Meme coin market is heating up again, with Shiba Inu (SHIB) showing renewed strength and attracting traders looking to capitalize on short-term volatility. Trading around $0.000009092, SHIB’s bullish sentiment has returned—but analysts suggest investors might find even greater upside by rotating profits into next-generation AI projects.

Ozak AI (OZ), an emerging AI-driven ecosystem, is drawing increasing attention thanks to its strong presale performance, real-world integrations, and potential for 50x–100x growth. As investors begin securing profits from SHIB’s latest rally, many are eyeing Ozak AI as the smarter move for exponential returns in 2025.

Shiba Inu and Ozak AI

Shiba Inu remains one of the most traded and recognizable meme coins in crypto. Trading at $0.000009092, SHIB shows healthy market momentum as whales accumulate positions ahead of a possible broader meme resurgence. Resistance is forming at $0.000009460, $0.000009870, and $0.000010240, where previous rallies have met selling pressure. Strong support remains intact near $0.000008730, $0.000008390, and $0.000008050, creating a strong base for potential continuation.

Analysts believe SHIB could deliver a modest 5x–10x during peak meme season, but beyond that, its upside may begin to plateau. This is prompting many traders to take partial profits from SHIB’s rally and redirect capital toward early-stage utility-driven tokens like Ozak AI, where the growth potential remains far greater.

Ozak AI (OZ)

Ozak AI (OZ) is quickly emerging as one of the most promising early-stage crypto projects of the year. Its ecosystem combines prediction agents, real-time market intelligence, and cross-chain AI automation—all designed to make blockchain systems faster, smarter, and more autonomous. The project’s momentum is undeniable: over 1 billion tokens sold and more than $4.5 million raised during the OZ presale.

Strategic partnerships with Perceptron Network, HIVE, and SINT enhance Ozak AI’s credibility, connecting it to real-time 30 ms data signals, trust-based verification systems, and AI-driven agent toolkits. Analysts describe Ozak AI as the perfect bridge between artificial intelligence and decentralized data networks—two of the fastest-growing sectors in tech. With AI narratives dominating the next cycle, Ozak AI’s fundamentals place it in a prime position for massive returns once it lists.

Why SHIB Traders Are Rotating Profits Into Ozak AI

Seasoned meme traders are known for spotting early market rotations, and the current trend is clear: profits from meme coins like SHIB are flowing into AI projects. Three key factors explain this shift:

• Massive upside potential: SHIB’s rally may continue, but its large market cap makes 50x–100x gains unlikely. Ozak AI, on the other hand, is still in its early valuation phase, where exponential returns remain achievable.
• AI narrative strength: Artificial intelligence is becoming the dominant macro trend in both crypto and traditional tech, making Ozak AI’s growth story even more appealing.
• Real utility over speculation: Unlike meme tokens, Ozak AI offers working technology—prediction agents, automation systems, and on-chain intelligence—all designed for real-world use.

As this rotation intensifies, Ozak AI is absorbing liquidity from meme-driven assets, becoming the focal point of early-cycle investment strategies.

Shiba Inu’s rally shows that community-driven momentum still works—but smart money is already moving into the next big narrative. Ozak AI offers that perfect mix of hype, real utility, and early-stage positioning. Analysts believe investors flipping their SHIB profits into Ozak AI could see their ROI multiply dramatically as the AI–crypto intersection matures through 2025.

SHIB’s run may be strong, but Ozak AI’s forecast looks explosive—making it the ideal target for traders aiming to turn meme gains into long-term wealth.

About Ozak AI

Ozak AI is a blockchain-based crypto venture that offers a technology platform that focuses on predictive AI and advanced records analytics for financial markets. Through machine learning algorithms and decentralized network technologies, Ozak AI permits real-time, correct, and actionable insights to help crypto fanatics and companies make the precise choices.

For more, visit:

Website: https://ozak.ai/

Telegram: https://t.me/OzakAGI

Twitter: https://x.com/ozakagi

During an all-hands meeting on November 6, Amin Vahdat, the vice president of Google Cloud responsible for AI infrastructure, laid out a staggering internal mandate: the company must double its compute capacity every six months to keep pace with the voracious demand for artificial intelligence services.

In a presentation viewed by CNBC titled “AI Infrastructure,” Vahdat displayed a slide that underscored the exponential stakes of the current technology arms race.

“Now we must double every 6 months,” the slide read, projecting a trajectory that would require a “1000x” increase in capacity within the next four to five years. Vahdat described the competition in AI infrastructure as “the most critical and also the most expensive part of the AI race,” a sentiment that aligns with the company’s massive financial escalation.

