DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 814

RomancesPower Review: Still a Good Place to Meet People Online?

0

With so much available online, the rise of new sites and social networks can be overwhelming. Members will often be faced with an avalanche of options as well as a level of superficial interactions and repetitive postings that can make deep connecting difficult to achieve.

As discussed in Forbes Health’s guide to 2025 trends in dating, nearly 40% of Americans used online dating. However, for some, it’s still challenging to receive enduring, significant relationships within this crowded online scene. That’s where RomancesPower comes in—building warmth on an emotional level, sincerity, and substantive discussion within a platform where you’re encouraged to converse at your own pace.

But in 2025, is RomancesPower relevant? Has it changed in ways that continue to make it helpful and inclusive? In this in-depth RomancesPower review, we examine how the platform operates, what it offers, and whether it’s still worthwhile spending time on.

Whether searching for friendship or looking for someone special, RomancesPower could offer the space to do so with reduced stress and richer depth.

Getting Started on RomancesPower: What to Expect

Registration on RomancesPower is quick and simple. The site offers a basic registration process via email to limit spam and encourage proactive user interactions. Content contributors undergo filtering by a third-party external source before they are approved, assuring the quality of posts and interactions.

Since the start, the website interface has been user-friendly. Its basic design ensures smooth navigation. Navigating through the profile recommendations or through the Newsfeed, everything has been created with the aim of encouraging gradual discovery over rushing into choices.

Features That Set RomancesPower Apart

Over time, using RomancesPower starts to reveal its rhythm. Instead of pushing for quick interactions, the platform emphasizes tools that invite curiosity, light engagement, and consistency.

This section offers a flexible way to customize how you interact with the platform.

The “People” Carousel

Here’s where RomancesPower introduces you to new users one by one. Instead of endless scrolling, the carousel keeps things focused:

Feature Description
Like Expresses interest in a profile
Save Keeps profiles for later viewing
Follow Subscribe to updates and posts

This gradual approach mirrors the platform’s overall goal: to build meaningful attention and connection over time.

Newsfeed: Beyond Profiles

Newsfeed empowers RomancesPower users to upload photographs, share ideas, and integrate individual stories. It facilitates content-driven interaction in the absence of face-driven interaction.

Benefits of Newsfeed interaction on RomancesPower:

  • Ensures effortless integration into native conversations
  • Let you discover the person’s values or interests
  • Offers insights into daily ideas and life moments

The Newsfeed also adds variety to the site, ending the profile scroll routine.

Like, Wink, and Follow

Each tool on RomancesPower serves a unique purpose:

  • Like: Shows clear interest in someone’s profile
  • Wink: A humorous one-time feature designed to gain attention in a respectful way
  • Follow: Allows you to view someone’s updates and activity

Instead of constantly pitching messaging, RomancesPower encourages you to gradually open up, which will likely feel more natural and smooth.

Search Page Highlights

The Search feature helps you narrow down profiles based on:

  • Age
  • Gender
  • General location (no specific filtering by region or background)
  • Online status
  • Followed users

Community Experience on RomancesPower

Since RomancesPower has many users, the membership is active and vibrant. Many users constantly log in and chat through winks and likes, or update on the timeline.

Research indicates 80% of users interviewed avowed RomancesPower helped in building rapport with people. That does not suggest that all will find instant rapport on the spot, but it fortifies the platform’s approach, leaving room for rapport within sincerity and depth.

What stands out in particular is the respectful demeanor in all interactions. Several users take the time to write quality posts, reply to content, or follow one another regularly. It’s a site where serene interaction is promoted over constant urgency.

Safety and Support: Is RomancesPower Safe?

On the note of user protection, RomancesPower invests in serious protection. Sophisticated algorithms in the aspect of moderation and a professional team quickly monitor content. A high percentage of hurtful content is filtered out prior to reaching the eyes of the remaining users.

Safety Features Overview:

Measure Effect
Content moderation Inappropriate content is filtered out through automated systems and human review
AI-powered anti-scam system Detects and blocks fraudulent behavior quickly and efficiently
Human moderation team Reviews user reports and ensures community standards are upheld
PCI DSS compliance Supports secure handling of financial transactions across the platform

If you’re wondering, is RomancesPower safe? The platform maintains consistent controls to create a secure experience. While no system is flawless, safety is clearly prioritized here.

