There is a great debate on the sovereignty of monetary policies of nations like Nigeria when Facebook Libra cryptocurrency takes off. Libra could become a supranational bank, removing the capacities of central banks to use many tools to drive policies. The implication is massive as welfare losses can skyrocket in some economies.
Libra is not a Bitcoin competitor; it is Naira, Cedi, Rand, etc competitor. Nigeria’s National Assembly should debate Libra urgently for a plan of action. During this debate, they must get the Central Bank of Nigeria to explain the implications and offer a plan for action. Nigeria needs action plan because Facebook has just unveiled a native payment protocol for the Internet which was created with none. The Web 3.0 is largely here.
Web 1.0: Web 1.0 consisted of static documents and read-only data (static web pages)
Web 2.0: Web 2.0 introduced multimedia content, interactive web applications, and participatory social media, all of these mediated by two-dimensional screens.
Web 3.0: But over the next 2 to 5 years, the convergence of 5G, artificial intelligence, VR/AR, and a trillion-sensor economy will enable us to both map our physical world into virtual space and superimpose a digital data layer onto our physical environments. Suddenly, all our information will be manipulated, stored, understood and experienced in spatial ways. That is the Web 3.0 which is also called spatial web.
Senate President Ahmed Lawan, here is a moment. Under Libra, the Central Bank of Nigeria may lose capacity to use many tools to manage inflation, and broad monetary policy. At least, have a conversation to get a line of action. I understand that doing anything may be hard since Facebook is a planet of itself; I had noted that point in a Harvard Business Review article.
These companies aggregate the data and scale massively with near-zero marginal cost, which is all made possible by the internet. Because they are ahead with an enormous number of users, they keep getting better, and the data they accumulate drives improvements in their algorithms. Changing this order is largely hopeless, and that creates a competitive stasis for local entrepreneurs.
Today, I gave a speech on Africa’s fintech and banking sector outlook with full consideration of the unveiling of Facebook Libra cryptocurrency. In my practice, our best product is being retained by firms so that CEOs or Chairmen can call in and ask for perspectives. But this was different: a fintech investor with focus on Africa wanted a quick insight.
Simply, I want everyone to note that Libra will partly provide paths for citizens to “avoid” the inflationary paralysis on the Nigerian naira. Libra is not fully decentralized – it is largely a digital currency which is tied to major currencies under the supervision and regulation of the founding members like Visa and Stripe. You have to go through those gatekeepers to participate in Libra. That is it – its functionality is different from the fully decentralized Bitcoin even though the blockchain engine is typical. (Read Libra Whitepaper here; great vision, generally.)
And when in, within the Libra ecosystem, interesting things can happen:
Cushion Against Inflation: Consider this scenario: I have been paid N1 million (in Nigerian naira) which I want to keep in my Naira bank account, but also worried that after a year, I will lose about 10% of value to inflation. With Libra, I can move that money into Libra which theoretically will not experience inflationary pull. With all frictions for Forex and currency conversion gone, this movement will be seamless. To avoid getting that inflated equivalent of N1m after a year, I will ask Facebook to pay me via my domiciliary dollar account in Nigeria trusting that my US dollars has marginal inflation. If I convert that USD back to Nigeria Naira, I would get better value compared leaving the money in Nigeria Naira bank account. (Assume Naira-US Dollar exchange rate is constant for a year). Using this, one can technically avoid inflation provided there is no significant friction in moving the money from bank account to Libra and out. Of course, Libra can say you must use the same bank account that you funded Libra wallet to get your local fiat currency. If that happens, this fails. But expect people to open Libra-anchored eShops so that they can pay themselves to have the capacities to move that Libra money to another bank account to overcome that inflation. Libra payment attracts no fees on users.
Cushion Against Currency Exchange Rate Deterioration: Then consider a situation where a currency keeps losing value like Naira. The simplest and safest strategy is to move your Naira into Libra so that if Naira drops from N310 to $1 to $N320 per $1, your Libra will ensure you do not lose value due to Naira currency deterioration. In that case, Libra will become a store for value.
Sure – Facebook and members of Libra are not concerned on monetary policies but their technology will wrestle significant powers from central banks as citizens will make best decisions for themselves. Why keep Naira to lose value when a mere Facebook account can “protect” it against loss of value.
The Calibra Digital Wallet
Libra comes with a digital wallet called Calibra. That will anchor many things like financial services and possible credit services in future: ‘“t’s an anomaly that the Internet has no protocol for money,” David Marcus [Libra Project lead] tells Fortune, adding that Project Libra will also provide more competition in financial services, along with increasing access to capital.’ Global exchanges, from Coinformant Australia to Binance to Coinbase, will have to key into this redesign.
In addition, the company also announced a new digital wallet called Calibra, which will be operated by Facebook as a separate subsidiary and provide users with a way to store and spend Libra. The digital wallet, which won’t be available to the public for months, will display the value of users’ Libra in their local currency and provide a design similar to popular digital wallet Venmo for transferring money.
[…]
In addition, members will also maintain the supply of Libra in response to demand—meaning they will issue new Libra as needed, and destroy the digital currency when people redeem them….In order to avoid the notorious volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, each unit of Libra will be backed one-to-one in a basket consisting of dollars, pounds, euros, and Swiss francs.
It is key to note that while Libra Foundation can create new Libras, it does not seem like new ones will devalue already existing ones due to the pegging imposed with the basket of currencies.
At the moment, only South Africa’s Naspers is in the Libra founding membership from Africa. Facebook expects 100 founding members (it has only 27 now), each pays $10 million.
All Together
It is important to understand that Libra will be the fiat currency of many fiat currencies just like central bank is the banks’ bank.
As this redesign happens, some of the most powerful institutions will be the institutions Libra will approve to connect Naira into Libra via the founding team. I will hope they will allow many and not just few. If not, there will be a dislocation. Yes, if they choose a Bank A, everyone will leave other banks for Bank A in order to have access into Libra.
My assumption is that Libra will have near-zero marginal cost with distribution and transaction costs largely insignificant. Yes, those costs will not drive the decisions of users in the practical way paying bank fees affect you when sending money from Nigeria to New York.
From all angles, Libra will become an operating system for global payment and will trigger major redesigns in global commerce. This is a global coin.
Ultimately it’s consumers who will determine whether Facebook’s grand gambit will succeed or fail, with the most important test of Libra likely being convenience. If the currency’s use becomes widespread and proves to be more useful than payment options like credit cards, debit cards, Venmo and Bitcoin, it could transform large parts of the tech and finance industries.
Then again, it could also inspire others—notably Apple or Amazon—to launch cryptocurrency networks of their own.
This is a conversation between a Lecturer and a 1st class graduate who completed top of his class in one of Nigeria’s state universities.
Paul: Sir, I made a first class but I have been told I cannot be retained as a Graduate Assistant
Lecturer: (Shocked): But why? You are the best graduating student in the faculty, why can’t you be employed?
Paul: The reason was I am not from this state.
Lecturer (infuriated and shocked): Just that?
Paul: Yes sir.
Paul toiled hard for several years to graduate top of his class but unfortunately cannot be employed by the University he graduated from. His crime is that he is not an indigene of the state. Many have suffered far more devastating deprivations and missed opportunities because they are not indigenes, despite being Nigerians. This painful deprivation occurs in the Education, Health, Agricultural and all sectors in our developing countries. A few scenarios come to mind:
When applying for a job, you must provide a State/Local Government Indigene form. Many have argued that because of our multi-ethnic and multi-religious country, this will allow for equitable distribution of jobs and resources. Although this bears some truth, it has also led to the employment of many unqualified people who deeply hurt the Nigerian state. Unarguably, this has led to the employment of many fake/ghost teachers, doctors, etc. If I live in Abia state, why can’t I apply for a job in the Abia State Civil Service Commission without being faced with the question of “Are you an indigene?”. Sadly, you find Nigerians from a particular state having several Local Government Area (LGA) indigene forms in the bid to be safe when there is a call for employment. Imagine the tragedy- that as an indigene of Nasarawa state, I need to have multiple LGA indigene forms as a strategy of wanting to be employed.
As a student in the University, my friends who were from other states had to pay twice the amount of tuition fee. Their crime? “Non-Indigenes”!!! The burning question remains “Why do non-indigenes have to pay more than the supposed indigenes?” Are they taught by different lecturers? Or do they use different school facilities?
Many might argue that we need indigenization for various reasons but in all my years of existing and rising the academic and professional cadre, I have observed indigenization to be highly problematic. It drives most of the cultural clashes that have laced our country.
I argue that although indigenisation may hold some benefits, I have witnessed more divisions and chaos from it. I join many to posit that:
“State of Origin (Indigenization) Be Replaced with State of Residence or State of Birth”.
Until we change this narrative, many of the problems that plague us will remain.
The recent discount on the cost of vessels calling at the Eastern ports by 10% that was granted by the Federal Government through Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA), to enable the port become significant in the maritime business have been making waves, but the question still remains; is that enough to make the port functional and adequately compete with her counterparts in the Western part of the country?
The answer is purely negative because some other disturbing issues that can hinder the port to maintain the pace of becoming a world class port in subsequent years, have been shallowly handled.
There are other salient problems holding the possible functionality of the port which can affect the incoming of vessels even if the charges are totally removed from it.
According to NPA, they posited that the major challenges delaying the proper usage of the port is dredging, insecurity, non-maintenance of berths and infrastructural decay.
Furthermore, shallow channels of the eastern port have become a very pertinent issue because large vessels always find it difficult to pass through the seaport unlike in the Western ports.
In a financial survey carried out by Vanguard Maritime Report, on August 15, 2018, it shows that importing goods from China to Lagos is cheaper as it costs $1,500 than shipping the same goods to Calabar which is going to cost between $4,000 and $4,500.
However, the efforts of the NPA should be intensified in order to decongest the populated Lagos port and bring about the proper ease of doing business across the country.
Both human beings and animals are not created to be static and restrict their movements to a single place. Every living creature is bound to move from one location to another, especially when the current location is no longer favourable to securing socioeconomic needs. From the stone ages to the modern era, movement of goods and people is a must.
In the last 10 years, there are reports on migration from south to the north and west to the east. The reports have significantly been about people moving from developing countries to the developed ones in search of better socioeconomic opportunities due to poverty, insecurity and political factors. In 2017, more than 1.2 million Nigerians left the country to developed countries. In 2018, OECD’s report through its experts notes that 50% of Nigerians would leave the country if there are means and opportunity to take the journey.
As noted earlier, moving from one country to another should not be a significant issue. But it becomes an issue when the media always see bad happenings in the migrants’ home countries and portray destinations as better to live than theirs. The world is not created by the God to be divided into ‘developed’, developing’, ‘global south’ and ‘global north’. These words are man’s creation, which has been the basis of understanding happenings across the world.
The United States of America, Canada, Europe, Israel, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan as well as Australia and New Zealand are categorised as global north based on socioeconomic advances and better public administration. The entire Africa, Latin America, developing Asia and the Middle East are being portrayed as global south using low socioeconomic status and deficiencies in governance.
This means that the gap in development and wealth remains the core factor of distinguishing between the global north and south, which news media on both sides do not hesitate to appropriate in their reportage over the years. Despite bad happenings in the global north, media do not always emphasize them over the good ones. But, in the global south, the media believe bad events would attract huge revenue to their establishments.
Where the conspiracy lies
In a research jointly conducted with other colleagues, result indicates that the volume of negative socioeconomic situations reported by the Global South and North news media organisations about Nigeria in 2010 and 2013 connect with Nigerians choice destinations during the years. Over 30% of 344,159 Nigerians who migrated to the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, United Arab Emirates, Spain, Italy, Ireland, France and Australia did it because of the poor education system reported by the media.
This year, The Punch Newspaper’s report about the number of Nigerians studying in the United States of America increased Nigerians’ interest in acquiring higher education in the country. The report notes that number of Nigerians studying in the country increase from 12,693 in 2018 to 16,039 in 2019. As the media report more of the negatives about Nigeria, countries capped as developed are not relenting in wooing best hands from Nigeria using different approaches. Scholarships, international jobs for competent professionals and visa lottery are the core strategies for attracting Nigerians by the developed countries in the last decade.
For instance, analysis shows that Nigerians’ interest about Canada’s Express Visa Entry increased from 18% in 2016 to 33% in 2018. Since January 2019, the interest about visa lottery programmes of Canada, USA and Australia has been increasing from people living in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Enugu, Anambra, Edo, Delta and Rivers states.
Our analysis shows that between 2010 and 2013 both the Global South and North media had a significant number of publications on economic opportunities in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, France, Australia, Germany and Canada. The USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia also featured prominently in publications on good living conditions, followed by Ireland. Under the financial stability reportage, USA, UK, Germany, Australia and France were above Canada. Analysis also indicates that USA, France, Canada, Ireland, Spain and Italy had significant publications that established quality education and training in 2010 and 2013. United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, United States of America, United Arab Emirates and Ireland were the top countries for the volume of publication in social and cultural identification. As the media report these happenings, analysis indicates that economic opportunities, better living conditions, quality education and training interested the public most.
Source: Google News, Author’s Analysis, Infoprations Analysis, 2019
Is Nigeria powerless in taming the publication tide? Answers to this question seems to come from Omoyele Sowore, one of the professionals in the media industry, who recently notes that African media need to change their framing of migration and the kind of agenda they are setting for the governments and policy makers. From the professionals in other industries, Nigerians movement to the countries should not be seen as a total loss to the country. According to them, some Nigerian Diasporas are making a significant impact on the country, especially the funding of startups, new skills transfer and building of business networks back home.
