Anthropic Engineer Says Computer-Using AI Agents Could Reshape Most Internet-Based Jobs

By

-

February 22, 2026

An Anthropic engineer says AI agents that can operate computers are advancing quickly and could disrupt nearly every internet-based job in the U.S., with software engineering roles potentially changing as early as 2026.

A senior engineer at Anthropic says a new class of artificial intelligence systems capable of operating computers like humans is developing fast enough to reshape nearly every internet-based job in the United States.

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code at Anthropic, made the remarks during an appearance on Lenny’s Podcast, hosted by Lenny Rachitsky. He argued that AI systems that can take direct action across workplace tools — rather than merely generate text — are improving at a pace that could significantly alter responsibilities for software engineers, product managers, designers and other knowledge workers.

“It’s going to expand to pretty much any kind of work that you can do on a computer,” Cherny said. “In the meantime, it’s going to be very disruptive. It’s going to be painful for a lot of people.”

Anthropic is widely known for its Claude chatbot, but Claude Code represents a strategic pivot toward what developers call “agentic AI.” Built on the company’s Claude models, Claude Code is designed as a coding agent capable of running terminal commands, editing files, navigating repositories, analyzing documents and executing multi-step tasks across applications.

The company released an updated version of its model suite, Opus 4.6, in early February, further enhancing Claude Code’s capabilities.

Unlike traditional chatbots that respond to prompts with text or images, AI agents can interact with digital systems directly. They can open software, manipulate files, generate reports, message collaborators, and deploy code — effectively functioning as a junior digital operator inside enterprise workflows.

Anthropic has said Claude Code has not yet reached the skill level of an experienced human engineer. However, Cherny described it as a breakthrough in accessibility, bringing agent-based AI into practical use for a broader audience.

“It’s the thing that I think brings agentic AI to people that haven’t really used it before,” he said. “People are starting to just get a sense of it for the first time.”

Productivity Gains and Role Redefinition

Cherny said his own team has already integrated AI tools deeply into its workflow and that productivity per engineer has increased sharply since Claude Code’s launch. While Anthropic has commercial incentives to promote its tools — the company sells access to enterprise customers — similar productivity claims have surfaced across the technology sector.

The core shift is from AI as a passive assistant to AI as an active executor. In software development, this could reduce the need for engineers to manually write and refactor large volumes of code. Instead, engineers may move toward defining architecture, validating outputs, designing systems, and supervising AI-generated work.

Cherny previously suggested on Y Combinator’s “Lightcone” podcast that the traditional job title “software engineer” could begin to “go away” in 2026. The implication is not necessarily that programming will vanish, but that its nature will change. Coding may become more about intent specification and system oversight than syntax-level craftsmanship.

The impact extends beyond engineering. Product managers could use agents to analyze user data and generate feature roadmaps. Designers might deploy AI to produce prototypes and conduct automated usability testing. Operations teams could rely on agents to reconcile data, generate compliance reports, and manage routine workflows.

If agents can navigate productivity suites, code repositories, customer support dashboards, and analytics platforms, the automation envelope expands across most internet-connected professions.

Tomorrow is Not Certain

The broader economic consequences remain uncertain. Cherny acknowledged that society has yet to determine how to manage the transition.

“As a society, this is a conversation we have to figure out together,” he said. “Anyone can just build software anytime.”

The prospect that “anyone” could generate functional software products through natural language prompts challenges long-standing labor market structures. Barriers to entry in software development may fall, enabling more entrepreneurs and small teams to launch products. At the same time, companies may reduce headcount if AI systems absorb a growing share of routine tasks.

Historically, automation has displaced certain roles while creating new categories of work. The difference with agentic AI is that it targets cognitive, digital, and creative tasks traditionally associated with white-collar employment. That could compress mid-level roles while increasing demand for high-level oversight, AI system governance, and interdisciplinary coordination.

Regulatory frameworks may also come under scrutiny. Enterprises deploying autonomous agents will need safeguards around data privacy, cybersecurity, audit trails, and accountability. Questions about liability — particularly if an AI agent executes flawed instructions or introduces security vulnerabilities — remain unresolved.

Technology firms are likely to adopt agentic systems rapidly to maintain efficiency and competitive advantage. Early adopters may see cost savings and faster product iteration cycles, pushing rivals to follow suit.

However, large-scale deployment will depend on reliability. AI agents that make mistakes in production environments — especially in financial, healthcare, or infrastructure systems — could expose companies to significant risk. Trust, therefore, becomes as important as capability.

Anthropic competes in a crowded field of AI developers racing to build more autonomous systems. The pace of model improvement, combined with falling compute costs and expanding enterprise integrations, suggests that experimentation with AI agents will intensify over the next year.

