DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 63

Waymo Stranded Vehicles and The Limits of Silicon Valley Assumptions for Africa

1

Good People, I have been reflecting on how Waymo, an Alphabet (Google) company, deployed driverless cars on American streets without fully modeling a basic but critical scenario: what happens during a power outage despite the billions of dollars spent on modeling, testing, and simulation over many years.

We all read how Waymo vehicles froze on the roads of California when parts of the state lost power. Specifically, a power outage in San Francisco caused significant disruption, immobilizing Waymo’s robotaxis as they encountered dark traffic signals. While Waymo has since indicated that it has enhanced its software and emergency protocols, one fundamental question remains unanswered: why was this scenario not modeled from the start?

This is where we begin to appreciate what many often criticize as European “overregulation.” When you examine what happened in San Francisco, you begin to see the value of regulatory regimes that insist on exhaustive edge-case analysis before large-scale deployment.

Largely,  Waymo and the American regulators that approved these vehicles for public roads without fully accounting for mass power outages have inadvertently delivered a lesson that African capitals must not ignore. Do not assume you are covered!  Yes, I fully expect that in a few years, some showmen will begin importing these vehicles into Nigeria and other African countries. But without subjecting them to local scenario testing, the risks are enormous.

Losing power in America is an exception. Losing power in many African cities is the default state. So, if a system struggles under a rare condition in San Francisco, what happens when it is deployed in environments where that condition is routine? And beyond power outages, what other risk vectors, already overlooked in California, could cause catastrophic failure on African roads?

Technology does not travel well without context. And before we import the future, we must first verify it against our realities. I am now increasingly cautious about driverless cars because the recipes used to build them may not have been fully optimized, and yet humans are being asked to consume half-cooked meals. Africa cannot, and must not, default to Silicon Valley assumptions.

Comment on Feed

Comment: Perhaps they would have modeled for that if they were deploying in Africa. I’m sure power failure ranked very low in the risk assessment for San Francisco.

My Response: My understanding is that no one buys a car and permanently geolocates it. Are you suggesting that someone cannot purchase a car in the U.S. and decide to ship it to Nigeria without written and express approval from the manufacturer? If that were the case, what then happens to the entire used-car business?

More importantly, even if this scenario is considered low probability, it represents high risk, and high-risk scenarios should never be ignored. Imagine if a similar failure occurred at a rail crossing transporting hazardous chemicals. Yes, an entire community could be put in danger. Edge cases are not trivial when their consequences are catastrophic.

I am still expecting a valid reason from Waymo for ignoring this risk!

OpenAI Offers $555,000 Role to Tackle AI’s Growing Risks as Safety Concerns Resurface

0

OpenAI is offering to pay more than half a million dollars a year to recruit a senior executive tasked with confronting the darker side of artificial intelligence, a move that indicates how seriously the company now views the risks emerging alongside rapid advances in its models.

The company is hiring a new “head of preparedness,” a role that will sit within OpenAI’s Safety Systems team and carry a base salary of $555,000 a year, plus equity. The position is designed to lead efforts to identify, assess, and mitigate the risks posed by increasingly capable AI systems, ranging from cybersecurity threats and misinformation to mental health harms and the erosion of human agency.

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman flagged the role publicly over the weekend, describing it as demanding and urgent. In a post on X on Saturday, Altman said the job would be “stressful” and warned that whoever takes it on would be “jump[ing] into the deep end pretty much immediately.”

Altman framed the role as essential at a moment when AI capabilities are accelerating faster than many anticipated.

“Models are improving quickly and are now capable of many great things, but they are also starting to present some real challenges,” he wrote.

He pointed to early warning signs already seen in 2025, including the impact of AI systems on mental health and the growing ability of models to identify serious vulnerabilities in computer security systems.

The hiring push comes as OpenAI’s products, particularly ChatGPT, have become embedded in everyday life for millions of users. The chatbot is widely used for research, writing emails, planning trips, and completing routine tasks. But as adoption has spread, so too have concerns about unintended consequences.

Some users now engage with chatbots as a substitute for therapy or emotional support. Mental health experts have warned that, in certain cases, this can worsen underlying conditions. There have been instances where interactions with AI systems appeared to reinforce delusions or encourage other harmful behaviors.

