse… This is the fear of it getting worse,” said Oliver Pursche, senior vice president and advisor at Wealthspire Advisors in Westport, Connecticut. “But our advice to clients is to take a step back and wait and see.”

Despite the losses, some analysts described the broader reaction as measured rather than panicked. Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital, said the market’s response “so far is very tame,” suggesting risk appetite has not collapsed. He noted that software stocks, which had been under pressure in recent weeks, outperformed on Tuesday. The S&P 500 software and services index rose 1.6%, indicating selective buying even amid headline-driven volatility.

That rotation into software may reflect a search for earnings streams less exposed to commodity inputs and global shipping risks. Technology and digital services firms typically have lower direct sensitivity to oil prices compared with industrials or transportation companies, making them relatively safe havens during energy-driven shocks.

Still, market breadth painted a cautious picture. On the New York Stock Exchange, declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 4.1-to-1 ratio, with 137 new highs and 167 new lows. On the Nasdaq, 3,540 stocks fell compared with 1,262 gainers, a nearly 3-to-1 imbalance. The widespread nature of declines suggests institutional investors were trimming exposure rather than simply rotating within sectors.

Alternative asset managers were not immune. Shares of Blackstone dropped 3.8% after its flagship credit fund, BCRED, experienced a surge in redemption requests. The development highlights how geopolitical uncertainty can spill over into private credit markets, where liquidity management is critical during periods of stress.

The broader macro question confronting investors is whether the conflict will remain contained or evolve into a prolonged disruption to global energy flows. A sustained spike in oil could undermine consumer spending, weigh on corporate margins, and delay the Federal Reserve’s ability to ease monetary policy. At the same time, escalating military involvement raises the risk of further market shocks.

However, the pattern of sharp intraday declines followed by partial recoveries suggests that while fear is rising, outright capitulation has not taken hold. Much will depend on the trajectory of energy prices and whether diplomatic efforts or security measures stabilize shipping through the Strait of Hormuz in the coming days.

Until clarity emerges, volatility is likely to remain elevated, with markets balancing geopolitical risk against still-resilient corporate earnings and economic data.

White House Weighs National Security Review of Tencent’s Gaming Stakes Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit in April

0

White House Scrutinizes Tencent’s Stakes in Epic Games, Riot, and Supercell Amid National Security Concerns Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit

The Trump administration is weighing whether to force Chinese tech conglomerate Tencent Holdings Ltd. to divest its significant investments in major U.S. and European video game developers, according to the Financial Times.

Top officials have convened internal meetings to evaluate potential national security risks posed by Tencent’s ownership stakes, with a key cabinet-level review postponed due to scheduling conflicts. The deliberations focus on Tencent’s 28% stake in Epic Games — the North Carolina-based creator of “Fortnite” and the widely used Unreal Engine — full ownership of Los Angeles-based Riot Games, developer of the blockbuster “League of Legends,” and majority control of Finnish studio Supercell, acquired for $8.6 billion in 2016 and known for “Clash of Clans.”

These holdings give Tencent influence over some of the world’s most popular gaming franchises, reaching hundreds of millions of players, particularly young users, and generating billions in annual revenue.

The review appears to involve the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)-like processes for existing investments, raising questions about data access, content moderation, and potential influence operations in the $200 billion-plus global gaming industry. The timing is particularly sensitive, coming just weeks before President Trump’s planned visit to Beijing from March 31 to April 2 — his first since 2017 — for talks with President Xi Jinping.

Top trade negotiators from both sides are expected to meet in Paris next week to lay the groundwork for potential business deals tied to the summit. Allowing Tencent to retain its stakes could serve as a concession in broader negotiations over trade, technology export controls, and geopolitical issues like Taiwan and the South China Sea, while mandating divestiture would signal continued hardline pressure on Chinese tech influence.

National security concerns center on Tencent’s potential access to user data from games played by millions of Americans, including minors. “Fortnite” and “League of Legends” collect extensive behavioral, location, and interaction data, raising fears of harvesting for surveillance, propaganda, or cyber operations. Riot Games and Supercell, with global player bases exceeding 500 million combined, amplify these risks.

Critics, including some U.S. lawmakers, believe such ownership enables Beijing’s soft power projection and data dominance in entertainment — a sector with cultural and economic leverage. The review echoes past U.S. actions against Chinese tech firms: TikTok’s forced divestiture, WeChat bans, and CFIUS blocks on investments. Tencent has faced scrutiny before; in 2020–2021, U.S. politicians called for reviews of its gaming stakes amid national security debates. Supercell’s Finnish ownership adds an EU dimension, potentially complicating transatlantic relations.

Tencent shares in Hong Kong dipped modestly on Tuesday but showed limited reaction, reflecting the company’s diversified portfolio beyond gaming (WeChat, cloud services). Epic Games, privately held, has not commented, but a forced sale could value its stake at billions, given Fortnite’s $20+ billion lifetime revenue.

For the gaming industry, the outcome could reshape ownership dynamics. Epic relies on Tencent for funding and Unreal Engine partnerships; Riot, fully owned, generates ~$2 billion annually; Supercell contributes ~$1.5 billion yearly. Divestiture would disrupt these relationships, potentially shifting power to U.S./European buyers but raising antitrust issues.

As the Trump-Xi meeting gets closer, the Tencent review symbolizes the administration’s dual-track approach: using investment restrictions as leverage while seeking deals on trade imbalances and fentanyl. Beijing has urged the U.S. to “cancel unilateral tariffs” and respect sovereignty, signaling red lines on tech decoupling.

A decision is expected soon, possibly influencing summit dynamics. If divestiture is mandated, it would mark one of the largest forced sales of gaming assets ever, escalating U.S.-China tech decoupling into cultural and entertainment spheres.