Preparing for the Transition

Cherny’s advice to workers is pragmatic: experiment with AI tools and understand how they function. Familiarity with agentic systems — including their limitations and failure modes — may become a foundational skill across industries.

Rather than eliminating work outright, agentic AI is likely to redefine it. The shift could mirror earlier technological inflection points in which tools first augment workers before altering organizational structures altogether.

India Delays U.S. Trade Talks as Trump’s 15% Global Tariff Resets Negotiations

By

Samuel Nwite

-

February 22, 2026

0

India’s decision to delay high-level talks underscores how Washington’s abrupt shift to a 15% global tariff has reset the negotiating baseline and forced both sides back to strategic recalibration.

India has postponed a planned visit by its top trade negotiators to Washington, D.C., after President Donald Trump moved swiftly to impose a 15% global import tariff following a landmark court ruling on his earlier trade measures.

According to a person familiar with the development who spoke to CNBC, the visit “will be rescheduled at a mutually convenient date,” as both sides assess the implications of the latest U.S. action. The reassessment comes after the Supreme Court of the United States struck down several of Trump’s previous tariffs as illegal. Within hours, the administration invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to first impose a 10% global import duty, later increasing it to 15%.

The abrupt escalation has effectively altered the framework under which India and the U.S. were negotiating an interim trade agreement.

A Deal in Motion, Now in Flux

India’s chief negotiator, Darpan Jain, and his team had been scheduled to begin a three-day round of in-person meetings this week with the office of the U.S. Trade Representative, led by Ambassador Jamieson Greer. Those talks were widely viewed as a precursor to finalizing the legal text of the interim agreement.

Earlier this month, the two sides agreed in principle to reduce India’s reciprocal tariff exposure from 25% to 18%, with provisions allowing for adjustments. A joint statement issued on Feb. 6 stated: “In the event of any changes to the agreed-upon tariffs of either country, the United States and India agree that the other country may modify its commitments.”

With the U.S. applying a 15% global tariff across the board, the negotiated 18% figure loses much of its relative benefit. Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative and a former Indian trade negotiator, noted that India, like other trading partners, appears set to face the 15% levy in addition to most-favored-nation (MFN) rates, typically around 2–3%.

In practical terms, this narrows the preferential margin India had secured and raises questions about whether the interim arrangement still delivers sufficient economic advantage.

“The 18% tariff negotiations were based on a certain premise of some benefits which is now gone. Now, both sides have to rethink their strategy,” Srivastava said, adding that Washington may have “more pressing issues” following the court ruling and its aftermath.

For India, the delay suggests a desire to avoid locking in commitments under conditions that are rapidly evolving. New Delhi must assess how the 15% global tariff interacts with sector-specific duties and how it affects key export categories such as pharmaceuticals, textiles, auto components, and information technology services-linked goods.

From Washington’s perspective, invoking Section 122 provides a legally distinct basis for imposing tariffs after the Supreme Court curtailed earlier emergency-based measures. Section 122 allows temporary tariffs to address balance-of-payments concerns or currency issues, but its use on a broad global scale introduces fresh legal and diplomatic complexities.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer announced on Friday that his office will launch multiple new investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, covering most major U.S. trading partners.

Others Too: The Implications Are Far-Reaching

The reset in U.S. tariff policy does not affect India in isolation. The flat 15% global duty alters competitive dynamics across emerging markets and advanced economies alike. Countries that had been negotiating tailored reductions now find themselves facing a standardized baseline.

Greer sought to reassure trading partners and markets that the ruling would not derail ongoing trade agreements.

“The administration is confident that all trade deals negotiated by President Trump will stay in effect,” he said. “Our partners have been responsive and engaged in good-faith negotiations and agreements despite the pending litigation.”

For India, the postponement of talks may serve several objectives:

Re-evaluating whether to seek deeper tariff concessions in light of the new baseline.
Assessing domestic industry impact before formalizing commitments.
Monitoring potential legal or political challenges within the U.S. to the new tariff structure.

Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal had indicated on Friday that the interim agreement was likely to be signed in March and implemented in April. That timeline now appears uncertain.

India and the United States have expanded trade ties significantly in recent years, with bilateral goods and services trade crossing record levels. Washington has sought greater market access for agricultural products and manufactured goods, while India has prioritized tariff relief and improved access for its exports.

The global tariff increase reshapes bargaining power. A uniform 15% duty may reduce Washington’s need to negotiate country-specific concessions quickly, while India must weigh whether waiting could yield more clarity or better terms.

