DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1157

Cloud Mining: Reshaping the Future of Global Digital Assets

0

In recent years, the rapid rise of cryptocurrencies has not only profoundly changed the global financial system, but also led to a new round of breakthroughs in the field of technology. From the popularity of digital assets such as Bitcoin to Dogecoin, the mining industry has become the key to the development of this trend. However, traditional mining is difficult for many potential novices to enter due to high hardware costs, severe energy consumption and complex technical requirements. In 2025, with the widespread popularity of the cloud mining model, this situation has been subverted, and the global cloud mining platform has become an important force leading the industry change.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) of the United States issued a statement reaffirming that national banks in the United States can carry out cryptocurrency activities and relax supervision.

“Today’s action will reduce the burden on banks to engage in crypto-related activities and ensure that these banking activities are treated consistently by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, regardless of the underlying technology,” said Rodney Hood, acting comptroller of the U.S. Currency.

“I will continue to work hard to ensure that regulation is effective and not excessive, while maintaining a strong federal banking system.”

Explore the future of digital assets in the U.S. financial system, especially as the President’s Digital Asset Task Force works to integrate digital currencies such as XRP, Solana, and Cardano into the country’s financial infrastructure. The move is part of the U.S. government’s efforts to examine how to strategically leverage cryptocurrencies, especially in light of global developments in the digital asset space.

 Global Cloud Mining: Breaking through the threshold and releasing value

Cloud Mining has successfully eliminated the dependence of traditional mining on expensive equipment and technical knowledge by completely migrating the complex cryptocurrency mining process to the cloud. Users can easily participate in the mining of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Dogecoin through Internet access. This not only lowers the threshold for participation, but also significantly improves the overall mining efficiency.

Against this background, (Global Cloud Mining Platform) has rapidly emerged relying on advanced technology and better user experience. By providing extremely simplified operating tools and full-process services, it has opened up a broad way for all kinds of investors to navigate the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Reasons for choosing Cloud Mining

In the fiercely competitive market, Global Cloud Mining quickly stood out with its distinct advantages and became the core platform focused by users.

  1. Simple one-stop operation

The platform interface is intuitive and friendly, and both novice and experienced users can quickly grasp the key points of operation. Under clear guidance, users can smoothly complete the entire process of account opening, contract selection and mining startup.

  1. Strict security protection

The platform uses cutting-edge technologies in the industry for asset and data security, including solutions such as McAfee® and Cloudflare®, to build a multi-level powerful security system to create a safe investment environment for users.

  1. Flexible income and personalized choices

Global Cloud Mining provides a daily income distribution mechanism and designs a variety of flexible contracts to adapt to users’ different mining needs, especially focusing on helping users maximize their personalized income.

  1. Absolute transparency, no hidden fees

The platform always adheres to transparent operations, does not charge any hidden fees, and provides the most direct presentation of users’ daily investment returns.

Through this new model, cloud mining continues to open up opportunities for currency circle users. Global Cloud Mining is at the forefront of the industry, leading the future integration of technology and economy, and releasing more possibilities for everyone.

Global Cloud Mining simplifies the process through the following steps:

Step 1: Select Cloud Mining

Global Cloud Mining provides mining options such as Bitcoin and Dogecoin. With only a minimum deposit, users can start mining immediately.

Step 2: Register an account

All you need is an email address to register. Invitation code (optional)Global Cloud Mining’s $10 bonus ensures that users can get started without prepayment.

Step 3: Choose a mining contract and select the right plan based on your investment goals to achieve sustainable profitability.

Global Cloud Mining, with its advanced technology and customer-centric approach, provides a way to sustainably mine cryptocurrencies in 2025. Whether users are experienced investors or beginners, the platform ensures profitability and ease of use.

Practitioners at the heart of the technological storm will expand cooperation and insights through this unique platform. As technology takes off, please remember that compliance, environmental protection and social responsibility coexist! In this way, the digital economy can truly promote sustainable development.

 

For more details, please visit the official website: https://35global.com

Email address: customerservice@35global.com

VanEck’s NODE ETF Has Began Trading on CBOE Exchange

0

The VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) began trading on the Cboe BZX Exchange on May 14, 2025. This actively managed ETF targets 30–60 stocks from a pool of over 130 companies tied to the digital asset economy, including exchanges, miners, data centers, energy infrastructure, semiconductors, traditional finance rails, consumer/gaming, and asset managers.

