Meta is preparing to introduce facial recognition capabilities to its smart glasses as early as this year, according to a report by The New York Times. The feature, internally called “Name Tag,” would allow wearers to identify individuals in their field of vision and retrieve information about them through Meta’s AI assistant.
The plan remains under internal discussion and could change. Executives have been weighing how to deploy a feature that carries what the company has described as significant safety and privacy risks.
An internal memo cited in the report shows that Meta had initially considered launching Name Tag at a conference for the visually impaired before expanding access more broadly. That limited rollout did not occur. The memo also indicated that the company believed the current political climate in the United States could provide a less adversarial backdrop for launch.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document said.
A Bet on Wearables and AI
Meta’s renewed push into biometric identification reflects broader strategic priorities. The company has been repositioning itself around artificial intelligence and hardware ecosystems, aiming to reduce dependence on third-party platforms and create direct consumer interfaces.
Its smart glasses, developed in partnership with Ray-Ban parent EssilorLuxottica, have exceeded early sales expectations. The devices already support hands-free photo capture, livestreaming, and AI-powered voice assistance. Adding facial recognition would deepen their functionality and potentially differentiate them in a competitive wearable market that includes offerings from Apple and other hardware makers investing in spatial computing.
Meta previously considered facial recognition integration in 2021 but abandoned the idea due to technical limitations and ethical concerns. Advances in on-device AI processing, improved computer vision models, and edge computing efficiency may now make real-time identification more feasible without constant cloud dependence.
The timing also intersects with shifting regulatory dynamics. The administration of President Donald Trump has signaled closer engagement with major technology firms, potentially reducing immediate federal pushback compared with prior regulatory cycles.
Deploying facial recognition in consumer eyewear would test legal and ethical boundaries. Biometric identification technologies are subject to a patchwork of U.S. state laws, including statutes that require explicit consent for collecting or processing facial data. Internationally, regulations such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation impose strict standards for biometric data handling.
Key operational questions remain unresolved:
- How the system would source identification data. Whether it would rely on publicly available images, user-uploaded databases, or opt-in contact lists.
- Where processing would occur. On-device computation would limit external data transmission, while cloud-based processing could raise additional surveillance concerns.
- How consent would be managed. Non-users in public spaces may not be aware they are being scanned, raising questions about informed consent and reasonable expectations of privacy.
- What safeguards would prevent misuse? Real-time identification could facilitate stalking, harassment, or unauthorized data harvesting if guardrails are insufficient.
Civil liberties organizations have historically opposed widespread facial recognition deployment, arguing that the technology erodes anonymity in public spaces. Law enforcement use of similar systems has already triggered litigation and municipal bans in some U.S. jurisdictions.
If Meta proceeds, the launch would mark one of the most visible attempts to normalize biometric identification in everyday consumer devices. Smart glasses, unlike fixed surveillance cameras, are mobile and discreet, potentially transforming how individuals experience public interaction.
The feature could also reshape social norms. Wearers might gain informational advantages in networking, professional settings, or social encounters. At the same time, widespread adoption could create pressure for individuals to assume they are constantly identifiable in public environments.
The decision represents a calculated risk for investors as enhanced functionality could boost device sales and reinforce Meta’s long-term augmented reality roadmap. However, regulatory backlash or reputational damage could offset commercial gains.