Alphabet added nearly 12,000 employees over the past year, bucking a broader trend of workforce reductions across the technology sector as the Google parent ramps up investment in artificial intelligence and expands the infrastructure needed to support its next phase of growth.

The company disclosed in its second-quarter earnings report that its global workforce increased to 198,933 employees as of June 30, 2026, up from 187,103 a year earlier, representing a net gain of 11,830 workers, or roughly 6.3%.

The hiring surge came alongside another quarter of strong financial performance. Alphabet reported revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% from a year earlier, driven by robust growth in Google Cloud, advertising and AI-related services.

The latest figures signal a marked shift from the aggressive cost-cutting campaign that swept through the technology industry over the past several years. While many large technology companies continue eliminating jobs in selected business units to improve efficiency, Alphabet is increasingly adding employees in areas tied to artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure and engineering.

The largest increase occurred during the second quarter of 2026, when Alphabet hired more than 4,000 employees, accounting for over one-third of its net workforce expansion during the past 12 months.

The hiring momentum contrasts sharply with the industry’s recent history.

Beginning in late 2022, major technology companies, including Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft, eliminated tens of thousands of positions after rapidly expanding during the pandemic. Google alone cut approximately 12,000 jobs in early 2023 and has continued to implement smaller restructuring rounds affecting thousands more employees as it redirected resources toward artificial intelligence.

Those layoffs have continued to shape employee sentiment.

Last week, Google employees across the United States organized demonstrations calling for stronger job protections, with roughly 4,500 workers signing a petition urging Chief Executive Sundar Pichai and senior executives to provide greater safeguards against future layoffs.

The hiring data suggests that while restructuring has continued in some parts of the business, Alphabet is simultaneously expanding teams in strategic growth areas. Although the company did not disclose which departments accounted for most of the new hires, executives emphasized during the earnings report that Alphabet remains focused on long-term AI expansion as demand for computing capacity continues to exceed available infrastructure.

Alphabet increased its projected 2026 capital expenditures to between $195 billion and $205 billion, up from a previous forecast of as much as $190 billion. The additional investment will primarily fund AI data centers, custom Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), networking equipment and cloud infrastructure needed to support increasingly sophisticated AI models.

Management said demand for AI infrastructure continues to outpace available capacity, highlighting the extraordinary growth in enterprise adoption of generative AI services.

The combination of expanding headcount and record capital spending shows that Alphabet’s AI plan extends beyond purchasing computing hardware. Developing and commercializing advanced AI systems also requires recruiting software engineers, AI researchers, chip designers, cloud architects, cybersecurity specialists and technical staff capable of building and operating large-scale AI platforms.

The hiring surge therefore reflects both infrastructure expansion and growing competition for highly skilled AI talent.

However, Alphabet’s approach differs from that of several technology peers, many of which are simultaneously increasing AI spending while reducing overall workforce numbers. Amazon, for example, recently announced additional layoffs within parts of its artificial general intelligence division even as it continues investing heavily in AI infrastructure. Microsoft and Meta have also continued targeted workforce reductions while directing billions of dollars toward AI development.

Rather than reducing its overall employee base, Alphabet appears to be pursuing a strategy of selective expansion, adding talent in high-priority areas while continuing to reorganize or reduce staffing in less strategic businesses.

The hiring is believed to have been necessitated by intensifying competition in artificial intelligence.

Google is seeking to strengthen its position against rivals including OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and a growing number of Chinese AI developers. As the race shifts beyond developing frontier AI models toward deploying those technologies at global scale, companies increasingly require not only massive computing resources but also larger engineering organizations capable of integrating AI across products and services.

Combined with plans to spend as much as $205 billion on capital expenditures this year, the increase in staffing underscores the scale of Alphabet’s long-term commitment to artificial intelligence. The company is investing simultaneously in people and infrastructure, betting that sustained demand for AI services will generate returns that outweigh the near-term impact of higher expenses.

European Union regulators have fined Google €890 million ($1 billion) for violating the bloc’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), accusing the U.S. technology giant of unfairly favoring its own services in search results and restricting app developers from directing users to alternative payment channels.

The penalty, announced by the European Commission on Thursday, marks Google’s first fine under the Digital Markets Act, the European Union’s flagship competition law designed to curb the market power of the world’s largest technology platforms.

The decision represents another escalation in the EU’s years-long campaign to reshape how dominant digital platforms operate, underscoring Brussels’ willingness to use the DMA not only as a regulatory framework but also as a powerful enforcement tool against companies designated as digital “gatekeepers.”