It may allocate up to 25% of its assets to cryptocurrency-linked exchange-traded products (ETPs) through a Cayman Islands subsidiary, offering indirect exposure to digital assets. The fund’s management fee is 0.69%, and it focuses on companies driving blockchain adoption across industries rather than direct cryptocurrency investments.

Managed by Matthew Sigel, VanEck’s head of digital assets research, NODE aims to capture the growth potential of the digital asset ecosystem. The launch of the VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) on the Cboe BZX Exchange carries significant implications for investors, the financial industry, and the broader digital asset ecosystem.

NODE provides a regulated, accessible vehicle for retail and institutional investors to gain exposure to the digital asset economy without directly holding cryptocurrencies. By investing in companies tied to blockchain infrastructure, mining, semiconductors, and DeFi-related services, the ETF bridges the gap between traditional equities and the crypto ecosystem.

This move signals growing acceptance of blockchain technology within TradFi, as VanEck, a prominent asset manager, leverages its expertise to offer a product that captures the growth of the onchain economy. Unlike single-asset crypto ETFs (e.g., Bitcoin or Ethereum ETFs), NODE’s focus on 30–60 companies across diverse sectors (exchanges, miners, data centers, etc.) offers investors a broader, less volatile way to bet on blockchain adoption.

The inclusion of up to 25% in crypto-linked ETPs via a Cayman Islands subsidiary adds indirect crypto exposure, balancing risk and reward. This structure may attract risk-averse investors who are hesitant to navigate crypto exchanges or custody solutions but want to capitalize on the sector’s growth.

NODE’s focus on companies driving the onchain economy (e.g., semiconductor firms, energy infrastructure for mining, or TradFi rails integrating blockchain) could funnel capital into critical infrastructure, accelerating blockchain scalability and adoption. Increased investment in these firms may spur innovation in areas like energy-efficient mining, decentralized data storage, or interoperable blockchain protocols.

The ETF’s listing on the Cboe BZX Exchange, a major U.S. venue, suggests regulatory comfort with indirect crypto exposure through equities and ETPs. This could pave the way for more crypto-adjacent financial products, further legitimizing the sector. VanEck’s 0.69% management fee is competitive, potentially setting a benchmark for similar funds and encouraging other asset managers to launch comparable ETFs.

NODE’s launch may raise awareness of the onchain economy’s scope, educating investors about blockchain’s applications beyond cryptocurrencies (e.g., in gaming, supply chain, or decentralized finance). This could drive broader interest in Web3 technologies. The introduction of NODE highlights and potentially widens several divides within the financial and technological landscape:

NODE operates within the centralized TradFi framework, offering exposure to the onchain economy through regulated equities and ETPs. This contrasts with DeFi, where investors directly hold cryptocurrencies or participate in decentralized protocols (e.g., staking, yield farming). While NODE makes the onchain economy accessible to TradFi investors, it dilutes the ethos of decentralization by filtering exposure through intermediaries.

DeFi offers higher potential returns (e.g., through volatile crypto assets or protocol incentives) but with greater risk and technical barriers. NODE, with its diversified portfolio and lower volatility, appeals to conservative investors but may limit upside compared to direct crypto investments. This creates a divide between those willing to embrace DeFi’s risks and those preferring TradFi’s safety.

In DeFi, users control their assets via private keys, aligning with the principle of “not your keys, not your crypto.” NODE investors, however, rely on VanEck and custodians, reinforcing TradFi’s custodial model. This divide may alienate crypto purists who prioritize self-sovereignty. NODE is primarily accessible to investors in regulated markets like the U.S., where brokerage accounts and exchange access are common.

In contrast, DeFi is globally accessible to anyone with an internet connection and a crypto wallet, but it requires technical know-how and risk tolerance. This creates a divide between wealthier, regulated-market investors who can easily buy NODE and underserved populations who may rely on DeFi but face barriers like education or volatility.

NODE’s simplicity lowers the barrier to entry for crypto-curious investors unfamiliar with blockchain. However, it may widen the knowledge divide, as these investors gain exposure without understanding the underlying technology, while DeFi participants must navigate complex protocols. This could lead to a two-tiered ecosystem: passive ETF investors vs. active DeFi users.

Institutional and high-net-worth investors may dominate NODE’s shareholder base, potentially concentrating wealth in TradFi structures. DeFi, while inclusive in theory, often sees wealth concentrated among early adopters or “whales.” NODE’s launch may exacerbate this by channeling mainstream capital into established firms rather than grassroots DeFi projects.

