DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 156

Apple Hit With $634m Verdict in Long-Running Patent Battle With Masimo

0

Apple has been ordered to pay $634 million to Masimo after a federal jury in California found that the Apple Watch’s blood-oxygen-related features infringed one of Masimo’s patents, marking the most significant victory yet for the medical-technology company in its sprawling legal war with the iPhone maker.

The jury concluded on Friday that Apple violated Masimo’s patent rights through the Apple Watch’s workout mode and heart-rate notification features. Masimo confirmed the verdict in a statement, calling the decision “a significant win in our ongoing efforts to protect our innovations and intellectual property.”

Apple said it disagrees with the jury’s findings and will appeal. “Over the past six years (Masimo has) sued Apple in multiple courts and asserted over 25 patents, the majority of which have been found to be invalid,” an Apple spokesperson said. “The single patent in this case expired in 2022, and is specific to historic patient monitoring technology from decades ago.”

The ruling caps a major chapter in a contentious, years-long legal feud between the two California-based companies, one that has stretched across federal courts, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and now U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

A Multi-Front Fight Over Pulse-Oximetry Technology

Masimo, headquartered in Irvine, has accused Apple of hiring away its employees and using its proprietary pulse-oximetry technology—traditionally used in medical devices—for the Apple Watch. That claim has spawned multiple lawsuits and regulatory battles since 2018, turning the conflict into one of Apple’s most persistent patent fights.

The most dramatic escalation came in 2023 when the ITC blocked imports of Apple’s Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches after determining that Apple’s blood-oxygen technology infringed Masimo’s patents. Apple responded by stripping the blood-oxygen feature from certain watches in the U.S. market to avoid running afoul of the ban. The company later reintroduced an updated oxygen-sensing technology in August after receiving approval from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Even with the workaround, the regulatory tug-of-war remains in motion. The ITC said on Friday that it will hold a new proceeding to determine whether Apple’s updated watch models should still fall under the import ban. That decision could again disrupt Apple’s sales depending on the outcome.

Masimo has an ongoing lawsuit against Customs over the agency’s clearance of Apple’s revised watches. Apple, meanwhile, is challenging the original ITC import ban in the federal appeals court.

A Dispute With No Clean Ending in Sight

Friday’s $634 million verdict represents one of the largest single judgments Apple has faced in a patent case in recent years, though the company is already signaling a lengthy appeal process. Because the patent in question expired in 2022, the dispute centers on earlier Apple Watch models and historic technology, not the company’s newest devices.

The two sides have split earlier rounds of litigation. A California judge declared a mistrial in 2023 in Masimo’s trade-secret case against Apple after jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict. Apple scored a symbolic win in Delaware last year when a jury ordered Masimo to pay just $250 over allegations that Masimo’s smartwatches infringed two Apple design patents.

Still, the broader battle over pulse-oximetry technology remains unsettled. The stakes go beyond the two companies, because the Apple Watch is one of the world’s most widely used health-monitoring devices. Any ruling that affects its features or availability tends to ripple across the wearables industry, health-tech suppliers, and regulators.

Friday’s verdict adds to that uncertainty. Masimo, emboldened by its win, is continuing to pursue claims across multiple venues. Apple is preparing for another round at the appeals court. And the ITC could once again determine whether Apple’s flagship watches stay on U.S. shelves.

For now, the only clarity is that the fight is far from over.

How Hodlers Are Destroying Bitcoin, Making It What It Was Not Invented for

0

Who will rescue Bitcoin as it continues its gravitational drift toward the bears of the market? This is one of those moments when you wish Bitcoin had a date on the calendar to present revenue, profits, margins, an earnings call to defend its value. But since Bitcoin cannot show a balance sheet or an income statement, the only lifeline is hope: hope that new faithfuls will buy, creating another inflection point.

Good People, the invention of money transformed humanity. The history is rich, from barter to cowries, from precious metals to minted coins. Across kingdoms and civilizations, humans have always sought efficient ways to exchange value. Then came a breakthrough in 7th-century China when the Tang dynasty invented paper money. The Song dynasty popularized it in the 11th century, and the Mongol Empire and Yuan dynasty scaled it across territories. The pursuit of frictionless exchange has been a timeless human project. Hello, electronic fund transfer of the internet era!

But Bitcoin introduces a paradox. For hodlers, it is not money, it is an asset class. Yet it is spoken of as a currency. And because it behaves more like an asset than a medium of exchange, it suffers: it must appreciate simply because people believe it should appreciate.

Imagine if Bitcoin had an earnings call tomorrow, standing before the market to defend its valuation. That would change the game. As money, used to buy, exchange, transfer value, Bitcoin is a remarkable innovation. As an asset class expected to produce returns without a business engine behind it, the logic becomes fragile.

Use Bitcoin as money and it delivers. Ask it to behave like a company, and it collapses under expectations it was never designed to meet. I like stablecoins because they strip away the hodling spirit, removing the speculative pressure and leaving a powerful utility: the ability to cut transaction costs dramatically. That is transformative.

Let us scale that utility across Africa. Let us move away from the mindset of buying coins simply because we expect them to rise. Instead, let us deploy digital tools to improve operations, eliminate cross-border frictions, and unlock abundance across our economies.

Czech National Bank Purchases of First Digital Assets

0

The Czech National Bank (CNB)—the central bank of the Czech Republic—announced its first-ever purchase of digital assets, totaling approximately $1 million. This marks a historic step as the first central bank to publicly disclose acquiring Bitcoin (BTC).

The Czech National Bank’s (CNB) $1 million acquisition of Bitcoin and other digital assets is framed as a limited experimental pilot rather than a strategic investment. However, its significance extends far beyond the modest sum, representing a cautious yet pivotal entry by a Western central bank into blockchain-based assets.

The acquisition was approved by the CNB’s Bank Board on October 30, 2025, and executed through a regulated platform outside the bank’s international reserves. The purchase is not aimed at financial returns but to test operational processes for blockchain-based assets, including: Purchasing and custody.

Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. Crisis response and tokenization workflows. The portfolio will be evaluated over 2–3 years, with the CNB planning to share insights publicly. It represents just 0.0006% of the CNB’s total assets, underscoring its limited, exploratory nature.

Governor Aleš Michl proposed the idea in January 2025 to prepare for a future where digital assets integrate with traditional finance, such as enabling seamless purchases of tokenized Czech bonds alongside everyday transactions.

The CNB noted that while it could invest in Bitcoin via exchange-traded funds (ETFs) under current laws, it opted for direct acquisition to gain hands-on experience. No immediate plans exist to add Bitcoin to official reserves due to its perceived immaturity.

This move positions the CNB as a pioneer among European central banks, leveraging the Czech Republic’s non-adoption of the euro for greater regulatory flexibility within the EU. It aligns with growing institutional interest in crypto, though the CNB emphasized compliance with Czech and EU regulations.

The announcement has sparked discussions on central bank digital asset adoption, with some viewing it as a signal for tokenized securities in public finance. As the first central bank to publicly disclose a direct Bitcoin purchase outside of seized assets or indirect ETFs, the CNB’s move normalizes crypto for sovereign institutions.

This could accelerate adoption, with analysts predicting it as a “turning point” for global Bitcoin integration into national strategies. Bitcoin’s price, already hovering above $100,000, saw a modest uptick post-announcement, reflecting heightened investor confidence in institutional inflows.

Governor Aleš Michl’s earlier proposal for up to 5% of reserves ~$7.3 billion in Bitcoin highlights potential for larger allocations. If the pilot succeeds, it could inspire similar tests elsewhere, echoing El Salvador’s full adoption but in a more measured EU context.

The portfolio—comprising Bitcoin for volatility/decentralization, a USD-pegged stablecoin and a tokenized deposit—focuses on practical workflows like custody, key management, AML compliance, and crisis simulations. Over 2–3 years, the CNB plans to share findings publicly, potentially establishing best practices for tokenizing assets like Czech bonds.

This could streamline future integrations, such as seamless koruna-based purchases of tokenized securities alongside everyday payments. By exploring blockchain’s role in payments, the CNB is preparing for a tokenized economy. Michl envisions “one-tap” transactions for everything from coffee to bonds, reducing barriers for retail investors and enhancing efficiency in a post-euro Czech system.

The Czech Republic’s non-euro status grants regulatory flexibility, allowing this pilot despite ECB President Christine Lagarde’s dismissal of Bitcoin as having “zero” value and warnings against reserve inclusion. Reactions on X describe it as “heroic,” potentially pressuring the ECB to revisit crypto policies and fostering debate on EU-wide standards.

Google Unveils $40bn Texas Data-Center Push as AI Infrastructure Race Heats Up

0

Alphabet’s Google on Friday announced a sweeping $40 billion investment to build three new data centers in Texas through 2027, marking one of the company’s largest-ever infrastructure commitments and intensifying the high-stakes battle among U.S. technology giants to secure the computing power needed for advanced artificial intelligence.

The investment underscores how fiercely competitive the AI arms race has become. Companies including OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Amazon are pouring billions into AI-focused data centers across the country, driven by unprecedented demand for training and deploying frontier AI models.

Google’s latest move places Texas at the heart of this new infrastructure surge. According to the company, one of the new facilities will be located in Armstrong County in the Texas Panhandle, while the other two will rise in Haskell County, a stretch of West Texas near Abilene. The tech company will also pump fresh capital into its existing Midlothian campus and the Dallas cloud region, both of which anchor its global network of 42 cloud regions.

“This investment will create thousands of jobs, provide skills training to college students and electrical apprentices, and accelerate energy affordability initiatives throughout Texas,” Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said in a statement.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott welcomed the announcement, saying, “Google’s $40 billion investment makes Texas Google’s largest investment in any state in the country and supports energy efficiency and workforce development in our state.”

The company’s Texas plan lands during a period of rapid industrial expansion across the cloud and AI sectors. Big tech firms have announced massive new spending in 2024 and 2025, particularly within the U.S., as President Donald Trump pushes for major domestic investment to maintain the country’s advantage in the global AI contest. Google’s move aligns closely with that policy direction.

Earlier this month, Anthropic announced its own $50 billion plan to build data centers across the United States—including in Texas and New York—highlighting how capital expenditure is accelerating beyond long-established giants and into the broader AI startup ecosystem.

Google’s investment in Texas also complements its growing commitments in Europe. Just days earlier, the company said it would invest €5.5 billion ($6.41 billion) in Germany over the coming years, dedicated to expanding infrastructure and data-center capacity in Europe’s largest economy.

The latest Texas investment follows Google’s recent upgrade of its AI capabilities and expansion of cloud services, both of which depend heavily on computing infrastructure. As more enterprises migrate toward AI-driven processes—and as model sizes balloon—hyperscale data centers have become essential to meeting demand.

Still, analysts are warning that the current AI spending boom bears echoes of past tech cycles where capital outpaced returns. Some investors have cautioned that valuations and expenditure growth may prove difficult to sustain if AI adoption does not rise at the same explosive pace as infrastructure deployment.

Even so, with rivals racing to secure land, power, and long-term access to advanced chips, Google’s Texas expansion signals that the company is unwilling to lose ground in one of the most consequential technology competitions in modern history. The data centers—spanning workforce development, energy infrastructure, and regional economic gains—are both a strategic and symbolic marker of where the AI race is headed next.

Google says the investment will expand its cloud footprint, add significant capacity for AI workloads, and prepare the company for the next phase of rapid model development and deployment. The project is set to roll out through 2027.

U.S. Accuses Alibaba of Aiding Chinese Military Operations as Long-Running Distrust of Chinese Tech Deepens

0

Washington has accused online marketplace giant Alibaba of providing technological support for Chinese military operations targeting the United States, according to a White House national security memo cited by the Financial Times on Friday.

The memo, which contains declassified top-secret intelligence, outlines how the company allegedly supplied capabilities to the People’s Liberation Army that the White House believes pose risks to U.S. national security.

The FT report did not specify which capabilities were involved, which military activities they allegedly supported, or whether the U.S. government is preparing a direct response. Even with those gaps, the disclosure was enough to rattle investors. Alibaba’s shares traded in the United States dropped 4.2% after the news.

Alibaba firmly rejected the allegations. “The assertions and innuendos in the article are completely false,” the company said in a statement. It added: “We question the motivation behind the anonymous leak, which the FT admits that they cannot verify. This malicious PR operation clearly came from a rogue voice looking to undermine President Trump’s recent trade deal with China.”

China’s embassy in Washington echoed that position. Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu said China “opposes and cracks down on all forms of cyberattacks in accordance with law,” and condemned the U.S. move.

“Without valid evidence, the US jumped to an unwarranted conclusion and made groundless accusations against China. It is extremely irresponsible and is a complete distortion of facts. China firmly opposes this,” Liu said.

A trust deficit despite fresh U.S.–China negotiations

While Beijing and Washington have recently engaged in talks aimed at easing trade tensions and stabilizing relations, the political backdrop remains fraught. The accusations against Alibaba underscore what officials in both countries quietly acknowledge: there is still a deep trust deficit. In Washington, suspicion toward Chinese technology companies has hardened into a structural, bipartisan stance, with concerns that firms could be leveraged—voluntarily or otherwise—for intelligence or military purposes.

That unease has shaped U.S. policy for years, long before this latest allegation.

How it escalated: From Huawei to TikTok — and now Alibaba

The distrust first surfaced prominently with Huawei, which Washington accused of posing national security risks due to its telecommunications equipment. The U.S. placed Huawei on its export blacklist in 2019, restricted access to American technology, and pressed allies to block the company from their 5G networks. China denied the allegations, but Huawei effectively became the first major casualty of the U.S. crackdown on Chinese tech.

The concerns later expanded to TikTok, owned by ByteDance, with U.S. intelligence agencies warning that the app could give Beijing access to American user data. Lawmakers pushed for restrictions and even forced divestiture, arguing that the social platform could be exploited for influence operations. ByteDance repeatedly denied the claims, yet the pressure persisted, marking TikTok as the second major target in Washington’s growing list of concerns.

Now, the spotlight has shifted to Alibaba.

The accusation that the company enabled Chinese military operations—an allegation Alibaba flatly denies—follows the same security logic that drove actions against Huawei and TikTok. Even as negotiations between Beijing and Washington reopen channels for cooperation, U.S. policymakers continue to act from a position that Chinese tech companies cannot be fully trusted due to their ties to, or obligations under, Chinese law.

A new front in a long-running rivalry

Though the White House memo reportedly contains declassified intelligence, the absence of public evidence leaves much unexplained. U.S. officials have not commented, and the FT report did not indicate whether further details will be released. Still, the timing is notable. The suggestion from Alibaba that the leak was intended to “undermine President Trump’s recent trade deal with China” shows how deeply geopolitical currents run beneath the accusation.

Beijing sees the allegation as another example of what it sees as Washington’s weaponizing of national security to contain China’s rise. For Washington, it is part of a broader strategy to secure its technological edge and prevent potential adversaries from acquiring or exploiting advanced capabilities.

Whether or not the U.S. pursues follow-up action, Alibaba has already found itself pulled into the same fault line that engulfed Huawei and TikTok. And with the U.S.–China tech rivalry accelerating, the company may not be the last.