DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1073

KuCoin’s Introduction Of Dormancy Fees For Non-KYC Accounts

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

KuCoin announced that it will impose dormancy fees on inactive non-KYC (Know Your Customer) and non-KYB (Know Your Business) accounts starting July 15, 2025. This policy targets unverified accounts to enhance platform security and comply with regulatory pressures. US users, along with those in restricted regions like mainland China, cannot complete KYC/KYB verification due to KuCoin’s Terms of Use and local regulations.

As a result, they are urged to withdraw their assets to self-custody wallets or other exchanges to avoid these fees. KuCoin will notify affected users before deducting fees, giving them time to act. Transfer assets to an external wallet (e.g., a non-custodial wallet like Best Wallet) or another exchange. KuCoin supports crypto withdrawals without KYC, though limits apply (e.g., 2 BTC daily for non-KYC accounts).

After withdrawing, consider closing your KuCoin account to avoid future fees. Notifications will be sent, but users should move assets before fees are applied on July 15, 2025. KuCoin’s withdrawal fees vary by cryptocurrency and network (e.g., 0.0002 BTC for Bitcoin, 1 USDT for Tether on TRC20). Check the withdrawal page for current fees. US users face restrictions due to KuCoin’s lack of a US license, limiting access to fiat withdrawals and advanced features without KYC. Using a VPN to bypass restrictions is risky and may lead to frozen assets.

This move aligns with global trends toward stricter KYC enforcement to combat fraud and money laundering. KuCoin’s introduction of dormancy fees for non-KYC accounts and its urging of US users to withdraw funds have significant implications for users, the crypto industry, and the broader divide between centralized exchanges (CEXs) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Dormancy fees will erode funds in inactive, unverified accounts, disproportionately affecting users who hold small balances or use KuCoin sporadically. Exact fee details are unclear, but they could be flat or percentage-based, similar to other platforms (e.g., Binance’s 0.0005 BTC monthly fee for inactive accounts).

Non-KYC users must either withdraw assets, incurring withdrawal fees (e.g., 0.0002 BTC for Bitcoin), or complete KYC where possible. For US users and those in restricted regions (e.g., mainland China), KYC isn’t an option, pushing them to exit the platform. Users who avoid KYC for privacy reasons may feel pressured to abandon KuCoin, potentially migrating to DeFi platforms or other CEXs with looser policies (e.g., MEXC, though it also enforces KYC in some cases).

KuCoin’s lack of a US license already limits US users’ access to fiat withdrawals and advanced features. The dormancy fees and withdrawal urging effectively signal a soft exit from the US market, aligning with regulatory scrutiny from agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Rushed withdrawals increase the risk of errors (e.g., sending funds to incorrect addresses or incompatible networks). Users without self-custody wallets may struggle to find secure alternatives, especially if unfamiliar with DeFi or other CEXs.

Withdrawing assets may trigger taxable events in the US, depending on the user’s cost basis and holding period. Users must track transactions for IRS reporting, adding complexity. The policy reflects KuCoin’s efforts to align with global anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) regulations, especially after facing scrutiny in jurisdictions like the US and India. By penalizing non-KYC accounts, KuCoin reduces exposure to illicit activity risks.

Dormancy fees could generate additional revenue from inactive accounts, offsetting operational costs or regulatory fines (e.g., KuCoin paid $22 million to settle a NY lawsuit in 2023). KuCoin may lose privacy-focused users but attract institutional or KYC-compliant traders, aligning with its goal of becoming a regulated, mainstream platform. KuCoin’s move signals a broader industry trend toward stricter KYC/AML enforcement, driven by global regulators like FATF. Other CEXs (e.g., Binance, Coinbase) may follow with similar policies, shrinking the space for non-KYC trading.

Disaffected users may migrate to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap or PancakeSwap, which don’t require KYC. However, DeFi’s complexity and risks (e.g., smart contract vulnerabilities) could deter mainstream adoption. As CEXs diverge based on regulatory stances, users may face a fragmented landscape where access to liquidity and services depends on their jurisdiction or KYC willingness.

Centralized (CEXs like KuCoin) prioritize regulatory compliance to operate legally, attract institutional investors, and integrate with fiat systems. KYC, dormancy fees, and user restrictions (e.g., US bans) are tools to achieve this, but they alienate privacy advocates. Decentralized (DeFi, DEXs) emphasize user control, anonymity, and censorship resistance. Non-KYC users pushed out of KuCoin may turn to DeFi, but barriers like technical complexity, high gas fees, and regulatory risks (e.g., Tornado Cash sanctions) limit accessibility.

