DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1355

The State of Microprocessors for AI Era and Playbook for US

By
Tekedia Editors
-
0

Summary, State and Possible Action

  1. Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 3.7, sparking humor about the company’s avoidance of the number “4” due to its meaning in Chinese.
  2. Sonnet 3.7 remains in the GPT-4 class of models in terms of compute, with future models expected to be larger.
  3. Grok 3, a new model, showcases advancements in compute capacity and reinforcement learning with human feedback, offering detailed answers but sometimes verbose explanations.
  4. ChatGPT excels in user experience, particularly with its Mac app, while Deep Research stands out as a top competitor in the field.
  5. OpenAI’s ChatGPT brand has gained significant popularity, surpassing 400 million weekly active users, positioning the company as a key player in consumer tech.
  6. DeepSeek, a Chinese open lab, introduces competitive models that impact API pricing and emphasize the importance of openness in AI models.
  7. The state of AI chips highlights Nvidia’s dominance, with DeepSeek’s success driving demand for Nvidia’s chips and impacting the market.
  8. TSMC’s leading position in chip manufacturing is underscored, contrasting with Intel’s challenges in transforming into a foundry and competing in the market.
  9. Intel’s struggles in the chip industry are attributed to its failure to adapt to the foundry model, impacting its competitiveness against companies like TSMC and Nvidia.
  10. The semiconductor industry has a significant presence in Asia, with companies like TSMC in Taiwan, SMIC in China, and Samsung in South Korea. The history of Silicon Valley’s development is closely tied to the semiconductor industry, which drove the venture capital model and the growth of the tech sector.
  11. The outsourcing of semiconductor manufacturing to Asia was a deliberate policy of the U.S. government, leading to a decline in American manufacturing and the rise of China as a manufacturing powerhouse.
  12. Taiwan plays a crucial role in the geopolitical dynamics between the U.S., China, and Taiwan. The U.S. faces a dilemma in balancing its relationship with Taiwan and China, especially concerning defense and economic ties.
  13. TSMC, based in Taiwan, is a key player in the global semiconductor supply chain. Both China and the U.S. heavily rely on TSMC for advanced chip manufacturing, making it a strategic asset in potential conflicts.
  14. Recent actions by the Trump administration, such as imposing tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, aim to revitalize advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. by involving companies like TSMC, Intel, Broadcom, and Qualcomm in potential partnerships.
  15. However, the feasibility of TSMC taking over Intel’s foundry business is questioned due to the significant differences in manufacturing processes and equipment between the two companies.
  16. The dependency of the U.S. on Taiwan for both leading-edge and trailing-edge chip manufacturing poses a vulnerability, especially in the face of China’s growing chip capabilities.
  17. The potential risks associated with a conflict involving Taiwan, such as the destruction of TSMC’s facilities, highlight the critical role of Taiwan in the global semiconductor industry and the broader implications for technology and national security.
  18. Proposal to end the China chip ban by allowing Chinese companies like Huawei to make chips at TSMC and purchase Nvidia chips, potentially increasing China’s dependency on TSMC and impacting Nvidia’s dominance.
  19. Emphasize the importance of AI in China’s technological advancements and the potential risks and benefits of allowing Chinese companies access to cutting-edge chips.
  20. Suggest doubling down on the semiconductor equipment ban to limit China’s access to essential equipment and increase its dependency on Taiwan for chip manufacturing.
  21. Highlight the need for the U.S. to build trailing edge fabs domestically to reduce dependency on TSMC and ensure national security in chip production.
  22. Address the challenges faced by Intel in establishing leading edge capacity and propose solutions such as spin-offs, subsidies, and open-sourcing of chip development.
  23. Advocate for significant market interventions to shift U.S. companies’ reliance from TSMC to domestic chip manufacturing, emphasizing the importance of making Taiwan indispensable to China’s technology industry.
  24. Emphasize the need for strategic interventions to foster a strong AI industry on U.S.-made chips and secure trailing edge capacity beyond China’s reach, acknowledging the risks and sacrifices involved in implementing the proposed plan.

