In Q1 2025, Solana reportedly led all Layer 1 blockchains in revenue, generating $370 million in fees, outpacing Ethereum, TRON, BNB Chain, and others, according to posts on X and industry sources. This revenue includes fees, tips, and maximum extractable value (MEV), with Solana’s high transaction demand driven by its scalability and low-cost transactions. Solana’s ability to process up to 65,000 transactions per second, facilitated by its Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms, has fueled its dominance in on-chain activity, particularly in meme coin trading and decentralized finance (DeFi).
Additionally, Solana surpassed Ethereum in staking market capitalization, reaching $53.15 billion compared to Ethereum’s $53.72 billion. Approximately 64.86% of Solana’s total supply is staked, yielding an annual percentage yield (APY) of 8.31%, significantly higher than Ethereum’s 28.18% staked supply with a 2.98% APY. Solana’s staking appeal is bolstered by its low entry barrier (0.01 SOL minimum) and growing liquid staking protocols, though its lack of a slashing mechanism has raised security concerns among critics.
While Solana’s performance metrics are impressive, some argue its revenue and staking figures may be inflated by speculative activity, such as meme coin trading, and question its long-term sustainability compared to Ethereum’s more mature DeFi ecosystem. Ethereum’s higher total value locked (TVL) and developer base still make it a formidable competitor, despite Solana’s Q1 lead. Always consider cross-referencing these metrics with primary blockchain data, as reported figures can vary and may not fully reflect network health or decentralization.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Solana’s $370 million in revenue signals strong user demand and network activity, particularly in high-throughput applications like meme coin trading and DeFi. Its ability to handle 65,000 transactions per second at low costs positions it as a go-to platform for retail users and developers building scalable dApps, potentially challenging Ethereum’s dominance in DeFi and NFT markets. With a $53.15 billion staking market cap and 64.86% of its supply staked, Solana’s high participation rate strengthens network security and validator decentralization. The 8.31% APY attracts investors, but the absence of a slashing mechanism could raise concerns about validator accountability, potentially exposing the network to risks if malicious behavior goes unpunished.
Solana’s cost-efficiency and performance are drawing developers away from Ethereum, where high gas fees remain a barrier. This could accelerate dApp development on Solana, particularly in gaming, DeFi, and social finance (SocialFi), but Ethereum’s entrenched developer community and robust tooling (e.g., EVM compatibility) may slow this shift. Critics highlight that Solana’s revenue is partly driven by speculative meme coin trading, which may not be sustainable long-term. If speculative activity wanes, Solana’s revenue could decline unless it diversifies into more stable use cases like tokenized real-world assets or enterprise applications.
Solana’s lead puts pressure on Ethereum to optimize its scaling solutions, such as Layer 2 rollups, and reduce fees to retain users. Ethereum’s higher TVL ($51 billion vs. Solana’s $10 billion) and institutional adoption still give it an edge, but Solana’s performance could force Ethereum to accelerate upgrades like sharding or lower staking barriers. Solana’s metrics bolster its appeal to investors, with SOL’s price potentially benefiting from its revenue and staking dominance. However, volatility tied to speculative trading and macroeconomic factors (e.g., interest rates) could temper gains. Investors should weigh Solana’s high APY against risks like network outages, which have historically plagued Solana.
Solana’s high throughput relies on relatively centralized infrastructure (fewer, more powerful validators), raising concerns about censorship resistance compared to Ethereum’s more decentralized validator set. This could impact long-term trust among users prioritizing ideological principles of blockchain. Solana’s rapid growth may strain its infrastructure, risking congestion or outages if transaction volumes surge further. Additionally, reliance on liquid staking protocols introduces counterparty risks, as seen in past DeFi exploits.
To navigate these implications, stakeholders should monitor Solana’s ability to sustain revenue beyond speculative trends, improve decentralization, and maintain network stability. Ethereum’s response—via scaling or fee reductions—will also shape the competitive landscape. Always verify on-chain data and network health metrics independently.