DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 636

Nigeria’s Labour Market: A Fragile Balance Between Creation and Loss

0

The performance of Nigeria’s labour market in 2024 offers both optimism and caution. Data from the first three quarters of the year, released by the National Bureau of Statistics,  shows that nearly one million jobs were created, yet the economy also suffered significant job losses by the third quarter. Our analyst posits that understanding these dynamics is crucial for business leaders, policymakers, and investors who must navigate a labour market that reflects the wider challenges of the Nigerian economy.

A Promising Start to the Year

Source: NBS, 2024; Infoprations Analysis, 2025

In the first quarter of 2024, Nigeria experienced a remarkable wave of job creation. Almost 490,000 new jobs were added, reflecting either government-led employment drives, seasonal agricultural demand, or private sector expansions. The second quarter sustained this trend, though at a slower pace, with about 250,000 additional jobs. Taken together, the first half of 2024 gave the impression of positive momentum, suggesting that the economy was beginning to absorb some of the millions of Nigerians entering the workforce every year.

This growth should not be understated. Nigeria faces one of the fastest-growing populations in the world, and each year over four million young people join the labour force. The creation of over 700,000 jobs in just six months was a significant achievement. It signalled resilience in sectors such as agriculture, services, and possibly parts of manufacturing, despite the macroeconomic challenges of inflation, foreign exchange volatility, and infrastructure gaps. For many, the data from the first two quarters provided a sense of cautious optimism that Nigeria could expand opportunities in the face of global and domestic pressures.

The Turning Point in the Third Quarter

By the third quarter, however, the picture shifted dramatically. Job creation fell further to about 232,000, while job losses surged to nearly 300,000. This resulted in a net decline of more than 67,000 jobs during the quarter. For the first time in 2024, the labour market contracted, reflecting deeper structural weaknesses in the economy.

Several factors likely contributed to this reversal. Inflation remained elevated, particularly food inflation. High costs of living reduce consumer demand and put pressure on businesses to cut costs. The depreciation of the naira also raised import costs and disrupted supply chains, particularly for manufacturers reliant on imported inputs. Rising energy prices added another layer of difficulty for small and medium enterprises, many of which operate with already thin margins. In more formal sectors such as banking, oil and gas, and technology, cost-cutting measures and retrenchments have also been reported.

This quarter’s outcome reveals how fragile the labour market gains have been. Without a steady macroeconomic foundation, job creation becomes highly vulnerable to shocks and policy inconsistencies.

The Broader Structural Challenge

While the net job gain across the first three quarters of 2024 stands at about 670,000, this falls short of what Nigeria needs to keep pace with its rapidly expanding workforce. Even in a year of relatively strong job creation, millions of Nigerians remain unemployed or underemployed. Many of the jobs created are concentrated in the informal sector or in seasonal agricultural activities, which often lack stability, social protections, and the ability to generate sustainable income.

This disconnect between headline job numbers and real livelihood improvements highlights a deeper structural problem. Nigeria’s economic growth has not consistently translated into quality employment opportunities. The mismatch between skills and available jobs, weak industrialisation, and underinvestment in sectors that drive productivity all limit the ability of the economy to create stable, high-paying jobs. Unless these issues are addressed, periodic spikes in job creation will not be enough to solve the underlying employment crisis.

Building a More Resilient Labour Market

To transform these patterns, Nigeria needs a deliberate strategy that links economic growth with sustainable job creation. Policymakers must focus on stabilising the macroeconomic environment by tackling inflation, improving foreign exchange liquidity, and reducing energy costs. Investment in infrastructure, particularly reliable electricity, would allow businesses to expand with more confidence.

Equally important is the need to strengthen the connection between education, training, and the evolving needs of the economy. As global industries shift toward technology and green energy, Nigeria must prepare its workforce with relevant skills to remain competitive. Supporting entrepreneurship and small businesses, which already account for a large share of employment, will also be critical.

For the private sector, the challenge is to identify opportunities in adversity. Companies that innovate around local sourcing, renewable energy, and digital services can create not only profit but also significant employment. Partnerships between government and businesses can accelerate this process, while international investors should see Nigeria’s young and energetic workforce as a long-term opportunity once structural reforms take root.

Blaxel – AI Cloud Infrastructure for AI Agents | Tekedia Capital

0

Call it the AWS of AI agents and the finest cloud infrastructure for AI agents. Blaxel, a Tekedia Capital portfolio startup, is ready to host your AI agentic mission. Begin here blaxel.ai.