Customer Support Experience

RomancesPower offers around-the-clock customer service. However, based on feedback, some users have noted:

  • Occasional delays in responding in support
  • Having to provide numerous follow-up questions to settle the issue

Despite this, communications with the support team are normally polite and constructive. You will not necessarily see immediate results, but the team will strive to resolve every problem in full.

Are There Any Drawbacks?

While RomancesPower performs well in many areas, it’s not without limitations:

Consider These Notes Before Joining:

Issue Comment
No mobile app Use is limited to mobile browsers
Paid features Some tools require payments
Payment confirmations Delays may occur with transaction processing

The absence of an app may frustrate users who prefer app-based platforms. And while many features are accessible without payment, some tools do require an upgrade.

Is RomancesPower Legit?

If you’re wondering, “Is RomancesPower legitimate?” The quick answer is yes. The site is solidly based, operates openly, and has features designed to connect in a thoughtful way.

While it will not guarantee results or overnight success, it creates a structured, warm environment where meaningful interaction may develop over time.

And where concerns like is RomancesPower scam, there is simply no evidence to indicate that. It has continual safety measures, clear-cut moderation process, and consistent help. It’s a working platform where efforts and respect are appreciated.

RomancesPower Review Verdict

Does RomancesPower still serve its purpose in 2025?

If intentional emotional exploration and communication are most important to you—without feeling forced into hurrying into things—RomancesPower remains steady. No flashy technology or app here, but in the absence of flashy elements comes the strength in how the app urges people to open up and listen on a slower level.

This RomancesPower review reveals a platform where real-time introspection prevails over snap judgments. Chasing likes is the last thing on our minds—we’re finding meaningful moments where it counts.

Whether you’d like to dabble lightly or go into more extensive discussions, RomancesPower has resources and space that may help along the way.

Sponsored by RomancesPower. This piece of writing is not expert advice and should not be taken as a means of treating any conditions.

Beyond “Labour”, We Need Domain Knowledge for Great Careers

0

This video podcast provides a timely and critical perspective on the transformation of the labor market in the age of artificial intelligence. It highlights that traditional labor, once a cornerstone of production, is becoming increasingly commoditized and susceptible to automation by AI systems. This shift is exemplified by recent layoffs at major tech companies like Microsoft, which are retooling their workforce to adapt to the new market dynamics driven by AI.

The core argument is that in this AI-driven economy, “knowledge” has emerged as the most valuable and durable factor of production, surpassing the traditional significance of mere labor. Unlike labor, which is finite and “expires,” knowledge possesses a regenerative quality, akin to capital. Companies are now making significant investments to acquire and retain individuals with specialized domain knowledge and “defensible moats,” recognizing that these experts can build and enhance enterprises in ways that AI cannot easily replicate.

Ndubuisi emphasizes that career longevity and success in the future will depend not on merely performing routine tasks or following established workflows, but on cultivating deep domain expertise with the ability to continuously curate and introduce new, impactful knowledge that can redesign core business systems. Microsoft’s strategy of compensating and retaining those who demonstrate this higher-level knowledge, even while reducing general labor, serves as a clear illustration of this paradigm shift. The message is clear: the future belongs to those who possess and can continually generate valuable knowledge.

Podcast VideoSign-up at Blucera and check Tekedia Daily podcast category under Training module.

Comment on Feed

Comment: Is it truly a knowledge problem? I can only see experience and execution emerging as the most valuable and durable factor right now. The knowledge gap has already been blurred by AI.

My Response: Labour has both experience and execution components. In natural philosophy, Labour could be seen as a scalar quantity. Knowledge is a vector quantity. In the context of this post, knowledge is not the same as intelligence. AI might have blurred “intelligence” but not “knowledge” which itself is a factor of production.

Knowledge is what you know while intelligence is the capacity to learn and use what you know. Out of knowledge, intelligence should flow. So, AI cannot have more knowledge than those who made it because intelligence is a subset of knowledge. In other words, someone must have knowledge before these intelligent systems are created.

The young men Meta is paying $200m are not just intelligent people, they are Knowledgeable people, recruited to create the next intelligent systems. It is their knowledge , and not the intelligence, that Meta is paying for.

