26
06
2025

PAGES

26
06
2025

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

China’s 16-Year Low In U.S. Treasury Holdings Underscores A Growing Strategic Divide

0

China’s holdings of U.S. Treasury securities dropped to $757.2 billion in April 2025, the lowest since March 2009, down $8.2 billion from March and $13 billion year-over-year, according to U.S. Treasury data. This continues a decade-long decline from a peak of over $1.3 trillion in 2013, with a 44% reduction since then. Beijing, now the third-largest foreign holder behind Japan and the UK, is diversifying its portfolio to reduce reliance on U.S. assets amid trade tensions and fears of potential sanctions.

Some holdings are channeled through intermediaries in Belgium and Luxembourg, masking their full extent. Selling Treasuries also supports the yuan’s exchange rate, but a large-scale dump is unlikely due to economic risks to China, such as a stronger yuan hurting exports. China’s reduction in U.S. Treasury holdings reflects efforts to diversify its foreign exchange reserves, reducing reliance on U.S. assets amid ongoing trade disputes, technological rivalry, and fears of potential sanctions, similar to those imposed on Russia. This shift signals a broader strategic move to insulate its economy from U.S. financial leverage.

By holding fewer Treasuries, China may be increasing investments in other assets like gold, European bonds, or emerging market securities, though data on these shifts is less transparent. China’s $757.2 billion in Treasuries (as of April 2025) represents about 2.8% of the $27 trillion in outstanding U.S. Treasury debt. While a significant holder, its reduced purchases have not yet disrupted U.S. borrowing costs significantly, as demand from Japan, the UK, and domestic investors remains strong.

However, a coordinated or rapid sell-off (unlikely but possible) could pressure Treasury yields upward, increasing U.S. borrowing costs and impacting federal budget deficits, projected to hit $1.9 trillion in 2025. Selling Treasuries provides China with dollars to support the yuan, which has faced depreciation pressure from capital outflows and economic slowdown. A stronger yuan helps stabilize China’s economy but risks hurting export competitiveness, a key growth driver.

Maintaining large-scale sales is challenging, as it could depress Treasury prices, reducing the value of China’s remaining holdings and triggering global market volatility. China’s actions contribute to a gradual de-dollarization trend, as it promotes yuan-based trade and alternative reserve assets. However, the dollar’s dominance (58% of global foreign exchange reserves) remains intact, limiting immediate systemic shifts. Reduced Chinese demand for Treasuries may push other central banks (e.g., Japan, with $1.15 trillion in holdings) to reassess their portfolios, potentially increasing global yield volatility.

Despite reduced Treasury holdings, the U.S. and China remain deeply intertwined. The U.S. relies on Chinese manufacturing, while China depends on U.S. consumer markets and dollar-based trade. This interdependence tempers aggressive moves like a Treasury dump, which would harm both economies. However, the divide is widening as both pursue decoupling strategies. The U.S. pushes for supply chain diversification and export controls on technology, while China seeks self-sufficiency in semiconductors and strengthens ties with non-Western blocs like BRICS.

China’s sell-off is partly driven by fears that the U.S. could weaponize its financial system, as seen with Russia’s frozen reserves post-2022 Ukraine invasion. This fuels China’s push for a multipolar financial order, including yuan internationalization and alternative payment systems like CIPS. Conversely, the U.S. views China’s actions as a challenge to its economic hegemony, prompting policies to maintain dollar dominance and restrict China’s access to advanced technologies.

The divide extends beyond economics, shaping global alliances. China’s reduced Treasury holdings align with its closer ties to Russia, Iran, and Global South nations, while the U.S. strengthens partnerships with allies like Japan, South Korea, and the EU to counter China’s influence. Neutral or non-aligned countries (e.g., India, Gulf states) face increasing pressure to choose sides, complicating global trade and investment flows.

For China, diversifying away from Treasuries risks lower returns and liquidity, as few assets match the depth of U.S. debt markets. A misstep could strain its $3 trillion in foreign reserves, critical for economic stability. For the U.S., sustained foreign sell-offs (if joined by others) could exacerbate fiscal challenges, especially with rising debt-to-GDP ratios (projected at 122% by 2030). Higher yields might force spending cuts or tax hikes, polarizing domestic politics further.

