In Nigeria’s oil sector, Oando Plc, an indigenous energy giant, is making headlines with a major shareholder reward initiative. The company has completed the first tranche of its planned share distribution, allocating 679,364,206 fully paid shares to eligible investors in what the company describes as a strategic move to deliver long-term value.

The allocation marks the completion of the first phase of a two-stage distribution involving a total of 1,283,712,601 shares, a plan approved by Oando’s Board of Directors in January 2025. The process stems from a settlement arrangement ratified at the company’s 45th Annual General Meeting in December 2024, where shareholders agreed to surrender a portion of their holdings for redistribution. Shares were earmarked for allocation on a pro-rata basis, ensuring that investors benefited in proportion to their existing stakes.

The first tranche, launched on February 14, 2025, was completed after receiving regulatory clearance in July. Under the plan, shareholders received one fully paid share for every twelve they already held, representing an 8.3 percent yield based on the prevailing market price at the time. The second tranche will be allocated to investors on record as of June 30, 2025, with details to be announced in the coming months.

Commenting on the development, Oando’s Group Chief Executive, Wale Tinubu, CON, described the initiative as a demonstration of the company’s “unwavering commitment to delivering tangible value to our shareholders.” He noted that the issuance came with no dilution to existing holdings, effectively increasing investors’ stakes without requiring additional capital.

For shareholders, the distribution not only boosts ownership but also offers the potential for future value appreciation, particularly if the company maintains strong performance.

From a corporate perspective, Oando sees the move as an opportunity to optimize its share structure, manage outstanding shares, reinforce investor loyalty, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. The company has encouraged any eligible shareholders who have not yet received their first tranche allocation to contact its registrar and update their records.

The distribution forms part of Oando’s broader strategy to streamline operations and strengthen its capital base, a plan aligned with resolutions from an Extraordinary General Meeting held on August 12, 2025, to address capital diminution. At that meeting, shareholders reviewed measures in accordance with Section 137 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020, aimed at reducing the company’s capital for the 2024 financial year.

The EGM came on the heels of Oando’s 46th Annual General Meeting earlier the same day, where a series of ordinary and special resolutions were approved. Among the key decisions was authorization for the company to raise up to N500 billion in fresh capital, a move seen as essential to funding growth initiatives and navigating market volatility.

With the first phase of the share distribution now complete, attention will turn to the execution of the second tranche later this year and the potential impact of Oando’s capital-raising efforts on its market position. For investors, the company’s latest moves signal a strong bid to balance shareholder rewards with long-term growth ambitions.

Business leaders in Nigeria’s telecom industry say the government’s recent shift back to market-driven pricing is one of the most decisive steps taken in years to revive the sector, restore investor confidence, and close the yawning gap in infrastructure.

The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) now confirms that the policy has already attracted more than $1 billion in fresh infrastructure investments in 2025, just months after it took effect.

Speaking at an interactive session with journalists in Lagos on Friday, NCC Executive Vice Chairman Aminu Maida said the landmark pricing reform—rolled out in January and February—ended nearly a decade of frozen tariffs for mobile network operators (MNOs). The new framework allows operators to adjust tariffs by up to 50%, reversing years of underinvestment and sluggish network expansion.

“This act alone has allowed investments to flow in,” Maida said. “We will be revealing more specific figures in the coming weeks after verification, but we are talking about over a billion dollars’ worth of investment in 2025 alone.”

Breaking a Decade-Long Stalemate

For years, Nigeria’s telecom sector operated under a rigid pricing structure that left MNOs unable to adjust service rates despite spiraling costs. Tower companies, by contrast, had annual leeway to revise prices in line with inflation and foreign exchange fluctuations, creating an uneven playing field.

The freeze, according to industry insiders, discouraged investment, delayed equipment upgrades, and eroded service quality—particularly as global telecom technology evolved rapidly. The NCC opens the way for operators to reposition Nigeria among competitive telecom markets worldwide by restoring the principles of the 2000 National Telecom Policy and the 2003 Communications Act, which advocate for market-driven pricing while safeguarding competition and consumers.

