While much of Silicon Valley dreams of humanoid robots that can fold laundry, mix cocktails, or assist the elderly, a smaller but ambitious cohort sees a darker, more urgent destiny for the technology. At the forefront is Foundation Future Industries, a San Francisco-based startup that is deliberately charting a course for autonomous humanoids in high-risk, high-stakes environments — including military operations.
According to CNBC, the company’s early prototypes, known as the Phantom series, have already seen limited deployment in Ukraine, marking what Foundation claims is the first known use of humanoid robots in an active combat theater.
Far from science fiction tropes of invincible terminators, these machines are currently focused on logistics — ferrying supplies to front-line positions where human soldiers would otherwise be exposed to mortal danger. The trajectory is that Foundation is building machines designed to operate where humans should not.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 20 (June 8 – Sept 5, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
CEO Sankaet Pathak, who previously led the ill-fated fintech platform Synapse before its 2024 bankruptcy, frames the company’s mission with stark moral clarity. In a recent appearance on Harry Stebbing’s “20VC” podcast, he argued that humanoid robotics should address humanity’s most dangerous challenges rather than mundane domestic tasks.
“I’m convinced the technology is reaching a level where it can replace jobs that are dangerous for humans to perform, and if you can do that, it’s the highest net good you can create out of all applications of robotics,” he said.
This philosophy sets Foundation apart in an increasingly crowded field that includes Figure, Agility Robotics, and Boston Dynamics. While many competitors emphasize consumer or industrial service roles, Foundation has explicitly embraced “dual-use” applications — technologies that can serve both civilian industry and defense needs.
From Ukraine Tests to American Ambitions
Foundation’s journey began gaining global attention earlier this year when it sent two Phantom MK-1 units to Ukraine for pilot testing. Focused on logistics in hazardous zones, the MK-1, though limited in payload (around 44 pounds) and lacking advanced environmental protections, demonstrated the potential to reduce soldier exposure during supply runs. The tests were conducted with Ukrainian officials and received backing from the U.S. government.
Pathak said the company plans to send improved Phantom 2 models to Ukraine later this year, promising “superhuman abilities” and double the payload capacity. These advancements are informed by real-world feedback from the conflict, which has become a living laboratory for robotics and AI in warfare. Ukraine has already deployed ground robots for supply delivery and AI-augmented drones for strikes and reconnaissance, providing valuable data on what works and what fails, in actual combat conditions.
The ultimate goal extends to the U.S. military. Foundation has secured $24 million in government research contracts for feasibility studies in inspection, logistics, and weapons handling across the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Pathak aims to begin frontline testing with American forces within the next 12 to 18 months.
This ambition is bolstered by a high-profile addition to the team: Eric Trump, the second son of President Donald Trump, who recently joined as chief strategy advisor. The move has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who described it as “corruption in plain sight” given the company’s government contracts. A Foundation spokesperson countered that Eric Trump had been an investor prior to his advisory role, citing a shared vision of reshoring advanced manufacturing to the United States.
The Stakes in the U.S.-China Robotics Race
Foundation is positioning its technology explicitly within the context of strategic competition with China. Pathak has said the company’s objective is to deliver “the best robots we can build” to the U.S. military — superior to anything Beijing can field. China has invested heavily in humanoid robotics, primarily for industrial applications, but military researchers have also explored their potential, including AI-powered robotic dogs and early humanoid prototypes for combat support.
Kateryna Bondar, a senior fellow at the Wadhwani AI Center at CSIS, noted that humanoids could offer tactical advantages in certain environments.
“Modern urban combat spaces — where there are stairwells, ladders, basements and narrow corridors — were created for human movement, which could give humanoid systems an advantage over tracked or quadruped robots in certain scenarios,” she said.
Yet significant skepticism remains among defense experts. Melanie Sisson of the Brookings Foreign Policy program pointed out the engineering challenges, saying: “Making robots look like humans is a complex and expensive engineering challenge, and what Ukraine has taught us is the opposite — that we need the ability to adapt rapidly and manufacture quickly and cheaply.”
Toby Walsh, chief scientist at the University of New South Wales’ AI Institute, suggested that while various forms of autonomous systems will increasingly replace human forces, “humanoid terminator-style robots” may remain more science fiction than battlefield staple in the near term.
Ethical and Practical Hurdles
The militarization of humanoid robotics raises profound ethical questions. Foundation has stated that most weaponized applications would retain human confirmation in the decision loop, but Pathak acknowledged that fully autonomous decisions may be necessary in time-critical situations. This stance mirrors broader U.S. military adoption of AI for targeting and decision support in conflicts like the one with Iran.
Beyond ethics, practical barriers are formidable. Current prototypes still struggle with payload capacity, battery life, environmental resilience, and cost-effectiveness. Scaling production to thousands of units this year, as Pathak intends, will test the company’s manufacturing prowess and supply chain management.
However, Foundation’s emergence reflects a broader transformation in how nations approach future conflict. The age of AI and robotics in warfare is no longer hypothetical. From Ukraine’s drone swarms to U.S. experiments with unmanned systems, autonomous technology is reshaping tactics, reducing human risk, and raising the tempo of operations.
The dual-use strategy, industrial applications providing revenue and data while military contracts drive innovation, offers Foundation a potentially viable business model. Yet it also places the company at the center of sensitive debates about accountability, escalation risks, and the moral boundaries of autonomous lethal systems.