China’s 16-year low in U.S. Treasury holdings underscores a growing economic and strategic divide, driven by mutual distrust and competing visions for global influence. While immediate market disruptions are limited, the trend signals long-term risks: higher U.S. borrowing costs, yuan volatility for China, and a fragmented global financial system. Both nations face a delicate balancing act—preserving economic stability while advancing their geopolitical agendas—ensuring this divide will shape global dynamics for years to come.

A Foray Into U.S. Consumer Confidence Data

0

The softening U.S. consumer confidence data has driven two-year Treasury yields to a six-week low of 3.78%, reflecting increased expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut in July. The CME’s FedWatch tool now indicates a roughly 20% probability of a rate cut, up from 13% a week ago, signaling growing market anticipation of monetary policy easing.

Declining consumer confidence suggests households are growing cautious about their financial prospects, potentially due to persistent inflation, high borrowing costs, or labor market uncertainties. Lower confidence can reduce consumer spending, which accounts for roughly 70% of U.S. GDP, signaling a possible economic slowdown.

The drop in two-year Treasury yields to 3.78% reflects market bets on a dovish Federal Reserve. The rise in the perceived probability of a July rate cut (from 13% to 20% per CME’s FedWatch tool) indicates investors expect the Fed to ease policy to stimulate growth. However, a 20% chance still suggests uncertainty, with many anticipating the Fed may hold rates steady to monitor inflation.

Lower yields on two-year Treasuries make fixed-income assets less attractive, potentially pushing investors toward equities or riskier assets. However, if economic fears intensify, demand for safe-haven Treasuries could rise, further suppressing yields.

Impact on Borrowing and Investment

Falling yields may reduce borrowing costs for consumers and businesses, encouraging loans and investment. However, if confidence remains low, demand for credit may not pick up, limiting the stimulative effect. A perceived U.S. slowdown and potential rate cuts could weaken the dollar, impacting emerging markets reliant on dollar-denominated debt. Additionally, global investors may adjust portfolios, favoring U.S. Treasuries as a safe bet, influencing international capital flows.

Optimistic investors may view the prospect of rate cuts as a catalyst for equity market rallies, particularly in growth stocks sensitive to lower interest rates (e.g., tech). Pessimists may interpret falling consumer confidence and yields as evidence of an impending recession, prompting a shift to defensive assets like bonds or gold.

Federal Reserve faces a delicate balancing act. Cutting rates too soon risks reigniting inflation, while delaying cuts could exacerbate economic weakness. The 20% probability of a July cut reflects market uncertainty about the Fed’s next move. A slowing economy may pressure lawmakers to consider stimulus measures, though political gridlock could limit action.

Lower confidence may lead to reduced spending, particularly on big-ticket items like homes or cars, especially if job security concerns grow. However, lower yields could ease mortgage rates, offering some relief. Firms may delay investments due to weaker demand signals but could benefit from cheaper borrowing if yields continue to decline.

Those with significant investments may benefit from potential stock market gains driven by rate cut expectations or lower borrowing costs for luxury purchases. Low-Income Households more reliant on wages and sensitive to inflation, these households may face tighter budgets if economic conditions worsen, with limited access to credit or investment opportunities.

Real estate, utilities, and technology may see gains from lower yields and rate cut prospects. Consumer discretionary, industrials, and energy could face headwinds if consumer spending and economic growth falter. The softening consumer confidence and falling Treasury yields highlight growing economic uncertainty, with markets increasingly pricing in a potential Fed rate cut. While this could stimulate borrowing and equity markets, it also raises recession fears.