NODE prioritizes profit through diversified exposure to blockchain-related companies, aligning with TradFi’s focus on returns. DeFi, rooted in the crypto ethos, emphasizes financial sovereignty, censorship resistance, and disrupting intermediaries. NODE’s launch may deepen the rift between those investing for financial gain and those advocating for systemic change via decentralization.

NODE invests in publicly traded companies, reinforcing corporate control over the onchain economy’s infrastructure (e.g., mining firms, exchanges). DeFi, conversely, supports community-driven protocols governed by DAOs or token holders. This divide pits centralized corporate growth against decentralized, participatory models.

By introducing the onchain economy to TradFi investors, NODE may encourage some to explore DeFi directly, narrowing the knowledge gap over time. Companies in NODE’s portfolio (e.g., exchanges or asset managers) may invest in or integrate with DeFi protocols, indirectly supporting decentralized ecosystems. The ETF’s inclusion of crypto-linked ETPs suggests a hybrid approach, blending TradFi and DeFi elements. This could inspire financial products that balance accessibility with decentralization.

The VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is a pivotal step toward mainstreaming the digital asset economy, offering diversified, regulated exposure to blockchain’s growth. However, it underscores a divide between TradFi’s centralized, profit-driven approach and DeFi’s decentralized, ideological vision, as well as disparities in access, knowledge, and wealth distribution.

Coinbase Faced Data Breach Affecting 84,000 Customers

1

Coinbase, a leading U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, disclosed a data breach affecting less than 1% of its monthly transacting users, roughly 84,000 customers. Cybercriminals bribed overseas customer support agents, primarily based in India, to access and steal sensitive customer data, including names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, government-issued ID images, the last four digits of Social Security numbers, masked bank account numbers, and account details like balance snapshots and transaction histories. No passwords, private keys, two-factor authentication codes, customer funds, or Coinbase Prime accounts were compromised.

The attackers demanded a $20 million Bitcoin ransom to not publish the stolen data, which Coinbase refused to pay. Instead, the company launched a $20 million bounty for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the perpetrators. Coinbase fired the involved support agents, is pursuing legal action against them, and is collaborating with law enforcement to trace the attackers. The company estimates remediation costs and voluntary customer reimbursements will range from $180 million to $400 million.

Affected customers, already notified, will be reimbursed if they were tricked into sending funds due to social engineering scams enabled by the breach. To prevent future incidents, Coinbase is opening a U.S.-based support hub, enhancing insider threat detection, increasing high-risk transaction monitoring, and implementing mandatory scam-awareness prompts and ID checks for flagged accounts.

The breach has raised concerns about the security of outsourced customer support and the potential for social engineering attacks, with some linking it to broader crypto scam networks. Coinbase’s stock fell over 4% on the day of the announcement, reflecting investor concerns ahead of its planned S&P 500 inclusion. The Coinbase data breach, disclosed on May 15, 2025, carries significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry, user trust, and the broader divide between centralized exchanges and decentralized systems.

The breach, affecting ~84,000 users, exposed sensitive personal and financial data, amplifying concerns about the security of centralized platforms like Coinbase. Even though no funds were directly stolen, the potential for social engineering scams (e.g., phishing or impersonation) could lead to significant user losses. Coinbase’s refusal to pay the $20 million Bitcoin ransom and its $180–$400 million remediation cost estimate signal a major financial hit, potentially shaking investor confidence. The 4% stock drop on the announcement day reflects market unease, especially as Coinbase aims for S&P 500 inclusion.

Users may hesitate to store assets or personal information on centralized exchanges, pushing some toward alternatives like self-custody or decentralized platforms. The breach stemmed from bribed customer support agents, primarily in India, highlighting risks in outsourcing sensitive operations. This could prompt regulatory scrutiny of third-party vendor security practices in the crypto industry.

Coinbase’s response—firing involved agents, pursuing legal action, and opening a U.S.-based support hub—suggests a shift toward insourcing. However, this may increase operational costs, potentially passed on to users through higher fees. The exposure of government-issued IDs and partial Social Security numbers raises concerns about identity theft, likely attracting attention from U.S. regulators like the SEC, CFTC, or FTC. This could lead to stricter data protection and KYC/AML requirements for crypto exchanges.