The internal disclosure comes just a week after Alphabet, Google’s parent company, reported better-than-expected third-quarter results and raised its capital expenditures forecast for the second time this year. The company now anticipates spending between $91 billion and $93 billion in 2024 alone, with a “significant increase” projected for 2026. This aggressive outlay is part of a broader trend among the “hyperscaler” giants—including Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta—who collectively expect to pour more than $380 billion into capital expenditures this year.

However, Vahdat emphasized to employees that the strategy is not merely about brute-force spending.

“Google’s job is of course to build this infrastructure but it’s not to outspend the competition, necessarily,” he said. While acknowledging that the company is “going to spend a lot,” he clarified that the ultimate goal is to engineer infrastructure that is “more reliable, more performant and more scalable than what’s available anywhere else.”

To achieve this efficiency, Google is leaning heavily on custom silicon. Vahdat highlighted the public launch of the company’s seventh-generation Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), codenamed “Ironwood,” which Google claims is nearly 30 times more power-efficient than its first Cloud TPU from 2018. He also pointed to a strategic advantage provided by DeepMind, whose research offers a roadmap for what future AI models will require. The objective, according to Vahdat, is to deliver 1,000 times more capability and compute power for “essentially the same cost and increasingly, the same power, the same energy level”—a feat he admitted “won’t be easy.”

The meeting also featured Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, who fielded questions alongside CFO Anat Ashkenazi regarding the sustainability of this spending spree. Addressing an employee’s question about the “zeitgeist” of a potential AI bubble and market skepticism regarding the return on investment, Pichai offered a pragmatic defense of the company’s aggressive posture. He reiterated his long-held view that in platform shifts of this magnitude, the risk of underinvesting far outweighs the risk of overinvesting.

“I actually think for how extraordinary the cloud numbers were, those numbers would have been much better if we had more compute,” Pichai said, referencing the cloud unit’s recent 34% annual revenue growth to over $15 billion, with a backlog swelling to $155 billion.

He argued that Google’s balance sheet and diverse business model make it “better positioned to withstand, you know, misses, than other companies.”

Pichai provided concrete examples of how hardware constraints are already throttling product distribution. He cited the video generation tool Veo, noting that while the launch was exciting, the company could not roll it out to as many users within the Gemini app as they wished “because we are at a compute constraint.” This bottleneck validates the urgency of Vahdat’s six-month doubling mandate.

The internal dialogue at Google mirrors the broader anxiety in the market. The bubble conversation intensified this week after Nvidia’s earnings report. Despite Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang rejecting the bubble premise and reporting 62% revenue growth with strong guidance, markets reacted negatively, with Nvidia shares sliding 3.2% and dragging the Nasdaq down 2.2%. Pichai acknowledged these external jitters, telling employees that 2026 will be “intense” and that “there will be no doubt ups and downs.”

Looking toward the financial horizon, CFO Anat Ashkenazi addressed concerns that capital expenditures are accelerating faster than operating income. She framed the spending as a critical opportunity to migrate more customers from physical data centers into the cloud, asserting that “the opportunity in front of us is significant and we can’t miss that momentum.”

With the launch of the new Gemini 3 model and the race against OpenAI tightening, Mountain View is preaching that the only way out is through—specifically, through a massive, unprecedented expansion of silicon and steel.

A punishing wave of selling washed over Asia’s technology sector on Friday, erasing billions in market value as investors reacted to a paradox that has rattled global trading floors: Nvidia, the engine of the artificial intelligence boom, posted a blockbuster earnings beat, and the market hated it.

The result was a sea of red across Asian exchanges, led by a stunning double-digit collapse in SoftBank Group, as traders priced in a harsher reality for the AI ecosystem.

The damage was most acute in Japan, where SoftBank plunged more than 10%. The drop carried a bitter irony for the Japanese conglomerate. SoftBank recently liquidated its direct stake in Nvidia—securing billions in profit—yet found itself unable to escape the gravitational pull of the chip giant’s sentiment. Investors punished SoftBank for its lingering exposure to the sector through its controlling stake in Arm Holdings, the British chip designer whose architecture underpins Nvidia’s processors, and its massive capital commitments to AI infrastructure projects like the $500 billion “Stargate” data center initiative.

The bleeding in Tokyo was indiscriminate. Tokyo Electron, a bellwether for chip manufacturing equipment, shed 6.6%, while Lasertec dropped 5.2%. Even Renesas Electronics, a smaller but critical supplier in the Nvidia chain, retreated 3%.

Supply Chain Contagion

The selloff rippled rapidly through the critical supply chains in Korea and Taiwan.