Moca Foundation Announces Moca Chain For Self-Sovereign, Privacy-Preserving Identity And User Verification

0

Moca Foundation today announced that it will launch Moca Chain, a Layer 1 blockchain built specifically for identity and user data. Moca Chain will support the development of identity protocols in respective industry verticals to enable individuals, devices, and AI agents to control, unify, and verify their digital credentials without relying on centralized platforms, and accelerate user-centric yet privacy-preserved growth via integrations with consumer applications. Moca Chain testnet and mainnet are expected to launch in Q3 and Q4 2025, respectively.

Moca Chain will allow on- and off-chain user data to be verified via any applications on any chains through its decentralized data storage, cross-chain identity oracle, web proof data generation (zkTLS), and on-chain verifications. It will operate as a modular, EVM-compatible chain, working interoperably with other chains to provide the identity and data layer for partners and adopters. Moca Chain will utilize MOCA Coin as the core token for gas, validator staking, storage, oracle, data generation, and verification fees.

Yat Siu, co-founder and executive chairman of Animoca Brands, said: “Billions of users today go online using single sign-on (SSO), which contains the keys to a user’s data, services, and digital lives. While convenient, SSO represents a centralized point of failure that compromises security while also allowing operators to aggressively extract value from users’ digital selves. Moca Chain seeks to solve this problem by giving users decentralized true ownership of their data, ensuring the sovereignty of users’ digital identity without a single point of failure.

He continued: “In conjunction with Moca Network’s AIR Kit, Moca Chain is creating a digital ecosystem where users can finally own their data, reputations, and contributions. This aligns strongly with the mission of Animoca Brands to advance digital property rights and empower individuals to control and benefit from their online activities and their personal data, enabling more equitable sharing of the value that users generate through their online presence and activity.”

Kenneth Shek, project lead of Moca Network, said: “Moca Chain and AIR Kit are a one-of-a-kind infrastructure for verified identity data to empower consumer apps and their users. By adopting Moca Chain and MOCA Coin, we believe we can disrupt current models of data ownership and break down the dominance of walled garden ecosystems, returning value to the users who generate it and making ecosystem growth more scalable.”

Moca Network is the identity ecosystem of Animoca Brands. As one of the launch partners of Moca Chain, Moca Network is committed to growing Moca Chain’s ecosystem and advancing the adoption of Moca Chain. Moca Network’s AIR Kit is integrated into offerings by various partners including Animoca Brands portfolio companies, partners, and affiliates, estimated to reach over 700 million addressable users. Protocols and applications built on Moca Chain will be able to gain access to the user networks and data of AIR Kit adopters, including SK Planet’s OK Cashbag (28 million KYC’d users) and One Football (over 200 millions users).

Together with its protocol partners, Moca Chain aims to solve common industry pain points for identity verifications: fragmentation, authenticity, privacy, interoperability, and self-sovereign control, with use cases spanning across multiple industries. Current use cases include Healthcare (unified electronic health records verifiable across healthcare providers), Recruitment (verified education credentials and training history), Finance (privacy-preserved KYC/AML), and Advertising (unified user data across apps for verified user onboarding).

Moca Chain is designed for real-world adoption, with Moca Network’s AIR Kit integrated into major Web2 platforms to power identity and rewards directly inside apps already familiar to millions of people. These partnerships make Moca Chain the backbone of a growing ecosystem of identity-based experiences.

Under the traditional paradigm, end users of major platforms and services (such as social networks or online retailers) are effectively locked into closed platforms where their data is siloed and monetized without their control. Moca Chain seeks to give back control to end users by enabling them to prove their identity and safeguard their data in a unified identity framework. Users of Moca Chain will specify which applications are able to access their private data, and they will be able to set granular permissions over how and where the data are shared; data sharing entitles users to partner ecosystem access, benefits, or token rewards for any use of their data.

Moca Chain’s composable identity layer will support seamless movement of user attributes such as loyalty points, social proof, and access rights across multiple dApps. This will enable users to unlock access and rewards across platforms without exposing private data, while maintaining a unified identity that is fully under their control.

Protocols built on Moca Chain can choose to issue or verify reusable on- and off-chain user data and credentials for monetization, while preserving the privacy of identity and reputation data. Once data is issued to the end users, data is verifiable everywhere via zero knowledge proofs, fostering ecosystem growth by cross-pollinating users without any direct API integrations, shifting the counterparty of verifiers from centralized platforms to end users.