OpenAI acknowledged those risks last year. In October, the company said it had begun working with mental health professionals to improve how ChatGPT responds to users exhibiting signs of psychosis, self-harm, or other concerning behavior. Those efforts form part of a broader attempt to adapt safety systems as AI becomes more persuasive, emotionally responsive, and context-aware.

The new head of preparedness will be directly responsible for building and coordinating the frameworks designed to anticipate such risks before they scale. According to the job listing, the role involves leading “capability evaluations, threat models, and mitigations that form a coherent, rigorous, and operationally scalable safety pipeline.”

The position also carries symbolic weight inside OpenAI, a company founded on the mission of developing artificial intelligence that benefits humanity as a whole. From its early days, safety and alignment were central to its identity. However, as OpenAI transitioned from a research-focused lab into a commercial powerhouse under pressure to release products and generate revenue, internal tensions over priorities have increasingly spilled into public view.

Several former staff members have openly questioned whether safety has taken a back seat to growth. Jan Leike, who led OpenAI’s now-dissolved safety team, resigned in May 2024 and used his departure to issue a blunt warning. In a post on X, he said the company had drifted away from its founding mission.

“Building smarter-than-human machines is an inherently dangerous endeavor,” Leike wrote at the time. “OpenAI is shouldering an enormous responsibility on behalf of all of humanity. But over the past years, safety culture and processes have taken a backseat to shiny products.”

Less than a week later, another OpenAI staffer announced their resignation, also citing safety concerns. Daniel Kokotajlo, a researcher who had focused on risks associated with artificial general intelligence, said in a May 2024 blog post that he left because he was “losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI.”

Kokotajlo later told Fortune that OpenAI initially had roughly 30 people dedicated to researching AGI-related safety issues. After a wave of departures, that number fell by nearly half, raising questions about whether the company had sufficient internal capacity to match the pace of its technological ambitions.

The head of preparedness role was previously held by Aleksander Madry, who moved into a different position within the company in July 2024. Filling the post now, with a significantly publicized compensation package, suggests OpenAI is attempting to reinforce its safety infrastructure at a time when scrutiny from regulators, researchers, and the public is intensifying.

But beyond mental health and cybersecurity, critics warn that advanced AI could accelerate job displacement, supercharge misinformation campaigns, enable malicious actors, and increase environmental costs through energy-hungry data centers. More broadly, there is growing unease about how much decision-making power humans may cede to systems they do not fully understand.

By putting a $555,000 price tag on preparedness, OpenAI is saying that managing those risks is no longer a peripheral concern but a core operational priority. Whether the role will be enough to rebuild confidence in the company’s safety culture, especially among skeptical former insiders, remains an open question.

China to Make More Proactive Fiscal Push in 2026 as Pressure Mounts to Rebalance Growth Model

0

China’s finance ministry said on Sunday that fiscal policy will become more proactive in 2026, reinforcing Beijing’s commitment to boosting domestic demand, accelerating technological innovation, and strengthening the country’s social safety net as it confronts slowing momentum at home and rising pressure from trading partners.

The policy signal followed a two-day meeting where fiscal authorities outlined economic priorities for next year, against the backdrop of a prolonged property downturn that has weighed heavily on household confidence, local government finances, and broader economic sentiment.

In a statement released after the meeting, the ministry said China would step up efforts to expand consumption and actively increase investment in what it described as “new productive forces,” a phrase often used by policymakers to refer to advanced manufacturing, high-end technology, green industries, and digital innovation.

“China will boost consumption and actively expand investment in new productive forces and people’s overall development,” the ministry said, pointing to a shift toward demand-side support after years of export-led growth.

The renewed emphasis on domestic demand comes as major trading partners continue to urge Beijing to reduce its reliance on exports, warning that China’s manufacturing overcapacity risks distorting global trade flows. Those calls have intensified as weak domestic demand has pushed Chinese firms to lean more heavily on overseas markets, even as geopolitical tensions and trade barriers rise.