The divide deepens as CEXs become gatekeepers for fiat on-ramps, while DeFi remains a niche for tech-savvy or ideologically driven users. This could slow crypto’s mainstream adoption if users feel trapped between compliance and complexity. Non-KYC users value anonymity to protect against surveillance, data breaches, or authoritarian regimes. KuCoin’s fees and KYC push undermine this, forcing users to choose between financial loss or exposure.

Push for KYC/AML to curb illicit activities (e.g., money laundering, tax evasion). KuCoin’s policy aligns with this, reflecting pressure from global watchdogs like FATF and US agencies. The divide creates a zero-sum game where privacy and regulation are at odds. Users in restricted regions (e.g., US, China) face exclusion from CEXs, while privacy-focused platforms risk regulatory crackdowns.

Those in KYC-friendly jurisdictions (e.g., EU, Singapore) can comply and continue using KuCoin with minimal disruption. They benefit from enhanced security and access to regulated services. Users face exclusion, forced withdrawals, or reliance on risky workarounds (e.g., VPNs). This creates a two-tier system where access to crypto depends on geography.

The divide reinforces inequality in crypto access, favoring users in compliant jurisdictions while marginalizing others. This could fuel demand for DeFi or unregulated CEXs in restricted regions, complicating global regulatory efforts. Bitcoin and early crypto aimed for financial sovereignty and decentralization. Non-KYC users align with this, resisting centralized control.

CEXs like KuCoin bridge crypto and traditional finance, prioritizing compliance over ideology. Dormancy fees and KYC mandates reflect this shift toward centralized control. The divide alienates crypto purists, who may abandon CEXs for DeFi or peer-to-peer trading, while pragmatic users accept KYC as the cost of convenience. This fractures the crypto community’s unity.

KuCoin’s dormancy fees and US withdrawal urging highlight the tension between regulatory compliance and crypto’s decentralized ethos. For users, the policy means financial and logistical challenges, especially for non-KYC and US-based accounts. For the industry, it underscores a growing divide between centralized, regulated platforms and decentralized, privacy-focused alternatives.

This divide risks fragmenting the crypto ecosystem, with access, privacy, and ideology as key fault lines. Users must adapt by securing assets and exploring alternatives, while the industry grapples with balancing regulation and innovation. For specific guidance, US users should withdraw funds before July 15, 2025, and contact KuCoin support for assistance.

What is the accumulation of capabilities Construct? Case Study of Dangote Group

By
Ndubuisi Ekekwe
-
0

Question: “What is the accumulation of capabilities according to Ndubuisi Ekekwe in tekedia?”

Response: According to Ndubuisi Ekekwe, as frequently discussed on Tekedia, the accumulation of capabilities is a fundamental principle for companies to succeed and address market frictions. He emphasizes that companies are established to solve problems or “frictions” in the market, and to do so, they must acquire and accumulate specific capabilities.

These capabilities are built upon three key pillars:

Tools: This refers to the technologies, software, machinery, and other physical or digital resources that a company utilizes to operate and produce.

Processes: These are the established methods, procedures, and workflows that a company implements to organize its operations, ensure efficiency, and deliver consistent results.

People: This encompasses the human talent, skills, knowledge, and expertise within the organization. Skilled and knowledgeable individuals are crucial for effectively utilizing tools and executing processes.

Ekekwe posits that these three pillars—tools, processes, and people—are then used to organize and reorganize factors of production. This organization allows companies to create the products and services that are ultimately deployed in the market to solve customer frictions and generate value.

In essence, for Ekekwe, the accumulation of capabilities is about building a robust and adaptable internal engine (comprising the right tools, efficient processes, and skilled people) that enables a company to innovate, produce, and effectively address the evolving needs of its target market.

In this video, I have used the Dangote Group as a case study. Next week, as I begin podcasting daily on the revelations on business, deeper insights would be shared.

According to Ndubuisi Ekekwe in Tekedia, the “accumulation of capability” construct refers to a strategic process where companies systematically develop and gather the necessary abilities, resources, and expertise to gain a competitive advantage and ultimately dominate their market.