Context

The intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) development and semiconductor manufacturing plays a pivotal role in shaping technological advancements and global power dynamics. Key players in the AI field, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Deep Research, rely heavily on cutting-edge semiconductor technology to drive innovation. Companies like TSMC, Intel, Nvidia are at the forefront of semiconductor manufacturing, producing leading-edge chips that power AI applications across various industries. However, geopolitical dynamics involving Taiwan, China, and the U.S. add a layer of complexity to this landscape. The historical context reveals how past U.S. government policies led to the outsourcing of semiconductor manufacturing to Asia while also highlighting previous actions regarding Taiwan and China.

Recent events have underscored the importance of strategic positioning in the semiconductor industry for national security and economic competitiveness. Actions taken by the Trump administration aimed to revitalize advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., signaling a shift towards reducing dependency on foreign entities for critical technologies like semiconductors.

Proposals to end the China chip ban raise questions about potential impacts on industry dynamics while advocacy for strategic interventions seeks to promote domestic chip production for enhanced self-reliance. Looking ahead, potential shifts in the global semiconductor supply chain are expected as countries reassess their dependencies amidst increasing integration of AI into manufacturing processes and evolving government regulations shaping both industries’ future trajectories.

Exploring the Potential Remedies for Google’s Antitrust Violations in the Search Monopoly Case

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

On August 5, 2024, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by maintaining an illegal monopoly in the online search and general search text advertising markets. The court found that Google’s exclusive distribution agreements, such as paying $26.3 billion in 2021 to secure default search engine status on devices like Apple’s iPhones and Mozilla’s Firefox browser, had anticompetitive effects. These deals foreclosed rivals like Bing and DuckDuckGo from significant market access, reinforcing Google’s dominance approximately 90% of the U.S. search market and 95% on mobile. The ruling rejected Google’s claim that its dominance stemmed solely from superior product quality, emphasizing the exclusionary nature of its contracts.

A second trial to determine remedies, which could include structural changes or bans on exclusive deals, is ongoing, with Google planning to appeal. On April 17, 2025, Judge Leonie Brinkema of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that Google violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by illegally monopolizing the open-web display publisher ad server and ad exchange markets. The court highlighted Google’s practices, including tying its publisher ad server (DFP) to its ad exchange (AdX), and its acquisitions like DoubleClick, which consolidated market power. The ruling found that Google’s actions harmed competition and publishers by limiting options and inflating costs.

The Department of Justice and 17 states are seeking remedies, potentially including divestiture of parts of Google’s ad network business, though Google argues this could harm publishers. Google plans to appeal, noting the court found no harm from its advertiser tools or acquisitions. These rulings mark the first major U.S. antitrust victories against a tech giant since the Microsoft case in 1998. They reflect heightened scrutiny of Big Tech’s market dominance, with the DOJ also pursuing cases against Meta, Amazon, and Apple. The search case could reshape how users access search engines, potentially opening the market to competitors, while the ad tech case may disrupt Google’s $200 billion+ digital advertising empire.

Remedies are still under consideration, and appeals could delay changes for years. In contrast, the European Union has fined Google over €8 billion since 2017 for similar antitrust violations, including Google Shopping, Android, and AdSense practices, showing a more aggressive regulatory stance. Google denies systemic wrongdoing, arguing its services benefit consumers and that market definitions in these rulings are too narrow. Critics of the rulings, including some industry groups, warn that aggressive remedies could stifle innovation or raise costs for publishers and advertisers. Supporters, including U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and state attorneys general, hail the decisions as historic wins for competition and consumer choice.

Judge Amit Mehta found Google illegally maintained a monopoly in online search and search text advertising through exclusive distribution agreements (e.g., paying $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine on Apple, Samsung, and Mozilla devices). The remedy phase, known as the “second trial,” began in September 2024 and is ongoing, with a final ruling expected in 2025.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is pushing to prohibit Google from entering contracts that make it the default search engine on browsers, operating systems, or devices. This could force Apple (Safari), Mozilla (Firefox), and Android manufacturers to offer users a choice of search engines at setup or allow easier switching. The DOJ argues this would restore competition by giving rivals like Bing or DuckDuckGo access to significant distribution channels (Google’s deals covered ~50% of search queries).