Azuki Partners OpenSea For ‘Mizuki Shorts NFTs’

0

Azuki has partnered with OpenSea to release Mizuki Shorts as ERC-1155 collectibles. These anime-inspired, short-form NFTs, directed by Gensho Yasuda and featuring the character Mizuki (Elemental #9195), allow collectors to directly support creators, with proceeds funding further production. The public mint for these NFTs is live on OpenSea, emphasizing a model where fans can own pieces of the story and engage in community-driven content creation. This collaboration highlights Azuki’s push toward tokenizing narrative and expanding its Web3 anime ecosystem, The Garden.

Azuki’s release of anime-inspired NFTs on OpenSea, a leading NFT marketplace, strengthens the integration of anime culture into Web3. By tokenizing short-form anime content, Azuki is pioneering a model where storytelling and collectibles merge, potentially setting a precedent for other creators to blend narrative media with blockchain technology. This could expand the appeal of NFTs beyond static art or profile pictures, attracting anime fans and creators to Web3, thus diversifying the NFT market.

The Mizuki Shorts model allows collectors to fund creators directly through NFT purchases, with proceeds supporting further production. This decentralized funding approach could disrupt traditional media financing, giving creators more autonomy and fans a stake in the creative process. It fosters a community-driven ecosystem, where holders influence the narrative, potentially redefining fan-creator relationships in media.

Partnering with OpenSea, a platform with significant reach, enhances Azuki’s visibility and accessibility. The use of ERC-1155 tokens, which support multiple editions, makes these NFTs more affordable than one-of-a-kind ERC-721 tokens, potentially broadening participation. However, the NFT market has faced volatility, with trading volumes dropping significantly since their 2021-2022 peak. This partnership could either revitalize interest or face challenges if market sentiment remains bearish.

By combining anime with NFTs, Azuki taps into a global cultural phenomenon while leveraging blockchain for ownership and authenticity. This could inspire similar experiments in other genres, like gaming or music. The project tests the viability of tokenized storytelling, where narrative fragments are collectible assets, potentially influencing how stories are created and consumed.

Supporters see this as a revolutionary step for creators, bypassing traditional gatekeepers like studios or streaming platforms. They argue it empowers fans to own a piece of the story and fosters innovation in media. Critics, including traditional anime fans or those wary of NFTs, may view this as a commercialization of art, reducing anime to speculative assets. They might argue that NFTs add unnecessary complexity or risk diluting the cultural value of anime.

Those bullish on NFTs see this as a bullish signal for the market, especially given OpenSea’s prominence and Azuki’s established brand (its floor price remains strong compared to many projects). They believe it could drive new adoption. With NFT trading volumes down (e.g., OpenSea’s volume dropped from $5B in January 2022 to under $500M in mid-2025 per some analyses), skeptics question whether this will gain traction or become another overhyped project in a cooling market.

The ERC-1155 format and OpenSea’s platform make these NFTs relatively accessible, but minting costs and gas fees could still exclude casual fans, especially in regions with lower purchasing power. Azuki’s branding as a premium NFT project (with high floor prices for its core collection) creates a perception of exclusivity, potentially alienating new entrants while appealing to high-net-worth collectors.

The Azuki-OpenSea partnership for Mizuki Shorts is a bold experiment in blending anime, NFTs, and community-driven storytelling. It could redefine how media is funded and consumed, but its success hinges on market conditions, community engagement, and bridging the divide between Web3 advocates and traditional audiences. The project highlights both the potential of decentralized innovation and the challenges of mainstream adoption in a polarized landscape.

GameSquare Holdings Acquires CryptoPunk #5577 For $5.15M

0

GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: GAME), a media, entertainment, and technology company, acquired CryptoPunk #5577, known as the “Cowboy Ape,” for $5.15 million in preferred stock from Robert Leshner, founder of DeFi protocol Compound and CEO of Superstate. The stock is convertible into approximately 3.4 million common shares at $1.50 per share. This marks GameSquare’s first direct NFT investment, aligning with its blockchain-native brand strategy targeting 6-10% annualized stablecoin returns.

The Cowboy Ape, one of only 24 Ape CryptoPunks in the 10,000-piece collection, is a culturally significant digital asset, now part of GameSquare’s treasury and displayed on its X profile. The company also added $10 million in Ethereum (2,742.75 ETH at $3,646 per ETH), bringing its total ETH holdings to 12,913.49 ETH, valued at over $52 million.

However, the NFT market has shown recent activity, with a wallet (0x1bb3) spending 2,082 ETH (about $5.87 million) to purchase 45 CryptoPunks in a single sweep, indicating a resurgence in high-value NFT transactions.  GameSquare’s acquisition of the Cowboy Ape marks one of the first instances of a publicly traded company (Nasdaq: GAME) using equity (preferred stock convertible to 3.4 million shares at $1.50) to acquire a high-value NFT. This signals a shift toward treating NFTs as strategic treasury assets, akin to holding stocks, bonds, or cryptocurrencies like Ethereum.

By structuring the deal with preferred stock rather than cash, GameSquare preserves liquidity while aligning the seller, Robert Leshner (Compound founder and Superstate CEO), with the company’s long-term performance. This equity-based structure could become a model for future high-value NFT transactions, especially in markets where cash flow is constrained. GameSquare’s $52 million Ethereum treasury (12,913.49 ETH) and the addition of the Cowboy Ape NFT reflect a broader trend of companies diversifying treasuries with digital assets.

Unlike Bitcoin-focused treasuries, GameSquare’s Ethereum-centric approach, including NFTs, taps into the cultural and financial potential of the Ethereum ecosystem, including DeFi and digital collectibles. CryptoPunks, especially rare ones like the Cowboy Ape (one of 24 Ape Punks), are seen as digital artifacts symbolizing early internet culture and decentralized identity. GameSquare’s use of the Cowboy Ape as its X profile picture and its plans for marketing activations, community building, and licensing demonstrate how NFTs can enhance brand equity and engage younger, crypto-native audiences (e.g., Gen Z and Millennials).

GameSquare is leveraging the Cowboy Ape as a yield-bearing asset by borrowing stablecoins against it at a fixed rate through Dialectic’s Medici platform, aiming for 6-10% annualized returns. This strategy, managed by 1OF1 AG (led by Ryan Zurrer), involves using NFTs as collateral in DeFi protocols, a novel approach that could redefine how corporations monetize digital assets. If the hoodie punks were acquired by GameSquare or a similar entity, they could also be used for such yield strategies, amplifying returns on high-value NFTs.

GameSquare’s broader Ethereum yield strategy targets 8-14% annualized returns, surpassing typical ETH staking yields of 3-4%. This reflects a sophisticated approach to DeFi, using machine learning and risk management to optimize returns. The integration of NFTs into this framework could set a precedent for other firms to treat digital collectibles as both cultural and financial instruments.

The involvement of Robert Leshner, a DeFi pioneer, as a shareholder and advisor strengthens GameSquare’s ability to bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). His expertise could guide the company in scaling its NFT and ETH yield strategies, potentially influencing other public companies to explore similar models. GameSquare’s stock (Nasdaq: GAME) surged 72% over the past month to $1.30-$1.32 as of July 24, 2025, reflecting investor enthusiasm for its crypto strategy.

With a $125.2 million market cap and 77.06% revenue growth, GameSquare’s crypto pivot enhances its appeal to investors seeking exposure to blockchain without direct crypto investment. However, its low current ratio (0.57) and high cash burn rate raise concerns about sustainability, making the success of its yield strategy critical.

GameSquare’s move could catalyze a trend where companies treat NFTs as balance sheet assets, similar to real estate or intellectual property. This could drive demand for blue-chip NFTs, pushing floor prices higher. Critics question the intrinsic value of NFTs compared to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. GameSquare’s strategy hinges on sustained NFT market growth and successful yield generation. A market downturn, as seen in 2021-2022, could impair asset values and returns, especially if the hoodie punks acquisition reflects speculative overreach.

The NFT market’s 20% surge is promising, but its history of boom-and-bust cycles (e.g., 50% drop from 2021 highs) poses risks. GameSquare’s $52 million ETH and NFT portfolio is exposed to Ethereum price swings and NFT market sentiment. GameSquare’s current ratio of 0.57 signals potential liquidity issues, and its $250 million crypto treasury authorization (with $45 million already spent) could strain finances if yields underperform or NFT values decline.

