DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6

Sky to acquire ITV’s broadcast and streaming business in £1.6bn deal to challenge Netflix and global streaming giants

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Comcast-owned Sky has agreed to acquire the broadcast channels and streaming platform of ITV in a £1.6 billion ($2.13 billion) deal, marking one of the biggest shake-ups in British media in decades as traditional broadcasters consolidate to compete with global streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ and YouTube.

The transaction, announced on Monday would combine Britain’s largest commercial free-to-air broadcaster with its biggest pay-TV operator, creating a media powerhouse spanning broadcast television, subscription TV, streaming, advertising, and sports.

Sky Chief Executive Dana Strong described the acquisition as a “defining moment” for the British broadcasting industry, saying the enlarged company would be better positioned to invest in premium British content while competing against technology companies that have dramatically altered viewing habits over the past decade.

“This is a defining moment and one of the biggest in the history of British broadcasting,” Strong said, adding that the deal would enable the combined business to continue delivering “outstanding British programming” as audiences increasingly migrate to digital and on-demand viewing.

She stressed that ITV would continue to fulfil its public service broadcasting obligations despite the change in ownership.

“ITV will remain a public service broadcaster at the heart of British life, and we’re excited about the future we can build together,” she said.

The acquisition is believed to have been orchestrated by the mounting pressure facing traditional broadcasters across Europe as streaming services and digital video platforms continue to capture audiences, advertising revenue, and sports rights. Only a few years ago, a merger between Sky and ITV would have been politically and commercially difficult to imagine. However, the rapid expansion of global streaming services and the growing dominance of online platforms have fundamentally reshaped the television industry.

Consumers are increasingly shifting away from scheduled television toward on-demand viewing. At the same time, advertising budgets have steadily migrated to digital platforms operated by companies such as Alphabet-owned YouTube, Meta, Netflix and Amazon.

The combined Sky-ITV business is expected to strengthen its position by integrating ITV’s mass-market broadcast reach with Sky’s subscription television business, streaming capabilities, broadband services, and premium sports and entertainment offerings.

Advertising Powerhouse Raises Competition Questions

The proposed merger is also likely to attract intense scrutiny from Britain’s competition authorities. According to analysts, the combined company would control more than 70% of the UK’s television advertising market, giving it enormous influence over commercial television advertising.

That level of market concentration is expected to become a central issue during regulatory reviews by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and communications regulator Ofcom, with lawmakers also likely to examine whether the transaction serves the public interest.

The deal may additionally receive political attention because ITV remains one of Britain’s designated public service broadcasters, with statutory obligations covering news, regional programming and public-interest content. Many Members of Parliament maintain close ties with ITV through its longstanding regional broadcasting network, which originated more than 70 years ago as a federation of local franchises serving communities across the United Kingdom.

The political environment has also become more interventionist. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy recently signaled the government’s willingness to examine major media transactions when she indicated she could intervene in the proposed merger involving Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery, suggesting regulators could closely examine the Sky-ITV transaction before granting approval.

ITV to Focus On Global Content Production

The agreement significantly reshapes ITV’s business model. Following completion of the transaction, the media giant will effectively become a standalone international production company centered on ITV Studios, one of the world’s largest television production businesses.

ITV Studios already supplies content to broadcasters and streaming services worldwide, producing programmes for the BBC, Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video and numerous international networks. Its portfolio includes globally recognised programmes such as Love Island, Coronation Street, The Voice, and the hit Disney+ drama Rivals.

Under the terms of the agreement, Love Productions, the producer behind the internationally successful The Great British Bake Off, will also become part of the remaining ITV Studios business, strengthening its position as a global content supplier.

This structure allows ITV Studios to continue producing programming not only for the combined Sky-ITV business but also for competing broadcasters and streaming platforms worldwide, preserving an important source of diversified revenue.

Under the agreed terms, ITV will receive:

  • £1.2 billion in cash upon completion.
  • An earn-out payment of up to £200 million, linked to the advertising performance of the business during the 2027 financial year.
  • Ownership of Love Productions, which will join ITV Studios.

The merged broadcasting business has also committed to investing at least £2.1 billion in programming between 2028 and 2032, underscoring plans to maintain investment in British television production despite broader industry cost pressures.