However, the decision to reschedule, rather than cancel, the talks suggests that both governments remain committed to the broader objective of an interim agreement. But the immediate priority appears to be strategic clarity.

Final Call for 12-Hour Early Access as BlockDAG Offers $0.000125 Entry! ADA & HBAR Face Unpredictable Market Outtakes

By

TI Partners

-

February 22, 2026

0

The digital asset space is currently seeing a massive shift as people move past old patterns to find the next major breakout. Many are paying close attention to the Cardano price prediction 2026, hoping the coin can finally move past its difficult resistance levels. At the same time, the latest Hedera price prediction shows a network that is very steady but currently waiting for a fresh spark to push it higher. While these well-known names deal with market doubt, BlockDAG (BDAG) is seeing massive demand during this period.

BDAG is quickly turning into a top choice among top crypto coins as it enters its final stage of execution. The current talk is centered on the Final Genesis Access, which lets participants join the market 12 hours earlier than the general public. With a set entry price of $0.000125, many experts are suggesting this could be the next project to see a massive jump once it reaches the major exchanges.

Hedera Price Forecast: HBAR Struggles as Data Points to Slow Growth

The current price for Hedera is sitting under $0.101 after it failed to move past a main resistance wall. Trading data reveals that fewer people are taking part in the market at this moment. When looking at the Hedera price prediction, the technical charts show the price having a hard time staying above $0.105. If the current downward path continues, the value could even fall toward the $0.090 support floor very soon.

Most indicators point toward a neutral or negative future for the coin’s value. Any Hedera price prediction must keep these falling numbers and the lack of new activity in mind. If the price cannot hold its position, it might even drop as low as $0.072. For now, the Hedera price prediction remains cautious as the network waits for a clear sign of strength to show up on the charts.

Cardano Price Forecast: ADA Hits a Ceiling as Market Structure Fades

Cardano is currently fighting to stay above the $0.29 mark while sellers keep a very tight grip on the market. Technical views show that the coin is facing a tough ceiling at $0.33. Many people feel cautious because the general price shape looks weak, which suggests a possible slide back toward $0.20 in the near future. Analysts following the Cardano price prediction 2026 mention that the coin needs a much higher trading amount to break out of this downward cycle.

If the current support floors fail to stay strong, the downward pressure could push the value even lower than it is now. Following the Cardano price prediction 2026, observers notice that the network’s speed remains very fragile while it trades below its main long-term averages. For the moment, the Cardano price prediction 2026 shows a period of great doubt as the market waits for a stronger sign of life.

BlockDAG Offers Final Genesis Access Before Trading Starts

BlockDAG is now entering its Final Genesis Access stage, which provides early participants with a very special advantage. This specific window allows people to trade the coin 12 hours before the global markets officially open up for everyone else. By joining right now, people can get their positions ready before the general public even gets a chance to begin. This early entry helps users stay one step ahead of the rest of the market.

During this final stage, the project is providing the coin at a set price of $0.000125. Anyone who joins this stage automatically gets an Early Access Pack. The network will then send all purchased coins directly to digital wallets at 18:00 UTC on March 3. This specific timing makes sure that everything is ready right before the official launch begins. This is the last chance to get involved as the Genesis phase is closing for good. Over 32,000 people have already claimed their spot, and there are only 12 hours left to buy before the listings go live. You can buy now, claim your coins, and lock in that $0.000125 price point before it is gone forever.

This window is the very last chance to join the project before the public trading starts for everyone. Because this is the final call, the excitement for the launch keeps growing. Many people are searching for the next big thing among top crypto coins, and this early access provides a massive head start. It puts early buyers in a spot where they can watch the market grow from the very beginning. Only 12 hours left to buy before listings go live!

This rare chance reminds many people of how early Bitcoin buyers saw massive growth by getting in at the very start. The project shows huge potential because it uses advanced technology to handle a lot of demand. Experts think the value could see a massive jump once official trading starts very soon. The current low price of $0.000125 will likely not return once the market opens fully. This makes it a key moment for smart traders to get their spots before this entry price disappears for good. Buy now, claim, and lock in $0.000125.

Final Thoughts

In summary, both Cardano and Hedera are currently moving through a time of quiet waiting. While the Cardano price prediction 2026 suggests a slow path toward recovery, the network is focusing more on long-term stability than quick gains. In the same way, Hedera remains a solid choice but currently lacks the quick spark needed to drive a giant price jump.

On the other hand, BlockDAG stands out among the top crypto coins by providing a massive head start. This is the only chance to get BDAG at $0.000125 and get a 12-hour early trading lead during the Final Genesis Access. Once trading starts, this low price will not come back. Smart traders should act now to secure their spot before this final window closes for good.