The DOJ may seek to compel Google to share search data e.g., user query and click data with competitors to level the playing field. Google’s vast data advantage fuels its search algorithm’s superiority, and sharing could help rivals improve their offerings. However, Google argues this raises privacy concerns and could degrade user experience. The DOJ has not ruled out breaking up parts of Google’s business, such as divesting Android or Chrome, which reinforce its search dominance.

However, Judge Mehta’s ruling suggested skepticism about structural remedies, focusing instead on behavioral fixes. Divestiture is considered a “long shot” due to complexity and Google’s integrated ecosystem. Inspired by EU remedies in the Android case, the court could require Google to implement a “choice screen” on Android devices or Chrome browsers, prompting users to select a search engine from a list of options. This has been effective in Europe, where Google’s search share dropped slightly after implementation.

While less likely, monetary penalties could be imposed to deter future violations. However, fines are less favored in U.S. antitrust law compared to the EU, where Google faced multibillion-euro penalties. The DOJ may seek to limit Google’s ability to tie search to other products e.g., Google Assistant, Maps or enter new exclusionary deals, ensuring competitors can access emerging platforms like AI assistants.

Ending default agreements could disrupt partnerships, potentially raising costs for companies like Apple, which relies on Google’s payments estimated at $20 billion annually. Apple might pass these costs to consumers or negotiate with other search engines. Remedies must ensure rivals can capitalize on new opportunities. Bing and DuckDuckGo have limited scale, and rapid market shifts could favor well-funded players like Amazon or OpenAI over smaller competitors.

Google argues that its default status reflects consumer preference and that remedies like choice screens could confuse users or degrade device performance. It also warns that data sharing could violate privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA. Remedies are unlikely to take effect before 2026 due to Google’s planned appeal, which could escalate to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

On April 17, 2025, Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that Google illegally monopolized the publisher ad server (DFP) and ad exchange (AdX) markets through tying practices, exclusionary conduct, and acquisitions like DoubleClick. The DOJ, joined by 17 states, is seeking remedies to restore competition in the $200 billion+ digital advertising market. The remedy phase is in early stages, with proposals due in mid-2025. The DOJ strongly favors breaking up parts of Google’s ad tech stack, with a focus on divesting DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), Google’s dominant publisher ad server, or AdX, its ad exchange. Divestiture would aim to dismantle Google’s “walled garden,” where it controls the buy-side (advertisers), sell-side (publishers), and exchange, holding a 60%+ share of the ad server market and 50%+ of the exchange market. The DOJ argues this would foster independent competitors and lower costs for publishers.

The court could prohibit Google from requiring publishers to use AdX to access DFP’s full functionality, or vice versa. This would allow publishers to work with rival ad exchanges e.g., Magnite, PubMatic without losing access to Google’s advertiser demand, breaking Google’s vertical integration advantage.

The DOJ may push for Google to make its ad tech tools interoperable with competitors’ platforms, enabling publishers and advertisers to mix and match services. For example, Google could be required to open AdX’s real-time bidding to rival ad servers, reducing barriers to entry. The court could ban practices like “First Look” or “Dynamic Allocation,” which gave AdX preferential access to publisher inventory, sidelining competitors. This would ensure fair auction processes across ad exchanges.

Google could be forced to provide advertisers and publishers with clearer data on ad pricing, fees, and auction dynamics. The DOJ found Google’s opaque practices obscured its market power, harming customers. To prevent further consolidation, the court might restrict Google from acquiring ad tech firms, similar to its DoubleClick and AdMob deals, which entrenched its dominance. While not the primary focus, the DOJ could seek financial penalties or restitution for publishers harmed by Google’s practices, such as suppressed ad revenue due to monopolistic fees.

Divestiture could disrupt the ad ecosystem, as many publishers rely on Google’s integrated tools. Smaller publishers fear reduced revenue if Google’s ad demand is fragmented, while larger ones e.g., News Corp support breakup for long-term competition. Google’s ad tech operates globally, and U.S. remedies could conflict with EU or UK regulations, which are also probing Google’s ad practices. Coordination may be needed to avoid contradictory mandates.