The commitment is intended to reassure regulators, policymakers, and viewers that domestic programming and public service content will remain central to the combined company’s strategy.

Shares of ITV rose around 1% to 83 pence in early London trading following the announcement, reflecting cautious investor optimism that the transaction unlocks value while allowing ITV Studios to focus on its faster-growing international production business.

The Hidden Price of Fiscal Irresponsibility in Nigeria

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The recent observations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) regarding Nigeria’s fiscal management have reignited an old debate about governance, accountability, and the country’s economic direction.

For many Nigerians, the IMF’s assessment came as a shocking revelation, exposing what some describe as widespread fiscal irresponsibility among those entrusted with managing public resources. Yet for others, the report merely confirmed what years of economic hardship, declining public services, and growing debt had already suggested.

The real surprise is not the content of the report but that anyone could still be surprised by it. Nigeria’s fiscal challenges have not emerged overnight. For decades, concerns have been raised about inefficient public spending, poor budget implementation, revenue leakages, rising debt obligations, and inadequate transparency in the management of public finances.

These structural problems have repeatedly weakened the country’s ability to deliver quality infrastructure, education, healthcare, and social services despite its enormous natural and human resources.

Reports from domestic watchdogs, civil society organizations, and international institutions have consistently highlighted these weaknesses, yet meaningful reforms have often progressed slowly. The deeper issue extends beyond government institutions alone.

It also involves the broader political and economic elite whose influence shapes public policy and national priorities. Many influential individuals have benefited from systems that reward patronage over performance and loyalty over accountability.

In such an environment, governance becomes less about serving the public interest and more about preserving networks of privilege. This creates a cycle in which fiscal indiscipline persists because those with the power to challenge it frequently benefit from maintaining the status quo.

Public silence has also played a significant role. While many Nigerians have voiced frustration over corruption and economic mismanagement, sustained civic engagement has often struggled against political intimidation, institutional weakness, and widespread voter disillusionment.

Elections alone cannot guarantee accountability if citizens remain disconnected from governance between election cycles. A healthy democracy requires continuous public scrutiny, active civil society participation, an independent judiciary, and a free press capable of investigating abuses without fear.

Economic consequences inevitably follow fiscal mismanagement. Rising debt servicing costs consume resources that could otherwise fund development projects.

Inflation erodes purchasing power, unemployment limits opportunities for young people, and investor confidence weakens when policy consistency becomes uncertain. These realities affect ordinary citizens far more than political elites, widening inequality and deepening social frustration.

Assigning blame solely to government risks overlooking the broader responsibility shared across society. Political leaders emerge from existing institutions and social structures. Business leaders, traditional authorities, professionals, and citizens all influence governance through their choices, advocacy, and participation.

When corruption is tolerated, institutions weakened, or accountability ignored, the entire system gradually becomes vulnerable to abuse. The path forward requires more than outrage over international reports. Nigeria needs stronger institutions capable of enforcing fiscal discipline regardless of political affiliation.

Budget transparency, independent oversight, anti-corruption enforcement, responsible borrowing practices, and meaningful public participation in governance are essential for restoring confidence. Equally important is cultivating a political culture where public office is viewed as a position of service rather than personal enrichment.

Nigeria’s future will depend not only on exposing fiscal excesses but also on building institutions and civic values that make such practices increasingly difficult to sustain. International assessments may highlight existing problems, but lasting solutions must come from Nigerians themselves through consistent demands for accountability, responsible leadership, and active participation in shaping the nation’s democratic and economic future.

Michael Saylor Says Bitcoin is “Digital Energy” Built For Long-Term Capital Preservation

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Strategy CEO Michael Saylor has characterized the world’s largest cryptocurrency Bitcoin, as “digital energy,” emphasizing its ability to store value more effectively than traditional assets.

He believes Bitcoin’s scarcity, portability, and resistance to manipulation positions it as a next-generation financial asset capable of safeguarding wealth over the long term.

In a post on X, he wrote,

“Bitcoin is digital energy”.

This was posted alongside a detailed chart highlighting MicroStrategy’s substantial Bitcoin holdings as of July 5, 2026. The visualization shows the company controls 847,363 BTC with a total reserve value of $53.06 billion.

