U.S. President Donald Trump has declared the new trade framework with the European Union as the “biggest trade deal ever made,” touting it as a win for the American auto industry and a key step toward rebalancing trade between the two economic giants.

Announced Sunday after intense negotiations with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the deal imposes a 15% blanket tariff on most European goods entering the U.S., including automobiles and auto parts. The new rate significantly reduces the looming threat of a 30% tariff Trump had threatened to enforce from August 1, while cutting nearly half of the existing 27.5% levy on European cars.

While the announcement has calmed fears of an escalating trade war, industry groups and economic analysts have warned that the tariff regime—though milder than anticipated—still poses serious risks to European automakers and could lead to long-term disruption in the global auto supply chain.

The Tariff Burden

CNBC reports that Germany’s powerful auto lobby, the VDA (German Association of the Automotive Industry), welcomed the deal for averting an outright trade dispute but described the 15% tariff as “a significant burden.” In a statement, VDA President Hildegard Müller stressed that the costs to German automakers would still run into billions of euros annually, exacerbating financial pressures at a time when the industry is already grappling with the high costs of transitioning to electric vehicles and digital manufacturing.

“The decisive factor now will be how the agreement is structured in concrete terms and how reliable it is,” Müller said, while urging both the U.S. and EU to support supply chains and maintain competitive investment environments. “A 15% tariff remains painful and burdensome.”

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) echoed those concerns. While acknowledging that the agreement provides some relief from the cloud of uncertainty, ACEA Director-General Sigrid de Vries warned that retaining elevated tariffs will continue to negatively impact both European and American automotive sectors.

“Nevertheless, the US will retain higher tariffs on automobiles and automotive parts, and this will continue to have a negative impact not just for industry in the EU but also in the US,” she said.

Margins Under Pressure

Rico Luman, a senior economist for transport and logistics at Dutch bank ING, said the agreement represents a reprieve but not a resolution.

“Margins are under pressure in a multi-challenge market and the bill can’t be fully passed on to customers without volume losses,” Luman told CNBC by email.

The tariff hit comes as automakers continue to digest the second-quarter earnings season, which already reflected pain from earlier tariff regimes and currency fluctuations. Luman added that the weakened dollar makes U.S. car imports more expensive, further complicating pricing strategies.

That’s why global car makers are all looking for ways to adjust manufacturing footprints within current facilities,” he added.

Winners and Losers

In market reaction, the Stoxx Europe Autos Index initially climbed 1.6% on news of the deal, but later reversed into negative territory as investors digested the implications of the new tariff floor.

Shares of some parts suppliers like Valeo jumped as much as 4.3%, while luxury carmaker Ferrari rose nearly 0.9%. But Germany’s biggest automakers — BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen — all slid more than 1.3%, indicating market skepticism about the agreement’s short-term upside.

Morningstar analyst Rella Suskin said the deal’s benefits will be unevenly distributed. Automakers that rely heavily on EU-based production for U.S. exports — such as Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, and Volkswagen — stand to gain relative protection from the reduced tariff, though the cost is still high. Stellantis, on the other hand, which imports only a single-digit share of its volumes from the EU into the U.S., is expected to see minimal impact.

What Comes Next?

Analysts warn that the deal, while momentarily stabilizing, is still fraught with uncertainty over enforcement, duration, and broader trade dynamics. While the Trump administration has portrayed it as a victory for American workers and manufacturing, European officials appear cautious, emphasizing that the details still need to be negotiated and finalized.

The European Commission has called for parallel measures to support EU-based manufacturers and make Europe more attractive to global investors. Without such support, analysts warn the EU could lose its edge in auto innovation and production, especially amid fierce global competition from China and emerging markets.

As it stands, the 15% tariff framework may be better than the feared alternative, but for automakers on both sides of the Atlantic, it remains a costly compromise.

Tesla is now touting a compact electric pickup truck, a strategic pivot that comes as its long-hyped Cybertruck continues to underperform.

The potential shift was revealed by Lars Moravy, Tesla’s vice president of engineering, who said the company has been actively considering a smaller sibling to the Cybertruck, particularly with an eye on international markets where demand and regulatory requirements sharply differ from the U.S.

“We always talked about making a smaller pickup,” Moravy said during an event in California over the weekend, hosted by Tesla investors and owners. He explained that such a model could align with future plans for Tesla’s robotaxi platform, saying, “That kind of service is useful not just for people, but also for goods… We’ve definitely been churning in the design studio about what we might do to serve that need.”

This marks a possible recalibration of Tesla’s electric truck ambitions, especially as Cybertruck sales remain far below expectations. Tesla had predicted annual sales of over 250,000 units, but the reality has been sobering: just under 39,000 Cybertrucks were sold throughout 2024, and approximately 11,000 have been sold so far in 2025, according to industry estimates. That figure is a fraction of what Tesla envisioned when it launched the “apocalypse-proof” truck with high hopes and cinematic flair in 2023.