“This is an industry that requires continuous investment,” Maida said. “The world is moving ahead, and if we do not create the right conditions, we will be left behind.”

Maida disclosed that telecom operators began placing fresh equipment orders earlier this year, with deliveries starting in June. Network expansion and upgrades are now underway across the country.

“We are closely tracking the rollout,” Maida explained. “We hold weekly calls with operators to monitor site builds, upgrades, and to step in when they face challenges with authorities.”

Industry analysts say these upgrades could significantly boost capacity, improve internet speeds, and enhance voice service quality—factors that are crucial to Nigeria’s digital economy ambitions.

Cost Pressures Still Loom

While celebrating the new investment inflow, Maida acknowledged that operators still face enormous operational cost burdens. The sector consumes more than 40 million liters of diesel each month—most of it imported—to power base stations.

The foreign exchange dependency is equally crippling. All network hardware and software is imported, with no domestic production capacity for critical telecom equipment.

“There is nothing you need to build or upgrade a network today in Nigeria that you can buy locally,” Maida said.

Securing the Lifeline of the Digital Economy

The NCC is also addressing the security risks to Nigeria’s telecom backbone. Working with the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), the regulator is developing region-specific rapid response frameworks to protect infrastructure.

The approach varies by geography—coastal areas require more community engagement, while volatile regions need a stronger civil defense presence. Maida stressed that the strategy goes beyond deploying force; it tackles the root causes of site vulnerability, such as inadequate security, generator theft, and disputes with host communities.

With the new pricing model breathing life back into the sector, and with targeted investments and security measures in motion, many believe Nigeria could be on the cusp of its most significant telecom transformation in a decade—provided the momentum is sustained.

The U.S. government’s landmark 15% revenue-sharing agreement with Nvidia and AMD on Chinese chip sales is drawing both praise and legal questions, as the Trump administration positions it as a model for future deals across other industries.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the arrangement as a “beta test” in a Bloomberg TV interview, hinting that the framework could be replicated beyond semiconductors.

“We could see it in other industries over time,” Bessent said, underscoring the administration’s confidence in the policy’s revenue potential.

The deal, announced earlier this month, is part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to increase domestic funding from foreign sales without directly imposing tariffs that might trigger retaliation. Under the agreement, Nvidia and AMD will pay the U.S. government 15% of their revenue from certain high-performance chips sold to China — chips that are not subject to outright export bans but still fall within Washington’s strategic technology oversight.

The move also fits into the White House’s push to use new tariffs and revenue-sharing deals to slow the growth of America’s $37 trillion national debt. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, these measures are already bringing in enough money to noticeably offset deficit expansion.

However, the deal faces potential constitutional challenges. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution — the “export clause” — prohibits taxes or duties on goods exported from any U.S. state. The Supreme Court has previously struck down attempts to collect fees or taxes on exports, notably in United States v. IBM (1996) and United States v. United States Shoe Corp. (1998). In both cases, the Court sided with businesses, ruling that such levies violated the export clause. Whether today’s Court would rule the same way remains uncertain, especially given recent rulings that have expanded the powers of the Executive Branch in trade and national security matters.

The Nvidia–AMD deal traces back to months of tense negotiations between the White House, chipmakers, and national security officials. President Trump had initially floated the idea of a complete ban on advanced chip sales to China, citing concerns about military applications.

Industry leaders, led by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and AMD CEO Lisa Su, warned that such a move would severely impact revenues, global market share, and America’s technological leadership. The compromise — a revenue-sharing model — allowed companies to continue selling certain downgraded products to China while providing the U.S. government with a steady income stream.

Analysts say the arrangement could become a blueprint for balancing national security concerns with corporate interests in other sensitive sectors, from aerospace to biotech. Yet the constitutional cloud hanging over the policy raises the prospect of legal challenges that could force the courts to revisit the export clause for the first time in over two decades.

Beijing and Washington’s continued weaponization of exports and global supply chains means companies are bracing for further disruption. The disruption comes with some rapid policy shifts that defy the norm. For the Nvidia–AMD agreement, it is not clear if the entities involved, or anyone else, intends to challenge the legality. However, it will be of great interest to business leaders to see if the deal survives court scrutiny.