At home, the drag from the property sector remains a central concern. The multi-year real estate crisis has eroded household wealth, dampened consumer spending, and strained local government finances that depend heavily on land sales. The ripple effects have contributed to subdued inflation and, in some sectors, outright deflation, reinforcing the urgency for stronger fiscal intervention.

Beyond consumption, the finance ministry said fiscal policy in 2026 would prioritize innovation as a means of cultivating new growth engines. Support for research, advanced manufacturing, and strategic technologies is expected to remain central to Beijing’s long-term plan to move the economy up the value chain and reduce dependence on foreign technology.

The ministry also pledged further improvements to the social security system, with a focus on expanding access to healthcare and education. Analysts see this as a key lever for encouraging household spending, as stronger social protections could reduce precautionary savings and free up income for consumption.

Other policy priorities outlined for next year include promoting deeper integration between urban and rural areas, a long-standing goal aimed at narrowing income gaps and unlocking rural consumption, as well as accelerating China’s transition to a greener economy through environmental and energy-related investments.

Despite mounting headwinds, China is expected to maintain its annual growth target of around 5 percent in 2026, according to government advisers and analysts cited by Reuters. Achieving that goal, however, would likely require authorities to keep both fiscal and monetary support in place as they attempt to break the economy out of its deflationary spell.

Earlier this month, China’s top leaders reiterated their commitment to a “proactive” fiscal stance in 2026, signaling readiness to use government spending and targeted stimulus to stabilize growth. That language suggests continued issuance of government bonds, support for infrastructure and strategic sectors, and policies aimed at reviving consumer confidence.

The challenge for policymakers will be balancing short-term stimulus with longer-term structural reforms, particularly as debt levels remain elevated and external demand becomes more uncertain. Currently, the finance ministry’s message points to a clear priority of reigniting domestic demand and restoring confidence as China seeks to sustain growth in an increasingly complex global environment.

Britain and Germany Seal £52m Deal for Mobile Artillery As Europe Accelerates Defense Build-up

0

Britain has signed a £52 million ($70 million) joint procurement agreement with Germany to acquire a new generation of mobile artillery systems, underscoring a growing push among European allies to strengthen land warfare capabilities amid heightened security concerns.

The move comes against the backdrop of a far-reaching rearmament drive across Europe, triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the return of high-intensity warfare to the continent.

The British Ministry of Defense said on Sunday that the agreement will deliver an early capability demonstrator of the RCH 155 artillery system to the British Army, along with two units for Germany to support testing and evaluation. While limited in scale, the deal is being closely watched as a potential precursor to larger orders as both countries seek to modernize their land forces.

The RCH 155 system is produced by Franco-German defense group KNDS in cooperation with Germany’s Rheinmetall. Mounted on an armored vehicle, the system is designed to fire while on the move, allowing units to strike and rapidly relocate, a capability that has proved critical on the battlefields of Ukraine, where counter-battery fire and drones have made static positions increasingly vulnerable.

According to the Ministry of Defense, the system can fire up to eight rounds per minute and hit targets at distances of more than 70 kilometers. It can be operated by just two crew members, reflecting a shift towards greater automation and efficiency in modern artillery units. With a range of about 700 kilometers without refueling, the platform is intended to support sustained operations over wide areas.

British officials said the early capability demonstrator will allow the army to test how the RCH 155 performs alongside existing artillery, logistics, and command-and-control systems. The evaluation is expected to inform future decisions on whether the platform could replace or complement current systems as the army reshapes itself for high-readiness deployments. Germany, meanwhile, will use the additional units to refine operational concepts and technical performance as it rebuilds its artillery strength.

Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, European countries have moved both individually and collectively to strengthen their defense capabilities, reversing decades of underinvestment. Governments have raised military spending, replenished ammunition stocks, expanded training programmes, and accelerated the acquisition of heavy weapons, with artillery emerging as a central focus.

Germany announced a landmark €100 billion special defense fund shortly after the invasion and has since committed to meeting NATO’s target of spending 2% of GDP on defense. Britain has also pledged to increase defense spending over the medium term, while emphasizing closer cooperation with European allies despite having left the European Union.