At Tekedia Capital, we make friends with the world’s finest founders who are building category-redefining technologies in five continents.

Nigeria’s Central Bank Directs Banks And Fintechs to Enforce PoS Terminals Geo-Tagging to Curb Fraud

0

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has issued a new directive requiring all financial institutions and licensed payment operators to comply with international payment messaging standards and introduce mandatory geo-tagging for Point-of-Sale (PoS) terminals.

According to the circular signed by Dr. Rakiya O. Yusuf, Director of the Payments System Supervision Department, the move aligns Nigeria’s payment infrastructure with global best practices while strengthening transparency and security across the financial system.

The CBN emphasized that all payment transaction messages, whether domestic or international, must adopt the ISO 20022 format in accordance with both its own and SWIFT’s global specifications. This standard requires the accurate inclusion of key data such as payer and payee identifiers, merchant and agent details, and transaction metadata.

All institutions in the payment ecosystem, including Deposit Money Banks, Microfinance Banks, Mobile Money Operators, and Switching Companies, are expected to complete migration and achieve full compliance by October 31, 2025.

Mandatory Geo-Tagging of Terminals

In addition, the CBN directed that all existing and newly deployed PoS terminals must come with native geolocation capabilities, specifically Double-Frequency GPS receivers, to ensure reliable location tracking. Operators must register terminals with a Payment Terminal Service Aggregator (PTSA) and capture precise latitude and longitude coordinates for every merchant or agent location.

The circular further states that PoS applications must integrate the National Central Switch Geolocation SDK, with Android OS v10 set as the minimum requirement. Terminals must capture and transmit geolocation data at the start of each transaction, which will serve as a mandatory reporting field.

Merchant activities are restricted to within a 10-meter geofence from their registered business location. All existing terminals must be geo-tagged within 60 days of the circular, while new terminals must be geo-tagged before certification and activation. Terminals not routed through a PTSA will not be allowed to operate.

CBN will commence compliance checks from October 20, 2025. The central bank stressed that these measures are part of efforts to modernize Nigeria’s payment ecosystem, curb fraud, improve regulatory oversight, and ensure interoperability with international financial systems.

This new directive by the CBN comes amid rising concerns over cloned terminals and ghost agents operating outside regulatory oversight. Since the introduction of PoS terminals in 2013, it has become the go-to for cash for many Nigerians. This has seen the PoS network in the country surge in recent years, with over 1.5 million agents nationwide.

As of March 2025, there were 8.36 million registered PoS terminals, with 5.90 million active/deployed. Transactions hit a record N10.51 trillion in Q1 2025, a 301.67% increase from Q1 2024. However, this growth has come with risks, as Agents often unknowingly serve as access points for fraud and criminal activity.

Fraudsters have continued to exploit PoS terminals through various methods, often targeting the trust-based interaction between customers and operators or weaknesses in the technology itself. The rapid growth of PoS terminals has outpaced regulatory and security measures. Many terminals are operated by unlicensed agents, making it easier for fraudsters to infiltrate the system.

Efforts to Combat PoS Fraud

Nigeria’s financial authorities and fintechs have been taking steps to address PoS fraud.

In January 2024, the Nigerian Electronic Fraud Forum (NeFF), in collaboration with AMMBAN and NIBSS, announced a fraud-flagging feature for PoS terminals, set to launch by Q1 2024. This feature requires KYC details for certain transactions and aims to identify suspicious activities. However, some PoS operators were unaware of the initiative, indicating communication gaps.

Also, the CBN and Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) mandated that all 1.9 million PoS agents register their businesses by September 5, 2024, to enhance accountability and reduce unlicensed operators.

Looking Ahead

PoS terminal fraud in Nigeria is a significant challenge driven by the rapid growth of electronic payments, lax oversight, and technological vulnerabilities.

While fraud cases are rising, financial losses have decreased, suggesting some improvement in detection and prevention. Initiatives like geo-tagging, fraud-flagging features, and stricter KYC requirements show promise to curb surging fraud cases.

Bitcoin Remains Sensitive to Global Liquidity and M2 Growth Correlations

0

Historically, Bitcoin’s price has shown a strong correlation (often cited around 80-89%) with global M2 growth, particularly when liquidity increases due to central bank policies like rate cuts or quantitative easing. However, deviations occur, and recent analyses suggest such a divergence happened around June 2025.

Crypto analyst Colin noted in June 2025 that Bitcoin’s price deviated from global M2, similar to a divergence seen in February 2025, but emphasized this was short-term and didn’t break the broader correlation, which holds about 80% of the time.

These deviations often occur near cycle tops or during crypto-specific events (e.g., institutional buying or market corrections) and don’t negate the long-term trend where Bitcoin tends to rally with rising M2. For instance, global M2 hit $108.4 trillion in April 2025, and Bitcoin’s price surged to $104,000 by May, though it later corrected to around $80,000 before rebounding.

The largest deviation in the past two years likely stems from Q1 2024, when Bitcoin rose sharply due to spot ETF approvals and halving anticipation, despite muted M2 growth, leading to a temporary negative 30-day correlation. By April 2025, the correlation realigned at 0.67, with a 90-day lagged M2 increase of 2% corresponding to a 70% Bitcoin price surge.

This suggests Bitcoin sometimes “front-runs” liquidity trends or reacts to crypto-specific catalysts not captured by M2 data. Continued M2 growth, especially outside the U.S. (e.g., China, India, Europe), and institutional accumulation via ETFs suggest Bitcoin’s price may realign with liquidity trends, potentially targeting $132,000-$170,000 by mid-2025, per analysts’ projections.

Bitcoin’s deviation from M2 suggests it’s increasingly driven by crypto-specific factors (e.g., ETF inflows, halving cycles, institutional adoption) rather than solely macroeconomic liquidity trends. This could mean Bitcoin is maturing as an asset class, less tethered to traditional monetary metrics.

When Bitcoin decouples from M2, its price can become more unpredictable, as seen in Q1 2024 with ETF-driven surges. Investors may face sharper corrections or rallies, requiring careful risk management. Large deviations often signal speculative fervor or market sentiment shifts, like retail FOMO or institutional accumulation.

For instance, June 2025’s divergence coincided with Bitcoin hitting $80,000 post-correction, hinting at sentiment-driven moves. If M2 growth slows (e.g., due to tighter monetary policy) but Bitcoin rallies, it could indicate a disconnect from broader economic conditions, potentially signaling overvaluation or a bubble.

Conversely, if M2 surges and Bitcoin lags, it may suggest underperformance or market hesitancy. Investors relying on M2 correlation for Bitcoin price predictions may need to incorporate additional indicators (e.g., on-chain data, ETF flows, or halving effects) during deviation periods to avoid misjudging market trends.

Despite short-term deviations, the 80-89% historical correlation with M2 suggests Bitcoin remains sensitive to global liquidity. Continued M2 growth (e.g., $108.4T in April 2025) could support Bitcoin’s long-term bullish outlook, with targets of $132,000-$170,000 by mid-2025.

Significant deviations might prompt regulators to scrutinize Bitcoin’s role in financial markets, especially if it moves independently of monetary policy tools like M2, potentially affecting future crypto regulations.

In summary, while deviations highlight Bitcoin’s evolving role and short-term volatility, its long-term tie to liquidity suggests these are temporary. Investors should monitor crypto-specific catalysts and global M2 trends for strategic positioning.

Pantera Capital’s $1.25B Solana Treasury Company Could Significantly Accelerate SOL Liquidity

0

Pantera Capital is reportedly planning to raise $1.25 billion to establish a U.S.-listed Solana treasury company, tentatively named Solana Co., by converting a Nasdaq-listed company into a dedicated Solana (SOL) treasury vehicle.

The fundraising will occur in two phases: an initial $500 million raise, followed by an additional $750 million through warrant issuance. Pantera itself plans to invest $100 million in the venture. If successful, this could create the largest corporate Solana treasury, surpassing the current combined value of public Solana treasuries, which hold approximately 3.44 million SOL tokens worth around $650-$695 million (0.69-0.7% of SOL’s total supply).

This move aligns with Pantera’s broader strategy, having already deployed over $300 million in digital asset treasury (DAT) firms across various tokens and regions. They argue DATs generate yield and increase net asset value per share, offering higher return potential than direct token holdings or ETFs.

Pantera has also backed Sharps Technology’s $400 million Solana treasury initiative and previously acquired 25-30 million SOL tokens from the FTX bankruptcy estate in April 2024. Other firms, including Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital, are also pursuing a $1 billion Solana treasury project, signaling growing institutional interest in Solana.

However, analysts warn that a single entity holding such a large Solana reserve could reduce free float and increase price volatility, similar to concerns with Bitcoin treasury firms like MicroStrategy. Solana’s current price is around $188.67, down 5.38% daily but up 3.97% weekly, reflecting short-term volatility amid rising institutional adoption.

Pantera’s initiative, alongside other firms like Galaxy Digital and Multicoin Capital, signals growing institutional confidence in Solana as a high-potential blockchain. A dedicated Solana treasury company listed on Nasdaq could attract traditional investors, bridging crypto and conventional finance.

Potential Price Impact and Volatility

A large Solana treasury holding (potentially millions of SOL tokens) could reduce the token’s free float, as a significant portion of the supply would be locked in the treasury. This could lead to price appreciation in the short term due to reduced supply available for trading.

The creation of a high-profile Solana treasury company could boost market sentiment, positioning Solana as a leading layer-1 blockchain alongside Ethereum and Bitcoin. This could attract more developers, projects, and users to the Solana ecosystem, further driving demand for SOL.

Conversely, if the fundraising falls short or the treasury company underperforms, it could dampen enthusiasm and lead to negative sentiment. A Nasdaq-listed Solana treasury company would operate under U.S. regulatory scrutiny, potentially setting a precedent for how crypto treasuries are structured and regulated.

Compliance with securities laws could enhance investor confidence but may also impose constraints on operations. The two-phase fundraising ($500M + $750M via warrants) suggests a complex financial structure, which could affect how quickly capital is deployed and how it impacts Solana’s market dynamics.

Pantera’s move comes amid competition from other firms pursuing similar Solana treasury initiatives (e.g., Galaxy Digital’s $1B project). This competition could accelerate Solana’s ecosystem growth by incentivizing more investment in infrastructure, DeFi, NFTs, and other Solana-based projects.

How It Will Accelerate Liquidity

A Nasdaq-listed Solana treasury company would likely attract institutional and retail investors who prefer exposure to SOL through a regulated equity vehicle rather than direct token purchases. This could drive trading activity in both the treasury company’s stock and SOL tokens, increasing overall market liquidity.

The involvement of Pantera, a prominent crypto investment firm, could draw attention from hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional players, further boosting trading volumes. By offering SOL exposure through a publicly traded company, Pantera’s initiative lowers barriers for traditional investors who may lack access to crypto exchanges or custody solutions.

This could bring new capital into the Solana ecosystem, increasing liquidity as more investors buy and sell SOL indirectly through the treasury company’s shares. The warrant issuance in the second phase ($750M) could further amplify liquidity by allowing investors to acquire additional equity exposure, which could translate into more SOL trading activity.

Pantera’s pitch for digital asset treasury (DAT) firms highlights their potential to generate yield and increase net asset value per share. If the Solana treasury company engages in yield-generating activities (e.g., staking SOL or participating in DeFi protocols), it could reinvest profits into acquiring more SOL or funding Solana-based projects, enhancing ecosystem liquidity.

Staking, in particular, could provide a steady flow of SOL rewards, which, if reintroduced to the market, could support liquidity without significant sell pressure. The influx of capital from Pantera’s initiative could fund Solana-based projects, such as DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, or layer-2 solutions, which typically increase on-chain activity and token circulation.

Higher transaction volumes on Solana’s blockchain would naturally enhance SOL liquidity. For example, increased DeFi activity could lead to more SOL being used for transaction fees, collateral, or liquidity pools, all of which contribute to market liquidity. A large Solana treasury could create arbitrage opportunities between the treasury company’s stock price and SOL’s market price.

Market makers and traders could exploit price discrepancies, increasing trading activity and liquidity in SOL markets. Additionally, the treasury company’s activities (e.g., periodic SOL purchases or sales) could provide consistent liquidity to exchanges, stabilizing SOL’s market depth.

A Nasdaq listing would expose Solana to a global pool of investors, including those in regions with limited access to crypto markets. This broader investor base could increase demand for SOL, leading to higher liquidity as more tokens are bought and sold across exchanges.

If the treasury company amasses a large SOL reserve, it could lock up a significant portion of the circulating supply, potentially reducing liquidity in the short term and causing price spikes or illiquidity during low-volume periods. If the treasury company or its investors decide to liquidate holdings, it could flood the market with SOL, temporarily reducing liquidity and causing price drops.

Pantera Capital’s $1.25 billion Solana treasury  initiative success in enhancing liquidity will depend on its ability to balance SOL accumulation with active ecosystem participation (e.g., staking, DeFi, or project funding) while managing potential risks like reduced free float or regulatory hurdles. If executed well, this could position Solana as a more liquid and accessible asset, further solidifying its place in the crypto market.