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, saw its shares fall about 4% in premarket trading. However, the decline was driven primarily by investor concerns over the company’s increasing artificial intelligence spending disclosed in its quarterly earnings report rather than the European regulatory action.

At the center of the Commission’s case is Google’s search business, where regulators concluded the company systematically gives preferential treatment to its own services, including Google Shopping and Google Hotels, at the expense of competing platforms. According to the Commission, Google displays its own products “more prominently in search results,” while comparable third-party services “do not have the same prominence,” limiting competitors’ visibility and reducing consumer choice.

The regulator also found Google in breach of the DMA’s anti-steering provisions governing the Google Play Store.

Under the legislation, app developers must be free to inform users about alternative purchasing options outside Google’s app marketplace, including lower-priced subscriptions or services available on external websites. Developers should also be able to direct customers to those offers without restriction.

The Commission concluded that Google failed to meet that obligation.

“In particular, Google prevents app developers from freely communicating and promoting offers and concluding contracts with users in distribution channels of their choice, including third-party app stores,” the Commission said.

The ruling strikes at two of Google’s most important businesses: online search, which remains the company’s largest source of advertising revenue, and the Play Store, which generates billions of dollars annually through commissions on digital purchases.

The Digital Markets Act was introduced in 2024 to reduce the dominance of large digital platforms that serve as critical gateways between businesses and consumers.

Unlike traditional antitrust cases, which often take years to resolve and require regulators to prove anti-competitive conduct, the DMA establishes a set of upfront obligations that designated “gatekeepers” must follow. Companies including Alphabet, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and ByteDance are subject to these stricter rules because of their scale, market influence and ability to control access to digital markets.

The legislation emerged from Europe’s broader efforts to promote contestability in digital markets by preventing dominant platforms from using their market position to favor their own products or lock users into proprietary ecosystems. The latest enforcement action therefore carries significance well beyond Google. It signals that the European Commission is prepared to impose substantial financial penalties and operational changes if major technology companies fail to comply with the new regulatory regime.

Google Rejects the Decision, Calls it Product Degradation

Google rejected the Commission’s findings, arguing that the required changes would ultimately harm consumers rather than improve competition.

Kent Walker, President of Global Affairs at Google and Alphabet, said the DMA’s implementation risks undermining products that millions of Europeans rely on every day.

“This implementation of the DMA continues to break everyday products. To comply, we are having to strip away real-time Search features Europeans love, like instant pricing and direct availability for hotels, flights, and restaurants, and dismantle safety protections on Google Play,” Walker said.

“This isn’t fair competition; it’s product degradation driven by a small group of self-serving complainants, with European businesses and consumers taking the hit. Regulation should improve products, not make them worse.”

Google said it is reviewing the Commission’s decision and assessing whether to file an appeal.

Beyond the financial penalty, the Commission ordered Google to make significant operational changes within 60 days. The company must ensure that competing services receive fair and non-discriminatory treatment in search rankings, reducing the preferential placement currently afforded to Google’s own offerings.

Google must also allow developers distributing applications through the Play Store to promote offers and conclude contracts with users both inside and outside Google’s marketplace, giving consumers greater freedom to purchase digital goods through alternative channels. Failure to comply could expose Google to additional penalties of up to 5% of its worldwide annual turnover, substantially increasing the financial stakes for the company.

The Commission acknowledged that Google has already begun implementing changes in response to the DMA.

According to regulators, the company has proposed and tested modifications to the way it presents its own services in search results. The Commission described those efforts as constituting “substantial progress towards compliance” and said it would continue monitoring their implementation.

Google has also introduced changes to its Play Store policies relating to anti-steering requirements.

The dispute highlights a fundamental philosophical divide between European regulators and major U.S. technology companies.

European authorities have held that dominant digital platforms should function as neutral intermediaries that provide equal opportunities for competitors. Google, by contrast, maintains that integrating services such as shopping, travel and maps directly into search results enhances user experience by delivering faster, more relevant information.

The company has also argued that allowing unrestricted links to third-party payment systems introduces security and fraud risks, weakening consumer protections built into the Play Store ecosystem.

However, the ruling is expected to have implications across the technology sector.

Other gatekeepers subject to the DMA, including Apple and Meta, are closely monitoring Google’s case because it provides one of the clearest indications yet of how aggressively the European Commission intends to interpret and enforce the new law.

The decision has further exposed the reality that regulatory risk has become a structural challenge for the world’s largest technology companies. Alongside rising spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure and intensifying competition in AI, companies must now navigate a stringent regulatory environment that could reshape core business models in one of their most important markets.