The July 2025 U.S. CPI data shows headline inflation at 2.7% annually, slightly below the expected 2.8%, indicating a modest cooling of overall price pressures. Core CPI, excluding volatile food and energy, rose to 3.1%, above the forecasted 3%, suggesting persistent underlying inflationary trends.
The monthly CPI increase was 0.2%, aligning with estimates, while core CPI rose 0.3%, also as expected but marking a five-month high. Key drivers include falling energy prices (gasoline down 2.2%) and stable food prices, though shelter costs (up 0.2%) and rising prices for used cars, transportation services, and new vehicles continue to fuel core inflation.
The mixed data—headline CPI beating estimates and core CPI missing them—has markets pricing in a 96% probability of a Federal Reserve rate cut in September, up from 90% post-release, per CME FedWatch.
This reflects expectations that the Fed may prioritize moderating inflation over persistent core pressures, especially with signs of labor market weakness. However, sticky core inflation could temper aggressive easing, as some analysts note the Fed faces a balancing act.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Tariffs are increasingly influencing prices, with Goldman Sachs estimating 67% of tariff costs may hit consumers by October, potentially complicating the inflation outlook. Crypto markets, sensitive to rate expectations, may see boosted sentiment for risk assets like Bitcoin if cuts materialize.
The lower-than-expected headline CPI suggests moderating price pressures, driven by declining energy prices (e.g., gasoline down 2.2%) and stable food prices. This could ease consumer burdens and support real income growth, potentially boosting consumer spending, a key driver of U.S. GDP (about 70% of economic activity).
The higher-than-expected core CPI, fueled by persistent shelter costs (up 0.2%) and rising prices for used cars, transportation services, and new vehicles, indicates sticky underlying inflation. This could constrain consumer purchasing power in non-energy sectors, potentially dampening demand for discretionary goods and services.
Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, reducing domestic production efficiency and potentially lowering GDP by 0.8–1% in broad tariff scenarios, with the U.S. and China facing the largest losses (up to 3.6% and 2.4% GDP declines, respectively).
However, tariff revenues, if redistributed to consumers, could partially offset these losses by boosting disposable income. Additionally, tariffs may spur domestic manufacturing employment (up to 1.1% by 2027), but at the cost of declines in services (down 0.3%) and agriculture (down 1.8%).
Federal Reserve Policy and Rate Cut Expectations
The slightly softer headline CPI, combined with signs of labor market weakness (e.g., unemployment at 4.2% and cooling job growth), has raised the probability of a September 2025 rate cut to 96%, per CME FedWatch.
A rate cut would lower borrowing costs, potentially stimulating investment and consumption, which could strengthen economic growth. The elevated core CPI and tariff-driven inflation risks complicate the Fed’s decision.
Some officials, like Susan Collins and Raphael Bostic, suggest that temporary tariff-induced price spikes might not necessitate rate hikes if inflation expectations remain anchored. However, persistent core inflation or rising consumer inflation expectations could prompt the Fed to maintain or even raise rates, especially if tariffs escalate.
The Fed is cautious due to uncertainty around tariff implementation. For instance, Trump’s 90-day trade truce with China and delayed tariffs on Canada/Mexico create a “wait-and-see” environment. If tariffs significantly boost inflation, the Fed may delay easing, keeping rates higher to prevent overheating, which could slow economic growth.
Tariffs incentivize domestic production by making imports costlier, potentially increasing manufacturing jobs (e.g., a 1.1% rise in manufacturing employment by 2027). This could strengthen industrial regions, particularly states less integrated into global supply chains (e.g., Colorado, Wyoming, Oklahoma, with real income gains up to 1.7%).
Tariffs may reduce reliance on foreign suppliers (e.g., China, where U.S. import dependence has decreased), enhancing economic resilience against supply chain disruptions. Tariffs raise costs for imported goods and domestically produced goods with imported components.
A September rate cut would lower borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, encouraging investment in capital-intensive projects and boosting consumer spending on big-ticket items like homes and cars. This could counteract tariff-induced price pressures and support GDP growth, especially given the Q2 2025 GDP growth of 3% despite trade war disruptions.
Manufacturing gains from tariffs, but services and agriculture face losses due to reduced competitiveness and higher input costs. A rate cut could mitigate these losses by lowering financing costs for service-oriented businesses and farmers.
Businesses are adapting to tariffs by building inventories, rerouting supply chains (e.g., via Mexico under USMCA), or seeking exemptions (e.g., consumer electronics from China). This could mitigate some inflationary and economic damage over time, but persistent high tariffs may force price hikes if trade deals falter.
A September rate cut (96% probability) would likely strengthen the economy by lowering borrowing costs, supporting consumer spending, and stabilizing the labor market, but it must be timed carefully to avoid exacerbating tariff-driven inflation. The Fed’s cautious approach, awaiting clarity on tariff impacts and upcoming data.