Strike, a Bitcoin Lightning-based payments app founded by Jack Mallers, announced the launch of Strike Lending, a Bitcoin-backed lending service. This service allows eligible U.S. customers to borrow fiat currency, ranging from $75,000 to $2 million, using their Bitcoin as collateral without selling it. The loans have a minimum 12% APR, 12-month terms, and flexible repayment options (monthly or lump-sum at maturity). There are no origination or early repayment fees, and the loans do not affect credit scores.
Strike partners with third-party capital providers to facilitate the loans, transferring the Bitcoin collateral to these providers for the loan duration. The service is initially available in select U.S. regions, with plans for international expansion. This move aligns with a broader resurgence in Bitcoin lending, as companies like Coinbase and Xapo Bank have also introduced similar offerings.
The introduction of Strike Lending has several implications for the Bitcoin ecosystem, financial markets, and users. By enabling Bitcoin holders to borrow fiat without selling their assets, Strike Lending enhances Bitcoin’s role as a store of value and collateral, potentially increasing its adoption and mainstream financial integration. Users gain access to cash for personal or business needs while retaining potential upside from Bitcoin price appreciation, appealing to long-term holders (HODLers) who prefer not to liquidate their holdings.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Widespread Bitcoin-backed lending could reduce sell pressure during bullish markets, as holders borrow instead of selling. However, in a downturn, collateral liquidations by lenders could amplify price drops, increasing volatility. Strike’s entry intensifies competition with platforms like Coinbase, Xapo Bank, and others offering similar services. This could drive innovation, lower borrowing costs, and improve terms but may also lead to a race for market share, potentially increasing risk-taking.
Bitcoin lending operates in a gray area of U.S. financial regulation. As Strike expands, it may attract attention from regulators like the SEC or CFPB, especially regarding consumer protection, collateral custody, and anti-money laundering compliance. The 12% minimum APR is relatively high compared to traditional loans, and borrowers risk losing their Bitcoin if they default or if collateral value falls below loan requirements during price dips, necessitating careful risk management.
By offering loans without credit checks, Strike Lending could serve underbanked individuals or businesses, though the high loan minimum ($75,000) currently limits accessibility to wealthier users. Strike’s plans to roll out lending internationally could bring Bitcoin-backed financing to regions with limited banking infrastructure, boosting financial access but also introducing regulatory and operational challenges.
Strike Lending could strengthen Bitcoin’s financial ecosystem but introduces risks tied to market volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and borrower exposure, shaping how Bitcoin integrates into traditional finance. Strike’s Bitcoin lending program, while innovative, risks widening the gap between the crypto-wealthy and those with limited access to Bitcoin or financial resources.
The $75,000 minimum loan size restricts access to individuals or businesses with significant Bitcoin holdings, favoring wealthier users who already own substantial crypto assets. Borrowers must hold enough Bitcoin to cover the loan, which excludes those without crypto wealth or the means to acquire it, particularly in a high-price Bitcoin market (e.g., Bitcoin’s price has been volatile, often exceeding $90,000 in 2025).
The 12% minimum APR is steep compared to traditional loans (e.g., U.S. mortgage rates around 6-7% or personal loans at 8-10%). This could deter lower-income users, making the service more viable for those who can afford high interest rates. Bitcoin-backed lending primarily benefits early adopters or institutional investors with large Bitcoin holdings, enabling them to leverage their wealth for liquidity without selling. This amplifies their financial flexibility, potentially widening the wealth gap.
Those without Bitcoin or crypto knowledge miss out on these opportunities, as the service doesn’t cater to fiat-only or crypto-novice users. Initially limited to select U.S. regions, Strike Lending excludes global users in regions with weaker banking systems, where such services could have the most impact. Even with planned international expansion, regulatory hurdles may limit access in certain countries.
In the U.S., underserved communities without access to crypto exchanges or education about Bitcoin are less likely to participate, reinforcing financial exclusion. Using Strike Lending requires understanding Bitcoin, wallets, and custodial risks, as well as navigating third-party collateral transfers. This creates a divide between tech-savvy users and those unfamiliar with crypto, who may shy away due to complexity or distrust.
The lack of credit checks, while inclusive, doesn’t address the need for financial literacy to manage high-risk loans tied to volatile assets like Bitcoin. Wealthier borrowers with diversified portfolios can better absorb risks like Bitcoin price drops or loan defaults, while smaller retail investors face higher relative losses if their collateral is liquidated.
The absence of origination fees and credit impacts is a boon, but the high APR and potential for collateral loss disproportionately burden less affluent users who misjudge market conditions. By catering to Bitcoin holders with significant assets, Strike Lending may deepen the divide between the crypto “haves” and “have-nots,” mirroring broader wealth inequality trends. The rich can leverage Bitcoin to grow wealth, while others remain locked out.
If Strike lowers loan minimums, reduces rates, or expands to underserved regions, it could bridge the divide by offering alternative financing to those excluded by traditional banks. However, this would require significant outreach and education. Bitcoin lending could further polarize views between crypto advocates (who see it as financial freedom) and skeptics (who view it as speculative and elitist), fueling debates about crypto’s role in equitable finance.