This reflects 113 purchase events, an average acquisition cost of $75,653 per Bitcoin, and a current unrealized position down approximately 17.24%.

The chart maps Bitcoin’s price trajectory alongside orange bubbles representing individual purchase sizes and a green line tracking the average purchase price over time, underscoring MicroStrategy’s long-term accumulation strategy amid market volatility.

Saylor’s statement reinforces his long-held belief that Bitcoin represents a revolutionary form of energy portable, verifiable, and resistant to degradation.

Far from a speculative gamble, the Strategy CEO treats these acquisitions as the accumulation of digital energy that can be stored indefinitely and transferred across borders without friction.

At its core, Saylor’s framing draws an analogy between Bitcoin and energy itself. Traditional energy sources like oil or electricity power physical machines, but Bitcoin powers the digital economy by securing value, enabling trustless transactions, and acting as a battery for human productivity.

Unlike fiat currencies that lose purchasing power through inflation, Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins creates scarcity akin to conserved energy. Once mined, this energy cannot be created anew or arbitrarily diluted by central authorities.

This perspective explains MicroStrategy’s aggressive Bitcoin strategy. By converting cash reserves into BTC, the company effectively transforms depreciating fiat into an asset designed to appreciate as adoption grows.

The volatility visible in the chart—dips and surges—becomes secondary to the long-term trajectory. Saylor has consistently argued that holding Bitcoin is like storing energy in its purest, most efficient digital form, one that survives political instability, currency devaluation, and technological disruption.

Critics often dismiss Bitcoin for its energy consumption during mining, yet Saylor flips the narrative. Mining converts real-world electricity into an immutable ledger entry, creating something far more valuable than the input.

In an article on X, titled “Bitcoin evolves by not changing”, Saylor says Bitcoin’s greatest evolution over the next decade will come from changing less at the protocol layer and mattering more everywhere else.

He adds that the base layer will harden, the capital markets will deepen, the applications will expand, and the world will build on Bitcoin.

This “digital energy” can then be moved instantly anywhere in the world, settled in minutes, and verified by anyone. In an era of increasing digitalization, from AI to global finance, Bitcoin serves as the monetary layer that underpins secure value exchange.

Saylor’s message resonates because it aligns with observable trends. Institutional adoption continues to accelerate, with companies and governments exploring Bitcoin as a treasury asset or strategic reserve.

The chart of MicroStrategy’s holdings serves as both proof and blueprint of  disciplined accumulation through market cycles yields substantial reserves of this digital energy.

As Bitcoin matures, Saylor’s statement highlights the crypto asset unique properties, decentralization, scarcity, portability, and verifiability that distinguish it from all prior forms of money.

In this view, holding Bitcoin is not merely investing, it is participating in the creation of a new energy standard for the digital age.

Ethereum Foundation Treasury Shrinks as Institutional ETH Holdings Surge, as Solana Expands Institutional Tokenized Finance Through Equities

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Ethereum has long been celebrated as one of the most decentralized blockchain ecosystems, but recent developments have intensified discussions about the changing balance of influence within its network.

The Ethereum Foundation, the nonprofit organization that played a central role in developing and supporting Ethereum, has seen its direct holdings decline dramatically over the years.

At launch, the foundation reportedly controlled roughly 17% of the total ETH supply. Today, that figure has fallen to approximately 0.1%, highlighting how its treasury has been gradually reduced to fund research, development, grants, and ecosystem growth.

Over the past five years, the Ethereum Foundation is estimated to have sold around $700 million worth of ETH at an average price of roughly $3,500 per coin. Its latest reported sale involved 25,000 ETH at approximately $2,400 each.

While treasury management through periodic token sales has always been part of the foundation’s operational strategy, recent financial disclosures suggest increasing pressure on its resources.

Reports indicate that the organization is operating with only three to nine months of financial runway, prompting a 40% reduction in its budget alongside a 20% workforce cut. Such measures signal a shift toward financial austerity during a period when Ethereum faces growing technical and competitive challenges.

Leadership changes have further fueled concerns. Since January 2026, nine prominent researchers and senior leaders have reportedly departed from the Ethereum Foundation. In response, new organizations such as EthLabs and Ethereum Institutional have emerged to continue advancing Ethereum’s technical roadmap and institutional outreach.

Both organizations are only weeks old, raising understandable questions about whether they can quickly replace years of accumulated expertise, organizational knowledge, and engineering leadership. At the same time, institutional ownership of ETH has grown rapidly.

BitMine, originally known as a mining company, now reportedly controls approximately 5.7 million ETH, representing around 4.7% of Ethereum’s total supply. Even more notable is that approximately 86% of these holdings are staked, generating an estimated $211 million in annual staking rewards.

This development illustrates how large institutional participants are becoming increasingly influential within Ethereum’s economic ecosystem.

The fact that a single corporate entity now holds substantially more ETH than the Ethereum Foundation reflects how ownership has shifted from the protocol’s original steward to market-driven participants. This changing landscape arrives as Ethereum embarks on its ambitious Lean Ethereum roadmap.

The initiative aims to improve scalability, efficiency, and long-term sustainability while preserving decentralization and security. Achieving these objectives is expected to require engineering efforts comparable in complexity to the historic Merge upgrade, potentially spanning three to four years.

Such an undertaking demands stable funding, experienced engineering teams, and effective coordination across multiple organizations. Fortunately, Ethereum retains one of its greatest strategic advantages: its dominant stablecoin ecosystem.

With more than $150 billion in stablecoin activity secured by the network, Ethereum continues to serve as the primary settlement layer for decentralized finance, tokenized assets, and institutional blockchain applications. This enormous economic moat provides resilience by ensuring sustained network usage, liquidity, and developer interest.

However, economic strength alone cannot replace sustained investment in protocol development. Stablecoin adoption may buy Ethereum valuable time, but successful execution of its long-term roadmap ultimately depends on capable leadership, consistent funding, and experienced engineering talent.

As governance responsibilities become increasingly distributed across new organizations and institutional stakeholders, Ethereum enters a pivotal chapter. Whether this transition represents a healthy evolution toward greater decentralization or introduces new coordination challenges will significantly influence the network’s ability to maintain its technological leadership in the years ahead.

Solana Expands Institutional Tokenized Finance Through Equities, Treasuries, and Trade Finance

Solana continues to strengthen its position as a leading blockchain for real-world assets (RWAs), with a wave of institutional-grade financial products demonstrating how traditional finance is increasingly merging with decentralized infrastructure.

The latest developments include the debut of Bending Spoons’ equity through xStocksFi, the launch of TruYields’ tokenized U.S. Treasury product, and Obligatecom’s trade-finance tokenization platform. These initiatives highlight Solana’s growing appeal as the preferred settlement layer for regulated financial assets and institutional capital.

One of the most significant announcements is the launch of Bending Spoons ($BSPx) on Solana through xStocksFi. The tokenized equity gives investors around the world access to shares of the technology company at institutional pricing, reducing many of the barriers traditionally associated with cross-border investing.

Tokenized equities enable investors to gain exposure to publicly traded companies without relying on conventional brokerage infrastructure, while blockchain settlement offers faster transactions, improved transparency, and broader accessibility.

This development represents another step toward creating a global financial market where ownership of traditional assets becomes more efficient and available to a wider audience. Alongside tokenized equities, Solana has welcomed another important institutional product with the introduction of TruYields’ $TRUBILL.

The asset offers permissioned access to tokenized U.S. Treasury yields, allowing eligible institutional participants to earn returns backed by short-term U.S. government securities. Treasury-backed digital assets have become one of the fastest-growing sectors within tokenized finance because they combine the stability of government debt with the efficiency of blockchain technology.

By launching on Solana, TruYields enables near-instant settlement, lower operational costs, and seamless integration with decentralized financial applications while maintaining the compliance standards expected by institutional investors.

The expansion does not stop with equities and government securities. Obligatecom has introduced oTFY on Solana, bringing trade-finance real-world assets into decentralized finance. Trade finance has historically been difficult to access due to its complexity, paperwork, and limited liquidity.

Tokenization changes this by converting trade-finance receivables into blockchain-based assets that can circulate within digital markets. Even more importantly, oTFY is designed to function as fully composable lending collateral within DeFi protocols.

