DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 586

$4.5B Crypto Options Will Expire in Deribit on Friday

0

The expiration of over $4.5 billion in crypto options on Deribit, coinciding with the U.S. nonfarm payrolls (NFP) report on Friday, September 5, 2025, is a significant event that could influence cryptocurrency market dynamics, particularly for Bitcoin (BTC).

Over $4.5 billion in crypto options are set to expire on Deribit, a leading cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, on Friday at 08:00 UTC. $3.28 billion for approximately 29,000 BTC options contracts. $112,000, the price level at which the maximum number of options contracts would expire worthless, causing the greatest financial loss for option holders.

1.38, indicating a bearish sentiment as more put options (bets on price declines) are being traded compared to call options (bets on price increases). Puts are clustered around the $105,000–$110,000 strike prices, suggesting traders are anticipating a potential Bitcoin price drop below $105,000.

Expected to show 75,000 jobs added in August (up from 73,000 previously) and an unemployment rate rising to 4.3% (from 4.2%). This report, due at 12:30 UTC, could impact broader financial markets, including cryptocurrencies, as it influences expectations for U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.

Implications for Bitcoin

The max pain point represents the price at which the most options (both puts and calls) expire worthless, maximizing losses for option holders. Option sellers (typically institutions with significant capital) may attempt to push the spot price toward this level to minimize their payouts.

As of now, Bitcoin is trading around $110,004.75, slightly below the max pain point. If the price remains near or moves toward $112,000 by expiry, it could lead to significant options expiring worthless, potentially stabilizing or capping price movements in the short term.

A put-call ratio above 1 indicates more put options than call options, reflecting bearish sentiment among traders. The clustering of puts around $105,000–$110,000 suggests many traders are hedging against or betting on a price decline below these levels. This bearish bias aligns with recent market conditions, including $115 million in long position liquidations and rising long-term Treasury yields, which have increased selling pressure on Bitcoin.

Impact of the NFP Report

The NFP report is a key macroeconomic indicator that can influence risk assets like cryptocurrencies. A weaker-than-expected report (e.g., job growth below 75,000 or unemployment above 4.3%) could signal economic slowdown, potentially strengthening expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, which are generally bullish for risk assets like Bitcoin.

Conversely, a stronger-than-expected report could reinforce expectations of sustained or higher interest rates, potentially increasing selling pressure on Bitcoin and pushing it toward the $105,000–$110,000 range where puts are concentrated. Historical data suggests that NFP releases can trigger short-term volatility in crypto markets, as seen in previous instances where Bitcoin prices reacted to unexpected jobs data.

Large options expiries, especially quarterly ones, often lead to heightened volatility as traders close or roll over positions. The $4.5 billion expiry, with Bitcoin accounting for $3.28 billion, could amplify price swings, particularly if the NFP report deviates significantly from expectations.

However, the max pain theory suggests that prices may gravitate toward $112,000, potentially mitigating extreme volatility unless external factors (e.g., NFP data or geopolitical events) trigger a breakout. Ethereum (ETH) options worth $1.28 billion are also expiring, with a put-call ratio of 0.78 (neutral sentiment) and a max pain point of $4,400, slightly above the current price of $4,385.

This suggests less bearish pressure on ETH compared to BTC. XRP options ($5.54 million) have a put-call ratio of 0.93 and a max pain point of $2.90, indicating a balanced but cautious market outlook.

Solana (SOL) is trading down 0.6% with reduced trading volume, reflecting a lack of interest ahead of the NFP report. The broader crypto market is experiencing pullbacks due to profit-taking and liquidations of $115 million in long positions. Rising Treasury yields and gold prices are adding pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin, as investors shift toward safer assets amid fiscal concerns.

Monitor Bitcoin’s price around $105,000–$112,000. A drop below $105,000 could trigger significant put option exercises, while staying near $112,000 may limit losses for option holders. A lower-than-expected jobs number or higher unemployment rate could boost Bitcoin prices by increasing expectations for monetary easing. A stronger report may exacerbate bearish sentiment.