Globally, the breach may fuel calls for harmonized crypto regulations, especially in jurisdictions with weaker oversight of outsourced operations. The stolen data (names, addresses, phone numbers, emails, etc.) is ideal for targeted scams. Coinbase’s commitment to reimburse affected users for scam-related losses is notable but may not fully mitigate reputational damage if scams proliferate. The incident underscores the need for user education on scam awareness, as Coinbase’s new mandatory prompts and ID checks aim to address.

Industry-Wide Security Reassessment

Other centralized exchanges like Binance, Kraken may face pressure to audit their customer support and insider threat detection systems. The breach could accelerate adoption of advanced security measures like AI-driven monitoring or zero-trust architectures. The $20 million bounty for catching the perpetrators signals a proactive stance, but it also highlights the sophistication of crypto crime networks, potentially linked to broader scams as noted in some analyses.

This breach amplifies the philosophical and practical divide between centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase and decentralized finance (DeFi) or self-custody solutions, rooted in control, security, and user responsibility. User-friendly interfaces, customer support, regulatory compliance, and fiat on-ramps make CEXs accessible to mainstream users. Coinbase’s 8.4 million monthly transacting users (as of Q1 2025) reflect their dominance.

The breach exposes inherent risks of centralization—single points of failure, reliance on human agents, and large honeypots of user data. Even robust security can’t eliminate insider threats or human error, as seen with the bribed agents. Users may question whether CEXs can adequately protect their data, especially as breaches like this fuel distrust. Coinbase’s planned U.S. support hub and enhanced monitoring aim to rebuild confidence, but the damage may linger.

DeFi platforms and self-custody wallets such as MetaMask, Ledger give users full control over their private keys and funds, eliminating reliance on third-party custodians. No central database of user data reduces the risk of breaches like Coinbase’s. DeFi is complex, with a steep learning curve and risks like smart contract vulnerabilities or user errors (e.g., losing seed phrases). Self-custody requires technical literacy, deterring mainstream adoption.

The CEXs align with traditional finance, offering convenience and compliance but sacrificing user sovereignty. DeFi embodies crypto’s original ethos of decentralization but demands self-reliance, which many find daunting. The breach may split users into two camps: those who value Coinbase’s reimbursements and regulatory backing, and those who see it as a wake-up call to embrace decentralization. Data from 2024 shows DeFi’s total value locked (TVL) at $100 billion, dwarfed by CEX trading volumes ($2 trillion monthly).

The breach could nudge TVL higher but won’t dethrone CEXs soon, given their accessibility. Some platforms (e.g., Uniswap’s front-end or Coinbase Wallet) blend CEX usability with DeFi principles. Coinbase’s post-breach security upgrades could incorporate decentralized identity or privacy-preserving KYC to reduce data exposure.

Improving user education on self-custody and scam prevention could ease the transition to DeFi. Coinbase’s scam-awareness prompts are a step, but broader industry efforts are needed. Balanced regulations that protect users without stifling DeFi innovation could narrow the gap. The breach may accelerate such discussions, especially in the U.S.

The Coinbase breach underscores the fragility of centralized systems, even at a leading exchange, and fuels the debate over centralization versus decentralization. While Coinbase’s response—reimbursements, bounties, and security overhauls—aims to restore trust, the incident may push some users toward DeFi or self-custody, deepening the crypto divide.

The industry faces a pivotal moment, CEXs must innovate to match DeFi’s security promises, while DeFi must simplify to rival CEX accessibility. For now, users must weigh convenience against control, with the breach serving as a stark reminder of the stakes.

Synthetix-Derive Acquisition Could Reshape and Enhance Synthetix’s Derivatives Capabilities

0

Synthetix, a decentralized derivatives protocol, has proposed acquiring Derive (formerly Lyra), an Ethereum-based options trading platform, in a $27 million token-swap deal. The proposal, outlined in SIP-415, involves exchanging 29.3 million new SNX tokens for DRV tokens at a 27:1 ratio (1 SNX for 27 DRV).

If approved by both communities, the deal would integrate Derive’s treasury, codebase, and operations, including its perpetual futures and options stack, into Synthetix’s ecosystem, aiming to enhance its derivatives suite on Ethereum mainnet. The acquisition would reunite the two protocols, which previously split, and follows a week-long rally in SNX, with its price jumping 11% amid the news.

However, some Derive community members, including Litocoen, have expressed concerns over the valuation, calling it “unfairly low,” and others have labeled the deal controversial, citing Synthetix’s past performance and the proposed terms. The deal awaits community approval and includes a one-year vesting period for the SNX tokens.