Here’s a breakdown of what it entails:

  • Fixing Market Frictions: Companies are established to address specific challenges or “frictions” within a market. To effectively resolve these, they must acquire and accumulate capabilities.
  • Pillars of Capability: These capabilities are built upon three main pillars:
    • Tools: The technologies, machinery, and systems utilized.
    • Processes: The efficient and optimized workflows and operational methods.
    • People: The skilled talent, expertise, and human capital.
  • Organization and Reorganization: These three pillars (tools, processes, and people) are then organized and reorganized to effectively manage factors of production.
  • Creating Products and Services: The culmination of these organized capabilities leads to the creation of superior products and services that effectively address customer frictions in the market.
  • Strategic Outcome (Higher Value Segments): When companies successfully accumulate capabilities, they are able to operate in higher-value market segments compared to their competitors.
  • Example (Dangote Group): Ekekwe often uses the Dangote Group as a prime example. Dangote leverages its accumulated assets and technical expertise (e.g., in cement production) to establish significant barriers to entry for new competitors. By continually perfecting its system, Dangote achieves higher productivity, economies of scale, and economies of speed, which in turn lead to skyrocketing margins and industry leadership.

In essence, it’s a dynamic process of continuous learning, investment, and strategic integration that allows a firm to not just compete, but to lead and extract maximum value from a sector.

Early Bitcoin, XRP, and Dogecoin Investors Waited a Decade to Build Life-Changing Wealth; Holders of This Crypto Will Do It By Q4

By
TI Partners
-
0

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency, each cycle brings a few rare tokens that challenge conventional expectations by appreciating value and shifting the landscape. Bitcoin did this in 2011. XRP followed suit in 2017. Dogecoin gained cultural relevance as a meme coin in 2020. In 2025, Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) is quietly executing a more ambitious mission: not to mimic those before it, but to build a fully operational Layer-2 blockchain tailored to the meme coin economy—and do it faster than anyone expects.

From Meme to Movement: Why LILPEPE is More Than Just Hype

Dogecoin and Shiba Inu paved the way for meme coin culture to flourish. But these early pioneers left huge gaps in utility and scalability. Dogecoin is famous, yet its code remains stuck in the past and has not received any major upgrades. Shiba Inu investors continue to hype Shibarium, yet the platform consistently struggles with poor infrastructure and scaling issues. Little Pepe was designed to tackle the daily headaches meme coin fans face. The Layer-2 network puts speed, low fees, and full features right at the fingertips of traders and community builders.  LILPEPE spins up an EVM-compatible chain that runs at lightning speed and incurs almost no costs. That’s great news for developers who want to launch new ideas or move existing projects over from Ethereum. It also eliminates one of the most predatory aspects of meme coin trading: sniper bots. Little Pepe’s custom-built framework removes the technical loopholes that allow these bots to outperform retail investors—a powerful incentive for both new investors and developers alike.

Tokenomics That Align with Community and Growth

What makes Little Pepe different from the endless stream of meme tokens? The project’s token setup is open and easy to follow. A chunk goes to the presale, another piece adds liquidity on exchanges, and the rest fuels staking rewards plus long-term community incentives. There are no sneaky buy or sell taxes or shady dev wallet hiding extra coins. It’s just plain math, not a giveaway for early insiders. The current presale in Stage 2 is priced at $0.0011, with nearly 80% of allocated tokens already sold. Early backers are quickly scooping up the remaining tokens at this stage as anticipation builds around its upcoming exchange debut. The presale not only serves as a fundraising mechanism—it’s also a means to ensure community-driven distribution at the foundational level of the ecosystem. Every transaction on the Little Pepe network—from token launches to staking—runs on $LILPEPE. This utility essentially links token demand to real, on-chain activity, rather than hype. The stronger that link gets, the sturdier and more lasting the token’s growth tends to be.

A Layer-2 Ecosystem Designed for Meme Coin Dominance

Unlike other meme tokens that exist solely as assets, $LILPEPE powers an entire blockchain explicitly designed for the meme economy. The Little Pepe chain offers a complete suite of tools for meme coin developers, including:

  • A dedicated launchpad for new meme tokens
  • Instant EVM compatibility, enabling fast deployment
  • Ultra-low fees for both developers and users
  • Bot-resistant architecture, leveling the field for fairer trading

This is the first Layer-2 blockchain designed entirely around the needs of meme coin culture. Projects that would otherwise struggle with gas fees, technical onboarding, or bot manipulation on Ethereum now have a home on Little Pepe. Every interaction—whether it’s a new token launch, a meme NFT mint, or a staking contract—feeds demand for the $LILPEPE token. Due to the chain’s robust backbone, developers are already discussing Layer-3 upgrades that could introduce meme-minded DeFi applications, cross-chain bridges, and even DAO-run voting systems. That kind of planning is a big hint that Little Pepe won’t fade out after one meme season; roomy foundations like this usually grow into year-after-year ecosystems.

Big Exchange Listings Confirmed—and More Expected

LILPEPE is already ahead of most meme tokens, having secured confirmed listings on two top-tier centralized exchanges and launched on Uniswap. This immediate availability on both CEX and DEX platforms significantly expands its reach across the global crypto user base. Few meme tokens have entered the market with such a robust plan for liquidity and visibility. Moreover, industry whispers suggest that the team is actively pursuing additional Tier 1 exchange listings, potentially including the world’s largest exchange. While details remain under wraps, the trajectory is clear: Little Pepe is not content with being a niche meme coin. It’s aiming for a top 100 placement on CoinMarketCap and long-term relevance in the broader altcoin space. The strategic alignment of presale momentum, exchange access, and an operational blockchain positions Little Pepe for fast-tracked adoption, both in retail and institutional markets.

Community, Culture, and the $777K Catalyst

Little Pepe isn’t just launching a blockchain—it’s igniting a cultural movement around meme coin empowerment. With a community-centered rollout and meme-rich branding, the project is tapping into the exact energy that made Dogecoin and Shiba Inu global sensations. But it doesn’t stop at branding. The team has launched a $777,000 giveaway campaign, awarding ten early supporters $77,000 each in $LILPEPE tokens. The new drive isn’t just about flashy ads; it’s a smart move to attract thousands of new users to the fold. The people who join now will help shape the first rules and uses of Little Pepe, and their excitement could kick off a loop where activity, value, and brand loyalty continue to grow.

Final Take

Little Pepe is everything a modern meme coin should be—and more. It combines the cultural explosiveness of Dogecoin with the technological power of Ethereum Layer 2s, while offering utility, fairness, and speed in a space that often lacks all three. While past meme coins required years to prove their worth, LILPEPE’s infrastructure, utility, and community allow it to make that leap within months. It’s not just another coin—it’s an ecosystem ready to lead the next chapter in meme coin history.

 

For more information about Little Pepe (LILPEPE) visit the links below:

Website: https://littlepepe.com

Whitepaper: https://littlepepe.com/whitepaper.pdf

Telegram: https://t.me/littlepepetoken

Twitter/X: https://x.com/littlepepetoken

Implications of Iran’s Crypto Trading Curfew

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Iran’s central bank has ordered domestic cryptocurrency exchanges to restrict trading hours to 10 AM–8 PM following a $90–100 million hack on Nobitex, the country’s largest crypto platform, on June 18, 2025. The curfew aims to enhance oversight and reduce the risk of cyberattacks during off-hours when response times are slower. The hack, claimed by the pro-Israel group Gonjeshke Darande (Predatory Sparrow), was politically motivated, with funds sent to inaccessible “burner” wallets to disrupt Iran’s financial system rather than for profit.

Nobitex, processing over $11 billion in inflows, is a key hub for Iranians bypassing sanctions. The exchange has moved assets to cold storage and promised to cover losses via its reserve fund, though user access remains unavailable due to ongoing internet disruptions. Critics argue the curfew limits access to 24/7 global markets and may push users toward decentralized platforms.

Restricting trading to 10 AM–8 PM allows better monitoring during peak hours, potentially reducing hack risks by enabling faster response to suspicious activity. The Nobitex hack, executed during off-hours, exposed vulnerabilities in Iran’s crypto infrastructure. The curfew disrupts access to the 24/7 global crypto market, limiting trading opportunities for Iranians already constrained by sanctions. This could push users to unregulated decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which are harder to monitor and secure.

Iran’s crypto market, with Nobitex alone handling $11 billion in inflows, is a critical workaround for sanctions. Restricted hours may reduce liquidity and deter investors, potentially weakening this financial lifeline. Smaller exchanges may struggle to comply with new security mandates, consolidating market share to larger players like Nobitex.

The hack by Gonjeshke Darande, a pro-Israel group, highlights crypto’s role in geopolitical conflicts. Funds sent to burner wallets signal intent to disrupt rather than steal, escalating tensions in Iran’s financial ecosystem. The curfew may be seen as a defensive move, but it could also signal to adversaries that Iran’s crypto sector is vulnerable, inviting further attacks.