Expect short-term price swings around the 08:00 UTC expiry and 12:30 UTC NFP release. Post-expiry, markets may stabilize unless a significant breakout occurs. Key support lies around $105,000, with resistance at $118,000–$121,000, as noted in recent market analyses.

The $4.5 billion crypto options expiry on Deribit, combined with the U.S. nonfarm payrolls report, sets the stage for potential volatility in the Bitcoin market. The bearish put-call ratio of 1.38 and max pain point of $112,000 suggest traders are bracing for a possible price drop toward $105,000–$110,000, especially if the NFP report signals tighter monetary policy.

However, a weaker-than-expected NFP could spark a recovery, potentially pushing Bitcoin toward higher resistance levels. Traders should closely monitor price action around the expiry and NFP release, as these events could dictate Bitcoin’s short-term direction.

OpenAI Announces Plan to Build Jobs Platform to Prepare Workers And Businesses For The AI Era

0

Artificial Intelligence company OpenAI has announced its ambition to build a jobs platform to help workers and businesses navigate the AI era.

As AI continues to transform industries, the company is introducing the OpenAI Jobs Platform and OpenAI Certifications, both designed to expand economic opportunities and ensure that people have the skills needed to thrive in an AI-driven world.

According to OpenAI, one of the most common concerns people express about AI is its impact on jobs and businesses. Many wonder how their roles will evolve or how companies will adapt as AI continues to advance. OpenAI’s leadership believes that while AI will be transformational, it will also be disruptive, fundamentally reshaping how people work.

The company emphasized that AI has the potential to create more opportunities than any technology in history—helping businesses operate more efficiently, empowering individuals to monetize their ideas, and even creating jobs that do not yet exist. However, it acknowledged that this transformation will require workers at all levels, from entry-level employees to CEOs, to learn new ways of working.

“We can’t eliminate the disruption, but we can help more people become fluent in AI and connect them with companies that need their skills”, OpenAI CEO of Applications Fidji Simo noted in a blog post.

To achieve this, OpenAI is focusing on access and education. The company noted that the majority of the hundreds of millions of people who use ChatGPT each week do so for free, aligning with its mission to democratize access to AI tools.

Now, the company is expanding its efforts by partnering with organizations such as Walmart, John Deere, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Accenture, Indeed, the Texas Association of Business, the Bay Area Council, and several state governments, including Delaware to help everyone take advantage of the opportunities that AI has to offer.

The first major initiative is the OpenAI Jobs Platform, which aims to connect employers with AI-skilled workers. This platform will use AI-driven matching technology to ensure that companies find candidates who meet their needs, whether they are seeking permanent hires or talent for specific projects.

OpenAI highlighted that this platform will not only serve large corporations but will also have a dedicated track for small businesses and local governments, helping them compete in the rapidly evolving digital economy. For instance, the Texas Association of Business plans to leverage the platform to connect thousands of Texas employers with skilled individuals who can modernize their operations.

The second initiative focuses on ensuring that companies can verify the AI fluency of workers. Earlier this year, OpenAI launched the OpenAI Academy, a free online learning hub that has already connected more than 2 million people with resources, workshops, and communities for mastering AI tools.

Building on this success, OpenAI is introducing OpenAI Certifications, which will provide formal recognition of various levels of AI expertise. These certifications will range from basic workplace AI skills to advanced areas like prompt engineering and custom AI development.

Learners will be able to prepare for these certifications directly within ChatGPT using its new Study Mode, making it simple to access training and complete certification without leaving the app. Businesses will also be able to integrate these certifications into their employee learning and development programs.

Research has shown that workers with AI skills are more productive, more valuable to employers, and earn higher wages compared to those without AI expertise.

OpenAI has set an ambitious target to certify 10 million Americans by 2030. Walmart, the world’s largest private employer, has already signed on as a launch partner for this initiative.

Notably, OpenAI’s job platform could put the company in direct competition with LinkedIn, a professional networking platform that serves as a digital resume and networking tool, allowing individuals to showcase their professional background, post updates, and engage with industry content.

Future Outlook

OpenAI noted that its efforts are not just about technology, but about bridging the gap between workers and economic opportunity. By giving people access to AI tools, training, and verified skills, OpenAI aims to ensure that the benefits of AI are widely shared rather than concentrated in a few hands.

The company believes these programs will empower individuals to control their future while enabling businesses of all sizes to innovate and grow in the AI-driven economy.

Key Strengths and Weaknesses of Nigeria-ASUU Agreement in 2019

0

The 2019 Memorandum of Action (MoA) between the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) was a pivotal document aimed at resolving a long-standing impasse in Nigeria’s higher education sector. Signed in February 2019 after a three-month strike, the agreement attempted to address the union’s grievances through financial commitments, administrative reforms, and renewed dialogue. While it succeeded in temporarily restoring industrial harmony, our analysis reveals both commendable strengths and critical weaknesses that continue to shape the trajectory of university education in Nigeria.

A Structured Response to Immediate Grievances

One of the most notable strengths of the 2019 MoA lies in its structured approach to resolving ASUU’s core demands. The agreement identifies nine key areas of concern, ranging from revitalization funding and earned academic allowances to issues of university governance and renegotiation of the 2009 agreement. This clarity of focus demonstrates a deliberate effort to engage with the union’s longstanding complaints in a comprehensive manner.

The financial commitments outlined in the agreement are particularly significant. The government pledged N25 billion for the revitalization of public universities and another N25 billion for earned allowances. Although these figures fell short of ASUU’s expectations, they signaled a willingness to invest in the sector and acknowledge the legitimacy of the union’s demands. Additionally, the MoA recognized ASUU’s autonomy in selecting its representatives and emphasized principles of equality in collective bargaining, reinforcing the union’s role as a credible stakeholder in education policy.

The inclusion of timelines for implementation added a layer of accountability. Specific dates were provided for disbursements, committee reports, and renegotiation processes. This time-bound structure was intended to prevent the delays and ambiguities that had plagued previous agreements. In theory, it offered a roadmap for restoring trust and ensuring that commitments would be honored.

Underlying Assumptions and Structural Gaps

Despite its strengths, the 2019 MoA was fundamentally limited by the way it framed the problem. The agreement treated the crisis in Nigeria’s university system as a matter of unmet financial and administrative obligations. This narrow representation overlooked deeper structural issues such as poor research output, outdated curricula, and the lack of a sustainable funding model for higher education.

The assumption that financial disbursements alone could resolve systemic challenges was overly simplistic. While money is essential, it cannot substitute for visionary policy reform. The MoA also assumed that setting timelines would automatically lead to compliance, yet it failed to include enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-implementation. This omission weakened the document’s credibility and left room for future breaches.

Another significant gap was the treatment of state universities. The agreement proposed a consultative committee to engage with state governments, but it did not outline how its recommendations would be enforced. Given the autonomy of state institutions and the uneven commitment of state governments to education funding, this aspect of the MoA lacked the necessary teeth to drive meaningful change.

Additionally, the agreement repeated many promises from earlier agreements, particularly those related to visitation panels and renegotiation timelines. This repetition raised concerns about the government’s sincerity and the likelihood of follow-through. Without a mechanism to monitor progress or hold parties accountable, the MoA risked becoming yet another symbolic gesture rather than a transformative tool.

Implications for Policy and Practice

The 2019 MoA reflects a pattern of reactive policymaking in Nigeria’s education sector. Rather than addressing the root causes of industrial unrest, the government has often resorted to short-term fixes aimed at ending strikes. This approach has created a cycle of disruption, negotiation, and temporary resolution, with little attention paid to long-term reform.

The absence of student-centered considerations in the agreement is particularly troubling. Repeated strikes have devastating effects on students’ academic progression, mental health, and future prospects. Yet the MoA is silent on how to mitigate these impacts or involve students in shaping the future of university education.

The agreement also fails to engage with broader questions of global competitiveness, innovation, and research excellence. In an era where universities are expected to drive economic growth and social development, Nigeria’s higher education policy must evolve beyond transactional agreements and embrace a strategic vision.

Toward a More Sustainable Future

To move forward, future agreements between FGN and ASUU must be anchored in a holistic understanding of the challenges facing Nigerian universities. This includes not only financial commitments but also structural reforms, accountability mechanisms, and inclusive policymaking. Stakeholders must prioritize long-term planning over crisis management and ensure that agreements are backed by legal and institutional frameworks that guarantee implementation.

The 2019 MoA was a necessary step in restoring industrial harmony, but it was not sufficient to transform the higher education landscape. Its strengths lay in its responsiveness and structure, while its weaknesses stemmed from limited scope and lack of enforcement. Our analyst notes that as Nigeria continues to grapple with the complexities of university governance, the lessons from this agreement must inform a more ambitious and sustainable path forward.

Bitcoin Slips Below $110K—Is Reinvesting in Ozak AI’s Presale the Key to Unlock 1000x Gains This Cycle?

0

Bitcoin is below $110,000 and people are asking if it can still deliver 1000x. CoinMarketCap shows BTC at $108,865 with a market cap of $2.16 trillion. While Bitcoin is still the top asset, its maturity is shifting investor attention to earlier-stage opportunities. At the top of the list is Ozak AI ($OZ) in presale, so can you reallocate your BTC for 1000x this cycle?

From Bitcoin’s Slip to Ozak AI’s Presale Momentum

Bitcoin’s price cycles are getting narrower as adoption increases. 19.91 million BTC out of 21 million is already in circulation, so the room for growth is limited compared to its early days. Analysts say this is why investors are looking for projects at earlier stages.

Ozak AI’s presale is a perfect example. The token is $0.01, the next phase is $0.012 and the long-term target is $1. Over 840 million tokens were sold for over $2.6 million. Minimum contribution is $100 so retail investors can participate and have liquidity. Compared to Bitcoin’s high entry point, Ozak AI’s early stage is attractive to those looking for asymmetric returns.

Why Ozak AI Offers a 1000x Narrative Against Bitcoin

Ozak AI combines machine learning and blockchain for real-time market analytics. The system includes the Ozak Stream Network (OSN) for low-latency data processing, DePIN for secure decentralized handling and Ozak Data Vaults for storage. Prediction Agents (PAs) let users create AI driven models without coding skills, opening up advanced analytics to everyone.

A recent partnership with Hive Intel (HIVE) takes this to the next level. Hive Intel provides multi-chain APIs for NFTs, DeFi, token metrics and wallet behaviors so Ozak AI bots can process and act on various on-chain data. Industry reports say this increases speed and accuracy, both critical in fast-moving digital markets.

The OZ token powers everything in this ecosystem. It’s used for Prediction Agent customization, platform transactions, governance and user rewards. Tokenomics are 30% presale, 30% ecosystem and community, 20% reserves and 10% each to liquidity and team. Unlike Bitcoin, where utility is largely tied to store-of-value, Ozak AI’s token is designed for constant use across the platform.

Bitcoin’s Stability Versus Ozak AI’s Growth Potential

Bitcoin’s dip below $110K shows its volatility but also its limited room for growth. Analysts say while BTC will always be a core asset, it may not give the same life-changing returns it used to. Ozak AI’s presale offers exposure to an expanding market where adoption drives token demand.

Decentralization means Ozak AI scales securely, reducing the risk of attacks or downtime. AI analytics addresses real-world use cases from day trading to institutional forecasting. This has put the project in talks of whether it can 1000x, a scale Bitcoin will never revisit.

Conclusion

Bitcoin slipping under $110K has sharpened investor focus on alternative strategies for the current market cycle. Ozak AI’s presale, priced at $0.01 with a $1 target, combines AI technology, decentralized networks, and a Hive Intel partnership to create a data-driven ecosystem. For investors deciding whether to hold BTC through its dip or reallocate toward higher-growth assets, the question stands: is Ozak AI the path to 1000x gains this cycle?

 

For more information about Ozak AI, visit the links below:

Website: https://ozak.ai/

Twitter/X: https://x.com/OzakAGI

Telegram: https://t.me/OzakAGI

A Look At Nasdaq’s Increased Scrutiny of Companies with Crypto Treasuries, as Kraken Acquires Breakout

0

Nasdaq has intensified oversight of publicly listed companies holding significant cryptocurrency assets, aiming to protect investors and maintain market integrity.

The new rules require these companies to obtain shareholder approval before issuing new shares to fund crypto purchases. This move targets firms following the model pioneered by MicroStrategy (now Strategy), which holds over 636,505 BTC. The scrutiny comes amid a surge in corporate crypto treasuries, with 154 U.S.-listed companies planning to raise $98.4 billion for digital asset acquisitions in 2025, per Architect Partners.

Non-compliant firms risk trading suspension or delisting. The increased regulation has impacted stock prices, with Strategy dropping 3.5%, BitMine Immersion 8.7%, and SharpLink Gaming 9% on the announcement day, alongside a broader crypto market dip (Bitcoin down 2.5%).

Companies listed on Nasdaq will now need to obtain shareholder approval before issuing new shares to fund crypto purchases. This move aims to ensure investors are fully aware of the company’s strategy and risks involved.

Nasdaq will require enhanced disclosure demands and may suspend trading or delist companies that fail to comply with the new rules. This move has already led to a decline in stocks of companies focused on crypto treasuries, such as Strategy, BitMine, American Bitcoin, SharpLink Gaming, and DeFi Development Corp.

Many companies are pivoting towards crypto-focused treasuries, with 184 public companies announcing plans to raise over $132 billion for crypto purchases. Nasdaq’s move may slow down this trend. The increased scrutiny from Nasdaq reflects a broader push for transparency and regulatory clarity in the crypto industry.

Companies are diversifying beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum into assets like Solana, XRP, BNB, and Toncoin, with AlphaTON Capital (formerly Portage Biotech) announcing a $100 million TON treasury. The rules align with U.S. laws like the 2025 GENIUS and CLARITY Acts, emphasizing transparency. This could slow crypto adoption but enhance long-term credibility.

Requiring shareholder approval for share issuances to fund crypto purchases ensures investors are informed, reducing risks of speculative or mismanaged crypto investments. Stricter oversight may curb aggressive crypto accumulation, potentially stabilizing stock prices of affected companies and the broader market.

The approval process and compliance costs could deter smaller firms from building crypto treasuries, limiting corporate participation in digital assets. Companies may diversify into less volatile assets or delay crypto purchases, as seen with firms exploring Solana, XRP, or Toncoin alongside Bitcoin.

Compliance with Nasdaq’s rules and U.S. laws (e.g., GENIUS and CLARITY Acts) will raise legal and administrative expenses, impacting profitability. Stocks of crypto-heavy firms like Strategy (-3.5%), BitMine Immersion (-8.7%), and SharpLink Gaming (-9%) already saw drops, reflecting investor concerns over regulatory hurdles.

Transparent practices could attract institutional investors, boosting confidence in companies with compliant crypto strategies. Slower treasury accumulation may temper demand for Bitcoin and altcoins, potentially pressuring prices in the short term.

Regulatory alignment could enhance crypto’s credibility, encouraging cautious institutional adoption over time. Companies like Strategy, with established crypto holdings, may face less disruption than smaller players struggling with compliance.

Stricter U.S. rules contrast with looser regulations elsewhere (e.g., Hong Kong or Singapore), potentially pushing crypto-focused firms to list on foreign exchanges. Firms may explore alternative funding mechanisms (e.g., debt or partnerships) to bypass share issuance restrictions.

Companies might invest in blockchain analytics to meet transparency requirements, fostering innovation in compliance tech. While Nasdaq’s scrutiny may slow corporate crypto adoption and pressure stock and crypto prices short-term, it could foster a more sustainable, transparent integration of digital assets into corporate finance, aligning with broader regulatory trends.

Kraken Acquires Breakout— A Tampa-Based Proprietary Trading Firm

Kraken, a major U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, acquired Breakout, a Tampa-based proprietary trading firm founded in 2023 by crypto industry veterans TraderMayne, CryptoCred, Alex Miningham, and Abetrade.

The acquisition integrates Breakout’s evaluation-based trading model into Kraken Pro, allowing skilled traders to access up to $200,000 in notional capital—$100,000 per account, with the ability to hold multiple accounts—without personal deposits, except for non-refundable evaluation fees.

Traders must pass a rigorous, performance-based assessment focusing on risk management, strategy consistency, and drawdown limits, with successful traders retaining up to 90% of profits, paid on-demand, including in USDC stablecoin. The platform supports over 50 crypto pairs, with up to 5x leverage on Bitcoin and Ethereum contracts.

This move, following Kraken’s $1.5 billion acquisition of NinjaTrader in May 2025 and Capitalise.ai in August 2025, expands Kraken’s advanced trading offerings and aligns with its merit-based capital allocation philosophy, as stated by co-CEO Arjun Sethi: “Breakout gives us a way to allocate capital based on proof of skill rather than access to capital itself.”

Breakout’s CEO Alex Miningham emphasized the synergy, noting the deal creates a “unified ecosystem” for traders, from education to capital deployment. The acquisition also positions Kraken as the first crypto exchange to enter proprietary trading, leveraging its infrastructure for scalability and liquidity.

While financial terms were undisclosed, Breakout had raised $4.5 million in a 2024 seed round. The move has sparked speculation about Kraken preparing for a potential 2026 IPO, though some in Kraken’s community question the synergy with its existing offerings. Critics note the unregulated nature of prop trading poses risks, urging caution due to potential scams.

By integrating Breakout’s prop trading model into Kraken Pro, Kraken diversifies its platform beyond traditional retail and institutional trading. This move attracts skilled traders who lack capital, offering them access to significant notional funds (up to $200,000) through a performance-based evaluation.

The acquisition builds on Kraken’s recent purchases of NinjaTrader and Capitalise.ai, signaling a strategic push into advanced trading tools, automation, and capital allocation models, potentially strengthening its competitive edge against rivals like Coinbase and Binance.

Democratization of Trading Access

Breakout’s model, which allocates capital based on skill rather than wealth, lowers barriers for talented traders who lack personal funds. This merit-based approach could attract a new demographic of traders, fostering inclusivity and potentially uncovering high-performing traders who might otherwise be excluded from crypto markets.

The ability to earn up to 90% of profits, paid on-demand in USDC, provides financial flexibility and aligns with the crypto ethos of decentralization and self-sovereignty. Kraken becomes the first major crypto exchange to enter the proprietary trading space, a novel move in the industry.

This could set a precedent, prompting competitors to explore similar models, potentially reshaping how crypto exchanges engage with traders. The integration of Breakout’s 50+ crypto pairs and up to 5x leverage on major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum enhances Kraken’s appeal to high-risk, high-reward traders, potentially increasing trading volume and revenue.

The acquisition fuels speculation about Kraken’s potential 2026 IPO. By expanding its portfolio with innovative trading solutions, Kraken strengthens its value proposition to investors, showcasing growth potential and diversified revenue streams beyond spot trading and custody services.

However, the unregulated nature of prop trading introduces risks, as noted by critics. Regulatory scrutiny could complicate Kraken’s IPO plans, especially if authorities view prop trading as a gray area in crypto markets. The prop trading model, while innovative, carries inherent risks. The non-refunded evaluation fees and strict performance criteria may deter some traders or lead to perceptions of exclusivity.

Additionally, the unregulated prop trading space is prone to scams, which could tarnish Kraken’s reputation if not managed carefully. Community skepticism about the synergy between Breakout’s model and Kraken’s core offerings suggests potential challenges in user adoption. Kraken will need to invest in education and marketing to bridge this gap.

Kraken’s move could pressure competitors to innovate or acquire similar firms, intensifying competition in the crypto exchange space. It may also spur the growth of prop trading in crypto, creating a new niche market. By offering a “unified ecosystem” (as noted by Breakout’s CEO), Kraken could capture market share from traditional prop trading firms and unregulated crypto platforms.

The acquisition highlights the growing convergence of traditional finance (prop trading) and crypto, potentially attracting institutional interest in crypto-based prop trading models. This could drive further mainstream adoption of crypto as a legitimate asset class.

Kraken’s acquisition of Breakout positions it as a pioneer in crypto prop trading, with potential to reshape trader access and market dynamics. However, it must navigate regulatory risks, user skepticism, and operational challenges to fully capitalize on this strategic move.