Google argues divestiture is disproportionate, claiming its ad tools benefit publishers by streamlining operations. It also contends that competitors like Amazon and Meta are gaining ad market share, reducing the need for drastic remedies. Google’s appeal, likely to the Fourth Circuit, could delay remedies until 2027 or beyond. The company may seek a stay on divestitures or other measures pending appeal.

Behavioral remedies like banning exclusive deals or mandating choice screens are more likely than structural breakup, given Judge Mehta’s focus on specific contracts and U.S. courts’ historical reluctance to split tech giants. The DOJ is pushing for aggressive measures, but Google’s integrated ecosystem makes divestitures e.g., Chrome legally and technically complex. Divestiture of DFP or AdX is a stronger possibility, as Judge Brinkema’s ruling emphasized Google’s vertical control, and the DOJ has prioritized structural relief. However, untying and interoperability mandates are less disruptive alternatives that could still open the market.

The EU’s €2.4 billion (Google Shopping), €4.34 billion (Android), and €1.49 billion (AdSense) fines, plus behavioral mandates like Android choice screens, provide a playbook. The EU’s ongoing probe under the Digital Markets Act could align with U.S. remedies, amplifying global impact.

Panama City’s Council Approved Tax Payments For Residents Via Cryptocurrencies

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Panama City’s council approved a measure allowing residents to pay taxes, fines, fees, and permits using cryptocurrencies, specifically Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), USD Coin (USDC), and Tether (USDT). This makes Panama City the first public institution in Panama to accept crypto payments. Mayor Mayer Mizrachi announced the initiative, noting that it bypasses the need for new legislation by partnering with a bank to instantly convert crypto payments into U.S. dollars, ensuring compliance with legal requirements for dollar-based transactions.

The system is expected to be fully implemented later in 2025, with the banking agreement to be finalized soon after the announcement. This move aligns with global trends, as jurisdictions like Colorado, Lugano (Switzerland), and Vancouver have also embraced crypto for public payments, though Panama City’s approach focuses on local governance and optional use without mandating crypto acceptance.

Accepting Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDC, and USDT, Panama City legitimizes cryptocurrencies as a payment method, potentially encouraging broader adoption among residents and businesses. This could normalize crypto use in everyday transactions and inspire other municipalities in Panama or Latin America to follow suit. Crypto payments could provide access to government services for unbanked or underbanked individuals who hold digital assets, fostering inclusivity in a region where traditional banking access can be limited.

The move signals Panama City’s intent to position itself as a forward-thinking, tech-friendly hub, potentially attracting blockchain businesses, crypto investors, and tourists. This aligns with Panama’s history as a financial and trade center. Partnering with a bank to instantly convert crypto to U.S. dollars minimizes volatility risks and simplifies accounting for the city. This could streamline payment processing and reduce reliance on traditional financial intermediaries, potentially lowering costs.

By bypassing the need for new legislation, Panama City sets a practical model for integrating crypto into public finance within existing legal frameworks. This could influence national policy or encourage other jurisdictions to adopt similar workarounds, though it may also prompt regulatory scrutiny to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) standards. While the instant conversion to dollars mitigates price volatility, the city must ensure robust cybersecurity and reliable banking partnerships to prevent fraud, hacks, or transaction errors, which could undermine public trust.

As one of the first public institutions in Panama to accept crypto, Panama City joins a growing list of global jurisdictions (e.g., Colorado, Lugano) embracing digital currencies. This could enhance Panama’s reputation in the global crypto community and pressure other governments to innovate. Not all residents may be familiar with or have access to cryptocurrencies, potentially creating a learning curve or exclusion for those reliant on cash or traditional banking. The optional nature of crypto payments mitigates this but highlights the need for education and infrastructure.

As residents use Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDC, and USDT for municipal payments, local businesses may feel incentivized to accept these cryptocurrencies to capture this growing market. This could lead to more point-of-sale crypto integrations, especially in retail, hospitality, and services. Businesses that adopt crypto payments could attract tech-savvy residents, tourists, and investors who prefer using digital currencies. Panama City’s reputation as a crypto-friendly hub may draw more blockchain-related visitors, boosting sectors like tourism and real estate.

Businesses accepting crypto will need to invest in payment infrastructure, such as crypto wallets or third-party processors, and train staff to handle transactions. They may also need to implement accounting systems to manage crypto volatility and comply with tax reporting, potentially increasing initial costs. Early adopters of crypto payments could gain a competitive edge, appealing to a niche but growing demographic. This could be particularly impactful for small businesses or startups looking to differentiate themselves in a crowded market.

If crypto payments streamline municipal transactions, businesses may benefit from faster or cheaper government services (e.g., permits or licenses). Increased economic activity from crypto-friendly policies could also drive demand for local goods and services. Not all businesses, especially small or cash-based ones, may have the resources or expertise to adopt crypto. This could create a divide between crypto-ready businesses and those left behind. Additionally, businesses must navigate cybersecurity risks and ensure compliance with AML/KYC regulations to avoid legal issues.

The city’s banking partnership for instant crypto-to-dollar conversion could inspire similar private-sector collaborations, enabling businesses to accept crypto without holding volatile assets. This could lower barriers to entry for smaller businesses. Overall, local businesses could see opportunities for growth and innovation but will need to weigh the costs of adoption, technological upgrades, and regulatory compliance. Those that adapt effectively could position themselves as leaders in Panama City’s emerging crypto economy.

Tekedia Crypto and Blockchain Weekend Roundup

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Mantra’s OM token crashed ~90% on April 13, 2025, dropping from ~$6.30 to below $0.50, wiping out over $5 billion in market cap. MANTRA attributes the collapse to “reckless forced liquidations” by centralized exchanges during low-liquidity hours, denying insider selling. Co-founder John Mullin suggested one exchange’s sudden closure of positions without warning triggered the cascade. However, community skepticism persists, with some alleging insider dumps due to large pre-crash token deposits (e.g., 3.9M OM to OKX). No conclusive evidence confirms either narrative, and investigations are ongoing.

Michael Saylor, a prominent Bitcoin advocate and Strategy chairman, has predicted Bitcoin could reach a $500 trillion market cap, implying a per-coin price of roughly $23.8 million to $25.2 million, given its 21 million total supply or 19.84 million circulating supply. His reasoning hinges on Bitcoin absorbing value from traditional assets like gold, real estate, and other stores of value, which he argues will be demonetized as capital shifts to digital assets. He sees Bitcoin as the next evolution of money, driven by its fixed supply and growing institutional adoption, potentially causing a supply shock.

This prediction assumes a 29,000%+ increase from Bitcoin’s current $1.67 trillion market cap, a scenario many view as speculative. Critics argue it would require an unrealistic reallocation of global wealth, dwarfing world GDP. Saylor’s track record shows bold forecasts—he previously predicted $13 million per coin by 2045—but skeptics note his heavy Bitcoin investments may bias his outlook. While some see his vision as plausible in a hyper-digital future, others call it exaggerated, citing practical limits to adoption and valuation.

Binance executives reportedly met with U.S. Treasury officials to discuss easing regulatory oversight, particularly around anti-money laundering compliance, while also exploring a deal with the Trump family’s crypto venture, World Liberty Financial. The talks involved potentially listing a new dollar-pegged stablecoin, USD1, which could leverage Binance’s massive user base and trading volume for adoption, potentially generating significant profits for the Trump family. Discussions about a Trump family stake in Binance.US have also surfaced, though details remain unclear.

These moves align with Binance’s efforts to re-enter the U.S. market after a $4.3 billion settlement in 2023 for violating anti-money laundering laws. Meanwhile, Binance’s founder, Changpeng Zhao, has been linked to seeking a pardon, though he denied involvement in specific deal talks. The Treasury meeting reflects Binance’s broader push to navigate a shifting regulatory landscape under a crypto-friendly administration.

Oklahoma’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act, House Bill 1203, failed to advance in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee on April 14, 2025, with a 6-5 vote against it. The bill, introduced by Rep. Cody Maynard, aimed to allow the state treasurer to invest up to 10% of public funds, including the State General Fund, Revenue Stabilization Fund, and Constitutional Reserve Fund, in Bitcoin and other digital assets with a market capitalization over $500 billion, as well as stablecoins. It had previously passed the House Government Oversight Committee (12-2) on February 25 and the full House (77-15) on March 24.

