Circle Internet Group is facing a fresh wave of skepticism from Wall Street as analysts increasingly question whether the stablecoin issuer can maintain its competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving digital payments market.
The latest blow came from investment bank Mizuho, which downgraded Circle’s stock to underperform and slashed its price target from $85 to $50, implying a downside of roughly 21% from the company’s recent closing price of $63.22.
The downgrade highlights a growing concern that Circle’s flagship product, USD Coin (USDC), may soon face intense competition from a new generation of stablecoin networks designed to distribute economic benefits more broadly among ecosystem participants.
At the center of these concerns is Open USD, an emerging stablecoin initiative backed by more than 140 companies, including financial heavyweights Visa, Mastercard, and Coinbase.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 20 (June 8 – Sept 5, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Unlike traditional stablecoin models, Open USD introduces a different economic framework. Stablecoin issuers such as Circle primarily generate revenue from the interest earned on reserves backing their tokens. As interest rates rose globally over the past several years, this reserve income became an exceptionally lucrative business.
Circle’s profitability has largely depended on the billions of dollars held in Treasury bills and cash equivalents supporting USDC. Open USD challenges this structure by allowing participating firms to retain the yield generated from their own reserves instead of transferring those earnings to a centralized issuer.
This seemingly simple change could significantly alter the economics of the stablecoin industry. For banks, payment providers, fintech firms, and large corporations, the ability to keep reserve yields represents a powerful incentive to adopt alternative stablecoin infrastructures.
Rather than acting merely as distribution channels for a third-party issuer, these companies become direct beneficiaries of the interest income generated by their stablecoin activities. Such a model could encourage greater participation and potentially accelerate adoption across global payment networks.
Mizuho’s downgrade reflects fears that Circle’s current business model may become increasingly vulnerable if major institutions migrate toward yield-sharing alternatives. The firm’s analysts argue that the stablecoin industry is entering a new competitive phase where network effects and revenue distribution mechanisms may matter more than first-mover advantages.
The involvement of giants like Visa and Mastercard further intensifies these concerns. Both companies possess enormous payment infrastructures and longstanding relationships with financial institutions worldwide.
Their participation signals that stablecoins are no longer merely a niche crypto product but are rapidly becoming an integral part of mainstream financial infrastructure. Coinbase’s backing of Open USD also carries particular significance.
Coinbase has historically been one of Circle’s closest strategic partners, with both companies sharing revenues generated from USDC reserves. Any shift in Coinbase’s priorities toward competing stablecoin ecosystems could raise additional questions about the long-term growth trajectory of USDC.
Circle still maintains several strengths. USDC remains one of the world’s largest and most trusted stablecoins, benefiting from strong regulatory compliance, deep liquidity, and widespread integration across crypto exchanges, decentralized finance applications, and payment platforms.
The company has also positioned itself as a leader in regulatory engagement, an advantage that could become increasingly valuable as governments introduce clearer rules for digital assets.
Yet investors are beginning to realize that the stablecoin market may not be a winner-takes-all industry.
As new competitors emerge with more attractive economic incentives, pricing pressures and market share battles could intensify. The debate surrounding Circle ultimately reflects a broader transformation occurring within digital finance.
Stablecoins are evolving from simple crypto trading instruments into foundational payment rails for the global economy. In this new environment, the companies that succeed may not necessarily be those that created the earliest products, but those that build the most compelling economic ecosystems around them.
For Circle, the challenge ahead is clear: adapt its business model to a changing competitive landscape or risk seeing its once-dominant position gradually eroded by a new generation of collaborative stablecoin networks.