The proposed $27 million token-swap deal between Synthetix and Derive carries significant implications for both protocols, their communities, and the broader decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. By absorbing Derive’s options and perpetual futures infrastructure, Synthetix aims to bolster its decentralized derivatives offerings on Ethereum mainnet. This could position Synthetix as a more comprehensive platform for synthetic assets and derivatives trading, potentially attracting new users and increasing trading volume.

The acquisition reunites Synthetix and Derive, which previously diverged. This could streamline development efforts, consolidate talent, and leverage Derive’s codebase to accelerate Synthetix’s roadmap, particularly for options trading. Acquiring Derive’s treasury and operations could strengthen Synthetix’s financial position and operational capabilities, enabling faster scaling and innovation.

The announcement triggered an 11% rally in SNX, reflecting market optimism about the deal’s potential to enhance Synthetix’s value proposition. However, issuing 29.3 million new SNX tokens could dilute existing holders’ value, depending on market absorption and future performance. Derive token holders will receive SNX tokens at a 27:1 ratio, subject to a one-year vesting period. This locks in value but exposes them to SNX’s market volatility, which some community members view as risky given Synthetix’s historical performance.

A successful acquisition could strengthen Synthetix’s competitive edge against other DeFi derivatives platforms like dYdX or GMX, especially in the growing options trading sector. The deal requires approval from both Synthetix and Derive governance communities, highlighting the decentralized decision-making process. Disagreements within Derive’s community could delay or derail the proposal.

Integrating Derive’s team and operations may foster closer alignment, but cultural or strategic differences could pose challenges during the transition. The acquisition reflects a trend of consolidation in DeFi, where larger protocols acquire smaller ones to expand capabilities and market share. This could lead to fewer but more robust platforms, potentially improving user experience but raising concerns about centralization.

By integrating Derive’s options stack, Synthetix could drive adoption of decentralized options trading, a niche but growing segment of DeFi, competing with centralized platforms like Deribit. The proposed acquisition has sparked significant debate within Derive’s community, revealing a divide over the deal’s fairness and strategic merit.

Litocoen have criticized the $27 million valuation of Derive as too low, arguing it undervalues Derive’s technology, treasury, and potential. Some community members believe Derive’s options trading infrastructure and growth trajectory warrant a higher price. The 27:1 DRV-to-SNX swap ratio is contentious. Critics argue that Derive token holders are receiving insufficient value, especially given SNX’s historical volatility and underperformance compared to other DeFi tokens.

The issuance of new SNX tokens raises concerns about dilution, which could depress SNX’s price and reduce the effective value of the swap for Derive holders. Some Derive community members question Synthetix’s ability to deliver on promises, citing its mixed track record in scaling and maintaining market share. They view the acquisition as a risky bet on Synthetix’s future success.

The one-year vesting period for SNX tokens is a point of contention, as it locks Derive holders into a potentially volatile asset, limiting their liquidity and flexibility. Proponents argue that merging with Synthetix offers Derive access to a larger user base, deeper liquidity, and shared resources, which could accelerate development and adoption of its options products.

Some see the acquisition as a way to align Derive with a more established protocol, reducing operational risks and enhancing its chances of success in a competitive market. The 11% SNX rally suggests market confidence in the deal, which could benefit Derive holders if SNX sustains its upward momentum.

The divide has spurred active discussions, with community members debating the deal’s terms on platforms like Discord and Snapshot. This reflects healthy decentralized governance but also underscores the challenge of reaching consensus. The Synthetix-Derive acquisition could reshape both protocols’ trajectories, enhancing Synthetix’s derivatives capabilities and potentially driving DeFi innovation. However, the divide within Derive’s community—centered on valuation, token swap terms, and trust in Synthetix—poses a hurdle.

The outcome hinges on governance votes, with the potential to either unify the protocols or expose deeper tensions in DeFi’s decentralized ethos. If approved, the deal’s success will depend on effective integration and delivering on the promised synergies.

Ndubuisi Ekekwe – Hall of Fame, Ministry of Science & Tech, Lagos State

0

Let me celebrate this one from the good people of Lagos Lagos state. Yes, the amazing Lagosians added a village boy from Ovim to its Hall of Fame in the Ministry of Science and Technology at Alausa, Lagos. Thank you, Lagos.

Good People, when your face shows up in college campuses and government buildings, all you can write is this: THANK YOU.