Private Sale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

Trump Raises Global Tariff to 15% After Supreme Court Blocks Emergency Authority

By

Samuel Nwite

-

February 22, 2026

0

USA and China trade war. US of America and chinese flags crashed containers on sky at sunset background. tarriffs — USC experts talk about the importance of U.S.-China trade and how it affects the economy. (Illustration/iStock)

President Donald Trump has lifted a temporary across-the-board tariff to 15% under Section 122 after the Supreme Court curtailed his earlier program, setting up a 150-day window that could redefine the limits of executive trade power.

President Donald Trump said Saturday he will increase a temporary tariff on U.S. imports from 10% to 15% on goods from all countries, invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a day after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his previous tariff framework.

The 15% rate is the maximum permitted under Section 122 and can remain in place for 150 days unless Congress votes to extend it. No president has previously used this authority, making Trump’s move both legally novel and politically consequential.

The action follows the court’s ruling that Trump exceeded his authority when he imposed sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In an opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, and the court’s three liberal members, the court concluded that IEEPA did not grant the president the broad tariff powers he claimed.

Less than 24 hours before announcing the 15% rate, Trump had unveiled a 10% universal tariff in response to the ruling. In a post on Truth Social, he said he would now raise that rate to the “fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level,” effective immediately.

A Temporary Tool With Built-In Limits

Section 122 is narrower than IEEPA and was designed to address balance-of-payments concerns. Its constraints are explicit: tariffs imposed under it expire after 150 days unless lawmakers approve an extension. That requirement shifts the political calculus to Capitol Hill.

Trade experts and congressional aides have expressed doubt that Congress — even with a Republican majority — would extend the tariffs, particularly amid voter concern about prices. A Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed Monday showed 34% approval for Trump’s handling of the economy and 57% disapproval, with affordability ranking as a leading issue.

The White House said certain goods, including critical minerals, metals, and energy products, will be exempt from the Section 122 tariffs, suggesting an effort to shield key supply chains and industrial inputs from immediate disruption.

An across-the-board 15% tariff affects a broad range of imports, from consumer goods to intermediate industrial components. Economists generally note that tariffs function as import taxes, often passed through at least partially to businesses and consumers. Retailers and manufacturers that rely on global supply chains may face higher costs, depending on the scope of exemptions and their ability to absorb or shift expenses.

Financial markets are likely to focus on the duration of the measure. Because Section 122 is time-limited, companies may treat the tariff as temporary in pricing and sourcing decisions. However, uncertainty over whether Congress will extend the tariffs — or whether the administration will layer additional measures under other statutes — could weigh on investment planning.

Administration Signals Broader Strategy

Trump said he intends to use the 150-day window to pursue other “legally permissible” tariffs. The administration has pointed to authorities such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which allows tariffs tied to national security investigations, and Section 301 of the Trade Act, which addresses unfair trade practices.

Unlike Section 122, those tools are product- or country-specific and require formal investigations. If deployed, they could result in a more targeted tariff regime replacing or supplementing the universal 15% rate.

The president has repeatedly used tariffs as leverage in bilateral negotiations. After the Supreme Court ruling, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said countries must honor existing trade agreements with Washington, even if those agreements include tariff rates higher than the new universal rate, according to Reuters.

He cited Malaysia and Cambodia as examples, noting that their negotiated 19% rates would remain in place. Indonesia’s chief negotiator, Airlangga Hartarto, said a trade agreement signed on Friday setting U.S. tariffs at 19% would remain in force.

By contrast, countries such as Brazil that have not secured bilateral reductions — and have faced tariff rates as high as 40% — could see temporary relief under the 15% universal framework.

The Supreme Court’s ruling drew praise from some foreign leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron said the decision showed the value of democratic checks and balances. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he expected the ruling would ease pressure on German exporters and reiterated that “tariffs harm everyone.”

Trump sharply criticized the court’s majority, calling the justices “fools” and singling out Gorsuch and Barrett as “embarrassments,” while pledging to continue pursuing aggressive trade measures.

Domestically, the tariff escalation intersects with electoral politics. Democrats need to flip three Republican-held seats in the U.S. House of Representatives to secure a majority in November’s midterm elections. They have argued that tariffs contribute to higher consumer prices. Whether voters attribute price increases directly to import duties could influence the campaign narrative.

A Constitutional Test Case

Beyond immediate economic effects, the episode represents a significant test of executive authority in trade policy. The Constitution assigns tariff powers to Congress, but lawmakers have delegated portions of that authority to the executive branch through statutes. The Supreme Court’s rejection of Trump’s use of IEEPA narrows the scope of emergency-based tariff powers and may shape how future administrations frame trade actions.

Section 122’s untested status means further litigation is possible. Courts may be asked to assess whether its use in this context aligns with statutory intent and procedural requirements.

However, the administration has secured a temporary legal pathway to maintain elevated tariffs. But the durability of that strategy will depend on congressional action, judicial review, and the broader economic impact during the 150-day window.

Microsoft Reshapes Gaming Leadership as AI Takes Center Stage

By

Samuel Nwite

-

February 22, 2026

0

The leadership overhaul places artificial intelligence at the center of Microsoft’s gaming strategy, signaling a structural shift rather than a routine executive transition.

Microsoft has initiated one of the most consequential leadership changes in its gaming division in more than a decade, with Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer and Xbox President Sarah Bond departing the company.

Spencer, who had overseen the Xbox brand through hardware transitions, major studio acquisitions, and the expansion of subscription gaming, will be succeeded by Asha Sharma, a former executive at Instacart and Meta who most recently served as president of Microsoft’s CoreAI product division.

The appointment is not merely symbolic as it positions artificial intelligence at the heart of the company’s gaming roadmap.

AI as a Structural Priority

Sharma’s background in AI product strategy suggests a pivot in how Microsoft views the intersection of gaming, monetization, and machine learning. In an internal memo published by The Verge, she wrote that Microsoft “will invent new business models and new ways to play,” adding that “monetization and AI” will “evolve and influence this future.”

The language frames AI not as a supplementary tool but as an architectural layer across development, distribution, and player engagement.

Microsoft has already signaled its ambitions in this area. The company has experimented with an AI-powered gaming companion designed to assist players in real time. It also released an AI-generated level for Quake II — a move that demonstrated both technical ambition and the limitations of current generative systems, as the level was widely described as buggy.

These experiments suggest that Microsoft is exploring AI across multiple vectors:

Procedural content generation
Player assistance and adaptive gameplay
Development tooling for studios
Live service optimization and monetization modeling

Under Sharma’s leadership, those initiatives may shift from experimentation to integration.

Guardrails Around Creative Integrity

At the same time, Sharma sought to reassure developers and players wary of automation overtaking creativity.

“Games are and always will be art, crafted by humans, and created with the most innovative technology provided by us,” she wrote. She also pledged that the company “will not chase short-term efficiency or flood our ecosystem with soulless AI slop.”

The dual messaging reflects a broader industry tension. Generative AI offers cost reductions and scalability in asset creation, dialogue systems, and world-building. Yet developers and players remain concerned about originality, labor displacement, and quality dilution.

By publicly acknowledging these anxieties, Microsoft appears to be attempting to balance innovation with brand preservation. Xbox’s identity has long been tied to premium first-party experiences and strong studio relationships. A perception that AI replaces rather than augments creative teams could undermine that trust.

Sharma’s memo also emphasized new monetization models. Microsoft has already transformed gaming economics through subscription services such as Xbox Game Pass. AI integration could extend that transformation further.

Potential directions include:

Dynamic pricing and personalized in-game economies
AI-driven content updates to extend game lifecycles
Automated live service management
Enhanced recommendation systems within the Xbox ecosystem

If AI improves player retention and lifetime value metrics, it could materially reshape revenue structures across console and cloud platforms.

Cloud, AI, and Ecosystem Integration

The leadership shift aligns with Microsoft’s broader corporate emphasis on AI infrastructure and cloud services. Gaming represents not only a consumer entertainment vertical but also a distribution channel for AI-powered experiences that leverage Microsoft’s cloud architecture.

Xbox cloud gaming, AI copilots for developers, and adaptive content systems could converge into a unified ecosystem strategy. Sharma’s experience across consumer platforms and AI productization suggests Microsoft intends to treat gaming as both a creative medium and a scalable technology platform.

Phil Spencer’s tenure marked a period of aggressive expansion, including major acquisitions and ecosystem growth. His departure, alongside Sarah Bond’s, introduces uncertainty about continuity in studio relations and hardware direction.

However, Sharma’s three stated commitments — building “great games beloved by players,” prioritizing Xbox, and integrating AI responsibly — signal an effort to anchor change within familiar brand pillars.

The real test will lie in execution. AI-enhanced development could accelerate production timelines and expand creative possibilities. It could also create friction if integration feels intrusive or commercially driven.

It is now clear that Microsoft is not treating AI as a side project. By installing a CoreAI executive at the helm of its gaming division, the company is redefining the future of Xbox around intelligent systems, adaptive design, and evolving monetization.