• SK Hynix plummeted nearly 10%. The South Korean titan is Nvidia’s primary supplier of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), the “turbocharger” memory chips essential for AI accelerators.
• Samsung Electronics, currently playing catch-up in the HBM race, was not spared, falling over 5%.
• TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), the sole manufacturer of Nvidia’s cutting-edge GPUs, dropped over 4% in Taipei.
• Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry), the builder of the server racks that house these AI brains, dipped 4.86%.

The Nvidia Paradox

The catalyst for the panic occurred thousands of miles away during Thursday’s U.S. trading session. Nvidia delivered what looked like a perfect scorecard: a beat on third-quarter earnings and revenue, coupled with a fourth-quarter sales forecast that exceeded Wall Street’s wildest estimates. CEO Jensen Huang even declared demand for the new Blackwell chips to be “off the charts.”

Yet, Nvidia shares fell over 3% in New York. The market’s reaction signaled a shift in psychology—investors are no longer satisfied with “great” results; they demand perfection. The selloff suggests that fears of valuation ceilings and “execution risk” are beginning to outweigh raw growth numbers.

Analysts argue this isn’t just about one company. The semiconductor slump is colliding with a broader risk-off environment.

“Nvidia was a victim of a combination of a Bitcoin selloff, the possibility of a delayed Fed rate cut, and generally tighter financial conditions,” said Billy Toh, regional head of retail research at CGS International Securities Singapore.

Speaking to CNBC, Toh pinpointed the psychological pivot point: “Add in the ongoing talk of an AI bubble, which triggers a broader risk-off rotation, and naturally Nvidia becomes one of the first pressure points.”

With Bitcoin retreating and the Federal Reserve’s minutes casting doubt on a December rate cut, liquidity is tightening just as the AI trade demands massive new capital outlays.

Morgan Stanley has abruptly reversed course on its forecast that the U.S. Federal Reserve would cut interest rates by a quarter-point in December, after September’s labor market report revealed resilience that caught even hawkish strategists off guard.

The bank now points to a more cautious Fed stance, shaped by complex economic data and growing political pressure.

The Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a gain of 119,000 non-farm payrolls in September, a sharp rebound from a revised 4,000-job decline in August. Economists had expected only 50,000 new jobs, having based their forecasts on earlier, less accurate data. Despite that strong hiring, the unemployment rate climbed to 4.4%, marking a four-year high.

Morgan Stanley’s strategists said the rebound suggests that a “summertime slowdown might have been exaggerated,” pointing toward a durable labor market even as unemployment ticked up.

Morgan Stanley now projects the Fed will hold off on rate cuts until next year, estimating three reductions in January, April, and June 2026, bringing the policy rate down to 3.00–3.25%.

Trump vs. the Fed

The Fed has found itself navigating not just the data, but also mounting political heat from former President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly lambasted Chairman Jerome Powell for failing to lower rates more aggressively. Trump’s pressure campaign has become a recurring flashpoint — accusing Powell of being too cautious, too “stupid,” and even calling for his ouster.

In June, Trump publicly urged Powell to slash rates by a full percentage point. He later floated replacing him with someone who would cut faster — an unusually bold statement that rattled markets and raised alarms about the Fed’s independence. He’s even threatened legal action over the Fed’s $2.5 billion headquarters renovation, casting it as wasteful amid rate policy tension.

Trump’s persistent attacks come as he signals that any successor he endorses “will be somebody that wants to cut rates.” While he has backed off on outright removal for now — saying he doesn’t plan to fire Powell before his term ends in May 2026 — his repeated criticisms have added a layer of tension to what was once a technocratic process.

Despite Trump’s pressure, Fed officials have held firm. Powell has repeatedly emphasized that monetary policy decisions will be made “based solely on careful, objective, and non-political analysis,” and not as a reaction to political demands. That stance reflects a broader concern inside the Fed: that overreacting to political pressure now could undermine the central bank’s credibility and its ability to fight inflation down the road.

Policymakers have also pointed to other economic headwinds: wildcards like Trump’s tariffs, which could stoke inflation, and uncertainty in trade policy. Several Fed officials argue that a hasty rate cut might reignite inflation or fuel financial instability, undermining long-term macroeconomic health.

Morgan Stanley’s pivot away from a December cut underscores just how delicate the Fed’s current path has become. The bank’s strategists now view early 2026 as the more likely window for rate reductions — not because of political appeasement, but because the data and risks support a more measured approach.

This cautious recalibration comes amid a highly politicized backdrop, where the Fed must balance fulfilling its dual mandate (stable prices and high employment) with resisting overt pressure from political actors.

In short, many Wall Street analysts believe the Fed is walking a tightrope, but the stronger-than-expected jobs report may be giving it the leverage it needs to stand its ground — even as the public battle over rates intensifies.