DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6284

Beyond MultiChoice (DStv, Gotv), Look At Football TV Rights Before Accusation of Monopoly

1

Great comments in our community on the MultiChoice (parent of DStv), Netflix and Amazon partnership. Some have called it a guerrilla warfare or battle; nothing like that though. In ancestral Africa, when three clans fight one another at once, be informed that a festival is taking place, not a war of strategic value. In other words, for Amazon and Netflix to fold parts of their African strategies into DStv,  they want to improve margins in the easiest ways possible. DStv distributes the goods in Africa, while the American firms provide regular supply from their production studios. Expect Disney+ to join in coming years once it settles in the U.S. and Europe. Simply, DStv plans to become an operating system for video distribution in Africa, as a super-aggregator.

From the comments also, many do think that MultiChoice (DStv, GOtv) is a monopoly. While I do not sanction anti-market prices, it is important to note that MultiChoice’s raw materials – the European football- are free products for anyone to bid, and the company is not the primary producer with no apparent moat against anyone bidding. I have looked at the numbers, from an independent angle, the price growth in DStv has trail-correlated with TV rights costs in Europe. According to Statistica, revenue from Premier League broadcasting rights was $3 billion in 2013-2016; for 2016-2019, it shot to $5.1 billion. That is the raw material which DStv sells. Yes, it has gone up by close to 70%.

Raise your hand if you would not increase price when your raw material has gone up by 70%. If you did raise a hand, you are running a charity and once your funds finish (or your donors get tired), you would close shop. DStv is not running a charity and the 15% increase Nigerians experienced during that time might have happened because the company possibly got a discount as it was always the only one bidding for Africa! So, European football has to dance or it misses the revenue altogether. 

Nothing stops companies like NTA, Channels, AIT, etc joining the bidding. My point is simple: anyone that holds these rights would at the end ask to be paid to recover its investments. Where we think we cannot take it, Enyimba, Rangers, Kano Pillars, etc, are still there.

So, when I read statements that Nigeria wants to force video entertainment companies to sub-license contents to competitors at a regulated price, you would ask, Why Not Ask Those Sub-firms to Go and Bid in Europe. So, DStv buys at say $100 and Nigeria will demand it sells for $50 knowing fully well that value makes sense when supply is not unbounded? Does not make sense to me how DStv will return in three years to pay Messi and C.Ronaldo equivalent of Abia State budget to keep them happy, kicking a round leather. Nigeria needs to live on FACTS as we make policies!

But DStv’s ambitions in Nigeria might hit a major wall if the new broadcast code by the regulatory commission goes into effect. The new code will prevent pay-TV and streaming platforms from making content exclusive and compel them to sub-license content at prices that it will regulate. (TC Daily newsletter)

Read more on this old piece where I explained further.

If MultiChoice does not increase rates, it has no business in Africa. It is irrelevant if the price in Nigeria is higher than what it prices in Ghana. It has made it clear that running a business in Nigeria is higher because it runs generators and hires private guards unlike in other economies where those are readily provided by governments.

The key reason why MultiChoice is increasing the price is thus: it is losing its best subscribers and to cover and service the loans it took to pay for the TV rights which have made it the best Pay-TV product in Africa, it needs to ask existing customers to pay more, and because TV rights are always going higher it has to budget more for the next cycle of licensing.

The statistic depicts the revenue from the Premier League television broadcasting rights from 1992 to 2019. From 2013 to 2016 the Premier League generated over 3 billion pounds in revenue from its marketing of TV broadcasting rights per year. (source: statista)

In other words, if it loses the most premium customers, it will not have enough money to pay for the TV rights. And if you ask it not to increase the prices on the existing customers, you have technically frozen its business. The product it sells was not created by it: England Premier League, Serie A, La Liga, etc decide their TV rights prices. As these brands continue to increase rights, and MultiChoice continues to see its customer base disintermediated, expecting it to keep prices static is not fair. What the court should have done is to demand that those selling TV rights freeze price increase and those leaving MultiChoice brands stop.

DStv Nigeria Explains, Would Not Offer Pay As You View (PAYV); Telcos Should Learn

An Executive from Jobberman To Teach Career Development During Tekedia Mini-MBA

0

She is a highly skilled Learning and Development Consultant with 12+ years’ experience facilitating Soft Skills training. A change management consultant who earned organizational insights, from working with a broad variety of highly specialized work cultures and professions. A consultant with experience in curriculum design, mentoring business leaders to develop soft skills. 

She is an innovative leader with national and international experience in data management, advocacy and program implementation and evaluation. Leads training sessions across Africa, focused on effective communication, building effective teams and finance for non-financial people.

A master’s degree graduate of the University of Aberdeen, she heads the Youth Engagement & Learning unit in the industry-king, and digital recruiter Jobberman. Precious Ajoonu will lead a session during Tekedia Mini-MBA on Career Planning, Professional Learning & Development.

Come and learn how to remain a valuable professional as you advance your career.

Testimonials on Tekedia Mini-MBA

9

A U.S. accelerator is sending its participants to Tekedia Mini-MBA. They want to understand Africa better and connect deeper as they build relationships with African founders and partners. Find below selected testimonials from Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 1, and also what we are doing on scholarship funds.

Selected Testimonials

A testimonial from a Tekedia Mini-MBA 1st edition participant, Franklin Okafor FCCA, CFE: “The program was ‘loaded’. Informative. Insightful. Practical and knowledge-filled. I’m better off than when i started in February.” He then throws a challenge: “If you have the means, please register for the next batch starting on the 22nd of June. Thanks Ndubuisi and the entire faculty.” Source: LinkedIn

Source: Comment section

From a Fellow of Chartered Accountants and a Bank Manager, here is a testimonial, below. Source: LinkedIn

Scholarship Funds

On scholarship, kindly note that there is no need to send my team your bank statement to make a case for a scholarship for Tekedia Mini-MBA. And no one needs your BVN for any reason (never do that please). At N50k ($140), our program is relatively expensive since in some public schools in Africa, that is the cost of tuition in a semester. For some students, their parents cannot absorb that extra cost.  We truly understand the challenges and are working hard to provide resources to assist more members. As I type, we have hundreds of pending scholarship requests. Where you can support young people in your community, do.

https://www.tekedia.com/mini-mba-2/