Mantra’s OM token crashed ~90% on April 13, 2025, dropping from ~$6.30 to below $0.50, wiping out over $5 billion in market cap. MANTRA attributes the collapse to “reckless forced liquidations” by centralized exchanges during low-liquidity hours, denying insider selling. Co-founder John Mullin suggested one exchange’s sudden closure of positions without warning triggered the cascade. However, community skepticism persists, with some alleging insider dumps due to large pre-crash token deposits (e.g., 3.9M OM to OKX). No conclusive evidence confirms either narrative, and investigations are ongoing.
The sudden collapse, likened to Terra LUNA and FTX, severely dents trust in Mantra and the broader real-world asset (RWA) tokenization sector. Retail and institutional investors may hesitate to engage with similar projects, fearing volatility or mismanagement. Rebuilding credibility will require transparency, detailed post-mortems, and accountability from Mantra’s team. Mantra’s claim of “reckless forced liquidations” by exchanges highlights risks in centralized platforms’ discretionary powers. Liquidations during low-liquidity hours amplify price swings, raising questions about exchange negligence or intentional market positioning.
This could spark calls for stricter oversight or push users toward decentralized exchanges. As a Layer 1 blockchain for regulatory-compliant RWAs, Mantra’s crash may cast doubt on the stability of tokenized assets. Despite partnerships like the $1B DAMAC deal, the incident underscores vulnerabilities in tokenomics or liquidity management, potentially slowing institutional adoption of RWA projects. Allegations of insider selling, fueled by on-chain data showing large pre-crash token deposits e.g., 43.6M OM to exchanges, intensify distrust. Claims that the team controls ~90% of supply raise red flags about governance and centralization, prompting demands for clearer token vesting and distribution policies.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
The crash triggered $68.86M in liquidations, with long positions hit hardest, reflecting over-leveraged bets. Technical indicators like RSI show OM as oversold, hinting at a possible short-term bounce, but sustained recovery depends on addressing structural issues. Without it, OM risks further declines toward $0.50 or lower. Accusations of market manipulation or insider trading could draw regulatory attention, especially given Mantra’s VARA license and institutional focus. Legal actions from affected investors may follow if evidence of misconduct emerges, complicating operations.
Mantra’s path forward hinges on transparent investigations, community engagement, and robust reforms to prevent recurrence. The crash serves as a cautionary tale for projects balancing innovation with market stability. Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization is the process of converting physical or traditional financial assets into digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens represent ownership, value, or rights to the underlying asset, enabling fractional ownership, increased liquidity, and broader access to markets. RWAs include tangible assets like real estate, art, or commodities (gold, oil) and intangible ones like bonds, stocks, or intellectual property. Traditionally, these assets are illiquid, costly to trade, or restricted to specific markets.
How Tokenization Works
An asset (e.g., a property worth $1M) is chosen for tokenization. Ownership is legally defined, often via a special-purpose vehicle (SPV) or smart contract, ensuring compliance with regulations. The asset’s value is divided into digital tokens on a blockchain (e.g., 1M tokens at $1 each for the property). Each token represents a fractional stake. Tokens are issued on a blockchain platform, like Mantra’s Layer 1, and can be traded on exchanges or DeFi platforms, often 24/7. Blockchain ensures transparent, tamper-proof records of ownership and transactions, reducing intermediaries. Illiquid assets like real estate become tradable, unlocking value.
Tokens lower barriers, letting retail investors buy stakes in high-value assets (e.g., $100 for a slice of property). Global markets open up, bypassing traditional gatekeepers like banks. Blockchain cuts costs and speeds up transactions by automating processes via smart contracts. Immutable records reduce fraud and enhance trust. RWAs must comply with local laws (e.g., securities regulations), which vary globally. Platforms like Mantra often seek licenses (e.g., VARA) to navigate this. Tokenized assets can face volatility, as seen in Mantra’s OM crash, if markets are thin or mismanaged.
Institutional trust in blockchain tech is growing but still limited by technical and regulatory hurdles. Projects may face scrutiny if token supply or governance is overly controlled, as alleged in Mantra’s case. Mantra, a Layer 1 blockchain, focuses on RWA tokenization for regulatory-compliant assets, targeting institutional and retail users. It aims to bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and DeFi by offering infrastructure for tokenized bonds, real estate, and more. Its OM token crash, however, highlights risks like market manipulation or liquidity mismanagement, which can undermine tokenized ecosystems.
RWA tokenization could democratize wealth, with forecasts suggesting $10T in tokenized assets by 2030. It blends TradFi’s stability with DeFi’s innovation, but incidents like Mantra’s crash show the need for robust tokenomics, transparency, and regulation to sustain growth.