Joint procurement initiatives such as the RCH 155 deal are increasingly seen as a way to share costs, speed up delivery, and improve interoperability among allied forces. European leaders have argued that fragmented national ??????? in the past left militaries with incompatible systems and limited industrial scale, weaknesses that the war in Ukraine has exposed.

The partnership also highlights the growing role of European defense manufacturers, as firms such as KNDS and Rheinmetall benefit from surging demand for artillery, armored vehicles, and ammunition. Production capacity, supply chains, and workforce expansion have become strategic priorities as governments seek to ensure long-term readiness.

Although the Ministry of Defense did not say whether the current agreement would lead to a full-scale purchase, officials on both sides have framed it as an important step in deepening UK-German defense ties. As the security environment in Europe remains tense, even relatively small procurement deals are taking on broader significance, signaling a sustained commitment to strengthening military capabilities in the face of ongoing geopolitical uncertainty.

Brazil Court Steps in To Contain Petrobras Strike as Unions Split Over Pay, Pensions, and Staffing Rules

0

Brazil’s top labor court has intervened to limit the operational impact of a prolonged strike at state-controlled oil giant Petrobras, ordering the company to maintain staffing levels at 80% across all facilities while negotiations with workers continue, in a ruling that underlines growing tensions between management and unions over pay, pensions, and transparency.

In a decision issued on Saturday, Brazil’s Superior Labor Court said unions must also refrain from blocking the movement of workers, equipment, and fuel to and from Petrobras facilities, including those operated by its logistics arm, Transpetro. The court framed the measures as necessary to protect production, transportation, and the national fuel supply as the labor dispute drags on into its second week.

Petrobras sought to reassure markets and consumers that operations remain under control.

“We continue working and ensuring production and supply,” Sylvia dos Anjos, the company’s head of exploration and production, told Reuters on Sunday.

The company said contingency teams had been deployed at critical units to guarantee that refining, logistics, and distribution activities continue despite the industrial action.

The strike began on December 15 after months of inconclusive talks, and has laid bare divisions within Brazil’s powerful oil unions. Petrobras said that after nearly four months of negotiations, 11 unions have accepted its latest compensation proposal, effectively ending strike action “in the vast majority” of their bases. However, five unions remain opposed, keeping pressure on the company and the government, which is Petrobras’ controlling shareholder.

One of the most influential dissenting groups, Sindipetro-NF, which represents about 25,000 oil workers, rejected the latest offer on Friday. The union has argued that Petrobras’ proposal fails to adequately address wage demands and broader concerns about working conditions, especially at a time when inflation and household costs remain elevated in Brazil.

Sindipetro-NF took a more nuanced view of Saturday’s court ruling. While opposing the 80% staffing requirement in principle, the union welcomed the court’s order compelling Petrobras to provide detailed information on its workforce, including headcount by operating unit, job title, and function. The union described this aspect of the decision as “a victory,” saying it would help expose staffing pressures and strengthen workers’ bargaining position.

Another major labor group, the National Federation of Oil Workers (FNP), which represents around 26,000 workers and is also participating in the strike, was more critical. FNP said the court-mandated staffing level was “unenforceable,” arguing that monitoring compliance across Petrobras’ sprawling network of offshore platforms, refineries, terminals, and pipelines would be highly complex.

At the heart of the dispute are not only wages but also long-running and sensitive issues related to Petrobras’ pension funds. Salary talks are intertwined with disagreements over deductions linked to payments to pensioners, a topic that has repeatedly triggered labor unrest at the company in the past. Union leaders say these pension-related deductions significantly reduce take-home pay for active workers, while Petrobras has argued that the measures are necessary to ensure the sustainability of its pension schemes.

Petrobras has consistently downplayed the impact of the strike on oil and fuel output, saying production levels have been maintained and that the domestic market remains fully supplied. Even so, the court’s intervention highlights official concern about the risk of prolonged disruption at a company that plays a central role in Brazil’s energy security and public finances.

With unions divided, pension issues unresolved, and no clear timeline for a breakthrough, the dispute remains open-ended. The court ruling may buy Petrobras time to keep operations running, but it does little to resolve the deeper structural disagreements that continue to fuel labor unrest at one of Brazil’s most strategically important companies.