Moca Chain will work alongside AIR Kit, the global account, identity, and reputation software development kit (SDK) of Moca Network. Developers can utilize AIR Kit to create feature-rich applications with smart accounts and verifiable credentials, while its support for plug-and-play permissions facilitates the creation of user-friendly applications.

Arizona House Passes HB2324 Bitcoin and Digital Assets Reserve, Waiting Governor Hobbs Signature

0

The Arizona House of Representatives passed House Bill 2324 (HB2324) on June 24, 2025, with a 34-22 vote, following a 16-14 Senate vote on June 19. The bill establishes a state-managed Bitcoin and Digital Assets Reserve Fund for cryptocurrencies seized through criminal forfeiture. It updates Arizona’s forfeiture laws to include digital assets, setting rules for secure seizure and storage using approved digital wallets. The first $300,000 of seized assets goes to the Attorney General’s office, with the remainder split: 50% to the Attorney General, 25% to the state’s general fund, and 25% to the reserve fund.

If signed by Governor Katie Hobbs, HB2324 will be Arizona’s second Bitcoin reserve law, following HB2749, which created a fund for unclaimed digital assets. Unlike previous bills (SB1373 and SB1025), which Hobbs vetoed due to concerns over speculative investments, HB2324 avoids direct state investment by focusing on forfeited assets, potentially increasing its chances of approval. The bill now awaits the governor’s signature, with no public comment from her yet. If enacted, it could position Arizona as a leader in state-level crypto governance, following New Hampshire and alongside Texas.

HB2324 positions Arizona as a forward-thinking state in cryptocurrency governance by creating a legal framework for managing seized digital assets. This could attract blockchain businesses, startups, and investors, boosting the state’s tech economy. By establishing a Bitcoin and Digital Assets Reserve Fund, Arizona could accumulate significant crypto holdings over time, potentially benefiting from long-term price appreciation.

If signed into law, Arizona would join states like New Hampshire and Texas in recognizing digital assets at a state level. This could inspire other states to adopt similar measures, normalizing crypto reserves as part of state financial strategies. The bill’s focus on forfeited assets sidesteps the speculative investment concerns that led to vetoes of prior bills, offering a model for other states to follow without risking public funds.

Legal and Operational Framework

The bill modernizes Arizona’s forfeiture laws to include digital assets, ensuring law enforcement can securely seize and store cryptocurrencies using approved digital wallets. This could enhance the state’s ability to combat crypto-related crimes. The allocation of seized assets (50% to the Attorney General, 25% to the general fund, 25% to the reserve fund) provides a balanced approach to funding state operations while building a crypto reserve.

Arizona’s move signals confidence in the longevity and value of digital assets, potentially encouraging broader adoption among businesses and individuals. However, the bill’s success hinges on Governor Katie Hobbs’ approval. Her previous vetoes of crypto-related bills (SB1373 and SB1025) suggest caution, but HB2324’s narrower scope might align better with her stance.

Volatility in crypto markets could affect the reserve fund’s value, though the bill mitigates this by not requiring direct state purchases. Secure storage of digital assets poses technical challenges, requiring robust cybersecurity measures to prevent hacks or losses. If vetoed, it could dampen Arizona’s crypto momentum and reinforce perceptions of regulatory uncertainty.

Republican lawmakers, who dominate Arizona’s legislature, largely back crypto-friendly policies, viewing HB2324 as a way to innovate and diversify state assets. The 34-22 House vote and 16-14 Senate vote suggest strong GOP support but limited bipartisan backing. Democrats, including Governor Hobbs (based on past vetoes), express concerns about crypto’s volatility, regulatory gaps, and environmental impact (e.g., Bitcoin mining’s energy use). Some see state involvement in crypto as premature or risky.

Hobbs’ decision will be pivotal. Her vetoes of SB1373 and SB1025 cited speculative risks and lack of oversight, but HB2324’s focus on seized assets might sway her, though skepticism remains. On X, crypto enthusiasts and libertarian-leaning users celebrate HB2324 as a step toward financial freedom and state-level adoption, with some that Arizona could become a “Bitcoin stronghold.” They argue it protects against fiat currency inflation.

Some X users and environmental groups question the wisdom behind prioritizing crypto over pressing issues like water scarcity or education funding, or express concerns about crypto’s association with illicit activities. Others worry about the state’s ability to manage volatile assets securely. Sentiment on X appears polarized, with pro-crypto voices louder but not necessarily representative of broader Arizona voters.

Urban areas like Phoenix and Tucson, with tech hubs and younger demographics, are more receptive to crypto innovation. Rural areas may see less immediate benefit and prioritize traditional industries, creating a geographic economic split. States like Arizona, Texas, and New Hampshire are embracing crypto to compete globally, while others (e.g., New York, California) impose stricter regulations, reflecting a divide in economic visions—decentralized vs. centralized control.

Supporters view crypto reserves as a hedge against federal monetary policies and a nod to individual sovereignty. They align with libertarian and anti-establishment ideologies. Critics advocate for stronger oversight, citing consumer protection, financial stability, and environmental concerns. They align with progressive or traditional financial systems.

HB2324’s passage underscores Arizona’s ambition to lead in crypto governance, with potential economic benefits but also risks tied to market volatility and political approval. The divide—political, public, economic, and ideological—mirrors national debates over cryptocurrency’s role in society. If signed into law, the bill could bridge some gaps by demonstrating a practical, low-risk approach to state crypto adoption. If vetoed, it may deepen the divide, reinforcing Arizona’s cautious stance on digital assets. The governor’s decision, expected soon, will be a critical turning point.

Backpack Exchange Season 2 Points Program Begins By July 3rd

0

Backpack Exchange has confirmed that Season 2 of its points program will start on July 3, 2025, as announced through various posts on X. This follows the success of Season 1, which began on March 21, 2025, and ran for 10 weeks, rewarding users with points based on their activity on the exchange. Season 2 is expected to expand access to European users and may introduce new ways to earn points, potentially through the Backpack Vault, similar to Hyperliquid’s HLP system, allowing users to farm points without trading futures.

The program aims to incentivize user engagement and platform growth, with points distributed weekly based on activity, though specific criteria remain intentionally opaque. The launch of Backpack Exchange’s Season 2 points program on July 3, 2025, has several implications for the platform, its users, and the broader crypto ecosystem, particularly when considering the potential divide in user activity. Season 2’s points program, like Season 1, rewards users based on their activity (e.g., trading volume, wallet interactions, or potential new features like Backpack Vault).

This gamified approach encourages users to trade more frequently, deposit assets, and engage with the platform’s ecosystem, driving trading volume and liquidity. Season 1 saw Backpack Exchange achieve $27.5 billion in total volume during its beta phase, suggesting Season 2 could further boost these metrics. With the acquisition of FTX EU and plans to offer regulated perpetual futures in Europe starting Q1 2025, Season 2 may attract a broader user base, particularly in Europe. This could enhance Backpack’s global presence and competitiveness against exchanges like Binance or KuCoin.

The points system is widely speculated to be a precursor to a future token airdrop, similar to Hyperliquid’s model. This anticipation could drive speculative trading, as users aim to accumulate points for potential rewards, increasing platform activity but also market volatility. Points earned in Season 2 can be redeemed for benefits like discounted fees, exclusive promotions, or advanced trading features. The tiered ranking system (Bronze to Challenger) fosters a sense of prestige, incentivizing users to climb ranks for better perks.

Backpack’s unique offerings, such as interest-bearing futures and auto-lending, allow users to earn passive income alongside points, potentially attracting both active traders and long-term holders. This could differentiate Backpack from competitors like Binance, which require separate accounts for similar features. Backpack’s ecosystem, including its wallet and Mad Lads NFT collection, aligns with the growing SocialFi trend on Solana. Season 2 may introduce quests or rewards tied to SocialFi platforms, enabling users to monetize content or digital identities, further diversifying engagement opportunities.

Backpack’s use of cryptographic techniques (e.g., zero-knowledge proofs, Multi-Party Computation) and its Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license from Dubai’s VARA enhance its reputation as a secure, regulated platform. Season 2’s expansion into Europe under MiCA regulations could solidify user trust, especially after the FTX collapse, in which Backpack lost 88% of its treasury. Starting May 12, 2025, Backpack will distribute funds to former FTX EU users, potentially integrating these users into Season 2’s points program. This could boost user acquisition but also create logistical challenges in managing payouts alongside new user onboarding.

The structure of Season 2’s points program, while designed to reward engagement, may exacerbate a divide between high-activity and low-activity users, creating both opportunities and challenges. Users with high trading volumes (e.g., >$5,000, as suggested for airdrop eligibility) or those engaging in futures and SocialFi features will likely earn more points and higher ranks (e.g., Platinum, Diamond, Challenger). These users benefit from lower fees (0.085% maker, 0.095% taker vs. industry average 0.1%), exclusive perks, and potentially larger airdrop allocations.

High-activity users drive significant trading volume, contributing to platform liquidity and visibility. Their participation in competitions (e.g., $60,000–$90,000 Volume and PnL rewards) further amplifies their impact, potentially skewing market dynamics toward their strategies. These users are more likely to leverage Backpack’s interest-bearing futures and cross-margined accounts, maximizing returns and consolidating their dominance in the points system.

The opaque criteria for earning points may disadvantage users with lower trading volumes or limited capital, as they struggle to compete with whales for higher ranks. The KYC process and learning curve for features like futures or SocialFi could further deter newcomers. Low-activity users may only achieve lower ranks (e.g., Bronze, Silver), restricting access to premium benefits. This could lead to a perception of inequity, where only high-volume traders reap significant rewards, potentially discouraging broader adoption.

While SocialFi features could appeal to retail users, the technical complexity of blockchain-based platforms and high Solana gas fees (despite being lower than Ethereum) may limit participation for those unfamiliar with DeFi or NFTs. Backpack’s intuitive interface and single cross-margined account simplify trading for newcomers, reducing the complexity seen in platforms like Binance. Season 2 could introduce quests or bonuses tailored to retail users, such as low-volume trading competitions or wallet-based tasks.

The Mad Lads NFT collection and SocialFi integration foster a sense of community, potentially bridging the gap by rewarding non-trading activities like content creation or platform referrals. As a Solana-based platform, Backpack’s success could bolster the Solana ecosystem, often compared to “Binance of Solana.” Season 2’s rewards may drive adoption of Solana-based assets (e.g., SOL/USDC, Mad Lads NFTs), increasing network activity and value.

By offering lower fees, interest-bearing futures, and a points system, Backpack challenges established exchanges. However, the user activity divide could limit its ability to compete with Binance or KuCoin if retail users feel marginalized. The promise of a valuable airdrop (potentially worth $5,000 for active users) could attract speculators, but low competition in Season 2 suggests an opportunity for early adopters. Long-term success depends on balancing rewards with sustainable platform growth to avoid a “pump-and-dump” scenario.

While Backpack’s points program incentivizes growth, the lack of transparency in point allocation criteria raises concerns about fairness. High-activity users may dominate rewards, potentially alienating retail users and creating a perception of exclusivity. Additionally, the speculative nature of airdrop-driven activity could lead to unsustainable trading volumes if not paired with genuine platform utility. Backpack must carefully design Season 2 to include low-barrier tasks and clear communication to ensure broad participation, especially as it expands into Europe and integrates FTX EU users.

Season 2’s launch on July 3, 2025, positions Backpack Exchange to drive user engagement, platform growth, and Solana’s ecosystem development. However, the user activity divide—between high-volume traders and retail users—could widen if rewards heavily favor whales. By leveraging its user-friendly design, SocialFi integration, and educational resources, Backpack can mitigate this divide, fostering inclusive growth.