At the heart of the problem is the Cybertruck’s design and pricing. Initially promised at a starting price of $39,900, the actual entry-level model now starts at over $60,000, with premium trims inching close to the $100,000 mark. The vehicle’s hefty 6,000kg frame and sharp-edged design have further restricted its global expansion. The truck is not road-legal in many markets, including Europe and China—Tesla’s two largest markets outside the U.S.

Authorities in the UK seized one of the first Cybertrucks imported into the country earlier this year, while another in the European Union had to be modified to pass local safety regulations due to its angular, rigid body. While Tesla has managed to expand Cybertruck sales to Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, these remain relatively limited markets compared to the regulatory-tight European and Chinese auto sectors.

Meanwhile, Tesla’s overall vehicle sales have continued to slump. In the second quarter of 2025, the automaker recorded a 13.5% year-over-year drop, marking the second consecutive quarter of declining sales. The disappointing numbers come at a pivotal time for the company, which has been battling mounting criticism over its controversial self-driving technology claims.

California’s Legal Challenge

Tesla’s ability to continue selling vehicles in its home state of California is also under scrutiny. The California Department of Motor Vehicles has concluded a weeklong court hearing on a lawsuit it filed in 2022, accusing Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) and “Autopilot” systems. The DMV is seeking to suspend Tesla’s sales license in the state for at least 30 days and to impose monetary penalties.

The suit argues that Tesla falsely marketed its driver-assist features as nearly autonomous, citing statements from the company’s website that implied the cars could operate from departure to destination without human input. DMV Commander Melanie Rosario, testifying as a witness, told the court she found Tesla’s branding around “Autopilot” and “FSD” to be confusing and contradictory, saying it gave the impression the vehicles could drive themselves despite disclaimers in the fine print.

Tesla’s legal team pushed back, arguing that the company had always stated drivers must remain attentive and that the systems are not fully autonomous. However, multiple witnesses, including experts in vehicle automation and advertising law, suggested that the language used by Tesla could indeed mislead consumers. The case remains pending, but legal analysts have flagged it as one with potentially far-reaching implications for Tesla’s operations nationwide.

Adding to Tesla’s woes is the public backlash tied to CEO Elon Musk’s recent appointment as the face of the White House’s controversial DOGE Office, which spurred protests outside Tesla dealerships across the country earlier this year. The political spotlight, coupled with growing consumer dissatisfaction, has only intensified the company’s mounting image problems.

Further complicating the situation are several lawsuits. In Florida, a wrongful death case alleges that a Tesla operating on Autopilot struck a parked SUV, killing a 22-year-old woman, while another class-action lawsuit and federal probe are examining reports of “phantom braking,” where Teslas suddenly slam on the brakes without cause, creating safety hazards at high speeds.

Amid the turbulence, a compact pickup could serve as a fresh offering to re-engage markets increasingly wary of Tesla’s bolder bets. Although Moravy noted that it’s still at the design phase, it is not clear whether a smaller truck will succeed where the Cybertruck stumbled.

Nations rise when leaders architect visions. Companies advance when business leaders articulate visions. Out of those visions are missions encapsulated. Simply, the enduring success of firms is intrinsically linked to a clear mission, relentless innovation, and strategic growth. A firm’s mission serves as its guiding star, articulating its fundamental purpose and the value it aims to deliver to stakeholders.

That clear purpose becomes the bedrock upon which all innovation is built, ensuring that new ideas and products are not merely novelties but purposeful advancements that align with the company’s core identity and market needs.

When they say in ancestral Igbo that a good product sells itself, the message is simple: through great products, product-market fits are readily attained. Oliver de Coque has noted that great music comes from God; and I paraphrase that great products emerge out of an innovation vision.

Innovation, in this context, is a continuous pursuit – from disruptive technologies to incremental process improvements – all designed to create new value, differentiate the firm, and overcome market frictions, ultimately driving its competitive edge.

Growth, therefore, is the natural outcome of a well-defined mission married with sustained innovation. It’s not just about expanding size but about enhancing market relevance and impact. Tekedia highlights that true growth involves scaling operations, capturing new market segments, and creating sustainable value for stakeholders. This strategic expansion allows firms to build “category-king” positions, solidifying their presence and influence.

Vision. Mission. By consistently revisiting their mission, fostering a culture of innovation, and executing intelligent growth strategies, firms can navigate dynamic landscapes, secure long-term viability, and contribute meaningfully to the broader economy.

From this September, at Tekedia Mini-MBA, we will be co-learning on “Why Do We Have Companies”? And everything that is required to answer that question! See our curriculum here