This means institutional-grade trade-finance assets can now be used alongside other digital assets to secure loans, improve capital efficiency, and unlock additional liquidity opportunities. The combination of these three launches illustrates how Solana is evolving beyond its reputation as a blockchain primarily associated with decentralized trading and memecoins.

The network is becoming home to regulated financial products that appeal to banks, asset managers, treasury providers, and institutional investors. Its high transaction throughput, low fees, and rapid finality make it an attractive platform for financial institutions seeking scalable blockchain infrastructure capable of supporting real-world economic activity.

These developments also demonstrate the growing maturity of the tokenized asset ecosystem. Rather than focusing solely on cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology is now enabling the digitization of company shares, government bonds, and commercial financing instruments.

Each new asset class expands the range of investment opportunities available on-chain while increasing the utility of decentralized finance. As more institutions recognize the operational efficiencies offered by tokenization, adoption is likely to accelerate across multiple sectors of global finance.

The arrival of Bending Spoons’ tokenized equity, TruYields’ Treasury-backed yield product, and Obligatecom’s trade-finance collateral reflects a broader transformation taking place within financial markets.

Solana is positioning itself as a comprehensive infrastructure layer where traditional financial assets can coexist with decentralized applications, creating a more accessible, efficient, and interconnected financial ecosystem.

As institutional participation continues to grow, tokenized real-world assets may become one of the defining catalysts driving the next phase of blockchain adoption.

Samsung’s AI Windfall: Record Profit Looms as Memory Boom Rewrites Chip Industry Economics

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Samsung Electronics is poised to deliver another historic quarter, underscoring how artificial intelligence has transformed the global semiconductor industry from a cyclical business into one driven by relentless demand for computing power.

The South Korean technology giant is expected to report an operating profit of 86 trillion won ($56.35 billion) for the April to June quarter, almost 18 times higher than the 4.7 trillion won recorded a year earlier, according to an LSEG SmartEstimate based on forecasts from 30 analysts. If realized, the result would mark Samsung’s third consecutive quarter of record operating profit, extending one of the strongest earnings streaks in the company’s history.

The expected performance comes as AI investment continues to stretch global memory supplies, allowing manufacturers to command significantly higher prices for memory chips that have become essential components of modern AI infrastructure.

For Samsung, the boom represents a remarkable turnaround. Just a few years ago, the world’s largest memory chipmaker was battling one of the industry’s worst downturns as oversupply and weak electronics demand crushed chip prices. Today, the opposite problem confronts the industry. Demand has overtaken supply, inventories have tightened, and memory prices have surged as cloud providers and technology companies race to build AI infrastructure.

Analysts believe the favorable supply-demand imbalance is unlikely to disappear anytime soon, with expectations that memory shortages will persist through at least next year.

The AI revolution has changed not only the volume of memory being consumed but also the type of demand driving the market. Early waves of generative AI were primarily centered on training massive language models, creating enormous demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), the premium memory technology used alongside AI accelerators. That trend continues, but analysts say a broader shift is now underway.

The rapid expansion of inference computing, where trained AI models respond to user requests in real time, is creating strong demand for conventional DRAM and NAND memory products that form the backbone of servers and storage systems.

The emergence of agentic AI is accelerating that trend.

Unlike traditional AI chatbots that simply generate responses, agentic AI systems execute complex, multi-step tasks, retrieve information from multiple sources, make autonomous decisions and continuously interact with software applications. Those capabilities require larger memory pools for server processors and significantly greater storage capacity to retain, retrieve, and process vast amounts of data efficiently.

As enterprises deploy sophisticated AI agents across business operations, demand is expanding beyond specialized AI chips into virtually every category of memory semiconductor.

That places Samsung in an enviable position.

The company supplies memory chips to many of the world’s biggest technology companies, including Nvidia, Google and Apple, making it one of the biggest beneficiaries of the global AI infrastructure race.

The pricing environment exposes just how tight supplies have become. According to Citi Research, average selling prices for DRAM jumped 44% quarter-on-quarter during the April to June period, while NAND flash prices rose an even steeper 53%.

Such increases would have been almost unimaginable during previous semiconductor cycles, when price swings were typically driven by fluctuations in smartphone or PC demand. Today, AI infrastructure spending has become the dominant force shaping memory markets.

The Electronics Side Too

The earnings boom has also fueled one of the biggest stock market rallies in the technology sector.

Samsung Electronics shares have surged approximately 158% this year. Rival SK Hynix has climbed about 273%, while U.S. memory producer Micron Technology has gained roughly 242%. The extraordinary rally has pushed the market valuations of all three memory manufacturers above the $1 trillion mark, highlighting investors’ confidence that AI-driven demand will remain robust for years rather than quarters.

Yet Samsung’s headline earnings could still contain one important caveat. Analysts caution that reported operating profit may come in below market expectations if the company recognizes larger employee bonus provisions during the quarter.

In late May, Samsung reached a wage agreement with its semiconductor workers, ending the threat of a large-scale strike that had raised concerns about disruptions to production. Under the agreement, 10.5% of the semiconductor division’s operating profit will be allocated as special bonuses for chip employees.

Some analysts estimate cumulative bonus provisions could exceed 40 trillion won. While those payments would not alter the underlying strength of Samsung’s semiconductor business, the timing of recognizing the expense could materially influence reported quarterly earnings.

Samsung is expected to publish its full earnings report later this month, offering investors greater clarity on how those accounting provisions affect the final figures.

But even as the industry enjoys record profitability, analysts are increasingly focused on one question that could determine how long the boom lasts: Can AI investment continue growing at its current pace?

JPMorgan recently said investor discussions have shifted away from whether memory demand remains strong and toward whether the industry’s biggest customers can continue allocating such a large share of their capital spending to AI infrastructure. The bank estimates AI memory already accounts for approximately 52% of cloud service providers’ capital expenditure this year and expects that figure to exceed 70% next year.

That concentration has prompted growing debate over whether spending can remain sustainable without corresponding growth in commercial AI services. Investors are now seeking evidence that AI products are generating enough revenue to justify continued investment in massive data centers, specialized processors and increasingly expensive memory systems.

Those concerns carry particular significance because memory manufacturers are embarking on some of the largest investment programmes in the industry’s history.

Last week, Samsung and SK Hynix announced plans to invest a combined 3,200 trillion won ($2.07 trillion) to expand semiconductor production capacity in South Korea. Samsung expects to spread its investment between 2026 and 2040, while SK Hynix has not disclosed a detailed implementation schedule.

The scale of those commitments reflects confidence that AI demand will remain structurally higher for many years. However, it also raises the financial stakes should cloud providers slow capital spending or delay planned AI deployments.

To reduce uncertainty, Samsung has already begun securing future demand through long-term customer agreements. The company disclosed in April that it had signed multi-year binding contracts with customers seeking guaranteed memory supplies, although it did not reveal either the identities of those customers or the financial terms of the agreements.

The outlook for pricing remains favorable.

Nomura expects commodity DRAM prices to rise another 24% quarter-on-quarter during the July to September period, while NAND prices are projected to increase 25%, supported by stronger demand from consumer electronics manufacturers as well as operators of conventional and AI-focused data centers.

The expectation of another quarter of price increases suggests the industry’s supply constraints remain far from resolved.

Gain Here, Pain There

Ironically, Samsung’s success in semiconductors is creating new challenges elsewhere within the company. Its smartphone business is increasingly feeling the impact of soaring memory costs, with more expensive components squeezing margins even after recent handset price increases.

Analysts say higher semiconductor costs have more than offset Samsung’s pricing adjustments, reducing profitability in the mobile division.

That pressure could intensify during the second half of the year if memory prices continue climbing.

Some analysts believe Samsung may need another round of smartphone price increases to protect margins, mirroring moves already taken by Apple, which raised prices on selected iPad and MacBook models last month.

The divergence between Samsung’s businesses illustrates how profoundly AI has reshaped the technology industry. The semiconductor division is generating unprecedented profits because memory has become one of the most valuable components of AI infrastructure. At the same time, those same elevated memory prices are increasing manufacturing costs for smartphones, tablets, and other consumer devices.

1...567...8,943Page 6 of 8,943

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy