DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5620

The Biggest Mistake In Nigeria’s Leaked New NITDA Bill

2

The leaked National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) draft bill should be updated before they pass it in the parliament. It is severely deficient. Largely, everyone agrees that NITDA needs a new operating protocol as the one passed in 2007 is no more adequate. Nonetheless, we do hope that the parliament does the right thing by making sure that we do not stifle innovation in the process.

This bill as drafted is totally inadequate as it missed the most consequential challenge facing the technology sector in Nigeria: re-domiciliation of Nigerian tech startups out of Nigeria to the United States and UK. I understand the inclusion of the big fines of N3 million for individuals, and N30 million for corporations, for breaking the protocol, but on things which matter, this bill lacks value.

“Any person or body corporate who operates an information technology or digital economy service, product, or platform contrary to the provisions of this Act, commits an offense,” the agency said in the statement.

Individuals found guilty by the agency will be fined not less than N3 million (~$6,000) or placed into custody for a year or more. The bill states NITDA can also decide to charge such a person both the fine and imprisonment.

On the other hand, a fine of not less than N30 million (~$60,000) will be charged against corporate bodies. The ‘principal officers’ of the companies may also serve a prison sentence for two years or more.

The wealth of the future through digital technology companies are not being domiciled in Nigeria even though the operating entities and the domains of operations are Nigerians and Nigeria respectively. A NITDA bill that does not address that paralysis is deficient.

When these startups are about to raise capital, most times, they re-domicile out of Nigeria, partly to protect their intellectual properties because they cannot have confidence that Nigeria will protect them. Nigeria needs to work on that urgently and give the startups what will make them comfortable to remain fully Nigerians.

Yes, despite the current effervescence of entrepreneurial capitalism in Lagos, the fact remains that most of the wealth being built is not Nigerian. If GTBank, Zenith and Access Bank were not Nigerian in the early 1990s, our current stock exchange would have lost the banking leaders of today. So, it is critical that Nigeria focuses on what matters: how to make sure the wealth which technology is opening up in Nigeria remains Nigerian! Not addressing that is a big mistake in the draft bill.

The leaked bill seems new but critically it is an expired document: unborn tomorrow, but died yesterday. They need to rewrite it.

Understand the Mechanics of Innovation At Tekedia Mini-MBA

0
innovation

What is innovation? At Tekedia Mini-MBA, we have a simple definition: Innovation = Invention + Commercialization. Yes, until markets have validated the hypothesis of that idea through commercial success, you cannot call it “innovative”. In our program, we have three phases to make that translation, and they are the innovation phase, business growth phase, and operational execution phase.

By the time we are done, you will master the innovation mechanics (yes, the physics of innovation which takes us to the natural philosophy of innovation). Fixing market frictions, capturing value and advancing the prosperity of nations, even as you accelerate human welfare.

Advance your career with Tekedia Mini-MBA (Sept 13 – Dec 6, 2021): 140 global faculty, online, self-paced, $140 (or N50,000 naira). Click and register here.

Welcome Wellahealth Team to Tekedia Mini-MBA

0

Tekedia Institute welcomes the team from Wellahealth to Tekedia Mini-MBA which begins Sept 13 to end Dec 6, 2021. Wellahealth partners with insurance companies to offer micro health insurance for high occurrence disease in Africa starting with malaria in Nigeria.

At Tekedia Mini-MBA, we co-learn the mechanics of business systems, mastering innovation, understanding how to accelerate business growth, and becoming agents for advancing communities.

Registration continues here

Tekedia Capital Publishes New Investment Cycle with Key Dates

3

Dear Member,

Greetings. We are providing guidance on timelines for the next Tekedia Capital Syndicate cycle, planned for mid-October 2021 to late November 2021. We continue to source for great businesses (full calendar with dates in the board for members).  If you plan to join us, click and complete your registration. We have amazing companies in our pipeline.

Your membership covers 12 months or 4 investment cycles if we do not do 4 cycles in 12 months. Our focus here is not quantity but quality. 

If you have more questions, please let me know.

Regards,

Tekedia Team

Blue Origin Sues NASA For Awarding Lunar Lander Contract to SpaceX

0

Jeff Bezos’ space company, Blue Origin, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against NASA, over the $2.9 billion lunar lander contract awarded to Elon Musk’s SpaceX earlier this year.

Blue Origin had complained that NASA had awarded the contract to SpaceX without following due process, which mitigated the chances of other bidders to win the contract.

“This bid protest challenges NASA’s unlawful and improper evaluation of proposals,” Blue Origin’s lawyers wrote in its court filing.

The protest, filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on Monday, is the latest move by Blue Origin to overturn the lunar lander contract. A Blue Origin spokesperson told CNBC that it is looking “to remedy the flaws in the acquisition process found in NASA’s Human Landing System.”

“We firmly believe that the issues identified in this procurement and its outcomes must be addressed to restore fairness, create competition, and ensure a safe return to the Moon for America,” Blue Origin said.

Blue Origin’s filing in court comes a couple of weeks after the U.S. Government Accountability Office denied the company’s protest, upholding NASA’s decision. Bezos had last month, offered to give NASA $2 billion if it would reconsider its decision on the lunar lander contract, after the space agency cited its own funding shortfalls as part of the reasons for awarding the contract to SpaceX.

NASA rejected bids from Blue Origin and Dynetics, against expectation that it would share the contract between two companies. It chose only SpaceX citing the company’s proven record of orbital missions and other factors. Kathy Lueders, a senior NASA official said the factors represented “what’s best value to the government.”

Following this decision, Blue Origin filed a complaint with the GAO on the claim that NASA gave SpaceX an unfair advantage by allowing it to revise its pricing. Blue Origin said then that the decision “not only delays but also endangers America’s return to the moon.”

Blue Origin was counting on the GAO to reverse the contract decision but was disappointed when the watch dog’s ruling backed NASA’s decision.

Blue Origin has not hid its obsession to win a contract under NASA’s HLS program, even though it has yet no record of successful orbital missions. Before the April contract award, NASA had handed out nearly $1 billion in concept development contracts – with SpaceX receiving $135 million, Dynetics $253 million, and Blue Origin receiving $579 million.

The company’s court filing on Monday comes as Blue Origin has stepped up a public relations offensive against NASA using SpaceX’s next-generation Starship to land astronauts on the moon. CNBC reported a series of comparative infographics, where Blue Origin has emphasized the “unprecedented number of technologies, developments, and operations that have never been done before for Starship to land on the Moon.”

Blue Origin last week released an infographic that added that Starship is “a launch vehicle that has never flown to orbit and is still being designed.”

Musk, in response to Blue Origin’s infographic, gave his view of Bezos’ company and its criticism.

“The sad thing is that even if Santa Claus suddenly made their hardware real for free, the first thing you’d want to do is cancel it,” Musk wrote in a tweet.

The Blue Origin lawsuit is also coming barely a week after Amazon, another company owned by Bezos, won a controversial $10 billion government contract. Amazon Web Services won the $10 billion service contract from the National Security Agency and Microsoft filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office.

Microsoft claims that NSA did not conduct proper evaluation while considering a provider for its new project code-named WildandStormy. The software’s firm move is considered vindictive because Amazon had taken the same step when the Defense Department awarded a $10 billion Jedi contract to Microsoft. The contract was eventually cancelled after years of legal battles, and Microsoft said Amazon is to be blamed for it.