In recent years, the term “climate change” has become a constant presence in our collective vocabulary. We’ve witnessed the aftermath of various natural calamities such as droughts, floods, hurricanes, and heatwaves, often attributed to the shifting climate patterns. While it’s undeniable that climate change plays a significant role in exacerbating these disasters, it’s crucial to recognize that not every catastrophe can be solely pinned on this global phenomenon.
Climate change, primarily caused by the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane, leads to a myriad of adverse effects on our environment. Rising temperatures, melting ice caps, erratic weather patterns, and changing precipitation levels are just some of the visible manifestations of this phenomenon. Human activities such as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes significantly contribute to the acceleration of climate change.
However, it’s important to discern between disasters that are directly linked to climate change and those that stem from natural occurrences or human negligence. For instance, while a severe hurricane may be intensified by warming ocean waters due to climate change, not every hurricane can be attributed solely to it. Hurricanes are a natural part of Earth’s atmospheric processes and have occurred long before human-induced climate change became a concern.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 14 (June 3 – Sept 2, 2024) begins registrations; get massive discounts with early registration here.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Similarly, floods and droughts can result from a combination of factors, including natural weather patterns, topography, and human activities. Blocking waterways, improper waste disposal leading to river contamination, and land-use changes that affect natural drainage systems are examples of human actions that can exacerbate flooding or drought conditions. While these activities may indirectly be influenced by climate change, they are primarily driven by human decisions and behaviours rather than direct climatic shifts.
Moreover, there’s a concerning trend where the term “climate change” is sometimes misused or exploited for political or financial gain. Some politicians or organizations may opportunistically use the rhetoric of climate change to secure funding or advance their agendas, even if the disaster at hand is not directly caused by climate variability. This misuse not only detracts from genuine efforts to address climate change but also undermines public trust and dilutes the urgency of the issue.
To address these complexities, it’s essential to approach each disaster with a nuanced understanding of its causes. While climate change undoubtedly amplifies the frequency and severity of certain events, not every calamity should be automatically labelled because of climate change. Instead, a comprehensive assessment should consider the interplay of natural factors, human actions, and the broader environmental context. Furthermore, there’s a critical need for transparency and accountability in the allocation of climate change funds. Proposals for mitigation and adaptation measures must undergo rigorous scrutiny to ensure that resources are effectively utilized for genuine climate action rather than being siphoned off for unrelated purposes or falling victim to corruption.
While climate change poses a significant threat to our planet and exacerbates many natural disasters, it’s essential to recognize that not every calamity is directly attributable to it. By understanding the nuances of each disaster and addressing both the underlying causes and the impacts of climate change, we can work towards building more resilient and sustainable communities. It’s time to approach the issue of climate change with the complexity and seriousness it deserves, while also guarding against misrepresentation and exploitation for personal or political gain.
Dear David,
I found your argument interesting, and it gives an insight to consider the natural disaster such as drought, flooding etc. as an interplay between climate change and human activities. Thus, climate change mainly as a natural process should note be blamed for all the problems surrounding us and we should have a balanced perspective on it.
I agree with you. I think there must be a holistic approach in addressing our challenges, especially in Africa. Perhaps this raises a research question: How can we identify disasters/challenges caused by human negligence versus those caused by climate change? Anyway, this write-up is a call for caution in using the term ‘climate change’ in every disaster occurrence. A proper assessment needs to be done in order to establish if any disaster is a result of climate variability. This will help curb corruption and other political gains that are emerging from this phenomenon.
The call for transparency and accountability in climate change funding resonates with me, as it highlights the importance of ensuring that resources are used effectively for genuine climate action. I appreciate the balanced approach and its focus on building resilience in the face of climate change.
Well-done Dr David!