Users may turn to VPNs or offshore platforms to bypass restrictions, increasing exposure to scams or less secure environments. The curfew could accelerate adoption of decentralized finance (DeFi), complicating government oversight and tax collection. Government seeks control and security, prioritizing stability over user convenience. The central bank views crypto as both a sanction-evasion tool and a liability due to hacks.

Users value unrestricted access to global markets, especially for hedging against inflation and sanctions. The curfew frustrates retail traders reliant on flexible trading hours. Centralized Exchanges (e.g., Nobitex) benefit from regulatory compliance but face operational constraints and are prime hacking targets due to large asset pools.

Decentralized Platforms gain appeal as users seek alternatives, but lack of oversight increases risks of fraud and technical errors. Iran’s restrictions contrast with the crypto ethos of borderless, 24/7 trading, isolating its users from global trends. The hack’s geopolitical motive underscores how Iran’s crypto market is a battleground for international actors, unlike the relatively neutral global crypto space.

The curfew reflects a broader tension: balancing cybersecurity with financial freedom. While protecting against hacks, it limits economic agency for Iranians navigating a sanctioned economy. The curfew may bolster short-term security but risks alienating users and driving them to less regulated platforms, undermining Iran’s crypto ecosystem.

German President’s Call for Closer Japan Relations

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, during a three-day visit to Tokyo in June 2025, called for stronger ties with Japan to address shared geopolitical challenges. Meeting with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Steinmeier highlighted concerns like Russia’s war in Ukraine and North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, emphasizing that security and prosperity in Europe and East Asia are interconnected. He noted ongoing progress, including the first German-Japanese government consultations in 2023 and a defense agreement for mutual logistical support. Ishiba echoed the sentiment, stating bilateral relations have grown stronger since Steinmeier’s 2017 appointment.

Steinmeier’s push for stronger Germany-Japan ties signals a strategic alignment to counter shared threats, notably Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and North Korea’s nuclear provocations. This reflects a broader trend of democracies coalescing to address authoritarian challenges, potentially strengthening multilateral frameworks like the G7, where both nations are active. The 2023 government consultations and defense agreement for mutual logistical support indicate deepening military and security collaboration. This could lead to joint exercises, intelligence sharing, or coordinated responses to regional crises, enhancing deterrence in both Europe and East Asia.

Closer ties could boost trade, investment, and innovation, especially in areas like green energy, AI, and critical supply chains (e.g., semiconductors). Japan’s technological prowess and Germany’s industrial base are complementary, potentially reducing reliance on adversarial economies like China. A fortified Germany-Japan partnership could amplify their collective voice in global governance, advocating for rules-based order, human rights, and climate action. This may also encourage other middle powers to align with democratic coalitions.

The call for unity underscores a growing divide between democratic nations and authoritarian regimes (e.g., Russia, China, North Korea). Germany and Japan’s alignment may provoke countermeasures, such as economic coercion or military posturing, particularly from China in the Indo-Pacific or Russia in Europe.

The Bavarian Alps experienced an unusually dry winter in 2024-2025, with record-low snowfall in several areas, according to meteorologists. At Zugspitze, Germany’s highest ski area, snowfall was below the previous record low from 1971-1972. The region saw only 470 liters of precipitation per square meter, close to the 1933-1934 record of 400 liters, marking the driest winter in over 90 years.

High-pressure systems led to increased sunshine hours and temperatures about 2°C warmer than the long-term average at summit locations. This aligns with broader trends of declining snowfall in the Alps, with a 34% decrease from 1920 to 2020, particularly pronounced below 2,000 meters. The climate crisis has warmed the Alpine region significantly, exacerbating snow loss and impacting water reserves and winter tourism.

In East Asia, Japan’s historical legacy (e.g., wartime aggression) could complicate regional acceptance of its enhanced global role, despite Germany’s support. South Korea and China may view Japan’s military cooperation with skepticism, potentially straining regional dynamics. Both nations face internal divides that could hinder bold cooperation. Germany grapples with economic pressures and political polarization, while Japan navigates a sluggish economy and an aging population. Public support for prioritizing international partnerships over domestic issues may waver.

Germany’s focus on Japan could create tensions with its EU and NATO allies, who prioritize countering Russia in Europe. Balancing commitments across two theaters may strain resources and highlight strategic divides within the West. While closer Germany-Japan ties promise strategic and economic benefits, they also deepen global democratic-authoritarian divides and risk regional and domestic friction. The partnership’s success hinges on navigating these fault lines while sustaining momentum in cooperation.

1...1,0721,0731,074...8,061Page 1,073 of 8,061

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy