OPEC+ on Sunday confirmed that it will hold oil production steady for March, maintaining the freeze imposed for January and February, as Brent crude hovers near six-month highs and geopolitical risks continue to roil global markets.
The decision highlights the producer group’s cautious approach amid a volatile environment, where concerns about a potential U.S. strike on Iran and disruptions in key oil-producing regions collide with expectations of a global supply surplus in 2026.
Brent crude closed near $70 a barrel on Friday, just shy of the six-month peak of $71.89 reached on Thursday. Analysts point to fears that U.S. action against Iran could constrain output from a major OPEC member, pushing prices higher in the near term. At the same time, expectations of a supply surplus next year, combined with seasonal consumption trends, limit the incentive for producers to expand output.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
The March freeze affects eight key OPEC+ producers: Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, and Oman. Last year, these countries agreed to raise quotas by approximately 2.9 million barrels per day for April–December 2025, equivalent to roughly 3% of global oil demand. However, they halted further increases for early 2026, citing weaker seasonal demand and a cautious outlook amid lingering economic uncertainties.
Significantly, OPEC+ offered no guidance on output policy beyond March, reflecting strategic ambiguity. Jorge Leon, former OPEC official and now head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, emphasized the importance of this silence.
“With rising uncertainty around Iran and U.S. tensions, the group is keeping all options firmly on the table,” Leon said.
He added that OPEC+ internal data points to a lower call on crude in the second quarter of 2026, which could constrain any future production hikes.
OPEC+, which comprises the 13-member Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus Russia and allied producers, controls about half of global oil output. Its decisions thus have a disproportionate influence on the market, shaping both pricing and investment signals for producers outside the cartel.
Geopolitical Risks and Iran
The geopolitical backdrop remains tense. U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing targeted strikes against Iranian security forces and leadership, following the January capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces. The Trump administration has imposed extensive sanctions on Tehran to limit its oil revenues, a critical source of state funding. While both sides have expressed some willingness to negotiate, Iran has stressed that its defense capabilities are non-negotiable, maintaining an element of uncertainty that supports oil prices.
OPEC+ appears to be factoring these risks into its production calculus. Any disruption in Iranian output, even temporarily, could tighten global supply and support near-term prices, though the group remains wary of overproducing in the face of projected surpluses in 2026.
Oil supply disruptions in Kazakhstan have also played a role in market dynamics. The Tengiz oilfield, one of the country’s largest, has been restarted in stages after experiencing outages earlier in 2026, according to local authorities. Any delays in returning to full capacity could further tighten supplies, at least temporarily, supporting prices.
Compliance with OPEC+ quotas continues to be a focal point. The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC), which met alongside the producers, reiterated the importance of adherence to output agreements. While it does not set policy, the JMMC monitors compliance and issues recommendations, helping to maintain cohesion among member states. Past challenges with uneven compliance have occasionally undermined market discipline and contributed to price volatility.
The March freeze reflects OPEC+’s broader strategy of cautious flexibility. By keeping output steady, the group preserves the ability to respond to short-term shocks—whether geopolitical disruptions, technical outages, or unexpected shifts in demand—without committing prematurely to long-term increases. Analysts note that the lack of forward guidance is a deliberate measure to avoid signaling excessive supply growth at a time when global demand may soften later in 2026.
Global oil markets are also grappling with mixed signals from macroeconomic factors. Inflationary pressures, high interest rates, and uneven growth in major economies could dampen demand, while strategic stockpiling in countries such as the U.S. has amplified price swings. The interaction of these economic drivers with geopolitical uncertainty has created a backdrop of volatility that market participants are closely monitoring.
The next OPEC+ ministerial meeting is scheduled for March 1, with the JMMC set to convene on April 5. Analysts expect these gatherings to provide more clarity on the group’s stance for the second quarter of 2026, particularly in light of projected supply surpluses and potential geopolitical shocks.