GameSquare’s acquisition of the Cowboy Ape CryptoPunk for $5.15 million positions it as a trailblazer in blending NFTs with corporate treasury strategies, leveraging cultural, financial, and DeFi opportunities. The move signals confidence in the NFT market’s revival, with implications for increased institutional adoption, innovative financing models, and brand engagement. However, risks like market volatility, liquidity constraints, and regulatory challenges remain. The unconfirmed hoodie punks sweep, if real, would amplify these trends, indicating broader market momentum but also speculative fervor.

Crypto Exchange WOOX Exploited, Resulting In Unauthorized Withdrawals of $14M

0

WOO Exchange experienced an exploit resulting in unauthorized withdrawals initially estimated at over $12 million but later confirmed to be $14 million. The exploit affected nine user accounts and involved assets across Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB, and Arbitrum networks. The breach was linked to a targeted phishing attack that compromised a team member’s device, allowing access to the platform’s development environment.

WOO X promptly detected the incident, paused withdrawals, and blocked several unauthorized transactions. The exchange has committed to fully reimbursing affected users and is collaborating with external security teams and other exchanges to track the stolen funds, with six wallet addresses linked to the attacker published for monitoring.

Withdrawals remain suspended pending a comprehensive security audit, but trading activities and user funds are reported as unaffected. This incident is part of a broader wave of crypto exchange hacks in July 2025, with total losses exceeding $3.1 billion this year. The breach, caused by a phishing attack compromising a team member’s device, underscores vulnerabilities in centralized platforms, where single points of failure (e.g., employee credentials) can lead to significant losses.

This may further erode user confidence in centralized exchanges (CEXs), pushing traders toward decentralized alternatives or self-custody solutions. WOO X’s commitment to fully reimburse affected users mitigates immediate financial harm but doesn’t eliminate reputational damage, especially as this is one of multiple hacks in July 2025, with industry losses exceeding $3.1 billion this year.

High-profile exploits like this intensify calls for stricter regulations. Governments and financial authorities may push for enhanced security standards, mandatory audits, or insurance requirements for CEXs, potentially increasing operational costs and barriers to entry for smaller platforms. WOO X’s response—suspending withdrawals, conducting a security audit, and collaborating with external teams—sets a precedent for crisis management. However, the incident highlights the need for robust internal security practices, such as multi-factor authentication, employee training, and air-gapped systems for critical operations.

The broader crypto industry may see accelerated adoption of advanced security measures, like multi-signature wallets or hardware security modules, to prevent similar breaches. The exploit could lead to short-term market volatility, particularly for assets heavily traded on WOO X, as users reassess platform reliability. Some traders may diversify across platforms or move to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) to avoid custodial risks.

The incident reinforces the importance of self-custody, potentially boosting demand for hardware wallets and non-custodial solutions. CEXs like WOO X offer user-friendly interfaces, high liquidity, and advanced trading features (e.g., futures, margin trading). They often provide customer support and fiat on-ramps, making them accessible to mainstream users. Centralized control creates vulnerabilities, as seen in the WOO X hack, where a single compromised device led to a $14 million loss.

Custodial risks, regulatory exposure, and potential mismanagement deter users prioritizing security and autonomy. The incident reinforces skepticism about CEXs’ ability to safeguard funds, especially as hacks become more frequent (e.g., $3.1 billion in losses in 2025). Users may question whether convenience justifies the risks. DEXs eliminate custodial risks by allowing users to retain control of their private keys. They are less susceptible to centralized breaches, as no single entity controls the platform. Blockchain transparency also enables real-time auditing.

DEXs often suffer from lower liquidity, higher transaction fees (especially on Ethereum), and complex interfaces that deter novice users. They are not immune to exploits, such as smart contract vulnerabilities, as seen in past DeFi hacks. The WOO X breach may drive users to DEXs, boosting platforms like Uniswap or SushiSwap. However, the learning curve and gas fees could limit mass adoption, maintaining the divide.

The WOO X exploit highlights the fragility of centralized crypto platforms and fuels the debate over CEXs versus DEXs. While CEXs remain dominant for their convenience, incidents like this push users and developers toward decentralized solutions, despite their limitations. The divide will likely persist until hybrid platforms or new security paradigms reconcile the trade-offs between usability and autonomy.