Opposition came from a bipartisan group of senators: Todd Gollihare (R), Chuck Hall (R), Brent Howard (R), Dave Rader (R), Julia Kirt (D), and Mark Mann (D). Despite a last-minute vote switch by Sen. Christi Gillespie, who was swayed by constituent outreach, the bill fell short. Critics likely raised concerns about Bitcoin’s volatility and the risks of investing taxpayer funds, as seen in other states like Montana, where similar bills were rejected.

Brazilian fintech Méliuz has taken steps toward adopting Bitcoin as a primary treasury asset. In March 2025, the company allocated 10% of its cash reserves, about $4.1 million, to purchase 45.72 bitcoins at an average price of $90,926 per coin, becoming the first publicly traded Brazilian firm to adopt a Bitcoin treasury strategy. The move, approved by its board, aims for long-term returns, with Méliuz viewing Bitcoin as a store of value to counter Brazil’s high inflation and interest rates (13.75% benchmark). A Bitcoin Strategic Committee was formed to explore further expansion, potentially making Bitcoin the main treasury asset.

Binance completed its 31st quarterly BNB token burn on April 16, 2025, destroying 1.57 million BNB tokens valued at approximately $916 million. This event, executed on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), reduced the total BNB supply to 139.3 million tokens. The burn included 1.46 million BNB via the Auto-Burn mechanism, calculated based on BNB’s price and BSC block production, plus 110,000 BNB through the Pioneer Burn Program, which compensates users for lost tokens.

Binance aims to halve the initial 200 million BNB supply to 100 million, enhancing scarcity and potentially supporting long-term value. Despite the significant burn, BNB’s price remained stable, reflecting a focus on gradual supply reduction rather than immediate market impact.

Ru Haiyang, co-CEO of HashKey, Hong Kong’s largest licensed crypto exchange, suggested that China could follow the U.S. strategy by retaining forfeited Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, with the central government consolidating asset disposals. This idea aligns with discussions in China about managing its growing pile of seized cryptocurrencies, estimated to involve 430.7 billion yuan ($59 billion) in crypto-related crimes in 2023.

While China currently bans crypto trading and does not recognize digital tokens as legal assets, local governments have been selling seized coins through private companies to bolster public funds, a practice some experts argue conflicts with the trading ban.

The Trump family is reportedly launching a blockchain-based real estate game inspired by Monopoly GO!, set for release in late April 2025. Led by longtime Trump associate Bill Zanker, the game features mechanics where players earn in-game currency and build digital properties on a virtual board, integrating crypto elements like NFTs and possibly meme coins. While sources compare it to Monopoly, Hasbro, the owner of the Monopoly franchise, has denied licensing its IP for this project. Zanker also attempted to reacquire rights to “Trump: The Game,” a 1989 Monopoly-style board game, but Hasbro no longer holds those rights.

This venture is part of the Trump family’s broader crypto portfolio, including NFTs, a stablecoin USD1, decentralized finance World Liberty Financial, and Bitcoin mining. The crypto community has expressed skepticism, citing unclear tokenomics and potential legal issues with Hasbro over gameplay similarities.

Solana has surpassed all other blockchain chains in 7-day decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volume, achieving a total of $15.7 billion, as reported on April 16, 2025. This milestone highlights Solana’s dominance in on-chain activity and liquidity, driven by its high transaction throughput and low fees, which make it a preferred platform for DeFi and memecoin trading. Solana’s DEX volume accounted for a 39.6% market share in Q1 2025, growing from $217.0 billion in Q4 2024 to $293.7 billion.

Key DEXs like Raydium and Orca have fueled this surge, with memecoins such as Dogwifhat and Bonk attracting significant trading activity. While Solana has previously outpaced Ethereum in specific metrics like monthly DEX volume ($55.8 billion vs. Ethereum’s $53.8 billion in July 2024), Ethereum still leads in longer-term metrics like 30-day transaction fees. Solana’s recent performance underscores its growing adoption, though its lead can fluctuate as seen with BNB Chain briefly overtaking it in daily fees earlier in 2025.

Shiba Inu (SHIB) to $0.000120 in 5 Months? This Crypto Will Make You More Money With a 23044% Price Explosion

By
TI Partners
-
0

At $0.00001432 right now, SHIB has seen some significant price swings.  Its market capitalization, which falls between $8.43 billion and $9.08 billion, together with a 24-hour trading volume of $190 million to $547 million, show its excellent market presence.   The fundamental concern is whether SHIB could rise to $0.000120 during the following five months.  With a forecasted 23044% price explosion, another cryptocurrency is already positioned to make investors much more money, even if such a price leap would call for notable catalysts.

Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Outlook and Potential Surge

SHIB has attracted between 4.24% and 14.38% during the past 24 hours, showing traders’ fresh interest. With a range from 10.97% to 22.30%, its price rise over the past seven days has been even more remarkable. This momentum points to a positive trend that can drive SHIB nearer to its ambitious aim of $0.000120.  Still, there are many difficulties on the road to this pricing point. SHIB has to increase by more than 738% from its present price to reach $0.000120. Such an increase is only conceivable under very favorable circumstances—an exponential surge in adoption, major burns of its token supply, and a more significant market rally.  Although the SHIB development team concentrates on extending the token’s value through initiatives like Shibarium, the meme currency mostly depends on market speculation. The ability of SHIB to achieve $0.000120 will also be significantly influenced by external market elements, including Bitcoin’s price behavior and general investor attitude. Though it is possible, the degree of risk involved makes it dubious.

Rexas Finance (RXS): The Crypto That Will Make You More Money

Although many investors are excited about SHIB’s aggressive price forecast, another cryptocurrency is expected to yield even more profits. Rexas Finance (RXS) is rising as a powerhouse in the crypto scene with a new platform that links actual assets with blockchain technology. Unlike meme currencies that depend on hype, RXS offers genuine value by letting users tokenize and trade real estate, commodities, and intellectual property.  Rexas Finance (RXS) is valued at $0.20, and it is currently in its final presale stage after an astonishing 6x spike from its starting presale price. With more than 91.71% of the last stage occupied, the presale has been an incredible success, generating almost $47.70 million. As excitement grows, the official launch price is $0.25; the token will first appear on June 19, 2025.  One of the most reputable blockchain security companies, CertiK, has audited RXS, unlike speculative meme coins, guaranteeing openness and increasing investor confidence.  Its ecosystem links decentralized finance (DeFi) with conventional finance, enabling smooth, efficient, borderless asset ownership and trading. This practical use provides RXS with a strong basis for long-term continuous development.

The Unstoppable Momentum of Rexas Finance (RXS) and the 23044% Price Explosion

With its continuous $1 million giveaway, Rexas Finance (RXS) has become rather popular beyond its successful presale. With over 1.80 million entries, this project has raised awareness and involvement significantly and given 20 fortunate winners $50,000 worth of RXS each. This increasing demand is driving conjecture that RXS is destined for one of the most notable price swings on the market. Leading crypto specialists estimate that RXS will soar by 23044%, far more than the possible increase of SHIB.  Early investors should make significant gains from the token, which is rising to an impressive $46.288 per RXS at this pace. Unlike meme coins, whose long-term value is unknown, RXS’s real-world asset tokenizing technique guarantees it stays relevant past market speculation.

Although SHIB is still a common choice among crypto aficionados, high supply and market instability restrict its possible expansion. The return on investment of SHIB at $0.000120 is meager compared to what RXS presents.  Blockchain technology allows RXS to redefine asset ownership, providing a competitive advantage over speculative tokens. Long-term investors drawn to RXS are seeing its ability to transform conventional finance. Its CertiK audit also guarantees that security and dependability take front stage, strengthening project credibility.  With its 23044% price explosion, RXS offers a considerably more profitable possibility as SHIB continues towards $0.000120. As RXS is ready for its official launch, early investors stand to make transforming gains in life. Rexas Finance (RXS) is the next primary cryptocurrency you should search for if you want one that will increase your income.

 

For more information about Rexas Finance (RXS) visit the links below:

Website: https://rexas.com

Win $1 Million Giveaway: https://bit.ly/Rexas1M

Whitepaper: https://rexas.com/rexas-whitepaper.pdf

Twitter/X: https://x.com/rexasfinance

Telegram: https://t.me/rexasfinance

1...1,3541,3551,356...8,061Page 1,355 of 8,061

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy