Home Latest Insights | News A Lesson for Nigeria from London on Readiness To Serve on Day 1

A Lesson for Nigeria from London on Readiness To Serve on Day 1

A Lesson for Nigeria  from London on Readiness To Serve on Day 1

She got the job on Monday. Hours later, she was crowned the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Before the nightingales could begin to sing their melodies on Tuesday, some key members of her cabinet were announced. Give her extra 72 hours, her core team would be set!

Contrast with Nigeria, you are elected in February to be sworn in late May. Yet, after that swearing, it will take another 3-7 months to form a cabinet!

Why? The governor or the president has no clue what the job entails – and consequently does not know those who can help. That is possible because he has NEVER thought about the issues he was elected to fix. He was only prepared on the verbosity of electioneering with soundbites to appeal to bases. 

Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 14 (June 3 – Sept 2, 2024) begins registrations; get massive discounts with early registration here.

Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.

People, until Nigeria amends the Constitution and requires Gubernatorial and Presidential candidates to debate (minimum of 5 debates) , men and women  who have no roles to be near seats of power will continue to find their bodies therein. The last debate will be on a blackboard with chalk, and it will focus on Flowcharting the Future. You give the candidate a chalk, and ask him to flowchart how he will fix a specific problem.  Have that in the constitution, many politicians will call in sick or withdraw from the contest. . But we need that to improve the playbook.

I was the Library Prefect in secondary school and the official leader of the school debate team. Once the topic was announced, the next was to read about that topic. Without the debate, there was no incentive. Nigeria needs mandatory debates in our democracy. 

Liz Truss became the third female prime minister in British history on Tuesday and pledged to immediately set about tackling the United Kingdom’s spiraling cost of living crisis, saying she was confident that “together we can ride out of the storm” of economic problems facing the nation.

Truss, 47, took office on a day of ceremony that saw her scandal-plagued predecessor Boris Johnson bow out in a defiant speech at Downing Street in London before both politicians flew to meet the Queen in Scotland for a transfer of power.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: I don’t share the opinion that debate will help anything in that Nigeria of a country.

First of all, before debates, most Nigerians have already decided who they will be cheerleading. Once that decision is made their mind is clouded by those things and they won’t even hear anything else.

Secondly, look at the pool of options currently on the table they are not the best communicators nor are they particularly good at leadership strategy. Read the manifesto of those who have one, and you will understand.

As for amending the constitution, most of those who have the intellect, the will, and the passion to effect such, are either dead, or confined in positions miles away from the legislative chambers. Again thanks to accepting misplacement of resources as way of life.

I don’t always like to comment about Nigeria, because I don’t understand why the creator chose to concentrate most of the non-human thinking humans in one geographic location.

Comment 2: Step on their necks sir. Enough is enough. We condone a lot of mediocrity and use the cliché quote that annoys me so much, “This is Nigeria and it’s how we do it here.” ????? Thank God people like you who can speak boldly about the ills of governance and not fear reproach. I celebrate you sir.
Comment 3: There is no credible evidence that debates sway voters. A Harvard Business School research data indicates debates really do not determine election outcomes. According to that study, 72% of voters make up their minds more than two months before the election, often before candidates square off. And those who shift to a different candidate closer to the election don’t do it following TV debates. Pew research pegs the number of voters who make up their minds based on debates at about 10%. American voters are informed, skeptical and engaged. A typical Nigerian voter is cynical and disengaged. According to INEC data, less than 35 percent of Nigerians vote. PMB was voted by less than 35 percent of Nigerians. And a vast majority of that number were told who to vote for or had their votes bought. 2019 elections had the lowest turnout post return to democracy in Nigeria. Rather than debates, I expect informed Nigerians, like you Professor Ekekwe, to articulate the issues and help frame them for voters. I expect the media to hold the feet of the candidates to fire. And to endorse candidates openly. It is treasonous to sit on the fence. According to Abraham Lincoln, “God loves ordinary people. He made a lot of them”. But they vote; blindly.
My Response: “There is no credible evidence that debates sway voters. ” – you got it wrong. I did not write that you need debates to win elections. Your premise is off my piece. I am saying that debates push leaders to think over issues, not get votes. Read my focus again.

---

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA (Jun 3 - Sep 2, 2024), and join Prof Ndubuisi Ekekwe and our global faculty; click here.

No posts to display

5 THOUGHTS ON A Lesson for Nigeria from London on Readiness To Serve on Day 1

  1. Nigeria is not a normal country, not because the politicians are smart or influential, but rather many of those who claim to have acquired education are dumber than our compatriots who never had the privilege of sitting in a classroom. Therein lies our challenge.

    If you ask for the candidates academic credentials, they tell you that it’s not by certificate or being a graduate. If you ask for debates, they tell you that it’s not by debates, that those who talk a lot don’t have capacity to deliver. The puzzling question remains, what are we going to use to assess people who are putting themselves forward for the highest office in the land? Every known indices or metric is considered an aberration by the cretins who want to capture power, and they are never embarrassed to defend nonsense.

    A leader who doesn’t speak often, how on earth do you intend to connect with the citizens and inspire them for the great undertakings ahead? Sound communication is perhaps the most important trait we need from a leader, because it’s ubiquitous and can influence minds faster than any physical project.

    The governing style here is ultra inefficient because the government wants to develop the country by itself. Until we learn to sell vision…

  2. I believe in debates, because it can be recorded and used as a checklist for M&E on performance during the regime of the candidate that eventually win the election. However, I strongly believe that the media, as is done in Ghana, shall play a bigger role in opening up the cans of past misdeeds, weaknesses and achievements of the candidates for citizens to know who they are choosing as their leaders. The media should also keep and reprint/rebroadcast repeatedly, the promises made by candidates during the debate while they are in the office after winning the election. On the flip side, I believe that Nigerians are too dosile and tolerates every sh*t thrown at them by their leaders. No where on the surface of this planet earth that a government commits atrocities as been done in Nigeria and the key leaders are allowed to stay in office for that “default 2 terms” 8 years. So the million dollars question is, how do we get Nigerian citizens become sensitive, active and sensible in affairs of governance, demand good governance and take appropriate action to stop bad governance?

  3. Thanks Prof. We definitely should be a lot more serious about the future of our nations. Debates can help us see better into the minds of would-be leaders. However, I think this might be also hinged on the level of education and exposure of the voting population. Almost like the vicious cycle of “a people deserve their leaders” and “the leaders create their people”

  4. Debates would target the liberates in the country, however a good channel to engage and choose a potential president. How many illetrates do you have in Nigeria? Do they also vote? Do villagers really feel the impact of inappropriate governance?

  5. Thanks for this article. Debate is a good way to capture who the good leaders are but in other perceptions, we have illiterate and high poverty levels in Nigeria with no access to TV or news.
    So Firstly, educating people and awareness of the value of education is one thing and bringing down debate centres to villages using cultures and values to communicate with them without the sentiment of money. I believe that is the first we need to take.

Post Comment

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here