The Federal Reserve, along with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), issued a joint statement clarifying that U.S. banks are permitted to provide custody services for Bitcoin and other crypto assets. This guidance does not introduce new regulations but reaffirms that banks can hold digital assets for customers in both fiduciary and non-fiduciary capacities, provided they adhere to existing risk management frameworks and comply with applicable laws, such as the Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, and cybersecurity standards.
Banks must maintain full control over cryptographic keys, ensuring no other party, including customers, can access the assets during safekeeping. They are also liable for any third-party custodians they employ, requiring thorough due diligence. The statement emphasizes the need for robust cybersecurity, operational expertise, and risk assessments to address complexities like key loss, cyberattacks, and market volatility. This regulatory shift, building on earlier guidance relaxations in 2025, aims to reduce uncertainty, foster institutional adoption, and align crypto custody with traditional banking practices.
Banks offering custody services legitimize crypto as an asset class, encouraging institutional investors (e.g., hedge funds, pension funds) to allocate capital to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. This could drive price appreciation and market stability due to increased liquidity. Banks providing custody services lower barriers for retail investors wary of self-custody risks (e.g., losing private keys). This could boost retail participation, potentially increasing crypto market capitalization.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Banks’ involvement strengthens crypto infrastructure, integrating digital assets into traditional financial systems. This could lead to new financial products like crypto-backed loans, ETFs, or derivatives, enhancing market sophistication. The statement builds on earlier 2025 relaxations, providing banks with a clearer path to offer custody services under existing regulations (e.g., Bank Secrecy Act, AML, KYC). This reduces legal ambiguity, encouraging banks to innovate in the crypto space.
Banks must implement robust cybersecurity, key management, and operational controls to mitigate risks like hacks or key loss. This could set industry standards for secure custody, benefiting the broader crypto ecosystem. The U.S. move may pressure other jurisdictions to clarify their crypto custody rules, fostering global regulatory alignment. However, discrepancies (e.g., stricter EU or Asian regulations) could create competitive challenges for U.S. banks.
Custody services open fee-based revenue opportunities for banks, diversifying income beyond traditional lending or wealth management. Large banks like JPMorgan or Goldman Sachs, already exploring crypto, may gain a first-mover advantage, pressuring smaller banks to adapt or risk losing market share. Banks must invest heavily in technology and expertise to manage crypto’s unique risks (e.g., blockchain forks, wallet vulnerabilities), potentially straining resources for smaller institutions.
Increased bank exposure to crypto could tie traditional finance to volatile markets, raising concerns about systemic risk if crypto prices crash, as seen in past cycles (e.g., 2022’s $2 trillion market drop). Banks holding large crypto assets become high-value targets for cyberattacks, necessitating advanced defenses to prevent losses that could impact depositors or shareholders.
While the statement clarifies custody, it may invite stricter oversight of banks’ crypto activities, potentially leading to future restrictions if risks materialize.
Crypto enthusiasts, including figures like Michael Saylor or Cathie Wood, see bank custody as a step toward mass adoption, validating Bitcoin’s role as “digital gold” or a hedge against inflation. They argue it bridges DeFi and TradFi, enhancing trust and accessibility. Posts on X reflect excitement, with some users predicting Bitcoin could hit $100,000 by 2026 due to institutional inflows. Banking purists and regulators like Gary Gensler (former SEC chair) remain cautious, citing crypto’s volatility, lack of intrinsic value, and use in illicit activities (e.g., 5-10% of crypto transactions tied to money laundering, per Chainalysis 2025 estimates).
They argue banks’ involvement risks destabilizing the financial system, especially without stricter oversight. Banks’ entry into custody aligns with CeFi, where trusted intermediaries manage assets. This appeals to institutional and risk-averse retail investors but contrasts with crypto’s decentralized ethos, where “not your keys, not your crypto” emphasizes self-custody.
Crypto purists, active on X and platforms like Reddit, argue bank custody undermines Bitcoin’s core principles of decentralization and censorship resistance. They fear banks could freeze or seize assets under regulatory pressure, as seen in some jurisdictions during 2022-2023 crypto crackdowns. The Federal Reserve’s guidance aligns with pro-innovation regulators who see crypto as a transformative technology. This view is supported by recent U.S. policy shifts, including the 2024 approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, signaling a friendlier stance.
Some regulators, particularly in the FDIC or international bodies like the Basel Committee, remain wary, advocating for higher capital requirements or restrictions on banks’ crypto exposure. This divide could lead to uneven regulatory enforcement, creating uncertainty for banks. Bank custody may favor wealthy clients and institutions, who gain access to secure, regulated crypto services, potentially widening the wealth gap. Smaller investors reliant on unregulated platforms face higher risks (e.g., exchange hacks like the 2022 FTX collapse).
The Federal Reserve’s statement is a pivotal step toward integrating crypto into mainstream finance, promising increased adoption, regulatory clarity, and banking innovation. However, it introduces risks like market volatility and cybersecurity threats while deepening divides between crypto advocates and skeptics, centralized and decentralized philosophies, and progressive and conservative regulatory approaches.